| en |
Indigenous recombinant streptokinase Vs natural streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction patients: Phase III multicentric randomized double blind trial
Diwedi S.K., Hiremath J.S., Kerkar P.G., Reddy Krishna N., Manjunath C.N., Ramesh S.S., Prabhavati S., Dhobe M., Singh Kavita, Bhusari P., Rao Raman
Abstract
Background : Streptokinase is the most widely used thrombolytic agent and can now be made using recombinant DNA technology. The present trial was initiated to assess an indigenous recombinant streptokinase (Shankinase, r-SK).
Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of indigenous recombinant streptokinase (Shankinase, r-SK) and natural streptokinase (Streptase, n-SK).
Settings and Design: Double blind, randomized, non-inferiority, multicentric, parallel study.
Materials and Methods: Patients of AMI < 6 hours of chest pain and 2 mm ST elevation in 2 contiguous chest leads V1- V6 or 1 mm in limb leads were randomized to receive 1.5 miu of either r-SK or n-SK. CK Peaking and decrease of > 50% ST segment were used to assess reperfusion.
Statistical analysis: Difference in the groups was assessed by chi-square or paired t test as required. Probability value <0.05 was considered significant with 95% confidence interval.
Results: Overall 150 patients were recruited (96 r-SK group and 54 in n-SK group) and demographic and clinical profile of the groups was comparable. Reperfusion was seen in 68.2% (58) and 69.4% (34) patients in r-SK and n-SK groups respectively. Commonly seen adverse events were fever in 7 (8.5%), hypotension in 3 (3.6%), nausea in 2 (2.4%) patients. Minor bleeding were seen in 4 (4.8%) of patients.
Conclusion: Indigenous recombinant Streptokinase (r-SK) is as efficacious as natural streptokinase (n-SK) in establishing reperfusion as assessed by non-invasive parameters with comparable side effect profile..
Keywords
Streptokinase, Recombinant streptokinase, Myocardial infarction, Thrombolysis
|
