search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine Society
ISSN: 1596-3519
Vol. 3, Num. 1, 2004, pp. 13-16

Annals of African Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004, pp. 13-16

PREVALENCE OF MULTI-DRUG RESISTANT (MDR) PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA ISOLATES IN SURGICAL UNITS OF AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL, ZARIA, NIGERIA: AN INDICATION FOR EFFECTIVE CONTROL MEASURES

A.T. Olayinka, *B.A. Onile and **B.O. Olayinka 

Department of Medical Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, *Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, and **Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Reprint requests to: Dr. A. T. Olayinka, Department of Medical Microbiology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria. E-mail: debolaola@yahoo.com 

Code Number: am04005

ABSTRACT

Background: Multiple antibiotic resistance in bacteria populations is currently one of the greatest challenges to the effective management of infections. Constant bacteriological monitoring of pathogens in the hospital in general and specialized units is necessary to provide accurate data on the prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of specific pathogens.
Method: All clinical samples from the surgical units of ABUTH, Zaria over a 24-month period were processed and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates characterized and identified using standard microbiological procedures. The antibiotic susceptibility of isolates and a standard strain to ceftazidime, amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and perfloxacin was determined by the disk diffusion method.
Results: A total of 1,452 clinical specimens were processed and 878 pathogenic bacteria isolated within the study period. There were 92 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, giving a prevalence level of 10.5%. Most of the isolates were from urine (51.1%) and wounds (41.3%). A total of 18/92 (19.6%) of the isolates were resistant to three or more of the antibiotics tested, with the most prevalent resistance pattern being ceftazidime+gentamicin+perfloxacin+ofloxacin (27.8%).
Conclusion: There is need for instituting an antimicrobial resistance surveillance system that provides clinicians with up-to-date data on the prevalence and resistance pattern of commonly encountered pathogens like Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 

Key words: Psuedomonas aeruginosa, drug resistance, surgical units 

INTRODUCTION

The Pseudomonads are a diverse bacterial group of established and emergent pathogens. 1 - 3 Members of the genus are major agents of nosocomial and community acquired infections, being widely distributed in the hospital environment where they are particularly difficult to eradicate. 3 However, despite abundant opportunities for spread, Pseudomonas aeruginosa rarely causes community acquired infections in immunocompetent patients. 4,5

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, although not an obligate parasite, is the species amongst the Pseudomonads most commonly associated with human diseases. There has been a lot of recent advances in medicine, such as, the advent of more elaborate surgery and intensive care, the use of broad spectrum antibiotics and immunosuppressive drugs, the availability of invasive procedures or instrumentations and the increase in the number of immunocompromised patients (e.g. oncology patients on cytotoxic therapy / radiotherapy, patients with organ transplants and even patients with AIDS). A direct consequence of this is that there is a rise in patients with impaired immune defences 3, 6 thereby leading to an increase in nosocomial infections especially by Gram-negative organisms such as Pseudomonas. Such organisms may be found in the patient’s own flora, or in damp environmental sites or hospital equipments and medicaments. They exhibit natural resistance to many antibiotics and antiseptics in which they may survive for long periods, and may even multiply in the presence of minimal nutrients and have the ability to colonize traumatised skin. 7

In recent years, drug resistant bacteria have given rise to several serious outbreaks of infections with many deaths. 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known to cause a wide spectrum of diseases. It can infect almost any external site or organ, and therefore can be isolated from various body fluids such as sputum, urine, wounds, eye or ear swabs and from blood. 3

Constant bacteriological monitoring of the pathogens isolated from clinical specimens from patients in special units is necessary to draw attention of clinicians and infection control specialists to their current antibiotic susceptibility pattern and how often specific pathogens are isolated. 9,10 This will form the bedrock of appropriate surveillance studies in such settings that will lead to developing, implementing and monitoring the impact of interventions such as the evidence-based, mutually agreed guidelines for the empirical antimicrobial therapy of common pathogens, effective infection control and public health guidelines. 11

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation, characterisation and identification
All clinical samples received from the surgical unit of ABUTH, Zaria, Nigeria between October 1999 and September 2001 were processed using standard microbiological procedures. 12

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were characterised and identified using a combination of colonial morphology, Gram stain characteristics, motility test, oxidative- fermentation test, catalase, citrate and oxidase tests and pyocyanin production.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing
The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method according to the modified Kirby-Bauer technique. 10 All the clinical isolates and a standard strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were tested for their sensitivity to the following antibiotics: ceftazidime 30μg, amikacin 30μg, gentamicin 10μg, imipenem 10μg, ciprofloxacin 5μg (all from 54932 BioMeriéux SA Marcy L’Etoile, France); ofloxacin 5μg (B39892 Oxoid Unipath Ltd, Basingstoke, England); perfloxacin 10μg (152 Pasteur Biological Laboratory, India).

RESULTS

A total of 1,452 clinical specimens were received from the surgical units of ABUTH, Zaria between October 1999 and September 2001, with 878 pathogenic bacteria isolated. There were 92 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, giving a prevalence level of 10.5%. Table 1 shows the relative distribution of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in various clinical specimens. Most of the isolates were from urine 47 of 92 [51.1%] and wounds 38 of 92 [41.3%]. Only one isolate each was obtained from blood and sputum.

 Table 2 shows the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates based on the source of the isolates. A total of 31 of 47(66%) of the isolates from urine and 26 of 35(74.3%) from wound were sensitive to gentamicin.  Greater than 80% of the isolates from wound were sensitive to Imipenem, Amikacin, Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime while more than 70% of the isolates from urine were sensitive to the same drugs. Isolates were considered multi-resistant if they showed resistance to three or more of the tested antibiotics. A total of 28 of 92(19.6%) were multi-resistant and they were isolated from urine, 9 of 47(19.1%); wound, 7 of 38(18.9%) and catheter tip, 2 of 3(66.7%).

Table 1: Distribution of pseudomonas aeruginosa from various clinical specimens

Source/Site

No of isolates

%

Urine

Wounds

Catheter tip

Ear swabs

Blood

Sputum

47

38

3

2

1

1

51.1

41.3

3.3

2.1

1.1

1.1

Total

92

100.0

Table 2: Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates based on site of specimen

Source/Site

IPM

CIP

AN

CAZ

GN

PEF

OFX

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

S

I

R

Urine [47]

46

1

-

43

-

4

40

5

2

36

7

4

31

8

8

17

19

12

5

17

25

Wound [38]

35

3

-

34

-

4

36

1

1

31

1

6

26

2

10

18

16

3

10

20

8

Catheter tip [3]

2

1

-

2

-

1

2

-

1

1

1

1

-

2

1

1

1

1

-

2

1

Ear swab [2]

2

-

-

2

-

-

2

-

-

2

-

-

1

1

-

1

-

1

1

1

-

Blood [1]

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

1

1

-

-

-

-

1

Sputum [1]

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

Total

87

5

-

83

-

9

82

6

4

72

9

11

59

13

20

38

37

17

16

40

36

Imp = Imipenem; Cip = Ciprofloxacin; An = Amikacin; Caz = Ceftazidime; Gn = Gentamicin; Pef = Perfloxacin; Ofx = Ofloxacin; S = Sensitive; R = Resistant; I = Intermediate                                                           

DISCUSSION

In this study, 92 isolates of P. aeruginosa from clinical samples received from the surgical unit of the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, were studied. This number represents 10.5% (92/878) of various bacterial pathogens isolated from this unit between October 1999 and September 2001.

In two similar studies, the percentage prevalence was higher (14.4% and 17.5%). However these studies though also hospital based covered all specimens from all clinical units within the respective hospitals and so the study population and number of specimens studied were larger. 13,14

Most isolates in this study were obtained from urine samples, accounting for 51.1% of the total. This is not surprising considering the fact that most patients going in for major surgery tend to get catheterised. Also the study included patients from the urology unit, some of who had been on catheter for a considerable period of time. Unfortunately, it could not be determined which of the urine samples were catheter specimens, post catheterisation specimens or mid-stream urine samples.

It has however been shown in other studies that the use of indwelling catheters create an inherent risk for infection. 15 Catheter associated UTIs (CAUTIs) comprise perhaps the largest institutional reservoir of nosocomial antibiotic resistant pathogens and the most important of which are multiple drug resistance enterobacteriacea such as Klebsiella, Proteus, P. aeruginosa etc. 16,17 CAUTI is also the second most common cause of nosocomial blood stream infection. 18

Microorganisms are commonly attached to indwelling medical devices such as urinary catheters to form biofilms made up of extracellular polymers. Bacteria that commonly contaminate urinary catheters and develop biofilms are Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, P. aeruginosa and Klebsiella pnuemoniae. 19 The longer the urinary catheter remains in place, the greater the tendency for these organisms to develop biofilms and result in UTI. For example, it was discovered that 10 – 50% of patients undergoing short-term catheterisation (i.e. £ 7 days) become infected, while virtually all patients undergoing long-term catheterisation (>28 days) become infected. 19 Also in a study done in Benin, P. aeruginosa accounted for 16.95% of CAUTI. 20

In this study, 41.3% of the isolates were obtained from wounds however the nature of the wounds was not defined. Tissues taken from non-device related chronic infections have shown the presence of biofilms bacteria surrounded by an exopolysaccharide matrix. 21 P. aeruginosa has also increasingly been isolated in surgical wound infections. 22

The incidence of wound infection however varies from surgeon to surgeon, from hospital to hospital, from one surgical procedure to another and most importantly from one patient to another. 23 Also hospital patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics as prophylaxis are frequently colonized by P. aeruginosa in the lower intestinal tract. 9,22

Blood and sputum accounted for 1.1% each of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained in this study; this may be due to the low number of blood and sputum samples sent in from the surgical unit during the study period. However P. aeruginosa is said to be responsible for pneumonia and septicaemia with attributable deaths reaching 30% in immunocompromised patients. 24 - 26 The possibility of aspiration Pseudomonal pneumonia cannot be ruled out in post-surgical patients especially if immunocompromised.

The prevalence of antimicrobial pathogens often varies dramatically between communities, hospitals in the same community, and among different patient populations in the same hospital. 27 Faced with these variations, the physician in clinical practice has the responsibility of making clinical judgements about likely pathogen(s) involved in the infection process. To effectively and correctly make such judgements, they should have access to up-to-date data on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of commonly encountered pathogens in their practice setting. It is therefore important to institute a system for the surveillance of antimicrobial resistance that will involve the collection and collation of both clinical and microbiological data. 8

REFERENCES

  1. Olorunfemi P.O, Onaolapo J. A. Comparative activities of some commonly used antibacterial agents on S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1988; 4: 53-57.
  2. Govan J. R. W. Pseudomonads and non-fermenters. In: Greenwood D, Slack R.C.B, Peutherer J. F (eds). Medical microbiology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. 1998; 284-289.
  3. Hugbo P. G, Olurinola P. F. Resistance of pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobial agents: Implications in medicine and pharmacy. Nigerian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1992; 4:1-10.
  4. Neu H. C. The role of pseudomonas aeruginosa in infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1983; 11: Suppl B, 1– 3.
  5. Delden C. V, Iglewiski B. H. Cell to cell signalling and pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis 1998; 4:551-560.
  6. Kluytmans J. Surgical infections including burns. In: Wenzel R. P (ed). Prevention and control of nosocomial infections. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. 1997; 841-865. 
  7. Richard P, Le F. R, Chamoux C, Pannier M, Espaze E, Richet H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a burn unit: role of antimicrobials in the emergence of multiply-resistant-strains. J Infect Dis 1994; 170: 377-383.
  8. World Health  Organization.  Surveillance standards for antimicrobial resistance. WHO, Geneva. WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.5
  9. Shanson D. C. Hospital infection. In: Microbiology in clinical practice. Butterworth, U.K. 1989.
  10. Vandepitte J, Engback K, Piot P, Heuk C. C. Basic laboratory procedures in clinical bacteriology. WHO, Geneva. 1991; 78 – 96.
  11. Karlowsky J.A, Sahm D. F. Antibiotic Resistance- is resistance detected by surveillence relevant to predicting resistance in clinically setting? Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2002; 2: 487-492.
  12. Cheesbrough, M. Medical laboratory manual for tropical countries. Volume II: Microbiology. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
  13. Liu P. Y, Gur D, Hall L. M, Livermore D. M. Survey of the prevalence of beta lactamases amongst 1000 Gram negative bacilli isolated consecutively at the Royal London Hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992; 30:429-447.
  14. Oduyebo O, Ogunsola F. T, Odugbemi T. Prevalence of multi-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa isolated at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital from 1994 – 1996. Nigerian Quarterly Journal of Medicine 1997; 7:373–376.
  15. Wong E. S. Guidelines for prevention of urinary tract infections. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11:28-31.
  16. Maki D. G. Nosocomial bacteraemia: An epidemiological overview. Am J Med 1981; 70: 719-732.
  17. Stark R. P, Maki D. G. Bacteriuria in the catheterised patient. New Engl J Med 1984; 311:560-4.
  18. Kreiger J. N, Kaiser D. I. L, Wenzel R. P. Urinary tract aetiology of bloodstream infectionsin hospitalised patients. J Infect Dis 1983; 148:57-62.
  19. Stickler D. J. Bacterial biofilms and the encrustation of urethral catheters. Biofouling 1996; 94:293-305.
  20. Osazuwa E. O, Onemu S. O. Evaluation of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with indwelling urethral catheter. Nigerian Journal of Pharmacy 1999; 3:25-32.
  21. Costerton J. W, Stewart P. S, Greenberg E. P. Bacterial biofilms (Review). A common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999; 287:1317-1320.
  22. Chmel, H. Management of antibiotic resistance in surgical wound infections. In: Chmel H. (ed) Emerging trends in surgery: antibiotic resistance in the 1990s. A continuing medical education monograph. Current Directions Inc. 1997 ; 8-18.
  23. Nichols R. L. Preventing surgical site infections: A surgeons' perspective. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:220-224.
  24. Fergie J. E, Shama S. J, Lott L, Crawford R, Patrick C. C. P. aeruginosa bacteraemia in immunocompromised children: analysis of factors associated with a poor outcome. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:390-394.
  25. Dunn M, Wunderink R. G. Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by pseudomonas infection (Review). Clinics in Chest Medicine 1995; 16:95-109.
  26. Brewer S. C, Wunderink R. G, Jones C. B, Leeper K. V. J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa. Chest 1996; 109:1019-1029.
  27. Sexton D. J. The impact of antimicrobial resistance on empiric selection and antimicrobial use in clinical practice. J Med Liban 2000; 48(4): 215-220.

Copyright 2004 - Annals of African Medicine


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[am04005t1.jpg] [am04005t2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil