search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Journal of Culture Collections
National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures
ISSN: 1310-8360
Vol. 5, Num. 1, 2006, pp. 16-24

Journal of Culture Collections, Volume 5, 2006-2007, pp. 16-24

PPROTEASE ACTIVITY OF SOME MESOPHILIC STREPTOMYCETES ISOLATED FROM EGYPTIAN HABITATS

Hala M. Rifaat1*, Osama H. El-Said2, Sadia M. Hassanein3 and Manal S. M. Selim2

1Microbial Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, Bohos Street, Cairo, Egypt,
2Microbial Biotechnology Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt;
3Microbiology Department, Ein Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

*Corresponding author, e-mail: halamohamed6@hotmail.com

Code Number:cc06003

Summary

Different streptomycetes (317 isolates) were obtained from several sources and areas in Egypt and were screened for proteolytic activity. Thirty nine of them produced proteases and were subjected to identification. Streptomyces anulatus formed the most abundant portion of the isolates. This species deserves special attention because it is a good candidate for biotechnological applications.

Key words: Egypt, identification, isolation, protease, streptomycetes.

Introduction

Proteases are one of the three largest groups of industrial enzymes. They account for nearly 60 % of the total enzyme sales covering about 20 % of the world market, and they are used mainly in detergents [15, 26, 37]. Proteases possess high catalytic activity and substrate specificity. They can be industrially produced in large quantities and are economically essential for the detergent, protein, brewing, meat, photographic, leather, and dairy industries.

Proteases are common enzymes in plant and animal tissues, fungi, and bacteria. Microorganisms are the preferred proteases producers, as they grow rapidly, require small cultivation space, and can easily be subjected to genetic manipulation. Bacterial proteases are industrially the most significant compared to animal and fungal proteases [37].

The possible use of streptomycetes for enzyme production has recently been investigated, and proteases have been obtained from various species [2, 21]. The streptomycetes comprise Gram-positive bacteria of high G+C content and unusual morphological complexity, which develop in their life cycle substrate and aerial mycelia, sporophores and spores [5]. Several proteases were obtained from streptomycetes and were biochemically characterized, such as serine protease produced by Streptomyces pactum, metallo- and serine proteases from Str. exfoliatus, and aminopeptidase from Str. rimosus [3, 17, 18, 36]. These enzymes are involved in the assimilation of proteinaceous nitrogen sources, degradation of aerial mycelium sporulation process, as well as in antibiotic production [16, 19]. In Egypt, high quantities of proteases are imported from abroad and it was found of great interest and of economic importance to produce industrially these enzymes by use of microorganisms.

The aim of the present investigation was to isolate and characterize mesophilic streptomycetes strains and test them for proteolytic activity. The Streptomyces isolates that showed considerable proteolytic activity were taxonomically identified.

Materials and Methods

Sampling and sampling sites. Samples were collected from three different types of sources from five Egypt governorates. The industrial source was taken from Cairo Tanneries sewage (T) and soil around it (Ts), the agricultural soil from Plant Island at Aswan (As) and agricultural field at El-Sharkia (Es). The water sources were obtained from a fish farm at Port Said (Fw), sediments with neutral (Fs) and alkaline pH (Fs*), and Qaroun Lake water (Q) at El Fayoum.

Isolation of streptomycetes. The serial dilution method was applied for isolation of streptomycetes, and each sample was diluted to 10-6 [12]. Eight agar media were used for isolation as follows: starch-nitrate [24], malt-yeast extract [29], Difco actinomycetes isolation, brain-heart infusion (BHI) [22], modified glucose-aspartic acid-ammonium nitrate, modified starch–aspartic acid-ammonium nitrate [8], lactose-peptone [6] and maltose-leucine-lycine [20]. 0.1 ml inoculum of the appropriate dilution was placed on each plate. The plates were incubated at 28 oC for 7-14 days to allow the slow growing forms to develop. Streptomycetes were isolated based on their specific morphological characteristics and then subjected to purification.

Screening for proteolytic activity. The streptomycete isolates were screened for their ability to produce protease. The enzyme activity was determined by three different methods. Extracellular protease production was assess-ed by the size of the clear zone as poor (≤1), fair (≤2), good (≤3) and very good (>3) on 3 % brain heart infusion supplemented with gelatin [22] and on egg-yolk agar [25]. The ability of the isolates to liquefy gelatin was rated as well [10].

Identification of streptomycetes. The active streptomycetes isolates were taxonomically identified through morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomical investigations. The following tests were carried out: colony and micromorphological characteristics, pigment production, lecithinase, lipolysis, proteolysis, hydrolysis of pectin, chitin, hipurate, degradation of xanthine, elastine, arbutin, utilisation of sucrose, I-inositol, D-fructose, xylose, galactose, glucose, L-arabinose, rhamnose, D-mannitol, raffinose, NO3- reduction, H2S production, whole cell sugar pattern and cell wall chemotype [13, 33, 34, 38].

Statistical analysis. The streptomycetes isolates showing proteolytic activity were subjected to all the tests listed. The obtained data were examined for normality and homogeneity of variance. Analysis was done using the SPSS software package for the dendrograms generation [31], similarity calculations were based on simple matching (SSM). The UPGMA algorithm was applied for dendrogam generation.

Results and Discussion

A wide range of methods can be applied to detect proteases using gelatin as a subtrate [11]. Another approach is based on substrate hydrolysis as an evidence for gelatinase-like proteases production [4]. Egg yolk is routinely used in proteolytic activity detection test systems [1].

A total of 317 streptomycete isolates were obtained on the eight different isolation media from the various collected samples. All of them were screened for protease production on 3 % BHI supplemented with gelatin, gelatin and egg-yolk agar medium. 39 isolates demonstrated proteolytic activity (Table 1). They originated from all the studied samples except those from Cairo Tanneries sewage (T). The activity was the best on BHI with gelatin, and it was moderate on the other two media what conformed to the results of Vermelho et al. [35] who reported that streptomycetes hydrolyzed preferentially gelatin incorporated in BHI. As actinomycetes are known to be good protease producers [9, 27], the protein substrate and the composition of the medium could markedly influence the extracellular protease production [35]. Differences in the ability to utilize various protein substrates may be due to substrate specificity of the produced enzyme [28]. Gelatin, being a type 1 collagen, is the most effective protease inducing substrate. It is possible that the gelatin, as a high molecular weight protein, increases the protease production to degrade the substrate to a suitable form for the microorganisms.

Table 1. Proteolytic activity of some mesophilic streptomycetes isolated on different media.

Medium

Number of strains and activity

Poor

Fair

Good

Very good

3 % BHI + Gelatine

2

Es 48, 112

10

Es 4, 24, 37, 127; As 81; Fs 1, 19; Fw 13, 14; Q1

18

Es 5, 81, 119, 130; As 8, 10, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77; Fs 3, 13, 16; Fw 11; Fs*4; Ts 3

9

Es 22, 117; As 22, 94; Fs 35: Fs*5; Ts 5, 6, 9

Gelatine medium

9

Es 24, 37, 48, 112, 117; As 8, 81; Fs* 4, 5

23

Es 4, 5, 22, 81, 119, 127, 130; As 10, 22, 49, 53, 71, 77, 94; Fs16; Fw 11, 13, 14; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

7

As  45, 75 ; Fs 1, 3, 13, 19, 35

None

Egg-yolk agar

11

Es 22, 81, 112, 130; As  8, 22, 45, 75; Fw 11, 13; Ts3

15

Es 4, 117, 119; As 10, 49, 53, 71, 81; Fs 13, 19; Fw14; Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

13

Es 5, 24, 37, 48, 127; As 77, 94; Fs 1, 3, 16, 35; Fs* 4, 5

None

The methods described above are quite relevant for detecting extracellular protease directly in the culture medium. The use of gelatin in the culture medium provides a qualitative assay, which is a simple, inexpensive, straight-forward method to assess the proteolytic activity of a given microbial colony. Thus, in addition, substrate selection is comfortable since low molecular weight (egg yolk) or high molecular weight (gelatin) proteins could be used. Consequently, simplicity is the greatest advantage of these methods, although they cannot be used for quantitative analyses.

The isolates that showed proteolytic activity were characterized and identified. The results of the morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomical tests presented in Tables 2 and 3 were subjected to statistical analysis (SPSS) and a dendrogram of the active streptomycetes isolates was plotted (Fig. 1). Using the determinative keys [13, 33, 34, 38] different Streptomyces species were identified. The cell walls of all the strains contained the diagnostic amino acid L-DAP and did not contain diagnostic sugars. This is characteristic for the species of genus Streptomyces

Table 2. Morphological characteristics of some streptomycetes isolates.

Characteristics

Number of positive strains

Spore chain morphology

Closed spiral

 

1

 

Es4

Flexible

15

Es 5, 37, 81, 112, 117, 130; As 49, 53, 75; Fs 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw14

Flexible, straight

12

Es24; As 8, 71, 77, 81, 94; Fw13; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

Straight

4

Es 22, 48, 127; As45

Straight, flexible

3

Es119; As10; Fs*4

Hooks

4

As22; Fs1; Fw11; Fs*5

Spore surface

ornamentation

Smooth

 

 

34

 

 

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 81, 127, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 71, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

Spiny

4

Es 112, 117, 119; As75

Hairy

1

As53

Colour of spore mass

Medium grey

 

4

 

Es 4, 5, 48; As81

Light grey

11

Es 24, 81, 112, 117; As 10, 45, 77; Fs 1, 13,19; Fw11

Dark grey

3

As 8, 22, 53

Grey

5

Es37; As71; Fs16; Ts 3, 6

Yellow

4

Es 22, 130; Fs 3, 35

Green

2

Es 119, 127; Fw14

White

4

As49; Ts 5, 9; Q1

Blue

1

As 75

Pink

4

As94; Fw13; Fs* 4, 5

Pigmentation of

substrate mycelium

Yellow brown

 

 

36

 

 

 

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 81, 112, 117, 127, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

Yellow

1

Es119

Dark yellow brown

1

As94

Dark brown

1

Ts3

Diffusible pigments

Yellow

 

6

 

Es22; As 71, 75; Fs 3, 35; Ts9

Citrin yellow

1

Es119

Orange

1

Fw11

Citrin orange

1

Es130

Orange citrin

3

As 49, 94; Fs16

Table 3. Physiological characteristics of streptomycetes isolates.

Characteristics

Number of strains

Positive

Negative

Utilization of
carbon sources

L-Arabinose



22



Es 4, 24, 37, 48, 81, 112, 117; As 10, 22, 45, 53, 71, 77; Fs 1, 13, 16, 35; Fw 13; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9



17



Es 5, 22,119, 127, 130; As 8, 49, 75, 81, 94; Fs 3, 19 Fw 11, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Q1

D-Fructose

28

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 81, 112, 127, 130; As 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 81; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 14; Fs*5; Ts3; Q1

11

Es 48, 117, 119; As 8, 77, 94; Fw13; Fs*4; Ts 5, 6, 9

Sucrose

27

Es 4, 5, 24, 37, 81, 112, 117, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81; Fs 13, 16, 35; Fw 11, 13; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

12

Es 22, 48, 119, 127; As 45, 94; Fs1, 3, 19; Fw14; Fs* 4, 5

Rhamnose

23

Es 4, 5, 24, 37, 81, 117, 119, 127, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81; Fs 1, 16, 19; Fw13; Ts3

16

Es 22, 48, 112; As 49, 94; Fs 3, 13, 35; Fw 11, 14; Fs* 4, 5 Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

D-Mannitol

33

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 81, 117, 119, 127; As 8, 10, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 14; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

6

Es 112, 130; As22; Fw13; Fs* 4, 5

D-xylose

28

Es 4, 22, 24, 37, 48, 112, 117, 119, 127; As 8, 10, 22, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 16, 35; Fw11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts3; Q1

11

Es 5, 81, 130; As45; Fs 1, 3, 13, 19; Ts 5, 6, 9

Raffinose

13

Es 37, 48, 81, 119; As 8, 10, 22, 71, 75, 77 Fs19; Fw11; Ts3

26

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 112, 117, 127, 130; As 45, 49, 53, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 35; Fw 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

I-inositol

15

Es 4, 5, 24, 81, 112, 117, 130; As 22, 53, 75, 77, 81; Fs1; Fw11; Ts3

24

Es 22, 37, 48, 119, 127; As 8, 10, 45, 49, 71, 94 Fs 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

Galactose

37

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 112, 117, 119, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

2

Es 81, 127

H2S production

31

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 81, 112, 117, 119, 127, 130; As 8, 22, 49, 53, 71, 75, 81, 94; Fs 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 13, 14; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9

8

As 10, 45, 77; Fs1; Fw11; Fs* 4, 5; Q1

Nitrate reduction

31

Es 5, 22, 24, 37, 112, 119, 127; As 8, 10, 22, 49, 71, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

8

Es 4, 48, 81, 117, 130; As 45, 53, 75

Table 3. Continued.

Characteristics

Number of strains

Positive

Negative

Degradation of

Xanthine

 

16

 

Es 4, 5, 81, 119; As 10, 22, 53, 75, 81; Fs1; Fw11; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 5, 6, 9

 

23

 

Es 22, 24, 37, 48, 112, 117, 127, 130; As 8, 45, 49, 71, 77, 94; Fs 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 13, 14; Ts3; Q1

Elastine

 

None

 

All

Arbutin

36

Fs 4,15, 22, 24, 37, 81, 112, 117, 119, 127, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 5, 6, 9; Q1

3

Es48; Fw13; Ts3

Pectine

13

Es 4, 5, 24, 37, 48; As 8, 49, 53, 71; Fs 1, 13, 16, 35

26

Es 22, 81, 112, 117, 119, 127, 130; As 10, 22, 45, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 3, 19; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

Chitin

 

None

 

All

Enzyme activity

Protease

 

38

 

Es 4, 5, 22, 24, 37, 48, 81, 112, 117, 119, 127, 130; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 75, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9

 

1

 

Q1

Lipase

18

Es 4, 37, 130; As 10, 22, 45, 49, 71, 81; Fs3, 35; Fw 11, 13, 14; Ts 3, 5, 6; Q1

21

Es 5, 22, 24, 48, 112, 117, 119, 127; As 8, 53, 75, 77, 94; Fs 1, 13, 16, 19; Fs* 4, 5; Ts9

Lecitinase

27

Es 4, 5, 24, 48, 81, 112, 127, 130; As 10, 45, 49, 53, 71, 77, 81; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19, 35; Fw14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 6, 9

12

Es 22, 37, 117, 119; As 8, 22, 75, 94; Fw 11, 13; Ts5; Q1

Melanine

production on

Iron agar

 

 

16

 

 

Es 22, 48, 112, 119, 130; As 8, 22, 45, 49, 75; Fs 1, 3, 16, 35; Fw 13, 14

 

 

23

 

 

 

Es 4, 5, 24, 37, 81, 117, 127; As 10, 53, 71, 77, 81, 94; Fs 13, 19; Fw11; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

Tyrosine agar

6

Es 22, 112, 119, 130; As75; Fs35

33

 

Es 4, 5, 24, 37, 48, 81, 117, 127; As 8, 10, 22, 45, 49, 53, 71, 77, 81, 94; Fs 1, 3, 13, 16, 19; Fw 11, 13, 14; Fs* 4, 5; Ts 3, 5, 6, 9; Q1

The most frequently isolated streptomycetes (43.6 %) were identified as Str. anulatus (Fig. 2). The strains in this group belonged to the yellow and grey colour series, and formed spores with smooth surface arranged in rectiflexibiles or occasionally spiral chains. As a rule, they did not produce melanoid pigments, with a few positive exceptions, particularly on tyrosine agar. This phenotypically variable species is widespread in nature where decaying organic matter is present. Based on the phenotypic scheme of Williams et al. [38], Str. alboniger, Str. aureofaciens and Str. griseus are nomen species of Str. anulatus, and all they produce extracellular proteases [20, 23, 32].

It is intriguing that the closest phenotypic relative of Str. anulatus, Str. albidoflavus was also detected (10.3 %). The two clusters were connected at 80 % SSM, and that was in accordance with the results of Williams et al. [38] who reported the level of similarity at 77.5 %. Most strains in this group had rectiflexibiles spore chains and smooth spore surface. Melanoid pigments were rarely produced. The spore colour was yellow or sometimes white. Proteases have been detected in cultures of Str. albidoflavus [16, 30]. The genome sequencing of Str. coelicolor, subjective synonym of Str. albidoflavus, reveals a multide of putative protease genes [14].

Five strains (12.8 %) were identified as Str. microflavus. Their sporophores were rectiflexibiles or spiral, the spore surface was smooth and the spore mass was grey. Most strains produced melanoid pigments.

Another cluster was identified as Str. exfoliatus (5.1 %). These strains also had rectiflexibiles spore chains, smooth spore surface, and the spore mass was grey. Some strains produced melanoid pigments. Kim et al. has mentioned that Str. exfoliatus produces proteases. Single member phenons were also detected as Str. lydicus (5.1 %), Str. chromofuscus (5.1 %), and Str. lavendulae (2.6 %). Two small clusters were identified as Str. atroolivaceus and Str. violaceus (5.1 % each). Only two isolates (5.1 %) could not be identified at species-level and remained to be referred as Streptomyces sp. All of the Streptomyces species studied possessed rectiflexibiles or spiral spore chains, the spore surface was smooth, spiny or hairy, and the spore mass was yellow or grey. Melanoid pigments were produced by all but few of the strains. All the identified Streptomyces species are well known as active producers of proteases [7, 16].

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the production of multiple extracellular proteolytic enzymes by different Streptomyces species isolated from several sources, which were coordinate during growth. More than 300 streptomycetes strains were screened for protease activity in three assay media and 39 of them actively produced proteases. Rapid, sensitive detection and qualitative assay of streptomycetes proteases were highly desirable. The production of proteases was much more sensitively detected on 3 % BHI containing gelatin than on gelatin or egg yolk agar media. The streptomycetes isolates that were active in protease production were subjected to identification. The obtained results displayed Str. anulatus as the major source for proteases. This species is widely acknowledged as a vast reservoir of natural products with different activities. The diverse metabolic capacities of Str. anulatus strains and their specific growth characteristics, i. e. mycelium formation and relatively rapid colonization of selective substrates, facilitate their collecting as suited proteases producers. Beside Str. anulatus, different Streptomyces species contribute to the production of proteases. These organisms grow in various environments. The use of indigenous strains for pro-teases production is an alternative approach, since the organisms have been already adapted to the habitat.

References

  1. Anson, M. L., 1939. J. Gen. Physiol., 22, 79-89.
  2. Aphale, J. S., W. R. Strohl, 1993. J. Gen. Microbiol., 139, 417-424.
  3. Bockle, B., B. Galunsky, R. Muller, 1995. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 3705-3710.
  4. Branquinha, M. H., A. B. Vermelho, S. Goldenberg, M. C. Bonaldo, 1996. J. Euk. Microbiol., 43, 131-135.
  5. Chater, K. F., D. A. Hopwood, 1984. Streptomyces genetics. In: The biology of actinomycetes, M. Goodfellow, M. Mordarski, S. Williams (Eds.) London: Academic Press, 229-286.
  6. Daguerre, R.,C. M. Cuevas, L. A. Mazza, A. P. Balatti, 1975. Rev. Assoc. Argent. Microbiol., 7, 49-55.
  7. De, S., A. L. Chandra, 1982. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol., 4, 158-160.
  8. El-Shanshoury, A. R., M. A. El-Sayed, W. A. El-Shonny, 1994. Acta. Microbiol. Pol., 43, 313-320.
  9. Goodfellow, M., S. T. Williams, M. Mordarski, 1988. Actinomycetes. In: Actinomycetes in biotechnology, M. Goodfellow, S. T. Williams, M. Mordarski (Eds.), London: Academic Press, 313-320.
  10. Gordon, R. E., J. M. Mihm, 1957. J. Bacteriol., 73, 15-27.
  11. Grubb, J. D., 1994. Methods Enzymol., 235, 602-606.
  12. Hayakawa, M., H. Nonomura, 1987. J. Ferment. Technol., 65, 501-509.
  13. Holt, G. J., N. R. Krieg, P. H. A. Sneath, J. T. Staley, S. T. Williams (Eds), 1994. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  14. Hoskisson, P. A., V. Makin, H. Taylor, G. P. Sharples, G. Hobbs, 2001. Biotechnol. Lett., 23, 185-187.
  15. Kalisz, M. H., 1988. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechn., 36, 17-25.
  16. Kang, S. G., I. S. Kim, Y. T. Rho, K. J. Lee, 1995. Microbiology, 141, 3095-3103.
  17. Kim, I. S., K. J. Lee, 1995. Microbiology, 141, 1017-1025.
  18. Kim, I. S., Y. B. Kim, K. J. Lee, 1998. Biochem. J., 331, 539-545.
  19. Kitadokora, K., H. Tsuzuki, E. Nakamura, T. Sato, H. Teraoka, 1994. Eur. J. Biochem., 220, 55-61.
  20. Laluce, C., R. Molinari, 1977. Instituto de Quimica, UNESP, Araraquara, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 14, 800-821.
  21. Lampel, J. S., J. S. Aphale, K. A. Lampel, W. R. Strohl, 1992. J. Bacteriol., 174, 2797-2808.
  22. Lantz, M. S., P. Ciborowski, 1994. Methods Enzymol., 235,563-594.
  23. Lopes, A., R. R. Coelho, M. N. Meirelles, M. H. Branquinha, A. B. Vermelho, 1999. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Crus., Rio de Janeriro, 94, 763- 770.
  24. Naguib, M. I., K. M. Zeinat, F. A. Mansour, 1978. Egypt. J. Bot., 21, 9-17.
  25. Nitsch, B., H. J. Kutzner, 1969. Experientia, 25, 113.
  26. Outtrup, H., C. O. L. Boyce, 1990. Microbial proteinases and biotechnology. In: Microbial enzymes and biotechnology, W. M. Fogarty, C. T.  Kelly, (Eds), New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 227-254.
  27. Peczynska-Czoch, W., M. Mordarski, 1988. Actinomycetes enzymes. In: Actinomycetes in biotechnology, M. Goodfellow, S. T. Williams, M.  Mordarski, (Eds.), London: Academic Press, 219-283.
  28. Ponsare, A. C., V. Venugopai, N. Lewis, 1985. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 58, 101-104.
  29. Pridham, T. G., P. Anderson, C. Foley, H. A. Lindenfelser, C. W. Hesseltine, R. G., Benedict, 1956-1957. Antimicrob. Ann., 947-953.
  30. Rho, Y. T., H. T. Kim, K. H. Oh, H. I. Kang, A. C. Ward, M. Goodfellow, Y. C. Hah, K. J. Lee, 1992. Korean J. Microbiol., 30, 278-285.
  31. Sokal, R. R., C. D. Michener, 1958. University Kansas Scientific Bulletin, 38, 1409-1438.
  32. Spungin, A., S. Blumberg, 1989. Eur. J. Biochem., 183, 471-477.
  33. Szabo, I. M., M. Marton, I. C. Buti, 1978. A Botany Academic Science Hungary, 21, 387-418.
  34. Tresner, H. D., E. J. Backus, 1963. Appl. Microbiol., 11, 335-338.
  35. Vermelho, A. B., M. N. L. Meirelles, A. Lopes, S. D. G. Petinate, A. A. Chaia, M. H. Branquinha, 1996. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz., 91, 755-760.
  36. Vitale, J., I. Skrtie, M. Abramie, 1996. Arch. Microbiol., 165, 409-414.
  37. Ward, O. P., 1985. Proteolytic enzymes. In: Comprehensive biotechnology, M. Moo Young (Ed.), New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 789-818.
  38. Williams, S. T., M. Goodfellow, G. Alderson, E. M. H. Wellington, P. H. A. Sneath, M. J. Sackin, 1983. J. Gen. Microbiol., 129, 1743-1813.

Copyright 2006 - National Bank for Industrial Microorganisms and Cell Cultures - Bulgaria


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[cc06003f1.jpg] [cc06003f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil