search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Actinomycetes
University of Udine, Mycology Department
ISSN: 0732-0574
Vol. 7, Num. 2, 1996
Actinomycetes, 1991, Vol.2, Part 1. pp. 56-65

STUDIES ON THE STREPTOMYCETE POPULATION INHABITING PLANT ROOTS

B. PETROLINI, S. QUARONI^1, M. SARACCHI and P. SARDI^1

Istituto di Patologia Vegetale dell'Universit… di Milano and
^1 Centro del CNR per il Miglioramento Sanitario delle Colture Agrarie, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy

Code Number: AC96010
Sizes of Files:
    Text: 37.7K
    Graphics: No associated graphics files

Abstract.

Streptomycetes were constantly recovered from surface- sterilised roots of 156 plant species. Following a grouping of the isolate population (1422 strains), a more detailed characterisation was carried out on 82 representative isolates. Identification by probabilistic methods showed the predominance of three Streptomyces clusters, namely S.anulatus, S.halstedii and S.albidoflavus, and allowed a physiological characterisation of the streptomycete population inhabiting plant roots.

Relationships between Streptomyces spp. and plants are well documented for their phytopathological implications, with particular reference to potato scab inducing agents (Locci, 1994). Occurrence of streptomycetes inhabiting the cortical tissues of root system (Quaroni et al., 1989; Sardi et al., 1992) as well as their involvement in the enhancement of plant growth (Ferri et al., 1996; Quaroni and Saracchi, 1994; Saracchi et al., 1992) have been previously reported.

The following report represents an attempt to identify the characteristics of root inhabiting streptomycetes so far isolated.

Materials and methods

Sampling, isolation and culture maintenance procedures.

Strains were isolated, according to procedures previously described (Sardi et al., 1992), by sampling roots of 156 plant species, during a 7 year period (1987-1994). Altogether 205 plants, 50 of which were grapevines (Vitis vinifera), were collected from different habitats and locations. For each sample, the selection of isolates was performed on the grounds of phenetic differences. The high number of grapevine specimens were collected during the uprooting of a vineyard in northern Italy (Retorbido, province of Pavia). Plants were chosen at random and only roots growing below 40 cm of depth were sampled.

Cultures were preserved by lyophilization and/or by freezing spore suspensions in 10% (w/v) glycerol at -20 C. CAY (Czapek solution agar plus 0.2% yeast extract) was chosen as a suitable medium favouring sporulation.

Preliminary grouping of isolates.

All selected isolates, attributed to Streptomyces spp. (1422 strains) on the basis of morphological features, were examined by recording morpho-cultural characteristics and some antimicrobial activities, as described by Sardi et al. (1992). This characterisation provided a suitable file of data that could be analysed by a dBase IV computer program (Ashton Tate) to group similar isolates. Inside each so formed group, strains originating from the same sample were considered as identical and only one of them was retained.

Selection of representative isolates.

For a more detailed characterisation 82 isolates, whose morpho-cultural features recorded on oatmeal agar (ISP 3, Difco) are reported in Table 2, were chosen. All the dominant patterns (major groups), numerous minor groups and some single or two-membered groups were represented by at least one strain. Strains from roots of Vitis vinifera and of a restricted number of other plants were chosen preferentially because of the higher number of isolates in order to evaluate the existence of possible specificity of the streptomycete microflora.

Identification of isolates.

Thirty-five out of the 82 representative isolates (group A, marked with an asterisk in Table 2) were subjected to probabilistic identification using the 50 characters (Williams et al., 1989) derived from numerical classification and identification studies of Streptomyces species (Williams et al., 1983a; 1983b). Cluster identification was assessed using the MATIDEN program and was regarded as acceptable when the similarity level was higher than 80%, with low scores for taxonomic distance and for its standard error (lower than 2.5). In addition distribution of characters within the 35 isolates, expressed as percentage of strains with positive character states, was analysed.

Analysis of the characteristics of the streptomycete root population.

The distribution of 31 out of the 50 characters used in streptomycete identification (see Table 4) was studied with reference to all 82 representative isolates. Isolates of group B (47 strains) were investigated with regard to these characters. Eighteen of the characters (bold-faced in Table 4) were shown by previous numerical analysis to be typical for strains of group A, being expressed as positive character states by over 80 or under 20 per cent of all 35 strains.

