search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Actinomycetes
University of Udine, Mycology Department
ISSN: 0732-0574
Vol. 4, Num. 1, 1993
Actinomycetes, Vol. 4, Part 1, 1-7, 1993 TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE REACTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVE BACILLUS STRAINS TO THERMOACTINOMYCES-PHAGE

D.I.KURTBOKE and K.SIVASITHAMPARAM

The University of Western Australia, School of Agriculture, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Nedlands, W.A. 6009, Australia

Code Number: AC93001
File Sizes:
      Text:  29K
      No associated graphics files.
ABSTRACT. The sensitivity of representative Bacillus strains to phage isolated to the members of the genus Thermoactinomyces and Thermoactinomyces spp. to Bacillus phage was studied. The phage sensitivity of the species belonging to the genera Bacillus and Thermoactinomycetes corresponded closely to those indicated by chemical and 16S rRNA comparative cataloguing studies and showed a natural relationship between the two genera. The value of phage susceptibility as an aid to reliable actinomycete identification schemes is emphasized.

The genus Thermoactinomyces is among the earliest known bacteria to have been classified with the actinomycetes (Tsiklinsky, 1899; Lacey, 1989). However, recent studies have suggested that genus Thermoactinomyces should no longer be classified in the Actinomycetales but placed in the family Bacillaceae (Stackebrandt and Woese, 1981). Not only do 1 6S rRNA oligonucleotide sequences suggest a close relationship with the genus Bacillus, but also Thermoactinomyces species, like Bacillus species, produce endospores (Cross et al., 1971) and have lower G+C contents than other actinomycete species (Craveri et al., 1966; Fritzsche, 1967).

On the basis of the 165 rRNA evidence Stackebrandt et al., (1983) concluded that Thermoactinomyces vulgaris is closer to Bacillus subtilis than to Streptomyces and similar organisms. This finding was also supported by the plasma membrane menaquinone data (Collins et al., 1982).

Phage to Thermoactinomyces spp. (Prauser and Momirova, 1970; Treuhaft, 1977; Kretschmer, 1982) and to Bacillus spp. (Saunders and Campbell, 1966; Reanney and Marsh, 1973) have been reported frequently. However, no phage typing studies were conducted to examine the cross infectivity of the phage isolated to members of these two genera. In this study the reactions of representative Bacillus strains and those of actinomycete genera with cell-wall chemotype III to Thermoactinomyces- phage and Thermoactinomyces spp. to Bacillus phage were examined, in an attempt to provide further evidence in support of the transfer of the genus Thermoactinomyces in the family Bacillaceae (Stackebrandt and Woese, 1981).

MATERIALS and METHODS

Bacterial strains. Three Thermoactinomyces spp., 24 species of Bacillus and 25 actinomycete species of cell wall chemotype III were used in this study (Tables 1 and 2). Cell wall chemotype III actinomycetes were tested since Thermoactinomyces belongs to this wall chemotype (Lechevalier and Lechevalier, 1970). Inoculum was stored as spore or mycelial macerates in 10% glycerol at 20 C (Wellington and Williams, 1978).

---------------------------------------------------------------- ---

Phage      Propagation host           Strain        Activity
spectra                               code      phiTl    phiT2  
         
phiT1*    Thermoactinomyces candidus  ACM 1751      +      + 
          
phiT2**   Thermoactinomyces candidus  ACM 1751      +      + 

phiT3*    Thermoactinomyces candidus  ATCC 27868    +      +

phiT4**   Thermoactinomyces candidus  ATCC 27868    +      + 
          
phiT5*    Thermoactinomyces vulgaris    ATCC 15733  +      + 
          
phiT6**   Thermoactinomyces vulgaris    ATCC 15733  +      + 
          
Table 1 continued
Phage                    Activity spectra

                      phiT3  phiT4  phiT5  phiT6

phiT1*                 +       +       +       +

phiT2**                +       +       +       +

phiT3*                 +       +       +       +
  
phiT4**                +       +       +       +

phiT5*                 +       +       +       +

phiT6**                +       +       +       +
----------------------------------------------------------------
---
Table 1. Activity spectra of Thermoactinomyces phage, isolated from compost* and from organic mulch** (strain codes as in Table 2.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------


                                              Activity spectra

Species Strain phi1 phi2 phi3 phi6 phi8 code Bacillus brevis NCTC 7577 + - + + - Bacilluscereus NCTC 9946 + - - - - Bacillus cereus UWA 1 PH - - - - Bacillus cereus var.Mycoides NCTC 926 + - + + - Bacillus circulans NCTC 7578 - - - - - Bacillus coagulans NCTC 10334 - - - - - Bacillus firmus M 2987 - - - - - Bacillus licheniformis NCTC 6346 - - - - - Bacillus megaterium NCTC 9848 - - - - - Bacillus megaterium NCTC 10342 - - - - - Bacillus polymyxa NCTC 4747 - - - - - Bacillus pumilis NCTC 8241 - - - - - Baclllus sphaericus UWA 2 - PH - + + Bacillus stearothermophilus NCTC 10003 - + - + + Bacillus stearothermophilus NCTC 10339 - + - + + Bacillus stearothermophilus NCTC 10007 - + - + + Bacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 7953 - + - + PH Bacillus stearothermophilus UWA 6 - + - PH - Bacillus subtilis NCTC 6276 + - - - - Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 + - - - - Bacillus subtilis M 708 + - - - - Bacillus spp. NCTC 5823 + - - - - Bacillus pp. M 2429 + - + - - Bacillus thuringiensis UWA 3 + - PH - - Table 2 continued Species Activity spectra phiB1 phiB2 phiB3 phiB4 phiB5 phiB6 Bacillus brevis - - - - - - Bacilluscereus - - - - - - Bacillus cereus - - - - - - Bacillus cereusvar.Mycoides- - - - - - Bacillus circulans PH - - - - - Bacillus coagulans - PH - - - - Bacillus firmus - - PH - - - Bacillus licheniformis - - - PH - - Bacillus megaterium - - - - PH - Bacillus megaterium - - - - + - Bacillus polymyxa - - + + - - Bacillus pumilis - - - - - PH Baclllus sphaericus - - - - - - Bacillus stearothermophilus- - - - - - Bacillus stearothermophilus- - - - - - Bacillus stearothermophilus- - - - - - Bacillus stearothermophilus- - - - - - Bacillus stearoihermophilus- - - - - - Bacillus subtilis - - - - - - Bacillus subtilis - - - - - - Bacillus subtilis - - - - - - Bacillus spp. - - - - - - Bacillus spp. - - - - - - Bacillus thuringiensis - - - - - - ---------------------------------------------------------------- --- Table 2. Activity spectra of phage isolated to Bacillus spp. (PH: Propagation host, +: species susceptible to phage lysis, -: species not susceptible to phage lysis. ACM: Australian Collection of Microorganisms; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland; DSM: Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen; NCTC: National Collection of Type Cultures, London; M: Department of Microbiology Culture Collection, University of Western Australia; UWA: Department of Soil Science Culture Collection, University of Western Australia)

---------------------------------------------------------------- --

Samples of organic mulch and composted eucalyptus bark. Avocado mulch and composted eucalyptus bark (CEB) were used for the isolation of phage in this study. These substrates were selected since they contain a diverse and highly competitive flora of which Bacillus and actinomycete species form an important component (Cook and Baker, 1983; Hardy and Sivasithamparam, 1989; Kurtboke et a1., 1993b).

Mulch was sampled from an avocado plantation in the experimental plots at the University of Western Australia during summer (November-December, 1991) when the temperature for the upper layer of the mulch (10 cm deep) was 20-25 C. The base of the avocado trees had been previously amended with 40 kg of straw and 25 kg of stabilized chicken manure. The stabilized pH of this mulch was 7.2 (1:5 water). Samples from the base of 6 avocado trees were mixed and 2g of this large composite sample were used to isolate phage.

Composted eucalyptus bark from marri (Eucalyptus calophylla R. Br. ex Lindl.) and karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F.J.Muell) trees was prepared by Western Australian Chip & Pulp, Manjimup, Western Australia. The details of this compost have recently been described by Hardy and Sivasithamparam (1989). They observed that sampling between the 140-160th dd of composting revealed the highest numbers of thermophilic actinomycetes. This compost was sampled at the 160th. day of composting and its stabilised pH was 6.5 (1:5 water). Sampling was done from different positions (corners and middle and depths of 50, 100 & 150 cm) of bark windrow (width: 3m, height: 1m and length: 20m). A large composite sample was prepared by mixing the parts of these subsamples for the isolation of phage .

Isolation of phage. Phage were isolated to Thermoactinomyces candidus (ATCC 27868), T.candidus (ACM 1751), T.vulgaris (ATCC 15733). Flasks containing 20ml of sterile peptone-yeast extract calcium (PYCa) broth (Bradley et a1., 1961) were inoculated with 1ml glycerol suspension of the prospective host bacteria and 2g of the organic mulch or CEB. These were then incubated in a gyratory shaker (Model G76, New Brunswick Scientific-Edison, NJ, USA) at 200rpm overnight at 37 C. After incubation, suspensions from each flask were centrifuged for 1h at 2000g and supernatants filtered through sterile Millipore (Millipore Corp.) membranes of 0.221um pore size and collected in sterile tubes. 0.2ml of filtrates were spotted on plates of PYCa agar (Bradley et a1., 1961) on which 0.3ml of a glycerol suspension of the prospective host had been spread and dried for 30min in a laminar flow. The plates were then incubated at 37 C for 96h and examined for plaques. Single plaques were removed from the agar plate and resuspended in 1ml of PYCa broth for 36hrs. A sample of this broth was then filtered and spotted on the plates previously inoculated with the prospective hosts as before. Single plaques developing on these plates were removed, resuspended, filtered and the resulting phage suspensions were stored at 4 C.

Phage were also isolated to Bacillus circulans (NCTC 7578), B.coagulans (NCTC 10334), B.firmus (M 2987), B.licheniformis (NCTC 6346), B.megaterium (NCTC 9848), B.pumilis (NCTC 8241) from the organic mulch, using the procedure described above. Other Bacillus phage used in this study had been previously isolated by Kurtboke et a1. (1993a) from the CEB (Table 2).

Phage isolated to Thermoactinomyces spp. were mixed to prepare a stock suspension of phage set 1 (Table 1). Phage isolated to Bacillus spp. were also mixed for phage set 2 (Table 2). Phage sets 1 and 2 were used to test the susceptibility of Thermoactinomyces and Bacillus spp. to each others phage.

Phage activity spectra. Phage cross infections were studied by spotting 0.2ml of stock phage suspensions of the phage sets containing 10^6 pfu/ml onto PYCa agar plates each seeded with a spore suspension (x10^6 cfu/ml) of the strain being studied (Table 2). The routine test dilution of 10^6 pfu/ml was the ten-fold dilutions of the clear spots in PYCa broth (Wellington and Williams, 1981). The plates were then incubated for 48h at appropriate temperatures (Claus and Berkeley, 1989; Lacey, 1989) and examined for lysis.

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

The phage sensitivity of the species belonging to the genera Bacillus and Thermoactinomyces in this study corresponded closely to those indicated by chemical and 16S rRNA comparative cataloguing studies (Stackebrandt and Woese, 1981).

Thermoactinomyces phage used in this study did not show any cross infectivity with other cell wall chemotype III actinomycetes (Table 3) and our findings agreed with those of Prauser (1983) and Kempf et al. (1987).

The cross infectivity observed between the members of the genus Bacillus and Thermoactinomyces (Table 4) supports the transfer of the genus into the family Bacillaceae (Stackebrandt and Woese, 1981). Thermoactinomyces continue to be included with other actinomycetes, by many workers, due to their morphological characteristics (Lacey, 1989).

However, RNA oligonucleotide sequencing studies showed that the possession of branched hyphae as in the members of the genus Thermoactinomyces does not warrant the placement of a bacterium within the order Actinomycetales, nor should the inability of an organism to form branching filaments such as Arthrobacter, Cellulomonas and Rothia, necessarily exclude them from this taxon (Goodfellow and Cross, 1984). Indeed, the exact composition and boundaries of the order Actinomycetales and its genera (Buchanan, 1918) has remained open to question and modification from continued application of new taxonomic methods (Stackebrandt and Woese, 1981; Goodfellow and Cross, 1984).

___________________________________________________________________

Actinomadura citrea, ATCC 27887
A.pusilla, ATCC 27296
A.spadix, ATCC 27298
A.verrucosospora, ATCC 27299
A.viridis, ATCC 27103
Brevibacterium linens, ATCC 9172
Dermatophilus congolensis, ATCC 14640
Geodermatophilus obscurus, ATCC 27100
Kitasatosporia setae, ATCC 33774
Microbispora aerata, ATCC 15448
M.rosea, ATCC 12950
M.thermodiastatica, ATCC 27098
M.thermorosea, ATCC 27099
Microtetraspora fusca, ATCC 23058
M.helvata, ATCC 27295
M.roseoviolacea, ATCC 27297
Nocardiopsis flava, ATCC 29533
Planomonospora parontospora, ATCC 23863
P.parontospora ssp. antibiotica, ATCC 23864
P.parontospora ssp. parontospora, ATCC 23864
Spirillospora albida, ATCC 23863
Streptosporangium albidum, ATCC 15331
S.pseudovulgare, ATCC 25243
S.roseum, ATCC 27100
Thermomonospora curvata, DSM 43183
__________________________________________________________________

Table 3. Actinomycete species with cell wall chemotype III
not susceptible to Thermoactinomyces phage.
__________________________________________________________________ Phage typing together with these new taxonomic methods may be used to define the boundaries of a taxon. To determine the place of phage typing in reliable actinomycete identification schemes more information is clearly needed on the specificity of phage and host-phage interactions in their natural substrates.

___________________________________________________________________ 
   
Species                            Code   Phage set   Phage set                                                 1             
                                               1            2
_______________________________________________________________
___
Thermoactinomyces candidus      ATCC 27868             +
Thermoactinomyces candidus      ACM 1751               +
Thermoactinomyces vulgaris      ATCC 15733             +
Bacillus brevis                 NCTC 7577      -
Bacillus cereus                 NCTC 9946      -
Bacillus cereus                 UWA 1          -
Bacillus cereus var. Mycoides   NCTC 926       -
Bacillus circulans              NCTC 7578      -
Bacillus coagulans              NCTC 10334     -
Bacillus firmus                 M2987          -
Bacillus licheniformis          NCTC 6346      -
Bacillus megaterium             NCTC 9848      +
Bacillus megaterium             NCTC 10342     +
Bacillus polymyxa               NCTC 4747      -
Bacillus pumilis                NCTC 8241      +
Bacillus sphaericus             UWA 2          +
Bacillus stearothermophilus     NCTC 10003     -
Bacillus stearothermophilus     NCTC 10339     -
Bacillus stearothermophilus     NCTC 10007     -
Bacillus stearothermophilus     ATCC 7953      -
Bacillus stearothermophilus     UWA 6          -
Bacillus subtilis               NCTC 6276      +
Bacillus subtilis               ATCC 6633      +
Bacillus subtilis               M 708          +
Bacillus spp.                   NCTC 5823      +
Bacillus spp.                   M 2429         +
Bacillus thuringiensis          UWA 3          +
__________________________________________________________________<
Table 4. Reactions of Thermoactinomyces to phage set 2 and of Bacillus spp. to phage set 1. (Species susceptible (+) and not ()) susceptible to phage lysis)

__________________________________________________________________< P> Also for the determination of the natural relationships of genera, the members of a host specific phage set must be selected after intensive cross-infection studies using as many strains and phage as possible (Prauser, 1984; Kurtboke and Williams, 1991). In this study we only used three Thermoactinomyces spp. the other members of this genus were not accessible due to quarantine restrictions in Australia imposed mainly because of their implication in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (Lacey, 1988). Further studies using phage with other members of the two genera are certainly warranted. Korn-Wendish and Schneider (1992) after extensive studies on 905 strains from several actinomycete genera using species specific and genus specific phage concluded that phage typing is a useful aid for the identification of actinomycetes. At the genus level, the specificity of actinophage has led them to correct the placement of falsely identified strains (Korn-Wendish et a1., 1978; Korn-Wendish and Schneider, 1992). Williams et a1., (1980) also used phage, in an attempt to provide supplementary information on the classification of the genus Nocardia.

At species level, the acceptance of phage typing as a useful tool in actinomycete systematics requires extensive studies including many phage and host strains, since almost no phage is virulent for all strains of the taxon under study (Prauser, 1970).

Detailed studies in actinophage ecology and phage-host interactions in their natural substrates is likely to provide more information about actinophage specificity (Williams et a1., 1987). This in turn would enhance the use phage typing as a taxonomical tool (Prauser, 1984; Kurtboke and Williams, 1991; Korn-Wendish and Schneider, 1992). This study emphasizes the value of phage susceptibility as an aid to reliable identification schemes and for the detection of natural relationships among taxa.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. We would like to thank Dr.L.I.Sly and Ms.S.Ben Dekhil of the Australian Collection of Microorganisms, University of Queensland, Australia, Dr B.Mee and Mr.C.Manensis, The University of Western Australia, Department of Microbiology, Perth, Australia for supplying the type strains.

REFERENCES

Bradley, S.G., D.L.Anderson & L.A.Jones (1961). Phylogeny of actinomycetes as revealed by susceptibility to actinophage. Dev.lnd.Microbiol., 2: 223-237

Buchanan, R.E. (1918). Studies in the classification and nomenclature of the bacteria. The subgroups and genera of the Actinomycetales. J.Bacteriol., 3: 403406

Claus, D. and R.C.W.Berkeley (1989). Genus Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174^AL In: P.H.A.Sneath N.S.Mair, M.E.Sharpe and J.G.Holt (eds.)Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Vol. 2, pp. 1105-1139

Collins, M.D., G.C.Mackillop & T.Cross (1982). Menaquinone composition of members of the genus Thermoactinomyces. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 13: 151-153

Cook, R.J. & K.F.Baker (1983). The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul

Craveri R., P.L.Manachini & N.Pacini (1966). Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of actinomycetes with different temperature requirements for growth. Ann.Microbiol.Enzimol., 16: 115-117

Cross, T., F.L.Davies & P.D.Walker (1971). Thermoactinomyces vulgaris. 1. Fine structure of the developing endospores. In: A.N.Baker, G.W.Gould & J.Wolf (eds.) Spore Research. Academic Press, London, pp. 175-187

Fritzsche, H. (1967). Infra-red studies of deoxyribonucleic acids, their constituents and analogues. II. Deoxyribonucleic acids with different base compositions. Biopolymers, 6: 863-870

Hardy, G.E.St.J. & K.Sivasithamparam (1989). Microbial, chemical and physical changes during composting of a eucalyptus (Eucalyptus calophylla and Eucalyptus dirversicolor) bark mix. Biol.Fert.Soils, 8: 260-270

Kempf, A., E.Greiner-Mai, J.Schneider, F. Korn-Wendish & H.J.Kutzner (1987). A group of actinophages of Faenia rectivirgula. Curr. Microbiol., 15: 283-285

Korn-Wendish, F. & J.Schneider ( 1992). Phage typing - a useful tool in actinomycete systematics. Gene, 116: 243-247

Korn-Wendish, F., B.Weingartner & H.J. Kutzner (1978). A study of twenty actinophages: Morphology, serological relationships and host range. In: E.Freerksen, I.Tarnok & J.Thumin, (eds.) Genetics of the Actinomycetales. G.Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 251-270

Kretschmer, S. (1982). Alteration of interaction with virulent bacteriophage Ta 1 during differentiation Or Thermoactinomyces vulgaris. Z. Allg.Mikrobiol., 22: 629-637

Kurtboke, D.I. & S.T.Williams (1991). Use of actinophage for selective isolation purposes: current problems. Actinomycetes, 2: 31-34

Kurtboke, D.I., N.E.Murphy & K.Sivasithamparam ( 1993a). Use of bacteriophage for the selective isolation of thermophilic actinomycetes from composted eucalyptus bark. Can.J. Microbiol., in press

Kurtboke, D.I., C.R.Wilson & K.Sivasithamparam ( 1993b). Occurrence of Actinomadura phage in organic mulches used for avocado plantations in Western Australia. Can.J. Microbiol., in press

Kurup, V.P. & R.J.Heinzen (1978). Isolation and characterization of actinophages of Thermoactinomyces and Micropolyspora. Can.J.Microbiol., 24: 794-797

Lacey, J. (1988). Actinomycetes as Biodeteriogens and pollutants of the Environment. In: M.Goodfellow, S.T.Williams & M.Mordarski (eds.) Aciinomycetes in Bioiechnology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 359-432

Lacey, J. (1989). Thermoactinomycetes. In S.T. Williams, M.E.Sharpe & J.G.Holt (eds.) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Willams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Vol. 4, pp. 2511-2526

Lechevalier, M.P. & HA.Lechevalier (1970). Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int.J.Syst Bacteriol., 20: 435443

Prauser, H. (1970). Character and genera arrangements in the Actinomycetales. In: H. Prauser (ed.) The Actinomycetales. G.Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp. 407418

Prauser, H. (1984). Phage host ranges in the classification of Gram-positive branched and related bacteria. In: L.Ortiz-Ortiz, J.F.Bojalil & V.Yakoleff (eds.) Biological, Biochemical and Biomedical A.spects of Actinomycetes. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 617-633

Prauser, H. & S.Momirova (1970). Phagensensibilitat, Zellwand-Zusammensetzung und Taxonomie einiger thermophiler Actinomyceten. Z.Allg.Mikrobiol., 10: 219-222

Reanney, D.C. & S.C.N.Marsh (1973). The ecology of viruses attacking Bacillus stearothermophilus in soil. Soil Biol.Biochem., 6: 399-408

Saunders, G.F. & L.L.Campbell (1966). Characterizalion of a thermophilic phage for Bacillus stearothermophilus . J.Bacteriol., 91: 340-348

Stackebrandt, E., W.Ludwig, E.Seewaldt & K.H.Schleifer (1983). Phylogeny of sporeforming members of the order Actinomycetale.s. Int.J. Syst Bacteriol., 33: 173-180

Stackebrandt, E. & C.R.Woese (1981). Towards a phylogeny of the actinomycetes and related organisms. Curr.Microbiol., 5: 197-202

Treuhaft, M.W. (1977). Isolation of bacteriophage from Thermoactinomyces. J.Clin.Microbiol., 6: 420-424

Tsiklinsky, P. (1899). Sur les mucedinees thermophiles. Ann.Inst. Pasteur, 13: 500-505

Wellington, E.M.H. & S.T.Wi11iams (1978). Preservation of actinomycete inoculum in frozen glycerol. Microbios Lett., 6: 151-157

Wellington, E.M.H. & S.T.Williams (1981). Host ranges of phage isolated to Streptomyces and other genera. Zentralbl.Bakteriol.Mikrobiol. Hyg. 1. Abt., Suppl., 11: 93-98

Williams, S.T., A.M.Mortimer & L. Manchester (1987). Ecology of soil bacteriophages. In: S.M.Goyal, C.P.Gerba & G.Bitton (eds.) Phage Ecology. J.Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, pp. 157-179

Williams, S.T., E.M.H.Wellington & L.S. Tipler ( 1980). The taxonomic implications of the reactions of representative Nocardia strains to actinophage. J.gen.Microbiol., 1 19: 173-178.

Copyright 1993 C.E.T.A.

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil