search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News  Donations


African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730
EISSN: 1021-9730
Vol. 2, No. 4, 1994, pp. 369-383
Bioline Code: cs94049
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1994, pp. 369-383

 en Control of the Cassava Mealybug in Africa: Lessons from a Biological Control Project
Neuenschwander, P.

Abstract

During the Africa-wide Biological Control project, the neotropical parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi check for this species in other resources (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) was established in 26 African countries, causing a satisfactory reduction in the population density of the cassava mealybug phenacocccus manihoti check for this species in other resources Mat.-Ferr. (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in most farmers' fields. Four conclusions concerning the possible application of the research results to other biological control projects are discussed. (1) Foreign exploration was intensive and should be maintained at this level in other projects, if necessary at the cost of other activities. (2) In the controversy about the amount of research needed before the first releases are made, understanding the proper role of quarantine is essential. While quarantine (preferably outside the continent) guarantees non-noxiousness of natural enemies, only research in the experimental release sites can determine whether a given natural enemy will be efficient. The topic of how released exotic insects affect the diversity of the indigenous fauna is also addressed. Modalities used in this project for executing releases, always on request by and in collaboration with national programmes, are recommended for adoption in future projects. (3) Laboratory and field studies, sometimes leading to simulation models, established the scientific basis for quantifying the impact of the pest insect and its biological control. This was expressed as reduction in pest population levels and yield loss, as well gain in revenue. Such studies are needed in order to attribute the observed effects to various causes and to advance the science of biological control. (4) It is concluded that biological control is the basis of IPM but cannot usually be manipulated by the farmer. Interventions such as cultural methods or the use of resistant varieties need to be compatible with biological control. This is usually so, unless resistances are very strong.

Keywords
Biological control, Epidinocarsis lopezi, phenacoccus manihoti

 
© Copyright 1994 - African Crop Science Society

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2022, Site last up-dated on 27-Jul-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Internet Data Center of Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa, RNP, Brazil