Results

Isolation of actinomycetes from surface-sterilised roots resulted in a collection of 1755 strains. The most frequent isolates belong to the genus Streptomyces (1422 strains, 81%) and were detected inside the roots of all the sampled plants. Several strains (215) were identified as Micromonospora spp. (Williams et al., 1993), while other non-streptomycete actinomycetes rarely occurred. Twelve isolates, showing varied morphological features, belonged to the genus Actinoplanes (Petrolini et al., 1995) and 12 to Streptosporangium. The genera Streptoverticillium (Brambilla et al., 1995) and Saccharomonospora were represented by 2 and 1 strains respectively. Nocardioform actinomycetes (21 strains) and isolates never bearing reproductive structures (70 strains) were also isolated.

Preliminary grouping of isolates.

After discarding identical isolates, the initial number of streptomycetes (1422) was reduced to 1080, of which 103 were isolated from roots of Vitis vinifera.

On the basis of morpho-cultural features and antimicrobial activity (Sardi et al., 1992), the population of root endophytic streptomycetes was divided into 177 groups of similar isolates and 224 single-membered groups, for a total of 401 profiles. Inside each group the number of strains corresponds to that of the plants from which the same profile was recovered, since just a single strain was selected from each plant.

Most groups so defined consist of few strains and the two or three-membered ones (69 and 33 respectively) are particularly numerous. Twenty-four have 9 or more members, the largest 37. This indicates that some patterns occur more frequently within the streptomycetes inhabiting plant roots, but no profile appears to be plant taxon specific.

Major groups are similar to those encountered during a previous investigation carried out on 482 strains isolated from 28 plant species (Sardi et al., 1992). Groups in that preliminary research were more numerous since identical strains were not removed, owing to the low number of isolates.

A picture of the whole population is given in Table 1 which shows the distribution of recorded characters among strains allocated to colour series according to Tresner and Backus (1963). A large number of isolates (43%) form a grey spore mass. Grey and red-coloured streptomycetes constitute about 70 per cent of the population. The most frequent antimicrobial activity is against Micrococcus luteus. Yellow strains are most active (49% against M. luteus and 30% against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cyclaminis). Red isolates show the highest number of strains active against Escherichia coli (more than 12%).

Grapevine isolates are distributed in several different profiles, though always together with isolates from other sources. So, even if the streptomycete population obtained from this plant species is better represented inside some profiles than others, it was not possible to single out any one profile consisting only of V.vinifera isolates. This confirms previous data regarding the distribution of streptomycetes in tested plants.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1. Distribution of morpho-cultural characters of the
streptomycete root population according to colour series.
Values are expressed as number of strains with positive
character states (^+  number of strains; * spore chain
morphology recorded on 2.5% water agar; a.m.: aerial
mycelium).
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
                   Spore mass colour on ISP 3
              ------------------------------------------------
Character         White  Blue  Grey  Yellow  Red no a.m. Total
                   81^+   92    466   136    276    29    1080
--------------------------------------------------------------
Different spore mass colour on 
  CAY and ISP 3    31     61    117    14     82     8     313 
Distinctive mycelial 
  pigment           3      8     78     5     37     2     133 
Diffusible pigment:    
  brown            23     30    115    24     68     10    270 
    red             4      0     36     3     16      0     59 
    yellow          7      9     62    30     19      1    128 
    other           0      9     49     4      5      1     68 
Spore chain:                                
  Pseudoverticillate 
                    2     30     27     1     10      2*    72 
  Rectiflexibiles  46      4    226   100    150      6*   532 
  Spirales         20     79    151    31     44      9*   334 
  Retinaculiaperti 15      7     88     5     82      8*   205 
Activity against:                                
Micrococcus luteus 28     26    169    66     87      9    385 
Escherichia coli    5      4     31    15     34      2     91 
Fusarium oxysporum 
  f.sp. cyclaminis  8      8     72    41     55      5    189
-------------------------------------------------------------- 

Table 2. Grouping of the 82 representative strains
according to morpho-cultural characteristics.
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
Represent- Spore  Spore  Mycelial  Diffusible  No. of   No. of
atives     colour chains pigment   pigment     isolates sample
strains     (a)            (b)                   (c)     (d)  
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
           white

AM12*, MR01*,       RF                             31      22 
   VT092       
VT023                S               brown          7       6  
VT113               RA               brown          8       5  
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
           blue

EP11*, VT101*,       S                              37     26 
  VT414, VT461
VT422                S               yellow          7      5  
VT064, VT254,        S               brown          26     24 
   VT273                 
VT423              RA                yellow           1      1 
VT222              RA                brown            3      3 
  
           grey
AZ144*, CN09*,     RF                                94     52 
  FT05*, MR19, 
  RMX04, RMX24, 
  RMX44, VT144      

LMP72*, VT214,     RF        blue, violet, green     10      8 
ZEA07*, ZEA15*                 

AST48*, MR06       RF               yellow           36     28 
              
AZ112*, RMX64      RF               brown            46     35 
             
AST25*             RF        +      yellow            2      2 
  
CU13, RMX27         S                                 51    34
              
VT105*              S               yellow            15    13 
  
VT013, VT363,       S               brown             43    31 
  VT493 
MR05, VT482        RA                                 46    34 
LMP64*, VT504      RA               yellow             9     9 
LMP74*, VT492      RA               brown             17    13 
PO03*              RA               red                9     8 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
         yellow

MR02, MR07,        RF                                 56    36 
  RMX01, RMX13,   
  SG10*, VT098*, 
  VT111*                   
CX11*               S                                 17     8 
VT173               S               yellow             6     6 
VT373              RA               yellow             1     1 
--------------------------------------------------------------
          red
  
AST32*, CU03,      RF                                 79    51
  QR26*, RMX02, 
  RMX42, VT183                
VT104 *, VT494     RF               yellow            14    14 
CMJ60*, EP15*,     RF               brown             41    35 
  VT110, VT142, 
  VT161, VT361, 
  VT365               
AZ117*             RF       +       yellow             1     1 
CMJ58*             RF       +       brown              1     1 
ZEA13*              S                                 25    17 
ZEA17*              S               brown             11    10 
CMJ59*              S       +       brown              3     3 
ER08, RMX16,       RA                                 48    24 
  RMX29                   
CX14*, VT491       RA               brown             14    13 
FS01*              RA       +                         13     9 
EP17*              RA       +       red                6     6 
--------------------------------------------------------------
         no a.m.
CH02*             RF                brown              5     2
--------------------------------------------------------------

(a.m.: aerial mycelium; RA, RF and S: Retinaculiaperti, Rectiflexibiles and Spirales spore chains; *strain subjected to probabilistic identification; ^(a) spore mass colour on ISP3; ^(b) distinctive mycelial pigment. The last two columns show the number of represented isolates^(c) and of different plant samples^(d) on which each profile was detected. Strains are labelled according to isolation sources, AM: Amaryllis belladonna; AST: Aster sp.; AZ: Azalea sp.; CH: Chelidonium majus; CMJ: Camellia japonica; CN: Phragmites communis; CU: Cyclamen persicum; CX: Carex sp.; EP: Euphorbia sp.; ER: Erica carnea; FS: Festuca rubra; FT: Triticum aestivum; LMP: Rubus idaeus; MR: Vaccinium myrtillus; PO: Allium porrum; QR: Quercus sp.; RMX: Rumex sp.; SG: Secale cereale; VT: Vitis vinifera; ZEA: Zea mays).

-------------------------------------------------------------- 

Table 3. Distribution of the 35 isolates of group A
according to Williams et al. (1989) clusters.
Correctly identified strains are *
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Best-fit cluster     Isolates                             %
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
S.albidoflavus    AST32*, MR01*, VT104, VT105*, VT111,   17.1  
                   ZEA13  
                    
S.anulatus        AM12*, AZ112*, AZ117, AZ144*, CMJ58,   25.7 
                  CX11*, CX14*, SG10*, VT098*               

S.chromofuscus    CMJ59                                   2.8  

S.cyaneus         EP11, VT101, ZEA17                      8.6  

S.diastaticus     QR26*, ZEA15                            5.7  

S.exfoliatus      AST48, FS01*, FT05*                     8.6  

S.halstedii       AST25*, CN09*, EP15, LMP64*, LMP72*,   20.0  
                  LMP74, ZEA07*               

S.rochei          EP17, CMJ60, PO03*                      8.6  
 
S.violaceus       CH02*                                   2.8
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
    
Table 4. Distribution of characters within the 35
strains of group A subjected to numerical analysis (A), the 47
strains of group B (B) and all the 82 isolates together
(C).
--------------------------------------------------------------
Character                               A        B         C   
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
Spore chain                
  Rectiflexibiles                      69        47        56  
  Spirales*                            11        28        21  
Spore mass                   
  red                                  31        28        29  
  grey                                 37        36        37  
Red-orange m.p. *                      11         0         5  
Diffusible pigment                     46        51        49  
Yellow-brown d.p.                      28        49        40  
Melanin on PYA *                       14         4         9  
Melanin on tyrosine agar*              17         9        12  
Antibiosis against:                           
  Bacillus subtilis                    31        34        33  
  Micrococcus luteus                   51        45        48  
  Candida albicans                     37        15        24  
  Saccharomyces cerevisiae             57        19        35  
  Streptomyces murinus                 37        45        41  
  Aspergillus niger                    26        17        21  
Lecithinase activity                   34             
Lipolysis                              71                      
Pectin hydrolysis                      63        21        39  
Nitrate reduction*                     89        74        80 
H2S production*                       100       100       100  
Hippurate hydrolysis                   23              
Elastin degradation                    77             
Xanthine degradation                   74              
Arbutin degradation*                   97        91        94  
Resistance to (mg/ml):                
  Neomycin (50)*                        0        11         6  
  Rifampicin (50)                      31        45        39  
  Oleandomycin (100)*                 100        89        94  
  Penicillin G (10 I.U.)*             100       100       100  
Growth at 45 C*                        11         2         6  
Growth in the presence of (w/v):                    
  NaCl 7%*                             91        60        74  
  Sodium azide 0.01%                   77                      
  Phenol 0.1%                          74                
  K tellurite 0.001%*                 100        96        98  
  Thallous acetate 0.001%              71            
Utilisation of:                  
  DL-a-Amino-n-butyric acid            40            
  L-Cystein*                           91        96       
94     L-Valine                             77               
  L-Phenylalanine*                     91        94        93  
  L-Histidine                          54                      
  L-Hydroxyproline                     63            
  Sucrose                              46                
  meso-Inositol                        63                      
  Mannitol*                            86        79        82  
  L-Rhamnose*                          94        79        86  
  Raffinose                            43            
  D-Melezitose                         63            
  Adonitol                             29              
  D-Melibiose                          46                      
  Dextran                              37                      
  Xylitol                               6        11         9
         
Values are expressed as percentage of strains with positive
character states. Characters common to more than 80% of
strains of group A are * (d.p.: diffusible pigment; m.p.:
mycelial pigment; PYA: peptone-yeast-iron agar; TA: tyrosine
agar).
--------------------------------------------------------------

Morpho-cultural profiles of the 82 more extensively characterised strains are reported in Table 2. Expression of morpho-cultural features alone allowed 111 profiles varying in size (from 1 to 94 members, obtained from 1 to 52 different plants) to be recognised, 48 of which are single or two- membered (29 and 19 respectively). Morpho-cultural profiles include more profiles with unlike antimicrobial activities, therefore inside major and minor groups more than one strain was chosen, in order to characterise isolates with different physiological properties. Selected strains, belonging to 37 morpho-cultural patterns, represent 839 isolates corresponding to about 78 per cent of the root population.

Identification of isolates.

Results of identification by numerical analysis are summarised in Table 3, where the twenty-one strains (60%) with good identification scores are asterisked.

The 35 isolates of group A are distributed among 9 major clusters of Williams and his co-workers (1989) as best-fit taxon, 7 of them including correctly identified strains. Physiological heterogeneity of the preliminarily recognised groups was confirmed by the fact that the representatives of the same morpho-cultural pattern were identified as belonging to different clusters. This is true except for strains LMP72 and ZEA07, both belonging to the Streptomyces halstedii cluster. The majority of strains was assigned to 3 clusters (S.albidoflavus, S.anulatus and S.halstedii), in particular S.anulatus groups the largest number of identified organisms and it is also the most frequently occurring cluster as nearest alternative.

The distribution of 50 characters among strains of group A is given in column 1 of Table 4. All strains are resistant to oleandomycin and penicillin G and sensitive to neomycin, grow in the presence of potassium tellurite, produce hydrogen sulphide and, except for one, degrade arbutin. A few strains show positive melanin reaction, particularly on tyrosine agar. Growth rarely occurs at 45 C. Most isolates grow in the presence of sodium chloride, reduce nitrate and utilise L- cysteine, L-phenylalanine, mannitol, L-rhamnose but not xylitol.

Considering the rather large number of common properties (18, mainly physiological ones), it is justifiable to argue that they determine the convergence of most strains on, or around, only three clusters. Subsequent allocation of isolates into one of these taxa is due to other characters. In particular the most diagnostic properties that assist in separation are spore-mass grey, antimicrobial activity against M.luteus, Candida albicans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, hippurate and pectin hydrolysis, nitrate reduction.

Analysis of special characteristics of the root population.

Comprehensive results are given in Table 4. The importance of 16 of the 18 characters which are most representative of and consistent within the isolates of group A (column 1) has been confirmed for the whole root population (column 3), also considering the distribution among other strains (column 2). Morpho-cultural features were of low diagnostic potential. Red-orange mycelial pigment can be considered as the only diagnostic property, characterising 5% of all strains. Spore chain morphology does not seem to be important, although only a small number of isolates (21%) forms spores borne in spiral chains. Among physiological properties, only the ability to grow in the presence of 7% NaCl is below 80 per cent, since only 28 strains of group B gave positive answers to the test, a lower percentage (60%) in comparison with that of group A (91%). Out of the 5 characters expressed by all the strains of group A, only two (hydrogen sulphide production and resistance to penicillin G) were characteristic of the whole population, the others showing a very high frequency. Resistance to each tested antibiotic was particularly homogenous, except for rifampicin.

Emphasis was placed, during this study, on antagonistic tests owing to the importance of some antimicrobial activities in separating the three clusters on which most strains converge. Antimicrobial activity spectra appeared rather heterogeneous, so there is no antibiosis profile dominant or typical of the examined microflora. A summary of antimicrobial activity pattern distribution among all representative isolates is given in Table 5. Activity against at least one of the test organisms is shown by 67% of strains and against all by 4%. Antibacterial activity is typical of 25 strains, while 14 are active against all test bacteria. This later profile is the most frequent, characterising 17 per cent of the population (corresponding to about 26% of active strains). Antifungal activity is less frequent, being shown by only 7 isolates, 4 of which were active against yeasts and 3 against all three tested fungi. Activity against Aspergillus niger is the least frequent, being shown by 17 isolates, all characterised by rather large antimicrobial activity spectra (3 to 6 positive answers).

-------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5. Antimicrobial activity profiles of the 82
representative isolates.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Number of                     Activity against
strains   ----------------------------------------------------
            B.      M.       S.       C.        S.        A. 
        subtilis  luteus  murinus  albicans  cerevisiae  niger 
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
27          -       -        -        -         -          -
 4          -       +        -        -         -          - 
 3          -       -        -        -         +          - 
 2          -       -        +        -         -          - 
 2          +       +        -        -         -          - 
 2          +       -        -        -         +          -   
 1          -       -        -        +         +          -   
 3          -       +        +        -         -          -
14          +       +        +        -         -          -   
 1          -       +        -        +         +          -   
 3          -       -        -        +         +          +   
 4          +       +        +        -         +          -   
 1          +       -        +        +         +          -   
 1          -       +        +        +         +          -   
 1          -       +        +        -         +          +   
 5          -       +        -        +         +          +   
 4          -       -        +        +         +          +   
 1          +       +        +        +         -          +   
 3          +       +        +        +         +          +   
-------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
Conclusions

Application of the isolation technique proposed in a previous paper (Sardi et al., 1992) to the current large-scale investigation permitted detection of a high number of actinomycetes inhabiting plant roots, mostly belonging to genus Streptomyces (over 80% of the isolates). This study provided evidence that streptomycetes are constantly present in cortical tissues of roots and that, despite heterogeneity in individual features, can be regarded as a population that is reasonably consistent in character states, having some common, well defined physiological peculiarities. This suggests a possible significance of an ecological role of these organisms. At present, the most important feature of the close relationship between streptomycetes and plants appears to be connected with plant growth stimulation and biological control of root diseases (Ferri et al., 1996; Quaroni and Saracchi, 1994; Reggiori et al., 1992; Saracchi et al., 1992).

It is interesting to note that actinomycetes were detected on grapevine roots collected at a depth where the microbial population is scarce. It appears that growing inside the cortical layer, they are able to colonise even the deeper parts of the root system.

Results appear to confirm data obtained during previous investigations on a smaller number of plants (Sardi et al., 1992). The distribution of various patterns is ubiquitous and the composition of the streptomycete population does not vary considerably from plant to plant, notwithstanding their botanical diversity.

Most isolates have been found to belong to Streptomyces albidoflavus, S.anulatus and S.halstedii clusters, taxa which are closely related and regarded by Williams and co-workers (1983a) as three sub-clusters of S.albidoflavus, the largest streptomycete taxon, approximately equivalent to the "griseus" groups previously recognised by several authors. Subgeneric relationships among the above-mentioned taxa have been also evaluated in the course of a more extensive numerical characterisation of the genera Streptomyces and Streptoverticillium by means of physiological tests (K„mpfer et al., 1991) and using other taxonomic methods as, for example, those based upon DNA homology (Mordarski et al., 1986) and analysis of protein profiles (Manchester et al., 1990).

Morpho-cultural features, although useful in preliminary grouping of isolates, appeared to be of little importance as diagnostic characters for the streptomycete root population. On the other hand the same Williams clusters are heterogeneous with respect to these traditional characters that are generally regarded as too variable for use as taxonomic criteria and can be difficult to determine (Kutzner, 1981; Shirling and Gottlieb, 1977; Szab¢ and Marton, 1976; Williams and Wellington, 1980; Williams et al., 1989).

Physiological characters of all examined the strains are responsible for their congregation around a few taxa and diversity of antibiotic spectra appears to be in agreement with the distribution of isolates in the three above-mentioned taxa. According to Williams et al. (1989) the physiological peculiarities examined are the most common among the strains grouped in the three clusters, while the antimicrobial activities play a role as diagnostic characters discriminating among the same taxa.

Information from the database on streptomycetes has already proved useful for studies of an ecological nature, particularly for the development of selective procedures designed to isolate members of streptomycete communities different from those usually detected on conventional media (Vickers et al., 1984; Williams et al., 1984).

The identification matrix for Streptomyces species (Williams et al., 1989), as used in the present investigation, provided a useful tool for diagnostic selection in the presence of a large amount of data. Consequently information derived from numerical analysis appears very useful in providing a workable system for a simplified description of natural populations.

Acknowledgements.

The authors wish to thank Mrs. Jacqueline Rogers for the revision of the English text.

References

Brambilla, U., G.Nasini, B.Petrolini, S.Quaroni, M.Saracchi & L.Fedeli (1995). Prodigiosin-like and other metabolites produced by a Streptoverticillium strain. Actinomycetes, 6: 63-70

Ferri, M., S.Quaroni, F.Reggiori, M.Saracchi, P.Sardi & E.Signorini (1996). Crescita endofitica in radici di pomodoro di Streptomyces sp. e sua influenza sulla produzione. Italus Hortus, 3(1):10-15

Kampfer, P., R.M.Kroppenstedt & W.Dott (1991). A numerical classification of the genera Streptomyces and Streptoverticillium using miniaturized physiological tests. J. gen. Microbiol., 137: 1831-1891

Kutzner, H.J. (1981). The family Streptomycetaceae. In: M.P.Starr, H.Stolp, H.G.Trper, A.Balows & H.G.Schlegel (eds.) The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation and Identification of Bacteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. II, pp. 2028-2090

Locci, R. (1994). Actinomycetes as plant pathogens. European J. Plant Pathol., 100: 179-200

Manchester, L., B.Pot, K.Kersters & M.Goodfellow (1990). Classification of Streptomyces and Streptoverticillium species by numerical analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns. System. Appl. Microbiol., 13: 333-337

Mordarski, M., M.Goodfellow, S.T.Williams & P.H.A.Sneath (1986). Evaluation of species groups in the genus Streptomyces. In: G.Szab¢, S.Bir¢ & M.Goodfellow (eds.) Biological, Biochemical and Biomedical Aspects of Actinomycetes. Akad‚miai Kiad¢, Budapest, pp. 517-525

Petrolini, B., S.Quaroni, M.Saracchi, P.Sardi & L.Fedeli (1995). Actinoplanes strains isolated from roots: morphological investigation. Actinomycetes, 6: 29-37

Quaroni, S. & M.Saracchi (1994). Effetti indotti sulla produttivit… vegetale dalla batterizzazione dei semi con ceppi di streptomiceti. Rivista di Agronomia, 28: 184- 190

Quaroni, S., P.Sardi, M.Saracchi & B.Petrolini (1989). Endophytic colonization by actinomycetes in roots. Abstr. "Fourth European Conference on Industrial Biotechnology (poster session)", Varese, Italy, June 12-14

Reggiori, F., E.Signorini, L.Mirenna & G.Pirali (1992). Lotta biologica all'antracnosi del fagiolo. Proc. "Giornate fitopatologiche", Copanello (CZ), Italy, April 21-24, Vol. II, 333-338

Saracchi, M., S.Quaroni, P.Sardi & B.Petrolini (1992). Relationships between S 57 Streptomyces sp. and roots and its utilization in the improvement of crop production. In: D.F.Jensen, J.Hockenhull & N.J.Fokkema (eds.) New Approaches in Biological Control of Soil-borne disease. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin, 15(1):110-112

Sardi, P., M.Saracchi, S.Quaroni, B.Petrolini, G.Borgonovi & S.Merli (1992). Isolation of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58: 2691-2693

Shirling, E.B. & D.Gottlieb (1977). Retrospective evaluation of International Streptomyces Project taxonomic criteria. In: T.Arai (ed.) Actinomycetes: The Boundary Microorganisms. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 9- 41

Szabo I.M. & M.Marton (1976). Evaluation of criteria used in the ISP cooperative description of type strains of Streptomyces and Streptoverticillium species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 26:105-110

Tresner, H.D. & E.J.Backus (1963). System of color wheels for streptomycete taxonomy. Appl. Microbiol., 11: 335-338

Vickers, J.C., S.T.Williams & G.W. Ross (1984). A taxonomic approach to selective isolation of streptomycetes from soil. In: L.Ortiz-Ortiz, L.F.Bojalil & V.Yakoleff (eds.) Biological, Biochemical and Biomedical Aspects of Actinomycetes. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 553-561

Williams, S.T. & E.H.M.Wellington (1980). Micromorphology and fine structure of actinomycetes. In: M.Goodfellow & R.G.Broad (eds.) Microbiological Classification and Identification. Academic Press, London, pp. 139-165

Williams, S.T., M.Goodfellow & G.Alderson (1989). Genus Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339^AL. In: S.T.Williams, M.E.Sharpe & J.G.Holt (eds.) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Vol. IV, pp. 2452-2492

Williams, S.T., M.Goodfellow & Y.C.Vickers (1984). New microbes from old habitats? In: D.P.Kelly & N.G.Carr (eds.) The Microbe: Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. University Press, Cambridge, Vol. II, pp. 219-256

Williams, S.T., M.Goodfellow, G.Alderson, E.M.H.Wellington, P.H.A.Sneath & M.J.Sackin (1983a). Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J. gen. Microbiol., 129: 1743-1813

Williams, S.T., M.Goodfellow, E.M.H.Wellington, J.C.Vickers, G.Alderson, P.H.A.Sneath, M.J.Sackin, & A.M.Mortimer (1983b). A probability matrix for identification of streptomycetes. J. gen. Microbiol., 129: 1815-1830

Williams, S.T., R.Locci, A.Beswick, D.I.Kurtb”ke, V.D.Kusnetsov, F.J.Le Monnier, P.F.Long, K.A.Maycroft, R.A.Palma, B.Petrolini, S.Quaroni, J.I.Todd & M.West (1993). Detection and identification of novel actinomycetes. Res. Microbiol., 144: 653-657.

Copyright 1996 C.E.T.A., The International Centre for Theoretical and Applied Ecology, Gorizia

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil