search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine Society
ISSN: 1596-3519
Vol. 8, Num. 1, 2009, pp. 19-24

Annals of African Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, March, 2009, pp. 19-24

Endophthalmitis: Magnitude, Treatment and Visual Outcome in Northwest Frontier Province of Pakistan

1 P. D.Wade, 2S. Khan S and 2M. D.Khan

1Department of Ophthalmology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria
2Khyber Institute of Ophthalmic Medical Science, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan
Reprint requests to: Dr. Patricia D. Wade, Department of Ophthalmology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria. E-mail: delsatwade@yahoo.com

Accepted: 7th September 2008

Code Number: am09004

Abstract

Background Many cases of post-operative and posttraumatic endophthalmitis are being managed at the Khyber Institute of Ophthalmic Medical Sciences, Peshawar in Pakistan but no study has been done to ascertain the magnitude of the disease and to also evaluate the visual outcome after management.
Methods The case notes of 39 patients diagnosed with posttraumatic and postoperative endophthalmitis between May 2006 and April 2007 were analyzed and clinical characteristics obtained were documented and tabulated
Results During the study period, 2474 patients were admitted in both the male and female wards. Of these, 39 (1.6%) had endophthalmitis due to surgical and traumatic complications. In all, 6 (12.4%) patients had evisceration, while 21 (53.8%) patients who had topical antibiotics consisting of ofloxacin, 0.1% corticosteroids, fortified cetazoline and 1% atropine along with intravitreal antibiotics, a combination of 0.1mg vancomycin and 0.4mg amikacin, were discharged home with a visual acuity of counting fingers to light perception.
Conclusion Endophthalmitis is a serious ocular complication of open globe injury and intraocular surgery. The frequency in this center has been noted to be very high as compared to other places. Its management is very challenging and often leads to devastating structural and functional damage to the eye; causing severe frustration to both the patient and the attending physician. Efforts must be made to prevent the condition. 

Key words: Endophthalmitis, magnitude, visual outcome

Résumé

Fond Beaucoup de cas de postopératoire et de poteau-traumatique endophthalmite sont contrôlés à l'institut de Khyber des sciences médicales ophtalmiques, Peshawar au Pakistan mais non étude a été fait pour s'assurer l'importance de la maladie et pour évaluer également les résultats visuels après gestion.
Méthodes Les notes de cas de 39 patients diagnostiqués avec l'endophthalmite poteau-traumatique et postopératoire entre mai 2006 et l'avril 2007 ont été analysées et des caractéristiques cliniques obtenues ont été documentées et tabulées
Résultats Pendant la période d'étude, 2.474 patients ont été admis dans les salles masculines et femelles. De ces derniers, 39 (1.6%) ont eu l'endophthalmite due aux complications chirurgicales et traumatiques. En tout, 6 (12.4%) patients ont eu l'éviscération, tandis que 21 (53.8%) patients qui ont eu les antibiotiques topiques se composer de l'ofloxacin, 0.1% corticostéroïde, cetazoline et atropine enrichie de 1% avec les antibiotiques intravitreal, une combinaison du vancomycin 0.1mg et de l'amikacine 0.4mg, étaient maison déchargée avec une acuité visuelle de compter des doigts pour allumer la perception.
Conclusion L'endophthalmite est une complication oculaire sérieuse des dommages ouverts de globe et de chirurgie intraocular. La fréquence à ce centre a été notée pour être très haute par rapport à d'autres endroits. Sa gestion est très provocante et mène souvent à dévaster des dommages structuraux et fonctionnels à l'oeil ; entraînant l'anéantissement grave au patient et au médecin étant présent. Des efforts doivent être faits pour empêcher la condition. 

Mots clés: Endophthalmite, grandeur, résultats visuels

Endophthalmitis describes the inflammatory response of the eye to intraocular infection and sometimes toxins from the organisms, which constitutes a true emergency. It is the most dreaded and devastating complication of intraocular surgery with a potential to lead to permanent and profound loss of vision.1 Postoperative endophthalmitis is the most common form, comprising up to 70% of infective endophthalmitis. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis follows open-globe injuries and accounts for one-fifth of all cases. 2 The incidence of endophthalmitis from postoperative ocular complications is 0.07%-4%.3-6

Intraoperative posterior capsule rupture is associated with an 8 to11 fold increased risk of acute endophthalmitis, 3 while contamination of topical medications, patient’s own flora, virulence of inoculated pathogens and immune status are recognized risk factors for endophthalmitis.7-9

The symptoms of endophthalmitis are blurred vision, redness and pain, while the signs include conjunctival hyperaemia, anterior chamber and vitreous cells, hypopyon, lid edema, chemosis, corneal edema, reduced red reflex and afferent pupillary defect.10 In endophthalmitis, the most common microorganisms cultured from the ocular surface and anterior chamber are staphylococcal aureus and staphylococcal epidermidis.8 Posttraumatic endophthalmitis associated with open globe injury represents a distinct kind of intraocular infection,10 and the risk factors include the presence of an intraocular foreign body, injury inflicted by organic material, delay in surgery and the type of wound involved.11 The main treatment is intravitreal antibiotics used in conjunction with subconjunctival, topical and intravenous antibiotics and corticosteroids.12 The Endophthalmitis - vitrectomy study concluded that routine immediate vitrectomy is not necessary in patients with better than light perception vision at presentation but of substantial benefit for those who have light perception only vision.13 Delay in primary wound closure or inadequate treatment worsens the visual prognosis,10 while removal of the intraocular foreign body within 24 hours of injury has been found to markedly reduce the risk of infectious endophthalmitis.14We undertook this study to:

  1. Determine the frequency of admitted cases of endophthalmitis in our center
  2. Determine the visual outcome following treatment
  3. Compare our results with those obtained in other parts of the world
  4. Prospectively assess the etiology, and effect of management of endophthalmitis on patients, quality of life.

Patients and Methods

Hayatabad medical complex, Peshawar is one of the 3 major tertiary hospitals in the North West Frontier Province of Pakistan. The Khyber Institute of Ophthalmic medical Sciences (KIOMS) serves as a referral center to the peripheral clinics, the district hospitals and parts of Afghanistan. From May 2006 to April 2007, 2474 patients were admitted in both the male and female eye wards. The case notes of thirty-nine patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis from postoperative and posttraumatic complications were retrieved. Information on age, gender, history of presenting complaints such as pains, poor vision and duration were obtained. Other information includes systemic illness, general and ocular examinations. The investigations, treatment and visual outcome on discharge were also noted. These were filled in a prepared proforma and analyzed. The results are presented in tables.

Results

During the period of study, 2474 patients were admitted. 1363 patients had cataract extractions, 154 had glaucoma surgery and 36 had vitreoretinal surgery. One hundred and eight patients were managed for open and closed globe injuries.

Thirty-nine (1.6%) were treated for endophthalmitis secondary to postoperative and posttraumatic complications. There were 31 (79.5%) males and 8 (20.5%) were females giving a male to female ratio of about 4:1. Children aged 1 to 10 years were mostly affected and this is closely followed by those between 11 to 20 years. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis accounted for 27(69.2%) (Table 1), while postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery occurred in 12 (23.1%) (Table 2).

Most of the specimens (vitreous tap) sent yielded no growth while staphylococcal aureus was isolated in 2 (5.1%), others were one case (2.6%) of E coli, pseudomonas and septate hyphae.All the patients had antibiotic treatment with ofloxacin, 0.1% corticosteroids, fortified cetazoline and 1% antibiotics given topically, while 0.1mg vancomycin and 0.4mg amikacin were administered intravitreally. Six (15.4%) patients had evisceration, while 2 (5.1%) had intraocular foreign bodies removed. The visual outcome on discharge was not too encouraging as 21 (53.8%) patients were discharged home with a visual acuity of counting finger to perception of light. Their visual acuities were either better or same on admission as shown on both tables. Twelve (30.8%) patients had no perception of light.

Table 1. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis

No.

Sex

Age (years)

Type of injury

Offending object

TAP (days)

Intervention elsewhere

IVA

Investigations (B/scan+c/s)

Management

VAD

1.       

M

60

OGI

Thorn

3

Not recorded

NPL

Not done

IV+ab+s

NPL

2.       

M

7

OGI

Stick

7

ab+eye drops

PL

No aspirate

IV+ab+s

PL

3.       

M

2

OGI

Stick

9

ab+eye drops

PL

E. Coli + S. Aureus

IV+ab+s

CF

4.       

M

28

OGI

Thorn

11

ab+eye drops

NPL

Not done

IV+ab+s

NPL

5.       

M

45

OGI

Thorn

6

ab+eye drops

6/12

No growth

IV+ab+s

PL

6.       

M

75

OGI

Thorn

18

ab+eye drops

CF

No growth

IV+ab+s

HM

7.       

M

12

OGI

Needle

1

Not recorded

PL

Infective process

PPV + IV + ab+s

PL

8.       

M

35

OGI

Iron piece

6

ab+eye drops

PL

Infective process + IOFB

PPV + IV + IOFB removed

PL

9.       

F

7

OGI

Needle

4

ab+eye drops

NPL

Clear with flat retina

IV+ab+s

NPL

10.    

M

38

OGI

Bomb blast

90

Debridement

PL

No IOFB

IV+ab+s

PL

11.    

M

10

OGI

Sick

7

ab+eye drops

PL

IOFB

IV+ab+s

PL

12.    

M

5

OGI

Wood

5

ab+eye drops

Not recorded

No growth

IV+ab+s

NPL

13.    

F

20

OGI

Umbrella

10

Corneal repair+ab

PL

Not done

Evisceration+ab

NPL

14.    

M

5

OGI

Not stated

15

ab+eye drops

?6/18

Infective process

IV+ab+s

HM

15.    

F

6

OGI

Needle

4

Not recorded

Not done

No growth

Evisceration+ab

NPL

16.    

F

11

OGI

Needle

20

ab+eye drops

NPL

No result

IV+ab+s

NPL

17.    

F

10

OGI

Pen

11

ab+eye drops

PL

No growth

IV+ab+s

PL

18.    

F

70

OGI

Thorn

Not stated

Nil

PL

Fungal septate hyphae

IV+ab+s

PL

19.    

M

4

OGI

Not stated

1

Nil

PL

No IOFB

 

PL

20.    

M

30

OGI

Bomb blast

Not stated

Upper and lower eye lid repair

PL

Infective process

IV+ab+s

Not stated

21.    

M

16

OGI

Hammering

3

ab+eye drops

PL

IOFB + RD

Removal of IOFB attempted

CF

22.    

M

19

OGI

Not stated

6

Corneal repair+ab

PL

Nil

IV+ab+s

Not stated

23.    

M

14

OGI

Nail

20

PPV

NPL

Nil

IV+ab+s

NPL

24.    

M

6

OGI

Telephone wire

13

Not stated

PL

Infective process

IV+ab+s

Not stated

25.      

M

20

OGI

Fist

4

Corneal repair+cataract extraction

NPL

Nil

Evisceration+ab

NPL

26.    

M

50

OGI

Thorn

3

Not stated

PL

IOFB

IV+ab+s

NPL

27.    

M

10

OGI

Pen

9

Corneal repair

PL

Scleral repair

IV+ab+s

HM

OGI: Open globe injury; PPV: Pars plana vitrectomy; PL: Perception of light; IV: Intravitreal injection; ab: antibiotic; s: steroids; CF; Counting fingers; HM: Hand movement; NPL: Non perception of light; ECCE: Extracapsular cataract extraction; PCIOL: Posterior chamber intraocular lens; IOFB: Intraocular foreign body; TAP: Time at presentation; IVA: Initial visual acuity; VAD: Visual acuity at discharge

Table 2. Postoperative ondophthalmitis

No.

Sex

Age (years)

Systemic illness

Type of surgery

Time interval to onset (days)

Initial VA

Investigations (B/scan + c/s)

Treatment

Final VA

1

M

65

Hypertension

ECCE + PCIOL

1

CF

No growth

IV + ab+s

HM

2

M

60

-

ECCE + PCIOL

2

HM

Echogenic vitreous

No growth

IV + ab+s

PL

3

M

30

-

ECCE + PCIOL

7

6/18

Not done

IV + ab+s

6/18

4

M

35

-

Trab + ECCE + PCIOL

5

PL

Pseudomonas

IV + ab+s

PL

5

M

20

-

PPV

2

PL

vitreous hemorrhage, PVD, evisceration

IV + ab+s

NPL

6

M

60

-

ECCE + PCIOL

6

HM

Not done

IV + ab+s

HM

7

F

45

Diabetes

ECCE + PCIOL

6

HM

Not done

IV + ab+af

PL

8

F

70

Hypertension

ECCE + PCIOL

12

NPL

No aspirate

IV + ab+s

NPL

9

M

35

-

ECCE + PCIOL

12

PL

No result

IV + ab+s

CF

10

M

70

-

ECCE + PCIOL

7

NPL

Not done

Evisceration+ab

NPL

11

M

60

-

ECCE + PCIOL

20

PL

No growth

IV + ab+s

NPL

12

M

21

-

ECCE + PCIOL

4

HM

Not done

IV + ab+s

CF

PPV: Pars plana vitrectomy; PL: Perception of light; IV: Intravitreal injection; ab: antibiotic; s: steroids; CF; Counting fingers; HM: Hand movement; NPL: Non perception of light; ECCE: Extracapsular cataract extraction; PCIOL: Posterior chamber intraocular lens

Discussion

Endophthalmitis is a tragic occurrence, be it after an intraocular surgery or following trauma, and with this event the hopes of the patient is vanished, while the confidence of the ophthalmologist is shattered.14 Efforts must be made as much as possible to prevent its occurrence.

Endophthalmitis accounted for 1.6% of all cases seen within the study period with posttraumatic endophthalmitis being higher, seen in 27(1.6%) patients than postoperative complications occurring in 12(0.5%) cases. These values are higher than most values seen in the literature. Mollar et al5 had an incidence of 0.099% endophthalmitis following cataract surgery in Birmingham, so also Lautha et al6 in South India, a similar Asian population recorded an incidence of 0.05% cases secondary to cataract surgery. Other workers3, 15, 16 also recorded lower values than seen in this study. Successful cataract surgery restores failing eyesight, and is also responsible for permanent and significant loss of vision resulting from severe endophthalmitis in upto 0.1% patients.17 There is a need therefore, in our prospective study to identify the reason for the high values obtained in this center.

Posttraumatic endophthalmitis is a complication of penetrating eye injuries that results in blindness in potentially salvageable eyes.18 Of the 154 patients treated for trauma during this period 27(17.5%) had endophthalmitis. Other similar studies13,19 had lower figures of 6.8% and 5.0% respectively, while the study in Vietnam10 recorded a much higher value of 11.8% but still lower than that obtained in our study. The risk factors identified were dirty wounds, retained intraocular foreign bodies; lens capsule breach, delayed wound repair and rural address.19 Most of the cases of posttraumatic endophthalmitis were either referred from district or peripheral hospitals or the patients have attempted self medication before presentation. Only one patient reported within 24 hours of injury. Nine (33.3%) patients with posttraumatic endophthalmitis had thorn or stick injuries. This is due to the fact that this is a farming community and the injuries occurred on the farms. Children pick dirty needles thrown around to play with and this accounts for the 4(14.8%) cases seen. These instruments carry along organisms as they penetrate the eye at the time of injury causing devastating effect. Narang et al 20 in India have attributed the high risk of posttraumatic endophthalmitis to bow and arrow, and household injuries.

Postoperative endophthalmitis remains a serious clinical problem in ophthalmology, and prognosis is largely determined by the virulence of the offending organisms.21 Only 1(8.3%) vitreous aspirate in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis yielded pseudomonas specie. Others in South India 22 cultured norcadia species in 60% of cases and coagulase negative and E. coli were also isolated. Ng et al23 had 84% gram positive cocci and streptococci, while enterococci and staphylococci were isolated in 19.1% and 18.3% respectively. Other studies15, 16 identified coagulase negative cocci, S. epidermidis and S aureus in their various studies. Postoperative endophthalmitis caused by organisms other than coagulase-negative staphylococcus or P. aureus carries a poor visual prognosis.24

The low rate of culture positivity in this study could be due to poor sampling technique, the use of antibiotics postoperatively or simply sterile endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis following open-globe injuries is caused by a specific range of microorganisms of which bacillus specie and coagulase negative staphylococcus are the most frequent.25 The vitreous aspirate of only 1 (3.7%) patient yielded fungal septate hyphae, while E coli and Staphylococcus aureus were cultured in the specimen of one (3.7%) patient, though the B-scan showed infective process in 7 (25.9%) patients’ vitreous cavities. Davey et al26 have reported far less cases of fungal infection, but found bacillus species as increasingly major causes of posttraumatic ocular diseases. Other studies18, 27 also found the bacillus species to be the most important cause of posttraumatic endophthalmitis.

Current recommended approach to suspected posttraumatic infection involves early diagnostic vitrectomy and intraocular culture, use of intravitreal antibiotics and combination of treatment with systemic and periocular antibiotics.26 In this study patients were treated with intravitreal antibiotics using a combination of 0.1mg vancomycin and 0.4mg amikacin. Topical eye drops included ofloxacin, 0.1% corticosteroids, fortified cefazoline, and 1% atropine. Four (10.3%) patients had pars plana vitrectomy as an adjunct to treatment. No oral, intravenous or subconjunctival injections were given. Ng et al23 had poorer visual outcome without antibiotics than with oral antibiotics, while Cuila et al15 found that use of subconjunctival antibiotic in routine intraocular surgery received a clinical recommendation of “C”, indicating that it may be relevant but cannot be definitely related to clinical outcome.

Only the visual outcome on discharge could be obtained from the files as patients follow up were not recorded. One (8.3%) patient with postoperative endophthalmitis had a pretreatment visual acuity of 6/18 and was subsequently discharged on same visual acuity. Nine (75.0%) patients had pretreatment visual acuity of counting fingers to light perception, out of which 2(16.7%) patients had non-perception of light as 1(8.3%) one was eventually eviscerated.

The visual outcome in those due to posttraumatic endophthalmitis were also similar with 2(7.4%) patients presenting with pretreatment visual acuity of 6/12 and 6/ 18 but were discharged with visual acuities of light perception and hand movement respectively. Seventeen (63.0%) cases had visual acuity of counting fingers to light perception on admission but only 12(44.4%) patients were discharged with same visual acuity. Four (14.8%) eyes were eviscerated. Visual outcome in posttraumatic endophthalmitis is generally poor as recorded by other workers, 21,25but Brimton et al28 had 26% of patients with final visual acuity of 6/9 (20/30) and 42.1% had 6/60(20/200) or better.

Endophthalmitis, be it due to postoperative or posttraumatic complications have a very devastating effect. The frequency of endophthalmitis in this center has been noted to be very high as compared to other studies. Effort must be made to identify the cause in order to find an optimal management option. 

Recommendations

  1. There is need to have a continuous medical education program for general practitioners and primary eye care providers on the devastating effect of endophthalmitis.
  2. Health education to all patients at the outpatient clinic on the dangers of self-medication and the need to seek immediate attention in cases of eye injuries.
  3. Parents should be involved in the management of their children’s condition
  4. The eye wards, operating theaters, instruments and consumables must be kept clean and sterile.
  5. More research is indicated to find out the causes of the high prevalence and incidence, poor yield of microorganisms on microscopy and culture and the poorer outcome of treatment in the department.

References

  1. OlsonRJ. Challenges in ocular infectious diseases and the evolution of anti-infective therapy.Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49:S53-S54.
  2. DasT, DerekKY, SavitriS, et al. Relationship between clinical presentation and visual outcome in postoperative and posttraumatic endophthalmitis in South Central India.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000; 48:123-128.
  3. AarbergTMJr, FlynnHWJr, SchiffmanJ, NewtonJ. Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis survey. A 10-year review of incidence and outcomes.Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1004-1010.
  4. WongTY, CheeSP. The Epidemiology of acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in an Asian population.Ophthalmology. 2004; 11:699-705.
  5. MollanSP, GaoA, LockwoodA. Endophthalmitis: incidence and microbial isolates in a United Kingdom region from 1996 through 2004. J Cataract Refract Surg.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:265-268. 
  6. LalithaP, RajagopalanJ, PrakashK, RamasamyK, PrajnaNV, SrinivasanM. Postcataract endophthalmitisin South India: incidence and outcome.Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1884-1889.
  7. MistlbergerA, RuchoferJ, RathelE, et al. Anterior chamber contamination during cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:1064-1069.
  8. BauszM, FodorE, ReschMD, KristofK. Bacterial contamination in the anterior chamber after povidone iodine application and the effect of lens implantation device. J Cataract Refract Surg.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1691-1695.
  9. SamadA, SolomonLD, MillerMA, MendelsonJ. Anterior chamber contamination after uncomplicated phaecoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol.Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 120:143-150.
  10. TranTP, LeTM, BuiHT, NguyenTM, KuchleM, NguyenNX. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis after penetrating injury in Vietnam: risk factors, microbial aspect and visual outcome.Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003; 220:481-485.
  11. Duch-SamperAM, Chaques-AlepuzV, MenezoJL, Hurtado-SarrioM. Endophthalmitis following open-globe injuries.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998; 9:59-65.
  12. HawkinsAS, DeutschTA. Infectious endophthalmitis.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 1999; 1:172-177.
  13. Endophthalmitis – vitrectomy Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; (12): 1479-96.http://www.ncbi.nlm.hih.gov/pubmed/748761. (Accessed 22/07/08)
  14. ThompsonJT, ParverLM, EngerCL,Mieler WF, Ligett PE. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign body. National Eye Trauma System.National Eye Trauma. Ophthalmology.1993; 100:1468-1474.
  15. CiullaTA. StarrMb, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophphylaxis for cataract survey. An Evidence-based update.Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:13-24.
  16. TabanM, BehrensA, NewcombRL, et al. Acute Endophthalmitis following cataract surgery. A systematic review of literature.Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123:613-620.
  17. SealDV, BarryP, GettinbyG, et al. ESCRS study of prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Case for a European multicenter study.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:396-406.
  18. AlfaroDV, RothD, LigettPE. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis, causative organisms, treatment and prevention.Retina. 1994; 14:206-211.
  19. Soheilian M, Rafati N. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis.Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1845-1846.
  20. NarangS, GuptaV, SimakundhiP, GuptaA. raj S, Dogra MR. Paediatric open globe injuries. Visual outcome and risk factors for endophthalmitis.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004; 52:29-34.
  21. HanscomTA. Postoperative endophthalmitis.Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38:542-546.
  22. LalithaP, RajagopalanJ, PrakashK, RamasamyK, PrajnaNV, SrinivasanM. Postcataract endophthalmitis in South India.Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1885-1889.
  23. NgJQ, MorletN, PearmanJW, SemmensJB. Management and outcomes of postoperative endophthalmitis since the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. The endophthalmitis population study of Western Australia (EPSWA)’s fifth Report.Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1199.
  24. SomaniS, GrinbaumA, SlomovicAR. Postoperative endophthalmitis: incidence predisposing surgery, clinical course and outcome.Can J Ophthalmol. 1997; 32:303-310.
  25. SabaciG, BayerA. muthi FM, Karaguul S, Yildirim E. Endophthalmitis after deadly-weapon-related open-globe injuries. Risk factors, value of prophylactic antibiotics and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol.Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 133:62-69.
  26. DaveyRT, TauberWB. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis: The emerging role of Bacillus cereus infection.Rev Infect Dis. 1987; 9:110-123.
  27. KunimotoDY, DaaT, SharmaS, et al. Micrbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates: Part II. Post traumatic endophthalmitis. Endophthalomitis Research group. Am J Ophthalmol.Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 128:242-244.
  28. BrintonGS, ToppingTM, HyndukRA, AerbergTM, ReeserFH, AbramsGW. Posttraumatic endophthalmitis.Arch Ophthalmol. 1984; 102:547-550.
  29. DasT. National endophthalmitis survey.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003; 51:117-118.

Copyright 2009 - Annals of African Medicine

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil