Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Medknow Publications on behalf of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine ISSN: 0972-5229 EISSN: 1998-359x Vol. 15, Num. 2, 2011, pp. 102-107

Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 2, April-June, 2011, pp. 102-107

Research Article

Serum lactate levels as the predictor of outcome in pediatric septic shock

Kana Ram Jat¹, Urmila Jhamb², Vinod K Gupta³

¹ Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi; Department of Pediatrics, Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
² Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
³ Department of Biochemistry, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address: Urmila Jhamb Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi India ujhamb@hotmail.com

Code Number: cm11025

DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.83017

Abstract

Keywords: Lactate level, pediatric, PRISM III score, septic shock

Introduction

Septic shock is one of the most frequent life-threatening conditions encountered in pediatric hospitals. ^[1] The optimal management of pediatric septic shock patients includes early recognition of inadequate tissue perfusion and its timely correction in an effort to prevent anaerobic metabolism, acidosis, and cellular death. ^[2],[3],[4] The knowledge of factors which affect the outcome in septic shock will help in the early recognition of children who are at the highest risk of death and may allow timely changes in therapy, which may improve the outcome. ^[5] Multiple conditions resulting in inadequate oxygen delivery, disproportionate oxygen demand, and diminished oxygen use may lead to elevated lactate levels. Hyperlactatemia is a cardinal finding of sepsis and septic shock. It is said that the mechanism for hyperlactatemia under both the conditions is different. While in sepsis, an increased lactate level represents the increased glycolytic flux due to hypermetabolism; in septic shock, an increased glycolytic flux is due to tissue hypoxia. This suggests that there are two varieties of lactate, namely, the "stress lactate" and the "shock lactate." ^[6] Blood lactate levels of up to 18 mg/dl (2 mmol/l) are usually defined to be normal for critically ill patients. Hyperlactatemia is defined as lactate levels between 18 and 45 mg/dl without metabolic acidosis whereas lactic acidosis is defined as lactate levels greater than 45 mg/dl and pH below 7.35. ^[7] Increased lactate levels may be considered an early marker of a potentially reversible state, e.g., early septic shock, possibly indicating that "there is still room" to boost fast intervention. ^[8] In adults with sepsis/septic shock, the lactate level is an important and well-studied prognostic marker of mortality. ^[9],[10] There are not many studies on lactate levels in the pediatric age group with sepsis/septic shock. In neonates, studies have shown a poor correlation between pH or base excess and blood lactate concentration, and independent measurements of the latter are needed. ^[11] In preterm newborns, hyperlactatemia has been described as an indicator of the presence of sepsis, but the predictive value for the outcome is uncertain. ^[12] In pediatric sepsis/septic shock, results of lactate are conflicting. Duke et al. reported lactate as a good predictor of mortality whereas in a study by Hatherill et al. there was no significant difference in lactate levels between survivors and nonsurvivors. ^[13],[14] The present study was conducted with an objective to measure serial lactate levels in children with septic shock, and correlates these levels with the outcome.

Materials and Methods

It was a prospective observational study conducted in PICU of a tertiary care center of North India. Thirty cases of septic shock between the ages of 1 month and 12 years were enrolled prospectively in the study over a period of 1 year. Septic shock was defined as sepsis with either hypotension, i.e., systolic BP < 2 SD adjusted for age or at least one manifestation of inadequate organ perfusion, i.e., (1) altered mentation (defined as irritability, lethargy, semicoma/coma), (2) hypoxia (PaO ₂ < 45 mmHg while breathing room air or PaO ₂ /FiO ₂ < 350), (3) metabolic acidosis (arterial pH < 7.35 or base deficit > 5), or (4) oliguria (i.e., urine output < 1 ml/kg/h for >2 h measured with a urinary catheter), along with signs of poor peripheral perfusion, i.e., poor capillary refill (CFT >3 s), cyanosis, or diminished peripheral circulation. Sepsis was defined as clinical or laboratory evidence of infection in the presence of more than two of the following findings: (1) temperature > 38°C or < 36°C, (2) WBC count abnormalities (i.e., >15,000 cells/mm ³ , <4000 cells/mm ³ , or 10% immature neutrophils), and (3) increased acute phase reactants (i.e., ESR >20 mm/h or CRP >20 mg/l). A positive blood culture for a likely pathogen or bacterial culture from an otherwise sterile site was not necessary for diagnosis of sepsis.

Following patients were excluded from the study: (1) patients with other causes of shock, not due to sepsis itself, e.g., cardiogenic, oligemic, anaphylactic, neurogenic, endocrinological, and dengue shock; (2) patients with known malignancies and immunosuppressive treatment; (3) patients with serious underlying neurological disease, chronic illness, and major congenital malformations, and (4) postoperative cases. Following clinical data were recorded for all patients: age/sex, underlying infection, PRISM III score, duration of the illness before the onset of septic shock, duration of shock, fluid boluses and inotropes received before the admission to PICU, and need and indication of mechanical ventilation. ^[15] Patients were monitored for vital parameters, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), urine output, and central venous pressure.

Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis was done at 0-3, 12, 24, 48 h, and then as and when required. The serum lactate level was measured in arterial blood at 0-3 h (lactate 1), 12 h (lactate 2) and 24 hs (lactate 3) by the NADH-dependent kinetic method using the reagent manufactured by Randex Laboratory Ltd., UK. Standard treatment for septic shock was used for all patients as per guidelines. ^[2],[16] The outcome of patients was recorded as "survived" or "expired." Serial serum lactate levels were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Secondly, the outcome was also correlated with the PRISM III score at admission to PICU. The correlation between the PRISM III score and lactate level at admission (lactate 1) was measured. The study was approved by the institution′s ethics committee.

Statistical methods

Statistical methods were performed using the Windows SPSS software version 16. The continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as means ± 2 SD and were compared using Student′s t-test, whereas continuous variables with an asymmetric distribution were expressed as median and the respective range interval (minimum and maximum) and were compared using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test, for independent samples. In the case of categorical variables, Pearson′s chi-square test, Yates′ correction in 2 × 2 contingency tables, and Fisher′s exact test were used to analyze differences in proportions. Lactate levels and PRISM III score were further analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and optimal cut-off points were chosen for the calculation of positive and negative predictive values and odds ratios. A test that predicts an outcome no better than chance has an area under the ROC curve of 0.5. An area under the ROC curve above 0.8 indicated fairly good prediction. ^[17] The relationship of lactate at admission (lactate 1) with the PRISM III score (at admission) was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient and two-tailed significance.

Results

A total of 250 children were admitted in PICU during the study period. Out of these, 58 (23.2%) cases were admitted with shock. Forty-six of these (79.4% of all patients with shock and 18.4% of total PICU admissions) were diagnosed clinically as septic shock and 12 (4.8% of total PICU cases) with other types of shock. Other types of shock were enteric fever with shock, nine cases, cardiogenic shock, two cases, and dengue shock, one case. Sixteen cases of septic shock were excluded from the study: eight postoperative cases and eight having associated chronic disease.

Characteristics of patients admitted in PICU with septic shock are shown in [Table - 1]. Pneumonia (73.3%) was the most common underlying infection associated with septic shock. There were only 3 (10%) patients who had culture-positive sepsis; all of these survived.

The median PICU stay of our cohort was 8.5 (IQR 2-14; range 0.2-35) days. The mean duration of the PICU stay among survivors and nonsurvivors was 12.2 ± 7.4 and 6.0 ± 9.0 days, respectively. The overall mortality of PICU admissions was 34.8% (87 out of 250) and 15 out of 30 cases of septic shock died (50% mortality).

Twenty (66.7%) patients of septic shock required mechanical ventilation. The median duration of ventilation was 72 (IQR 13.4-258; range 2-840) h. Among the survivors and nonsurvivors, the median duration of ventilation was 264 (IQR 132-408; range 96-456) and 32 (IQR 9-192; range 2-840) h, respectively. In our study, 20 (66.7%) cases of septic shock had one or more organ dysfunction other than cardiovascular system. Among these, most common organ dysfunction was respiratory in 20 (66.7%) followed by central nervous system in 16 (53.3%), renal failure in 5 (16.7%), hematologic (DIC) in 2 (6.7%) patients, and hepatic failure in 1 (3.3%) patient.

In four patients, lactate 2 and 3 levels could not be measured as patients died within 12 h of PICU admission. Mean and median lactate 1, 2, and 3 levels were 60.1 ± 49.0, 51.7 (range 7.1-252.7, IQR 31.9-73.9); 56.4 ± 38.6, 47.8 (range 7.4-138.3, IQR 23.6-85.9); and 49.2 ± 44.7, 43.8 (range 5.9--70.0, IQR 11.0-61.0) mg/dl, respectively. The distribution of lactate levels were as follows: lactate 1: less than 18 mg/dl, 3 (survived: 2, death:- ); 18-45 mg/dl, 7 (survived: 6, death: 1); more than 45 mg/dl, 16 (survived: 6, death: 10); lactate 2: less than 18 mg/dl, 5 (survived: 4, death: 1); 18-45 mg/dl, 7 (survived: 6, death: 1); more than 45 mg/dl, 14 (survived: 4, death: 10); and lactate 3: less than 18 mg/dl, 6 (survived: 5, death: 1); 18-45 mg/dl- 6 (survived: 5, death: 1); more than 45 mg/dl, 11 (survived:4, death, 7).

[Table - 2] shows that age, sex, total leucocyte counts, GCS, and pH at the time of transfer to PICU were not significantly different between survivors and nonsurvivors. All three lactate levels and PRISM III score were significantly higher in nonsurvivors as compared to survivors.

PRISM III score and lactate levels were further analyzed using the ROC curve. Results are shown in [Table - 3] and [Figure - 1]. The area under the ROC curve for the PRISM III score (0.909) suggests that it was a strong predictor of mortality in septic shock patients. For all three lactate levels, the area under the ROC curve was almost 0.8 (P-value < 0.05) which indicates a fair correlation between the lactate level and death [Table - 3].

The relationship of lactate at admission (lactate 1) with the PRISM III score (done at admission) was determined by calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient and two-tailed significance. A highly significant positive correlation existed between the PRISM III score and lactate level (lactate 1) at admission (r = 561; P = 0.003).

Cut-off points for the PRISM III score and lactate levels along with the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and odds ratio for the prediction of death are shown in [Table - 4]. A PRISM score more than 10 and a lactate level more than 45 mg/dl (5 mmol/l) at all three time periods (0-3, 12, and 24 h) significantly discriminated nonsurvivors from survivors [Table - 4]. When we analyzed serial values of lactate, it was observed that the lactate level remained high in nonsurvivors even at 24 h (third lactate value) of PICU admission [Table - 2].

Discussion

Septic shock was the most common type of shock in patients admitted to PICU, comprising 79.3% of all patients with shock and 18.4% of all PICU admissions although it does not mean that the occurrence of septic shock is commonest. Hypovolemic shock is easily managed by fluid boluses and often does not need admission to PICU. This figure is comparable to various studies where sepsis and septic shock comprised 12.3-26.7% of PICU admissions. ^{[1],[4],[18],[19],[20]}

Pneumonia was the most common underlying infection with septic shock, accounting for 73.3% of total cases. Pneumonia was most common in other studies from abroad as well as India ^[1],[18] whereas in a study by Jacobs et al., meningitis was the most frequent localized site of infection occurring in 49.7% of cases. ^[19] Two cases (6.7%) had no identifiable underlying infective pathology in our study. Llorens et al. observed 24% cases of septic shock with no identifiable focus of infection. ^[1] Our patients of septic shock had 50% mortality. In various studies, the mortality in pediatric septic shock varied from 9.8% to 50%. ^{[1],[14],[18],[21],[22],[23]} Higher mortality in our study may be due to the fact that the majority of septic shock patients admitted to PICU were fluid refractory and also refractory to one inotrope. With presently available bed strength, it is not possible to admit all cases with septic shock to PICU and those who respond to fluid boluses or small doses of inotropes were managed in the wards and survived. They have not been included in our study. Therefore, patients coming to our PICU were sicker and had a higher mortality. In infants, the incidence of sepsis and associated mortality is higher. ^[23] Most of patients in our study were infants thus contributing to high mortality.

Trials have demonstrated the prognostic value of lactate levels in postcardiac surgery patients, surgical patients, in infections/sepsis and septic shock. ^{[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30]} Marecaux et al. showed that when correlated with other markers, lactate has a better prognostic value than the tumor necrosis factor and IL-6. ^[31] Lactate clearance can be used to risk stratify patients and determine their response to therapy. ^[32] Vincent et al. described that shock patients with the best prognosis were those in whom lactate levels had considerably decreased within 1 h after resuscitation. ^[33] Besides these studies with adults, observations in pediatric patients for the establishment of laboratory parameters as predictors of death have presented controversial results. When compared with other parameters, blood lactate levels were not correlated with mortality. ^[34] Hatherill et al. found that the initial lactate concentration in children submitted to cardiac surgery cannot predict death. ^[35] In another study by Hatherill et al., mortality correlated with gastric intramucosal pH but not with the lactate levels. ^[14] Siegel et al. observed that in children admitted to the ICU after a cardiac surgery, high levels of lactate had a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 97% for death. ^[36] By using univariate logistic regression, Duke et al. found that lactate allowed distinguishing survivors from nonsurvivors among children with sepsis at 12 and 24 h of admission. ^[13] Hatherill et al. suggested that hyperlactatemia can indicate death on admission and if it persists after 24 h of treatment. ^[37] In another study, as a predictor of death, the blood lactate level at 24 h of PICU admission presented the best sensitivity and specificity. ^[38]

In our study, all three different lactate levels were significantly higher among nonsurvivors as compared to survivors [Table - 2] and the area under the ROC curve for all three lactate levels was just at the significance level [Table - 3]. Further, a lactate value more than 45 mg/dl (5 mmol/l) predicted death at a significant level [Table - 4]. In previous studies by Duke et al.^[13] and Koliski et al., ^[38] a lactate level of >3 mmol/l significantly predicted mortality. This value was high (5 mmol/l) in our study. The reason for this difference may be patient selection: Duke et al. included patients with sepsis with or without shock; Koliski et al. included all patients admitted to PICU whereas in our study only patients with septic shock were included where a high lactate level was expected. A small number of patients is the limitation of our study.

Conclusions

Septic shock is a common cause for PICU admission and high mortality. This study demonstrated that most patients who died had higher blood lactate levels than those who survived. Lactate levels at 0-3, 12, and 24 h (> 5 mmol/l) and PRISM III score (>10) were predictors of death in septic shock. There is a need for larger studies on cut-off values of lactate levels in pediatric septic shock above which mortality increases significantly. The persistence of high lactate was associated with higher mortality. This makes it useful as a prognostic marker for the risk of death. The numbers of patients were small in our study; therefore, further studies are necessary to confirm the predictive value of lactate in pediatric patients admitted to PICU.

References

Copyright 2011 - Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine

The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images