search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Australasian Biotechnology (backfiles)
AusBiotech
ISSN: 1036-7128
Vol. 10, Num. 1, 2000, pp. 28-29
Untitled Document

Australasian Biotechnology, Vol. 10 No. 1, 2000, pp. 28-29

Regulatory Update - Consultation Draft of Gene Technology Bill 2000

Stuart Clague and Deborah Weekes, Planning, Environment and Local Government Group, Corrs Chambers Westgarth Lawyers

Code Number: au00011 Regulation of Dealings with GMOs

Central to the operation of the Gene Technology 2000 Act will be the regulation of dealings with GMOs. However, in order to understand the intended operation of the Act, it is necessary to understand a number of key definitions in the Bill.

The term "deal with", in relation to GMOs, has been very widely defined to mean:

    • the conducting of experiments with GMOs;
    • the making, developing, producing or manufacture of GMOs;
    • the breeding of GMOs;
    • the propagation of GMOs;
    • the use of GMOs in the course of manufacture of a thing that is not a GMO;
    • the growing, raising or culture of GMOs; and
    • the importation of GMOs.

In addition, the term includes ancillary dealings such as the possession, supply, use, transport or disposal of GMOs for the purposes of, or in the course of, one of the primary dealings mentioned above.

The term "genetically modified organism" has been defined to mean an organism that has been modified by gene technology, an organism that has inherited particular traits from a parent organism (being traits that occurred in the parent organism because of gene technology) or anything declared by regulation to be a genetically modified organism. However, the term does not include a human being or an organism declared by the regulations not to be a genetically modified organism. The drafting of this definition reflects the policy that the regulation of GM products should remain with existing regulators (e.g. ANZFA, TGA, NRA). However, the Bill permits GM products for which there is no existing regulator ("gap" GM products) to be declared as GMOs and to therefore become subject to the Act.

The term "gene technology" has been defined to mean any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material but does not include sexual reproduction, natural recombination, selective breeding or any other technique specified in the regulations. Finally, the term "organism" is defined to mean any biological entity that is viable, capable of reproduction or capable of transferring genetic material.

Licensing System for Dealings with GMOs

The introduction of a licensing system for dealings with GMOs is a key component of the Bill. In the absence of a GMO licence, any dealing with a GMO is an offence unless the dealing is a notifiable low risk dealing or an exempt dealing.

In establishing the licensing system, the Bill draws a distinction between the licensing of dealings which involve the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment, (e.g. field trials and the commercial release of GMOs) and those which do not (e.g. contained research with GMOs). In the former case the Regulator may only decide the application after undertaking extensive consultation with the public, GTAC and other agencies in relation to the application and preparing a risk assessment and risk management plan for the proposed dealing. In the latter case, the Bill merely provides that the Regulator may consult with GTAC and other agencies in relation to the application.

In each case, after considering the above matters, the Regulator must decide whether to issue the licence, with or without conditions, or to refuse the licence. In making this decision, the Bill requires the Regulator to have regard to:

    • in the case of a dealing involving a deliberate release of GMOs into the environment, any risk assessment and risk management plan prepared by the Regulator and any subsequent submissions made in relation to the risk assessment and risk management plan; and
    • any policy guidelines or codes of practice that are in force.

Further, the Regulator must not issue a licence unless satisfied that the risks posed by the dealing are able to be managed in such a way as to protect the health and safety of people and the environment. In addition, the Regulator must have regard to the national interest.

Low Risk Dealings and Exempt Dealings

A GMO dealing which is classified as a notifiable low risk (NLR) dealing or an exempt dealing will not be subject to the licensing requirements of the Act.

Notifiable low risk dealings are low risk dealings, prescribed by regulation, which do not involve the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment. These dealings will be subject to requirements imposed by regulation. These requirements may relate to matters such as notifying the Regulator of any NLR dealings, the supervision of NLR dealings by Institutional Biosafety Committees and the containment levels of facilities in which NLR dealings are to be undertaken. It is anticipated that NLR dealings will include those dealings which are currently classified as "Category B" dealings under the existing GMAC guidelines.

In addition, the Bill provides that certain very low risk dealings may be specified by regulation as exempt dealings. It is anticipated that these will include the existing GMAC exemptions.

Confidentiality

A person ("the applicant") may apply to the Regulator for protection of confidential commercial information in relation to GMOs. The types of information which are considered to be confidential commercial information are trade secrets, information which has a commercial or other value which will be diminished upon disclosure and information which concerns the lawful commercial or financial affairs of a person or an organisation. A person who is aware of confidential commercial information, because they are performing duties under the Act, may only disclose that information under a court order, with the consent of the applicant or in the course of performing duties under the Act.

Review of Decisions

The Bill introduces a procedure for merits review of decisions made under the Act. However, this right of review is only available to persons directly effected by a decision and does not extend to third parties. The Bill provides for internal review by the Regulator, in the case of decisions made by a delegate of the Regulator, and for external review by the Commonwealth Administrative Appeals Tribunal, in the case of decisions made personally by the Regulator.

In addition, an aggrieved person may make an application for judicial review of decisions made under the Act. This review process is available to third parties which are able to establish sufficient standing. These may include peak environment and industry organisations.

Conclusion

The consultation draft of the Bill provides a framework for the regulation of dealings with GMOs to ensure that they do not compromise public health or safety or the environment. However, much of the detail of this regime still remains to be spelt out in the regulations and in policy guidelines and codes of practice prepared under the Act. A consultation draft of the proposed regulations is expected to be released in late February 2000. This will allow for a more complete understanding of the new regime. The closing date for submissions to the IOGTR on the Bill is 10 March 2000.

 
GMAC Proposals: Public Information Sheets and Gazette Notices

The Genetic Manipulation Advisory Committee (GMAC) has assessed nine proposals for the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms and three extensions to existing proposals.

They are as follows

  • PR119 - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars
  • PR120 - Development of methods to reduce glucosinolate content in canola cultivars
  • PR121 - Development of dwarfed canola cultivars
  • PR122 - Development of canola cultivars with reduced pod-shatter
  • PR125 - Field evaluation and seed increase of LibertyLink tomatoes
  • PR126 - Colonisation ability of transposon marked derivatives of Pseudomonas biological control bacteria on wheat roots in soil
  • PR128 - Field assessment of transgenic papya for superior post-harvest fruit quality
  • PR129 - Planned Release of GMO (P. somniferum) oilseed poppy
  • PR83X4 - Release of Roundup Ready cotton - trial program 99/00
  • PR89X2 - Ecological assessment in northern Australia of transgenic cotton expressing the CryIA(c) and CryIIA delta-endotoxins from Bacillus thuringiensis
  • PR98X - Queensland cotton: Flinders River project 1999/2000.

Further information can be obtained from the website www.health. gov.au/tga/gene/gmac/gmac.htm

GMAC is requesting comments on environmental and/or safety aspects of two new applications for deliberate release and fifteen extensions to existing proposals published in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette: Government notices of 22 December 1999. Submissions are to be made by the 21st of January, 2000. For more information see the website www. health.gov.au/tga/gene/gmac/gmac. htm

  • PR132 - Development of photoperiod insensitive canola cultivars (Brassica napus)
  • PR133 - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars
  • PR63X5 - Release of glufosinate-ammonium tolerant hybrid and open-pollinated canola cultivars
  • PR77X3 - Backcrossing Canadian Roundup Ready canola varieties into Australian canola varieties, seed production and evaluation of the Roundup Ready canola system
  • PR79X2 - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars
  • PR85X3 - Small and large scale seed increase of a genetically modified canola (Brassica rapa) with a new hybridisation system
  • PR87X2 - Field performance and integrated pest management studies on transgenic cotton expressing the CrylA(c) delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis, in the Kimberley region of Western Australia
  • PR90X2 - Development of herbicide tolerant Brassica juncea
  • PR93X2 - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars
  • PR109X - Winter nursery seed increase of roundup ready (RR) and Ingard (Bt)/roundup ready (RR) cotton plants, 2000
  • PR110X - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars (Brassica napus)
  • PR111X - Development of photoperiod insensitive canola cultivars
  • PR112X - Winter nursery seed increase of Ingard (Bt) and Ingard (Bt)/CryX transgenic cotton plants
  • PR119X - Development of fungal disease resistant canola cultivars
  • PR120X - Development of methods to reduce glucosinolate content in canola cultivars
  • PR121X - Development of dwarfed canola cultivars
  • PR122X - Development of canola cultivars (Brassica napus) with reduced pod-shatter

 

Copyright 2000 - Australasian Biotechnology

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil