search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Journal of Culture Collections
National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures
ISSN: 1310-8360
Vol. 3, Num. 1, 2002, pp. 48-52
Journal of Culture Collections, Volume 3, 2000-2002, pp. 48-52

IDENTIFICATION OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM KATYK, GOAT’S MILK AND CHEESE

Lilia Tserovska*, Stanka Stefanova and Tanya Yordanova

National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, 1113 Sofia, P.O.Box 239, Bulgaria

Code Number: cc02007

Summary

Eighteen lactic acid bacterial strains were isolated from home made katyk, goat’s milk and cheese. Nine of them belonged to lactic acid cocci and others were referred to genus Lactobacillus. Five strains were identified to species by determination of morphological, cultural, physiological and biochemical characteristics - Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus plantarum.

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria are widely distributed in the nature. In this group are included representatives of the genus Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus and Leuconostoc. They could be isolated from soils, waters, plants, silages, waste products, and also from the intestinal tract of animals and humans. The lactic acid fermentation, which these bacteria perform has long been known and applied by the humans for making different foodstuffs. It plays an essential role in the production of all dairy products and is involved in the production of many other foods and drinks – sausages, pickles, boza etc. Since decades by these processes the application of well-studied starter cultures was established. They should possess stable fermentation characteristics and should be resistant to bacteriophages [5]. In our country at domestic conditions dairy products are prepared from cow, but also from sheepish, goat’s and buffalo-cow’s milk – such as cheese, curds, katyk (specific national dairy product), yellow cheese, etc. By these products the species composition of lactic acid bacteria is more various and inconstant when compared with those of the trade products. The “wild” strains, in biotechnological aspect are perspective as bacteriocin producers [6, 10] and probiotics [3, 4]. They have a potential use for the establishing of new, the so-called “functional foods” [3, 9].

The aim of the recent study was the isolation and taxonomic determination of lactic acid bacteria from home made katyk and products of goat’s milk in order for their including in original Bulgarian collection of lactic acid strains.

Materials and methods

Isolation of lactic acid bacteria. The lactic acid bacteria were isolated form home made katyk of cow’s milk in the Sofia region (2 samples), yogurt of goat’s milk (2) and goat’s cheese (2) of Tabashko village, Troyan region. The isolation was performed by the routine microbiological procedure and inoculation on a solid medium. Selective media for lactic acid bacteria were used – MRS-agar and M-17 agar. The cultivation was performed without shaking at the appropriate temperature (32 and 40°C) for five days. From katyk were isolated only termophilic strains and they were cultivated at temperature 42-45°C. Once single colonies were obtained they were inoculated in MRS broth or M-17 broth. After growing the cultures were diluted and tested for purity on the suitable agar medium.

Identification of the bacterial strains. The determination of the strains was performed according to their morphological, cultural, physiological and biochemical characteristics by the procedures described in the Bergey’s Manual [1]. For performing the biochemical tests a medium with the following com-position was used (g/l): bovine extract – 10.0; neopeptone – 10.0; yeast extract – 5.0; Tween 80 –1 ml; K2HPO4 – 2.0; CH3COONa x 3H2O – 5.0; diamonium citrate – 2.0; MgSO4 – 0.2; MnSO4 – 0.05; bromcresol purple – 0.17. The carbon source was added to the sterile basal medium as filter sterilized solution to a final concentration of 1 %. Carbohydrates utilization was assessed at the 24th, 48th hour and on the 7th day of the strain growth at the corresponding temperature.

For identification of the lactic acid bacteria API 50 CH tests (bioMerieux) were also used. 

Results and Discussion

From the tested samples eighteen lactic acid bacterial cultures were isolated. After the original characterization nine of them were determined as representatives of the lactic acid cocci, and the rest were referred to genus Lactobacillus. The strains K1, K2, Ch1, Ch2 and Ch3 were determined to species.

The strains K1 and K2 isolated from katyk were cocci – Gram-positive, nonspore-forming, nonmotile, catalase-negative, facultative an-aerobes. Their morphological, cultural and physiological characteristics are shown in Table 1, and the biochemical – in Table 2. As a result of the investigations the strain K1 was determined as Pediococcus acidilactici and the strain K2 as Pediococcus pentosaceus. Both strains curdled the milk very well, which is not typical for the pediococci. This characteristic could be explained with adaptive alterations as a result of growth in the tested substrate. The strains were deposited in the National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (NBIMCC) with accession numbers 3437 and 3545, respectively, and were kept in a freeze-dried state. Representatives of these two species from the genus Pediococcus find biotechnological application by the processing and conservation of meat and vegetable foods and play an essential role as components of trade starter cultures by sausage production [8].

Table 1. Morphological, cultural and physiological characteristics of the isolated strains.

Characteristics

Strains

K1

K2

Ch1

Ch2

Ch3

Cell morphology

cocci in tetrads

a group of two or four cocci

thin, long rods

medium-long rods, rounded ends

short, rounded rods

Gram stain reaction

G+

G+

G+

G+

G+

Spores formation

-

-

-

-

-

Colony morphology

grey-white, 1-2 mm

grey-white, 1-2 mm

small-sized, slightly convex, R,  <1 mm

circular, irregular, “snowflake” type, 1-2 mm

circular, white, glistening, convex, 1 mm

Catalase activity

-

-

-

-

-

Glucose fermentation

+

+

+

+

+

NH3 from arginine

+

+

-

-

-

Growth at temperature (oC)

15

ND

ND

-

-

+

30

+

+

+

+

+

45

+

+

+

+

-

50

+

-

ND

ND

ND

Growth in a medium with
NaCl (%)

4

+

+

ND

ND

ND

6.5

+

+

ND

ND

ND

Gelatin liquefaction

ND

ND

-

-

-

Milk curdle

+

+

+

+

+

pH optimum

6.5

6.5

5.8-6.5

5.8-6.5

5.8-6.5

Legend: positive reaction (+), negative reaction (-), not determined (ND).

Table 2. Biochemical characteristics of the tested strains – acid production by utilization of carbon sources.

Carbon sources

Strains

Carbon sources

Strains

K1

K2

Ch1

Ch2

Ch3

K1

K2

Ch1

Ch2

Ch3

Arabinose

-

+

-

-

+

Melibiose

-

+

-

-

+

Cellobiose

+

 

-

-

+

Raffinose

-

+

-

-

+

Esculin

+

+

-

-

+

Rhamnose

-

-

-

-

-

Fructose

+

+

+

+

+

Ribose

+

+

-

-

+

Galactose

+

+

+

+

+

Salicine

+

+

-

-

+

Glucose

+

+

+

+

+

Sorbotol

-

-

-

-

+

Lactose

-

-

+

+

+

Sorbose

-

-

ND

ND

ND

Maltose

-

+

+

+

+

Sucrose

-

-

+

-

+

Mannitol

-

-

-

-

+

Trehalose

-

+

-

+

+

Mannose

+

+

-

+

+

Xylose

-

-

-

-

-

Melezitose

-

-

-

-

+

           

Legend: positive reaction (+), negative reaction (-), not determined (ND).

The other three lactic acid cultures were referred to genus Lactobacillus. They are Gram-positive, nonspore-forming rods, catalase-negative, microaerophilic, with fermentative metabolism. For their identification to species the morphological, cultural, physiological and biochemical characteristics were tested. The data are shown in Table 1 and Table 2.

The strain Ch1 could be determined as a representative of the obligate homofermentative species Lactobacillus delbrueckii. The all three subspecies of the species (subspp. bulgaricus, delbrueckii and lactis) are characterized with a narrow fermentation profile. The studied strain was able to ferment glucose, fructose, lactose, galactose and maltose. It is the closest to Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus although the dissimilation of the last two carbohydrates is not characteristic for the type strain.

As a result of the taxonomic studies the tested strain Ch2 was determined as Lactobacillus helveticus. Its morphological, cultural and biochemical characteristics were identical with those of the type strain. This species belongs to the group of the termophilic lactobacilli, obligate homofermentative type and is included in starter cultures by the production of the cheese Gruyere, Gorgonzola, Mozarella [2].

The phenotype analysis of the strain Ch3 indicated its relativity to Lactobacillus plantarum. This strain belongs to the group of the mesophilic lactobacilli, which are commonly met in the later phase of the maturing of the cheese, together with Lb. casei, Lb. brevis and Lb. buchneri [2]. Olarte noted that the presence of Lb. plantarum by the production of the cheese Cameros from goat’s milk decreased the number of the enterobacteria and fecal coliforms in the final product [7].

The two strains from genus Pediococcus were isolated from katyk – Pediococcus acidilactici and Pediococcus pentosaceus. From goat’s yogurt was isolated Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and from home made goat’s cheese Lactobacillus helveticus and Lactobacillus plantarum. These strains showed some non-essential phenotypic differences from the type strain due to the specificity of the substrates and the growth conditions. The “wild” strains have potential as producers of growth inhibition factors, which play important role in the interaction within the mixed cultures and the investigations in this direction will continue.

References

  1. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 1984. N. Krieg (Ed), vol. 1, 2, Baltirnore: Williams and Wilkins.
  2. Hammes, W., N. Weiss, W. Holzapfel, 1999. The Prokaryotes, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1-103.
  3. Holzapfel, W., P. Habere, R. Geisen, J. Bjorkroth, U. Schillinger, 2001. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73, 365-373.
  4. Kitazawa, H., S. Ueha, S. Itoh, H. Watanabe, K. Konno, Y. Kawai, T. Saito, T. Itoh, T. Yamaguchi, 2001. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 65, 9(3), 149-62.
  5. Lee, B., 1996. Bacteria-based processes and products. In: Fundamentals of Food Biotechnology VEH, B. Lee (Ed), New York: 219-290.
  6. Leisner, J. J., B. Pot, H. Christensen, G. Rusul, J.E. Olsen, B. W. Wee, K. Muhamad, H.M. Ghazali, 1999. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 65 (2), 599-605.
  7. Olarte, C., S. Sanz, E. Gonzalez, P. Torre, 2000. J. Appl. Microbiol., 88 (9), 421-429.
  8. Raccach, M., 1987. Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 14, 291-309.
  9. Reid, G, 1999. Appl. Env. Microbiol., 65(9), 3763-3766.
  10. Vaughan, A., V. Eijsink, Tf. O’Sullivan, K. O’Hanlon, D. van Sinderen, 2001. J. Appl. Microbiol., 91 (1), 131-138.

Copyright 2002 - National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures - Bulgaria

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil