|
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine Society
ISSN: 1596-3519
Vol. 6, Num. 4, 2007, pp. 186–189
|
Annals of African Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2007, pp. 186 – 189
Prescription
Pattern at a Secondary Health Care Facility in Ilorin, Nigeria
T. M.Akande1 and M.
O.Ologe2
1Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Reprint
requests to: Dr. T.M. Akande, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, P.M.B. 1459, Ilorin, Nigeria. E-mail: akandetm@yahoo.com
Code Number: am07041
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Expenditures due to irrational use of drugs have been a strain on the meagre
health budgets of several developing countries and inappropriate prescribing
has been identified in many health facilities in developing countries. This
study examines the prescription pattern in a secondary health facility.
Method: A
descriptive cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Three hundred and
three randomly selected prescriptions issued to patients attending out-patients'
clinics in the facility over a period of three months were examined. Data
obtained was analyzed using EPI-INFO 2000 computer software.
Results: Mean number of drugs per prescription in the health
facility is 3.99 ± 1.55. At least 4 drugs were prescribed in 61.6% of the
prescriptions. Generic prescribing was generally low. Out of a total of 1219
drugs prescribed 511 (41.9%) were prescribed in generic names. Analgesics,
antimalarials, antibiotics and antihypertensives accounted for 19.7%, 10.2%,
13.0% and 4.9% of the drugs prescribed respectively. Only 124 (40.9%) of the
prescriptions had all drugs prescribed available in the health facility.
Conclusion: This study found practice of polypharmacy prevalent
as found in other studies in developing countries among prescribers and
prescription in generic names is low. Regular orientation and re-orientation of
prescribers on rational drug prescription and prescription in generic names in
conformity with national drug policies is necessary.
Key words: Drug prescription, pattern, health facility
Résume
Introduction/Objectifs: Les dépenses dues à lutilisation
irrationnelles des médicaments ont été une rude épreuve sur des maigres budgets
de la santé de plusieurs pays en voie de développement et de prescription inappropriée
a été identifié dans de nombreux établissements de santé dans les pays en voie
de développement. Cette étude fait un examen de la tendance de la prescription
dans un centre des soins secondaire.
Méthodes: Une étude descriptive dun groupe représentant a
été utilisé dans cette étude. Trois cents trois ordonnances délivrées aux
patients choisis au hasard, aux patients fréquentant le clinique des patients
externes du centre hospitalier pendant une période de trois mois sont été
étudiés. Des données obtenues ont été analysées à laide de EPI INFO 200
logiciels informatiques.
Résultats: Nombre moyen de médicaments par prescription
dans le centre de la santé est 3,99 +- 1,55. Au moins, 4 médicaments sont
prescrits dans 61,6% des ordonnances. Prescrivant des génériques a été
généralement faible sur un total de 1219 médicaments prescrits 511 soit 41,9%
ont été prescrits dans noms génériques. Analgésiques, le antipaludiques, les
antibiotiques et les antihypertensions sont représentés 19,7% 10,2% et 4,9% des
médicaments prescrits respectivement. Seulement 124 (40,9%) des prescriptions
de médicaments prescrits sont tous disponibles dans les établissement de la
santé.
Conclusion: A travers cette étude, nous remarquons que la
pratique de la fréquence de la poly pharmacie comme trouvées dans dautres
études dans les pays en voie de développement entre les prescripteurs et la
prescription des noms génériques est faible. Orientation régulières et de
réorientation des prescripteurs sur la rationnelle de la prescription des
médicaments et de prescription de noms génériques en conformité avec les
politiques en matière de drogue est nécessaire.
Mots clés: Médicament sur ordonnance, tendance, centre hospitalier
Introduction
Appropriate
drug utilization has a huge contribution to global reductions in morbidity and
mortality with its consequent medical, social and economic benefits.1 The WHO published its first report on selection of essential drugs in 1977.
Essential drugs program was introduced in Nigeria through the promulgation by
the Federal Government National Drug Formulation and Essential Drug list decree
in 1989. One of the objectives of preparation of essential drugs list is to
develop and follow a system of rational use of drugs. Expenditures due to
irrational use of drugs have been a strain on the meagre health budgets of
several developing countries.
Despite
the Essential drug program in countries, there is some evidence of poor
prescribing habits by physicians, including irrational use of drugs, high
numbers of drugs per prescription and high use of injectable formulations and
antibiotics.2 Inappropriate prescribing has
been identified in many health facilities in developing countries.3 Misuse of antibiotics, overuse of injections, and under-use of life-extending
drugs for illnesses such as HIV/AIDS, heart disease, and other chronic
illnesses together constitute a global epidemic of irrational use of medicines.
According to figures gathered by surveys presented to WHO, in 2000, about 60%
of antibiotics in Nigeria were prescribed unnecessarily.4 Irrational use of drugs due to inappropriate prescription can also lead to
adverse drug events which cause illness or death. Surveys have shown that
doctors prescribe drugs when they are not indicated.5,6 There is no previous publication on prescription pattern in secondary health
facilities in this part of Nigeria. This descriptive cross-sectional study
examined prescription pattern in a secondary health facility in Ilorin, Nigeria. Findings from this study will sensitize health workers on rational drug
use and also help policy makers have some information that can help in further
review of policies as well as implementation of policies related to drug
prescribing in the country.
Materials and Methods
This
descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Civil Service Hospital in Ilorin, Nigeria. It is a secondary health care facility run by Kwara State Ministry of
Health. The facility is a 32-bed hospital and provides in-patient and
out-patient health care. The physicians in the facility are general
practitioners except one specialist in Ophthalmology. The health facility was
initially meant to provide health care for the civil servants but for several
years has been providing health care to the general public. The facility has 4
Pharmacists and 4 Pharmacy technicians. The facility has the essential drug
list but this is not made available to prescribers.
Three
hundred and three prescriptions issued to patients attending out-patients'
clinics in the facility over a period of three months were examined. Data
collection form was designed and used by trained pharmacy technicians to record
data and information on the prescribed drugs in the health facility. Systematic
random sampling was used to select patients prescriptions to be used for the
study. The average number of prescriptions in the facility per day was 40. A
sampling interval of 4 was used to select prescriptions used for the study. The
starting point for the first prescription used was the selected by balloting and
subsequent prescriptions was picked using the sampling interval of 4.
Data
generated from the questionnaires were analyzed using EPI-INFO 2000 software7 after manual data verification and cleaning. Frequency distribution tables were
produced from the analysis.
Result
The
study was conducted at civil service clinic, Ilorin, a secondary health care
facility run by Kwara State government. A total of 303 forms were filled by
pharmacy technicians in the hospital. Majority 270 (89.1%) of the prescriptions
were from doctors while other health care providers were responsible for 33
(10.9%) of the prescriptions.
In 291
(96.0%) cases, prescriptions sheets were used for writing the prescription. The
number of items prescribed per prescription sheet for the patients ranged from
1 -13 with a mean of 4.22 ± 1.81. The number of drugs prescribed ranged from 1 9
with a mean of 3.99 ± 1.55. Majority of the prescriptions (61.6%) had at
least 4 drugs prescribed. Majority of the prescriptions (80.5%) did not include
consumables (needle and syringe, cotton wool, etc).
One
hundred 100 (33.0%) of the prescriptions contained at least one antimalarial.
Out of the total of 124 antimalarials prescribed only 45 (36.3%) were
prescribed in generic name and 24 (19.4%) were prescribed as injectables. Of
the antimalarials prescribed 47 (35.1%) was chloroquin, 66 (49.3%) was
sulphadoxine combinations and the rest type of antimalarials constituted
(15.7%).
Among
the patients prescriptions 124 (40.9%) had at least one analgesic, 58 (19.1%)
had at least 2 types of analgesics prescribed. Out of the total 240 analgesics
prescribed, 151 (62.9%) were in generic names and 26 (10.8%) were injectables.
More than half (59.5%) of the analgesics prescribed was paracetamol, nimesulide
(16.1%), metamizol, (10.3%), other analgesics prescribed included Ibuprofen and
celecoxib.
As much
as 189 (62.9%) of the prescriptions had at least one vitamin and 38 (12.6%)
contained at least 2 vitamins which were mostly (66.7%) prescribed in generic
names and oral form (97.8%). Out of the 303 prescriptions, 135 (44.7%) of
prescriptions contained at least one antibiotic and only 23 (7.6%) had at least
two antibiotics. Most commonly prescribed antibiotic is amoxicillin (25.0%)
followed by combination of ampicillin and cloxacillin (16.7%), other
antibiotics prescribed include tetracycline (7.7%), Ciprofloxacin (7.1%) and cotrimoxazole
(6.4%), antibiotics prescribed in generic name was (31.4%).
Of all
the prescription 60 (19.8%) contained at least one antihistamine mainly as
chlorpheniramine (91.0%), 7 (2.3%) had at least two antihistamines and only 3
(4.5%) were prescribed in generic names. Also, 46 (15.2%) of the prescriptions
had at least one antihypertensive, 12 (4.0%) contained at least two
antihypertensives and 24 (40.0%) of the antihypertensives were prescribed in
generic names. A total of 41 (13.6%) of the prescriptions contained diuretics
of which only 2 (4.8%) were in prescribed in generic name. About a tenth, 31
(10.3%) of the prescriptions contained antispasmodics and all not prescribed in
generic name. All antihistamines (H1-blockers), antihypertensives,
diuretics and antispasmodics prescribed were in oral form.
One
hundred and forty seven (48.7%) of the prescription contained 210 other drugs
mainly made up of drugs like antitussives (9.7%), haematinics (9.7%), antacids
(6.5%), corticosteroids (6.9%), anxiolytics (7.4%). Sixty-seven (30.9%) of
these other drugs were prescribed in generic names.
Out of a
total of 1219 drugs prescribed (Table 1), 511
(46.2%) were prescribed in generic names. Out of the 303 prescriptions 124
(40.9%) had all the drugs prescribed available, 178 (59.1%) had at least one
drug not available, 71(23.5%) had at least 2 drugs not available and 28 (9.3%)
had at least 3 drugs not available. The mean number of prescribed drugs per prescription
that was available is 3.056±1.68 and the mean number of drugs not available was
0.95 ± 1.04.
Table 1. Distribution of 1219
prescribed drugs and type of prescription
Drugs |
Generic
name |
|
Prescribed
route |
|
Analgesics |
Yes (%) |
No (%) |
Oral (%) |
Parenteral (%) |
151(62.9) |
89
(37.1) |
214
(89.2) |
26
(10.8) |
Vitamins |
152
(66.7) |
76
(33.3) |
223
(97.8) |
5
(2.2) |
Antimalarials |
45(36.3) |
79
(63.7) |
100
(80.6) |
24
(19.4) |
Antihistamines |
3(4.5) |
64
(95.5) |
54
(80.6) |
13
(19.4) |
Antibiotics |
50
(31.4) |
109
(68.6) |
158
(99.4) |
1(0.6) |
Antihypertensives |
24
(40.0) |
36
(60.0) |
60
(100.0) |
- |
Diuretics |
2
(0.5) |
39
(99.5) |
39
(99.5) |
2
(0.5) |
Antispasmodics |
- |
31
(100.0) |
30
(96.8) |
1(3.2) |
Eye
medication |
17
(28.8) |
42
(71.2) |
59
(100.0) |
- |
Others |
67
(31.9) |
143
(68.1) |
190
(90.5) |
20
(9.5) |
Total |
511
(41.9) |
708
(58.1) |
1127
(92.5) |
92
(7.5) |
Discussion
In this
study the prescribers as expected of a secondary health facility were mainly
physicians. The mean number of drugs per prescription in this study was 3.99±1.55 and
at least 60% of the prescriptions contained at least 4 drugs. This is similar
to finding of average number of drugs per encounter of 3.9 in the public
hospital in a study in Warri, Nigeria3 and
the finding in Iran2 where average number of drugs
prescribed was 3.4. The situation in tertiary health facility in Nigeria is not
too different from findings in North Western Nigeria of 3.5 drugs per
prescription.8 The number of drugs per
prescription in this study is however higher than the average number of drugs
prescribed at 2.41±0.02 for Randle health center and 2.64±0.02 for
Onikan health center both in Lagos, Nigeria.9
The most
prescribed group of drugs in this health facility is analgesics received by
41.1% of the patients and this is followed by antimalarial which was prescribed
for about a third of the patients. Sulphadoxine combinations were prescribed
more than chloroquine in this center and very few received artesunate or
artesunate based combinations. The study was conducted at a time when the
Federal Ministry of Health had just introduced the policy of making
artemisinin-based drug combinations the first drug of choice in malaria
treatment, thus it would be necessary to sensitize health care professionals at
all levels of health care delivery on the advantages and benefits that these
drug combinations have over the former antimalarial drugs.
According
to figures gathered by surveys presented to World Heath Organization (WHO) in
2000, about 60% of antibiotics in Nigeria were prescribed unnecessarily. In Nepal, over 50% of antibiotics prescribed in 1996 were not needed and 40% of medicines
expenditure in the same year was wasted due to inappropriate prescriptions.
Globally, the figure for unwarranted antibiotics prescriptions stands at
roughly 50%.4 In this study about 45.0% of
the prescriptions contained antibiotics.
Parenteral
route prescription of drugs in this study was found to be relatively low when
compared with findings from other studies, only 7.5% of the drugs prescribed in
this study were parenteral drugs as compared with 26.9% in a study in Enugu,
Nigeria10 and Isah et al reported
percentage encounters with injections of 10.1 17.0% in a study in two States
in Nigeria.11
Availability
of drugs remains a problem in health facilities in developing countries. In this
study only about 40% of the patients got all prescribed drugs and an average of 1 out of 4 drugs prescribed per prescription
was not available. This situation is worrying given the long period of time
this country has accepted the principle of Bamako Initiative and drugs are not
given to patients free in this facility. Since patients pay for drugs purchased
there is no reason why these essential drugs should not be readily available
for the patients. The health system needs to overhaul drug procurement system
in health facilities. The over-centralized drug procurement in public health
facilities particularly those run by State governments with its bureaucracy
often affect drug availability in the health facilities.
Prescription
of drugs in generic names is not a common practice in this health facility as
no group of drugs except vitamins had more than 40% of drugs prescribed in
generic names. The group of drugs least prescribed in generic names was
diuretics with only 0.5% prescribed in generic names. Of all the prescribed
drugs only 46.2% were prescribed in generic names. Prescription of
antihypertensive in generic names in this facility is better than what was
found in a Lagos University Teaching Hospital in which only 31.6% of
antihypertensives prescribed were in generic names.5 These findings are despite the fact that over 120 developing countries
including Nigeria have now adopted the essential drugs concept and developed a
national essential drugs list.12
Polypharmacy,
non-prescription of drugs in generic names and non-availability of drugs in
health facilities remain a problem in health facilities. Prescription of drugs
in trade names is not in conformity with the national drug policy. This
adversely affects the effectiveness of the essential drug program and reflects
the state of irrational drug prescription. This study however was not able to
capture prescriptions that were not taken to the facilitys pharmacy by
patients who go outside the facility to procure their drugs. Further studies
are needed on drug prescribing habits in Nigeria, to help policy makers to be
well informed of the problems and provide feasible policies to reduce these
problems. Necessary measures should be put in place including re-orientation
and training of clinicians on rational drug prescribing to avoid un-necessary
expenses on drugs and avoid likely negative effects on health of the people.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the contribution of the Pharmacists and
staff of Pharmacy Department of Civil Service Hospital, Ilorin in collecting
data for this study.
References
- TeferraA,
ZeruesenayD,
AsfawossenGY.
Prescribing pattern of drugs in medical wards of three
hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.Journal
of Ethiopia Medical
Practice. 2002;4:8-13.
- CheraghaliAM,
NikfarS,
BehmaneshY, et
al. Evaluation of availability,
accessibility and prescribing pattern of medicines in the Islamic Republic of
Iran.World Health
Organisation (Eastern Meditarranean Regional Office). Bull WHO2004;10:406-415.
- ErahPO,
OlumideGO,
OkhamafeAO.
Prescribing practices in two
health care facilities in Warri, Southern Nigeria: A comparative study.Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.
2003;2:175-182.
- WHO. Promoting rational use
of medicines saves lives and money, WHO experts say. http://www.who.int2004;
10: 406 - 415 (Press Release 29-3-2004)
- WHO Indias doctors
warned on irrational prescribing.Essent
Drugs Monit. 1996;22:6.
- OreagbaIA,
OlayemiSO,
MabadejeAFB,
NwoyeE.
Assessment of rational prescribing of antihypertensive drug combinations in
Lagos University Teaching Hospital Nigerian Journal of Health and Biomedical
Sciences 2004; 3: 8-11.
- EpiInfo
2000 Manual. A database and statistics program for public health professionals.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, 2000.
- IbrahimMTO.
Physicians' prescribing behaviour in two tertiary health
care facilities in north western Nigeria. Analysis of 518 prescriptions.Sahel Medical Journal.
2004;7:115-118.
- AkinyedeAA,
MabadejeAFB,
AliuMO. A
comparative study of patterns of prescription of antibiotics in two health
centres in Lagos.Journal of the Nigerian Association of Infection Control.
2000;3:20-23.
- AghajiMN. Injection practices in Enugu, Nigeria.Journal of College of Medicine.
2002;7:118-120.
- IsahAO,
LaingR,
QuickJ,
et al. The
development of reference values for the WHO health facility core prescribing
indicators.West Afr J Pharmacol
Drug Res. 2002;18:6-11.
- WeerasuriyaK,
BrudonP.
Essential drugs concept needs
better implementation.Essent
Drugs Monit. 1998;25/26:32-33.
Copyright 2007 - Annals of African Medicine
|