search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Biokemistri
Nigerian Society for Experimental Biology
ISSN: 0795-8080
Vol. 23, Num. 2, 2011, pp. 91-96

Biokemistri, Vol. 23, No. 2, June, 2011, pp. 91-96

Effect of processing (sprouting and fermentation) of five local varieties of sorghum on some biochemical parameters

M. B. Raihanatu, S. Modu, A. S. Falmata, Y. A. Shettima and M. Heman

Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.

(Received April 12, 2011; Accepted May 18, 2011)

Code Number: bk11012

ABSTRACT

The effect of processing (combined sprouting and fermentation) on chemical composition, tannin content, in vitro protein digestibility and mineral element composition   of five local varieties were studied. The five varieties studied were: “chakalari white, chakalari red, yafimoro, tumbuna and mire”. The parameters were assayed using standard methods (proximate analysis, tannin content, in-vitro protein digestibility and mineral element composition). The results for tannin content showed that processing decreased tannin content between the ranges of 2.08%-14.58% for the five cultivars. As for mineral composition, there was a general decrease in percentage mineral composition of most varieties when comparison was made between raw and processed samples. Processing increased protein digestibility which ranged between 93.78%-95.68% as compared to the unprocessed samples. These result hence showed that processing (combined sprouting and fermentation) decreases the tannin content of sorghum, increases in-vitro protein digestibility and decreases mineral element composition of sorghum.

Key words: Sorghum; Sprouting; Fermentation; Digestibility

Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is considered as one of the most important food crops in the world, following wheat, rice, maize and barley (FAO, 2006).  Sorghum provides the staple food of a large population in Africa, India and the semi-arid parts of the tropics.  It is commonly consumed by the poor masses of many countries and it forms a major source of proteins and calories in the diet of large segments of the population of India and Africa.  Processed sorghum seeds or flour were found to be important sources of calories and proteins to the vast majority of the population as well as for poultry and livestock (FAO, 2006).  Sorghum acts as a principal source of energy, proteins, vitamins and minerals for millions of the poorest people living in Africa, Asia and the Semi-arid tropics worldwide (Mauder, 2006).  Unfortunately, sorghum has low nutritional value and inferior organoleptic qualities due to the presence of anti-nutritional factors which forms complexes with food ingredients (Reed, 1995).  In addition, in vivo and in vitro studies indicate that the proteins of wet cooked sorghum are significantly less digestible than the proteins of other similar cooked cereals such as wheat and maize (Davidson et al., 1979; Guathier et al. 1982).  The factors responsible for poor sorghum protein digestibility are divided into exogenous factors (grain organizational structure, polyphenols, phytic acid, and starch and non-starch polysaccharides) and endogenous factors (disulphide and non-disulphide cross-linking, kafirin hydrophobicity and changes in protein secondary structure. Processing methods, such as soaking, sprouting and cooking has been reported to improve the nutritional and functional properties of plant seeds.  There are a number of roles that microorganisms can play in food processing, either positive or negative.  The positive effect is generally regarded as part of the fermentation processing namely product preservation, flavour development and reduction of antinutrient.  Furthermore, fermentation enhances the nutrient, vitamins, essential amino acids and protein, by improving proteins and fiber digestibility.  The negative effect includes spoilage of food products and contamination by pathogenic microorganisms (Brune et al., 1989; Hurel et al., 1999; Lewis and Elvin, 1977). Processing of sorghum (boiling, germination, fermentation and cooking) greatly improved its nutritive value (Inyang and Zakari, 2008).  However, combination of these processes further improved the quality of sorghum as a food by removing the antinutritional factors as well as by alleviating the effect of heating.  Many workers reported reduction in major and trace elements in the soaked and cooked grains.  As observed, cooking resulted in more significant loss in trace elements than soaking, which could be attributed to effect of heat on changing the insoluble chemical species of some trace elements into soluble ones; thus extracted more in the cooking water.

Objective of the Study

The objective of the study is to determine the effects of the various processing techniques (sprouting and fermentation singly) on tannin content, protein in vitro digestibility and mineral composition.

Materials and Methods

Source of Raw Materials

The sorghum grains used for this study were obtained at the open market (Monday Market, grains section). The five varieties of the sorghum used include (using local names) Chakalari white, Chakalari red, Tumbuna, Yafimoro and Mire. The sorghum varieties were authenticated by a seed breeder at the Lake Chad Research Institute, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.

Fermentation

The five varieties of sorghum were each weighed and 100g were collected in different flat bowls. Then 100g of each sample was then rinsed using water before it was drained. To these about 250ml of water was added. This was covered and kept for 72 hours away from light for fermentation to occur. After that, the fermented samples were washed thoroughly in water and dried for 94 hours (4 days approximately) as described by Pederson et al. 2000.

Proximate Analysis

The feed samples were analyzed to determine the Crude Protein (CP), Ether Extract (EE), Ash and Nitrogen Free Extract (NFE) using the method of A.O.A.C. (2000). The mineral element level was determined using Atomic Absorption method and in vitro protein digestibility was determined as described by Nills (1979).

Results

Physical Characteristics

All the five local varieties of sorghum used were dry and hard. Each of this cultivar had a unique colour characteristic that distinguished it from the other cultivars used. Averagely, they all had about the same size although “Mire” grains where slightly smaller than the others. For colour, “Chakalari white” had a white appearance, “Chakalari red” also appeared red in colour although having virtually the same characteristics as the Chakalari white except for colour. Mire had a blend of red and black colours but these grains were slightly smaller than all the other grains. Tumbuna was softer than all the grains and had a colour appearance of milkish white and little black spots at the tip of some of the grains. Yafimoro had a blend of colours to it, some of the grains had white, black and red spots on them with the white dominating while others had only the pure white and black colours in them. The grains looked thin and slim and it was a very hard grain.

Table 1 shows the results for the proximate analysis of the five varieties of sorghum that were analyzed. The percentage of dry matter ranged from 96.20 – 97.50 with raw Chakalari white having the highest value while raw Yafimoro had the lowest dry matter. Percentage crude protein ranged between 22.23 with raw Tumbuna having lowest percentage protein while processed mire had the highest percentage. Percentage crude fiber increased for all the processed varieties while percentage ash was relatively stable for all the varieties.

Table 1. Proximate analysis of the five local varieties of Sorghum

Variety/ Treatment

DM (%)

MC (%)

CP (%)

FAT (%)

CF (%)

ASH (%)

Chakalari white

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw

97.50

2.50

19.60

14.50

2.50

2.50

Processed

96.60

3.40

16.50

2.00

12.50

1.00

Chakalari red

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw

96.40

3.60

20.66

16.00

2.00

1.00

Processed

97.00

3.00

20.13

1.50

10.50

1.00

Mire

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw

96.00

4.00

18.73

15.00

1.50

2.50

Processed

96.50

3.50

22.23

1.00

9.50

2.50

Tumbuna

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw

96.40

3.60

9.97

13.50

3.50

1.00

Processed

96.60

3.40

18.20

2.00

14.50

1.50

Yafimoro

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw

96.20

3.80

22.23

13.50

4.00

1.00

Processed

96.80

3.20

18.03

2.00

12.50

1.00

DM = Dry Matter;  MC = Moisture Content;  CP = Crude Protein CF = Crude Fibre.

Table 2 shows that for all the varieties, digestibility occurred above 90% but maximum increase in digestibility was recorded in 2 hours when raw tumbuna (91.27%) increased to 93.79% upon digestion (processed). For the raw varieties, protein invitro digestibility ranged from 91.27% to 97.35% while for processed, digestibility ranged from 93.79% – 95.68%.

Table 2: Protein digestibility of the five local varieties of Sorghum.

Variety

Raw (%)

Processed (%)

2 Hrs

4 Hrs

6 Hrs

2 Hrs

4 Hrs

6 Hrs

Chakalari white

34.65

47.35

46.43

95.26

95.26

95.26

Chakalari red

32.22

44.92

42.22

94.39

95.23

95.68

Mire

42.87

45.84

45.84

95.28

95.28

96.68

Tumbuna

31.27

41.27

42.18

93.79

95.22

93.79

Yafimoro

35.59

36.09

46.09

94.68

95.19

94.18

Table 3 indicates the mineral element composition on the sorghum cultivars. These results showed that for each of the mineral assayed, there was a general decrease in composition when compared to both raw and processed varieties. The compositional range of the minerals was between 0.000% - 12.030%.

Table 4 shows the result for the determination of tannin content of the various cultivars. The tannin content for the raw variety ranged from 3.4 mg/g to 4.9 mg/g while that of the processed variety ranged from 3.2 – 4.7 (mg/g). The percentage reduction in tannin content ranged from 2.22% - 14.58 % with mire having the highest reduction in tannin content.

Discussion

Proximate analysis studies performed on the sorghum varieties vary slightly from that stated by Kent (1983). The observed differences could be due to difference in cultural practices, environmental conditions and in cultivars and varieties.

Proximate composition of a grain is important in that it helps in determining the quality and storage stability of grains. Protein digestibility studies conducted showed that processing increase protein in vitro digestibility as was stated by Pederson et al., (2000). It was also discovered that sorghum in vitro digestibility of protein all occurred at above 90% at 2 hours; this goes to show that sorghum grain is almost digested in vitro after 2 hours in normal conditions. Also based on the result obtained, the processing of sorghum significantly increased protein digestibility (p < 0.05), but with respect to time, after 2 hours, the level of significance of digestibility was not significant. 

Processing of the sorghum grain, from the results obtained significantly reduced the tannin content of the grain. This is in agreement with the work of Hibberd et al., (2003). Processing method (combined sprouting and fermentation) significantly reduces tannin content more than the other previously known methods such as malting, steeping, fermentation, sprouting alone e.tc.

As for the mineral element level, the results showed a marked decrease in almost all the mineral compositional contents of the processed grains when compared with the raw. This is so because during the various processing techniques, the pericarps of some grains are removed while the grains (some) break open. Also the aleurone layers of some of these cereals are lost thus resulting in this massive decrease. This is so because almost mineral elements are found on either the pericarp or the aleurone layer of the grain. This work is in agreement with previous studies which reported that, processing of cereals depletes their tannin content (Gee and Harold, 2004).

Table 4: Tanin content of the five local varieties of Sorghum.

Variety

Raw (mg/g)

Processed (mg/g)

% Reduction

Chakalari white

3.4

1.2

5.88

Chakalari red

4.8

2.7

2.08

Mire

4.8

2.1

14.58

Tumbuna

4.9

2.7

4.08

Yafimoro

4.5

2.4

2.22

Conclusion

Based on the study carried out, it can be concluded that far above sprouting or fermentation singly, the combined processing of  sprouting and fermentation, reduces tannin content, with a resultant increase in vitro protein digestibility. However, the mineral composition decreases and therefore the fortification of processed sorghum varieties to be consumed should be encouraged so as to replenish the nutrients that are lost during processing.

References

  • A.O.A.C. (2000). Official method of analysis. 10th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC. pp. 1008 -1009.
  • Brune, J. J., Cadle, C., Juan, P. O. and Harris, R.N. (1989). Tannins and mineral absorption. Journal of Pharmacology, 81: 29-41.
  • Davidson, S., Passmore, R., Brock, J.F. and Truswell, A.S., (1979). Millets. In: Human Nutrition and Dietetics Churchill Livingstone. p. 175.
  • F. A. O. (2006). Official Agricultural statistics 18th edition, Food and Agricultural Organization, Canada. Pg 1002 – 1004.
  • Guathier, S.F., Vachon, C., Jones J.D., and Savoie E., (1982). Assessment of protein digestibility by in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis with simultaneous dialysis. Journal of Nutrition 112: 1718-1725.
  • Gee, M. C. and Harold, G. W. (2004). An assessment of the tannin content of wild sorghum. Journal of Crop Science, 43:1850 – 1870.
  • Hibberd, C.A., Wagner, D.G., Scheum, R.L., Mitchell, E.D., Hintz, R.L. and Weibel D.E. (2003) Nutritive characteristics of different varieties of sorghum and corn grains. Textbook on Cereals. McGraw Hill New Delhi. Pp. 98-100.
  • Hurel, C.J., Dowen, P., Cornado, R.N., Cely, O. and Susu, H.H. (1999). Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds. Indian journal of chemistry, 33: 11-22.
  • Inyang, C.U. and Zakari, U.M. (2008). Effect of germination and fermentation of pearl millet on proximate, chemical and sensory properties of instant “Fura”- a Nigerian cereal food. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 7 (1): 9-12.
  • Kent, N.L. (1983). Technology of cereals. An introduction for Students of Food Science and Agriculture. 3rd Edition. Pergamon Press, New York.
  • Lewis, S. H. and Elvin, I. C. (1977). Inhibitory effects of tannins. Journal of Ethnopharmacology; 44: 32 -39.
  • Mauder, B. (2006). Sorghum: The global grain of the future. Retrieved 8th July, 2008 from http://www.sorghumgrowers.com/sorghum.
  • Nills, B.B. (1979). In vitro digestibility of Barkary and other cereals. Journal of Food Science 30: 583-589.
  • Pederson, J.F., Milton, T. and Mass, R.A. (2000). A twelve hour in vitro procedure for sorghum grain feed quality assessment. Journal of Crop Science. 40:204-208.
  • Reed, J. D. (1995). Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. Journal of Animal Science 73: Pg 1516-1528.

Copyright © 2011 Klobex Academic Publishers


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[bk11012t3.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil