|
Biotecnologia Aplicada
Elfos Scientiae
ISSN: 0684-4551
Vol. 12, Num. 2, 1995, pp. 79-80
|
Revista Biotecnologia Aplicada 12(2): 79-80
(1995)
REPORTE CORTO/SHORT REPORT
Presented in the Congress Biotecnologia Habana'94. La Habana,
Cuba, Nov. 28 - Dec. 3, 1994
A NONRADIOACTIVE, BRANCHED DNA-BASED TECHNIQUE FOR DETECTION
OF Trypanosoma brucei spp. IN BLOOD
Eva Harris^1, J. Kolberg^2, M. Urdea^2 and Nina Agabian^1
^1Intercampus Program in Molecular Parasitology, University of
California at San Francisco, 333 California Avenue, Suite 150,
San Francisco, CA, 94118; ^2Nucleic Acid Systems, Chiron
Corporation, 4560 Horton Street, D-2 Emeryville, CA 94608-
2916.
Code Number: BA95020
File Sizes:
Text: 5K
No associated graphics
INTRODUCTION
Since their recent advent, molecular diagnostic methodologies
have proven to be very useful and offer a number of advantages
over microscopic, biochemical, and immunologic procedures for the
detection of pathogens. To date, target amplification methods
such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been the most
commonly applied molecular techniques. The branched DNA (bDNA)
Signal Amplification Assay is an alternative hybridization based
system for the sensitive and rapid detection of agents of
infectious disease. This molecular technique amplifies the signal
from a target molecule rather than the target itself, and thus
avoids artifactual problems that have hampered other molecular
diagnostic methodologies (1).
We have developed a nonradioactive bDNA-based assay for detection
of Trypanosoma brucei in clinical samples. T. brucei
gambiense and T. brucei rhodesiense are the etiologic
agents of sleeping sickness, and the disease is considered a
major health problem in many African countries for humans as well
as for cattle, which are infected with T. brucei. The
accurate diagnosis of African sleeping sickness by direct blood
examination is problematic due to the wave-like fluctuations in
levels of parasites present in biological samples, while
immunologic tests are hampered by the trademark antigenic
variation of T. brucei used by the parasite to avoid the
host immune response. We have developed a sensitive and specific
diagnostic assay for African trypanosomiasis, regardless of the
stage of infection, variable antigen type (VAT), or subspecies
of T. brucei.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the branched DNA assay, crude lysates of samples are denatured
and hybridized in solution to two sets of oligonucleotide probes
(50 mers). One set serves to capture the target sequence from the
organism of interest by hybridizing to both the target sequence
and oligonucleotide probes bound to microtiter dish wells. The
other set of probes contains regions complementary to both the
target sequence and to branched DNA molecules and serves to
amplify the signal. Each of the 45 branches in this amplifier
structure then hybridizes to an alkaline phosphatase-labeled
probe. Finally, the complex is detected by the addition of an
enzyme-triggerable chemiluminescent substrate, and light emission
is measuredwith a luminometer or a Polaroid camera (1). Plasma
and Buffy coat were prepared from heparinized blood samples and
used directly in the T. brucei bDNA assay (2).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Two repetitive DNA sequences specific to the Trypanosoma
brucei complex were chosen as targets, namely the 177 bp
satellite repeat (3) and the RIME sequences (4, 5), and the
appropriate oligonucleotide probes were designed and tested.
Parasites were detected in biological samples with clinically
relevant sensitivity (5-10 parasites/mL of blood), and comparable
limits of detection were observed with cloned target sequences,
purified T. brucei DNA, procyclic trypanosomes and
bloodstream trypomastigotes. Analysis of the species specificity
of the T. brucei bDNA assay with serial dilutions of
purified DNAs revealed a strong signal from the three T.
brucei subspecies and no signal from a variety of related
organisms.
Thus, the branched DNA technology offers certain advantages over
alternative molecular techniques, including the simplicity of
sample preparation and of the procedure itself, the stability of
the reagents, the ability to process large numbers of samples
simultaneously, and freedom from cross-contamination
artifacts.
REFERENCES
1. URDEA, M. S. (1993). Clinical Chemistry
39:725-726
2. HARRIS, E. et al. Manuscript in preparation.
3. SLOFF, P. et al. (1983). J. Molecular Biology
167:1-21
4. HASAN, G. et al. (1984). Cell 37:333-
341
5. KIMMEL, B. E. et al. (1987). Molecular and
Cellular Biol. 7:1465-1475
Copyright 1995 Sociedad Iberolatinoamericana de Biotecnologia
Aplicada a la Salud
|