search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Medknow Publications and Staff Society of Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
ISSN: 0022-3859
EISSN: 0022-3859
Vol. 55, No. 2, 2009, pp. 108-112
Bioline Code: jp09030
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge

Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2009, pp. 108-112

 en Patient controlled sedation during central neuraxial anesthesia
Tripathi, M; Nath, SS; Chaudhary, A; Singh, PK & Pandey, CM

Abstract

Background: Patient controlled sedation (PCS) gives liberty to patients to choose the time of sedative administration to attain a desired level of comfort.
Aims: The PCS use was evaluated in patients during surgery under central neuraxial blockade.
Settings and Design: Prospective, cross-sectional, clinical study on consecutive patients in a tertiary care university hospital.
Materials and Methods: PCS technique, using propofol (1%) 2 ml in 2 min was used in 160 adult patients undergoing urologic procedures under central neuraxial block. We observed the time to first PCS activation by patient, duration of surgery, propofol dose, sedation score, hemodynamic stability, patient′s acceptability, and the factors correlating with the PCS use.
Statistical analysis used: Non-parametric two-tailed Pearson′s test, univariate correlation analysis for the factors favoring PCS use followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis amongst correlating factors.
Results: In our cohort, the majority (83%) of the patients activated PCS during surgery under central neuraxial blocks at median time of 30 min and (17%) did not activate PCS. Female patients activated sedation earlier (median 15 min) than male patients (median 30 min). All patients were hemodynamically stable and without significant side effects. Multivariate analysis showed that sedative use significantly ( P < 0.05) correlated with female gender (odds ratio-3.54 [IR-2.64 to 4.73]) and prolonged surgery (>90 min). Majority (91%) of patients rated PCS technique excellent to good.
Conclusions: PCS was very well accepted by patients during central neuraxial block. Propofol regimen (2 ml in 2 min) in PCS was safe, as it caused neither apnea nor significant hypotension.

Keywords
Central neuraxial anesthesia, epidural block, patient controlled sedation, propofol, subarachnoid block

 
© Copyright 2009 Journal of Postgraduate Medicine.
Alternative site location: http://www.jpgmonline.com

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil