search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Cancer
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Cancer Society
ISSN: 0019-509X EISSN: 1998-4774
Vol. 42, Num. 1, 2005, pp. 11-20

Indian Journal of Cancer, Vol. 42, No. 1, January-March, 2005, pp. 11-20

Review Article

Cancer preventive role of selected dietary factors

The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, 801-16th Avenue NE, Austin, MN55912

Correspondence Address: The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, 801-16th Avenue NE, Austin, MN55912
E-mial: amitraym@rediffmail.com / aray@hi.umn.edu

Code Number: cn05004

ABSTRACT

Dietary behavior seems to be an important modifiable determinant for the risk of cancer. The evidences from several epidemiological studies suggest that higher intakes of fruits and vegetables have been associated with lower risk of cancer. Dietary phenolic and polyphenolic substances, terpenoids, dietary fibers, fish oils, some micronutrients present in foods of both plant and animal origin, and a reduction of caloric intake appear to inhibit the process of cancer development. Many dietary factors possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and cause induction of phase II enzymes like glutathione-S-transferases. It has been suggested that cruciferous vegetables play an important role in cancer prevention, and their chemopreventive effects are due to high glucosinolate content which under enzymatic hydrolysis produces bioactive compound isothiocyanates. Further, isothiocyanates of a wide variety of cruciferous vegetables are powerful inhibitors of carcinogenesis in experimental animal models. Several flavonoids present in fruits, tea, soya beans, etc. may be useful as cancer preventive agents. Similarly, ellagic acid, perillyl alcohol and resveratrol found in various fruits may have chemoprotective effect. Moreover, different vanilloids such as curcumin and gingerol have been shown to possess antioxidative properties. Nevertheless, in spite of several studies, still the effects of various ingredients are not clearly distinguished. In human, little convincing evidence has been established for the proposed protective effects of dietary constituents. It is an important future research goal to provide necessary evidences to support the chemopreventive role of different dietary factors, and also to clarify misunderstandings in this perplexing area.

INTRODUCTION

This article is based on (however, not restricted to) the discussion of the meeting ′Dietary Factors and Cancer Prevention: Current Premises and Future Promises′ which was held at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester (Minnesota, USA) on 23rd-25th September 2004. This review paper has covered all the relevant lectures of the said conference (which were about 70%). A total of 31 speakers including well-known personalities like Lee Wattenberg, John H. Weisburger, Akira Murakami and the other investigators participated in the meeting. All relevant lectures have been summarized in this article by quoting appropriate published papers of the concerned speakers. The remaining lectures (about 30%) in that meeting were on other issues of cancer such as pathology including natural history and diagnostic aspect, treatment and related US governmental policies.

Cancer is the second major cause of non-communicable deaths, contributing to 13% mortality and 22% of non-communicable disease mortality, worldwide; whereas cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of deaths.[1] Cancer is a multifactorial disease that develops over a long period of time and progresses through different stages. Perhaps nutrition is the most important aspect, which is intricately and intimately associated with the entire pathological process of cancer. In general, the total mixed fat (i.e., different types of dietary fat) intake is probably associated with a higher incidence of several leading cancers such as carcinoma of the breast, colon, prostate, ovary, endometrium and pancreas.[2],[3] Similarly, obesity increases the risk for different cancers and physical activity, the main determinant of energy expenditure, reduces the risk.[4] Moreover, it has been observed that caloric restriction inhibits carcinogenesis in many animal models.[5]

Epidemiological studies and animal experiments indicate that dietary fiber and n-3 fatty acids exert protective effects against some common cancers, especially cancers of the breast, colon and prostate.[6],[7],[8],[9] Dietary fiber comprises a heterogeneous group of non-starch polysaccharides such as cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin and non-carbohydrate substances like phytic acid, with the protective effect of dietary fiber depending on the nature and source of fiber. Wheat bran appears to inhibit colon tumor development more consistently than do other dietary sources of fiber.[10] Human diet intervention studies have demonstrated that supplemental wheat bran in the diet decreased the formation of putative metabolites such as secondary bile acids and diacylglycerol in the colon, which have been shown to act as tumor promoters.[9] However, in a study conducted by Alberts et al., three years of dietary supplementation with wheat bran fiber did not protect against the recurrence of colorectal adenomas.[11] On the other hand, several studies have suggested that n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) - especially long-chain n-3 PUFA, which are synthesized from α-linolenic acid, can prevent cancers. Generally, fish and seafood are the main dietary sources of long-chain n-3 PUFA in majority of populations. Whereas, n-6 PUFA, synthesized from linoleic acid, has been suggested to facilitate cancer development.[12]

Throughout history, many naturally occurring agents have been used for the prevention and treatment of cancer and other diseases.[13] The cancer preventive effects of fruits and vegetables have been observed in several epidemiological and experimental studies. However, these studies could not distinguish the effects of various dietary factors because of high collinearity of nutrients and food constituents. The majority of these naturally occurring substances possess antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties which appear to contribute to their chemopreventive activity. The term ′chemoprevention′ was first used by Sporn, who showed that retinoids hindered experimental carcinogenesis.[14] However, the conventional classification of chemopreventive agents was first proposed by Wattenberg,[15] who subdivided the chemopreventive agents into two principal groups: blocking agents and suppressing agents. Blocking agents such as isothiocyanates, ellagic acid and flavonoids are able to prevent initiation by either inhibiting the formation of carcinogens from precursor molecules or hindering carcinogens from interacting with cellular target molecules. On the other hand, suppressing agents such as β-carotene, gingerol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), are thought to prevent carcinogenic expression of cells in promotion or progression stage. Some agents such as curcumin and resveratrol act as both blocking and suppressing agents.[16]

The detoxifying/biotransformation enzymes play a vital role in deciding the final fate of carcinogens or procarcinogens and their subsequent influence on the process of carcinogenesis. Overall, the purpose of physiological system is to increase the water solubility of carcinogenic substances in order to facilitate their excretion; this purpose is achieved in two phases. Phase I enzymes (cytochrome P450 and flavin-dependent monooxygenases) convert lipophilic compounds into more hydrophilic intermediates. In certain cases, this process can also give rise to carcinogens from biologically inactive compounds (procarcinogens) and, thus, inhibition of phase I enzymes may be protective. Subsequently, phase II enzymes (e.g., glutathione-S-transferases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, sulfotransferases, N-acetyl-transferases) catalyze conjugation reactions with molecules such as glutathione, glucuronic acid, or sulfate to render the toxic substances even more water soluble; and eventually, they are excreted through urine or bile. A wide variety of phenolic compounds present in diet can modify the detoxifying enzymes. Induction of phase II enzymes in general leads to protection of cells against exogenous and/or endogenous carcinogenic intermediates.[17] Regulation of phase II enzymes by dietary chemopreventive compounds is mediated by the antioxidant or electrophile response element (ARE/EpRE), which is located in the promoter region of concerned gene. Many chemopreventive agents modulate several signal transduction pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), protein kinase C, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways, leading to activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) that binds to the ARE sequence to initiate gene expression.[18]

Lifestyle Factors and Cancer

The process of carcinogenesis is a complex phenomenon, and several factors (both environmental including behavioral, and genetic) are associated with the etiology. Among behavioral factors, tobacco use, diet, physical activity, and obesity/energy balance - are all linked with the pathogenesis of cancer.[19] Large international variation in cancer incidence and mortality rate, and an increase in cancer rates among populations who migrated from low to high cancer incidence areas are important evidence that lifestyle factors influence the development of cancer.[20],[21] Further, human lifestyle factors are closely associated with various enzymes of the physiological system, including enzymes that metabolize exogenous environmental compounds and different nutrients. The genes encoding metabolic enzymes are polymorphically expressed and many polymorphisms have a functional consequence for the expressed protein. Therefore, the interaction of genetic polymorphisms with consumed nutrients or with promutagens could modulate cancer etiology.[22] For instance, studies have shown that glutathione-S-transferase genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 null allele are associated with an increased risk of several cancers.[23],[24] Similarly, certain genetic variations of different enzymes such as cytochrome P450s, acetyltransferases, sulfotransferases, superoxide dismutase etc. have been suggested to be related to cancer risk.[22] Moreover, recent studies have documented that diets and energy balance influence carcinogenesis in genetically altered animals like p53-deficient mice.[25],[26]

It has been suggested that 5% of all cancers have genetic origin, smoking has an impact in about 30% and nutrition in about 35% of affected subjects.[27],[28],[29] However, in recent time, the evidence for a role of energy imbalance, physical inactivity, and obesity has been strengthened than dietary fat.[30] Energy balance, reflected in a low body weight and high level of physical activity, has been more convincingly related to lower cancer rates.[31] Different experimental studies have shown that animals on energy-restricted diets are relatively resistant to tumor development.[5],[32] It has been observed that energy restriction augments apoptosis.[33] Further, the adverse effects of energy imbalance may be mediated through alterations in the metabolism of insulin and insulin-like growth factors.[34] Insulin regulates energy metabolism and increases the activity of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) by enhancing its synthesis and by decreasing several of its binding proteins (IGFBP-1 and 2). Both insulin and IGF-I stimulate anabolic process which can promote tumor development by inhibiting apoptosis, and by stimulating cell proliferation.[35] Evidence is accumulating, which shows that energy balance may affect carcinogenesis of various sites.

Anti-cancer Effects of Foods

Common food groups and cancer risk

In recent time, a high level of awareness/interest has been created among general people worldwide about the protective effects of fruit and vegetables against cancer risk. But, it should be clear that no protective effects have actually been firmly established. Although, a recent publication of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has suggested to increase or maintain fruit and vegetable intake to improve nutrition for reducing the burden of cancer and other chronic diseases.[36] However, different studies have generally agreed that consumption of a diet rich in vegetables, fruits, and other plant food constituents; low in animal fats, along with maintaining a physically active healthy weight can reduce the risk of cancer and other chronic diseases.[13],[28],[37] Among animal foods, red or processed meat seems to enhance the risk of cancer, while it is not clear for white meat, and fish seems to be protective.[38] Furthermore, micronutrients present in animal foods such as calcium, vitamin D, folates, vitamin A and selenium can be protective [Table - 1].[38],[39] Milk and dairy products are the good source of calcium and vitamin D. Dairy products are a diverse food group comprising of various factors that could influence risk, e.g., relatively high saturated fat content, growth factors such as IGF-I, and chemical contaminants such as pesticide residues.[40] However, the calcium and vitamin D contents of dairy products have been hypothesized to reduce the cancer risk.[40],[41],[42],[43],[44]

Cruciferous vegetables

Cruciferous vegetables play an important role against the risk of cancer.[45],[46] The Cruciferae (syn. Brassicaceae) are the family of plants that include a wide variety of familiar members of the species Brassica oleracea (e.g., broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, parsnip, kale, kohlrabi, brussels sprouts, turnip, rutabaga) and many other plants which are commonly consumed in various parts of the world such as oriental cabbage, arugula, watercress, radish, daikon, wasabi, various mustards, horseradish, kai choi, etc. The role of cruciferous vegetables to protect against cancer is attributed to the fact that they are the unique source of glucosinolates (β-thioglycoside-N-hydroxysulfates) in our diet. Glucosinolate content is about 1% of dry weight of the Brassica vegetables; and it plays important roles in plants such as in allelopathy (suppression of growth of neighboring plants), and in protection against predators including nematocidal, microbicidal, antifungal and insecticidal activities.[47] Glucosinolates are hydrolyzed by the plant enzyme myrosinase (a β-thioglucosidase) when the cells in plants are damaged due to cutting or chewing, releasing the biologically active isothiocyanates which are basically organosulfur compounds. If myrosinase has been inactivated due to cooking, glucosinolates are broken down by intestinal bacterial myrosinase in the colon.[48]

At least 120 different glucosinolates have been identified.[49] Glucobrassicin and glucoraphanin are generally found in high concentrations in broccoli. Chinese cabbage, radish and watercress contain high amount of gluconasturtiin; whereas, sinigrin is found in high concentrations in brussels sprouts, cabbage and cauliflower. As mentioned earlier, hydrolysis of glucosinolates by myrosinase produces various types of isothiocyanates. Hydrolysis of glucoraphanin results in sulforaphane, hydrolysis of sinigrin results in allyl isothiocyanate, gluconasturtiin produces phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) and glucobrassicin produces indole-3-carbinol.[50] The isothiocyanates formed from indole glucosinolates are unstable, and decompose spontaneously to indole-3-carbinol, indole-acetonitrile, thiocyanate and 3,3′-diindolylmethane. Indole-3-carbinol may then spontaneously condense under the acidic conditions of the stomach to form compounds that closely resemble 2,3],7],8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin), which is carcinogenic. In spite of this property, indole-3-carbinol has been investigated as a cancer chemopreventive agent.[49] A large amount of data demonstrate that isothiocyanates act as cancer chemopreventive agents by favorably modifying carcinogen metabolism via selective inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in carcinogen metabolic activation and induction of phase II enzymes.[51] Interestingly, sulforaphane is an extremely potent inducer of phase II enzymes and effectively inhibits proliferation of cancer cells by causing caspase-9 and caspase-8 mediated apoptosis.[45],[52]

Cruciferous vegetables can modulate estrogen metabolism and it has been hypothesized that they might lower the risk of estrogen-dependent cancers like breast cancer.[53] 16-α-hydroxylation yields potent estrogen that may play a positive role in the development of breast cancer; whereas hydroxylation at the 2-position lowers the biosynthesis of 16-α-hydroxylation product of estrogen. Therefore, the ratio between the products of these two major pathways of estrogen metabolism may be important in the pathogenesis, e.g., 2-hydroxyestrone:16-α-hydroxyestrone, an increase in the ratio is thought to be protective. Several studies have observed that indole-3-carbinol increased the level of 2-hydroxyestrogen and simultaneously decreased the concentration of 16-α-hydroxyestrogen.[54],[55] Interestingly, cruciferous vegetables also contain other chemopreventive ingredients such as flavonoids and selenium.[50],[56],[57]

In this connection, it may be worthy to mention that in plants, selenium content varies with geographical areas. The products of plants grown in soils containing sufficient selenium are good sources. However, in general, foods providing the good sources of selenium are fish, grains such as wheat and oat, eggs, and meat [Table - 1]. It has been thought that selenium could protect against cancer through several mechanisms.[58]

Flavonoids and terpenoids

Flavonoids are a large group of plant′s products that have a common C6-C3-C6 structure consisting of two aromatic rings linked through an oxygenated heterocycle (which is fused to one of these aromatic rings). Approximately, 8000 flavonoids have been characterized and the major classes [Table - 2] are flavones (apigenin, luteolin), flavonols (quercetin, kaempferol), flavanones (hesperetin, naringenin), flavanols (epigallocatechin, EGCG), anthocyanins (cyanidnin, delphinidin) and isoflavones (genistein, daidzein).[59] Flavonoids possess free radical scavenging properties and have been reported to modulate cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) transcription in a number of different cell models.[60] There are two major isoforms of cyclooxygenase: COX-1 which does not change in response to stimuli, whereas COX-2 is overexpressed during inflammation and in the pathological process of cancer.[61] Liang et al. observed that apigenin was the most potent inhibitor of COX-2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and nuclear factor- B (NF- κB).[62] On the other hand, Singh and Agarwal noticed that silibinin, a flavonoid isolated from milk thistle, inhibited mitogenic and cell survival signaling such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin-like growth factor receptor type I (IGFRI) and NF- κB signaling.[63] Interestingly, isoflavones like genistein and daidzein possess estrogenic properties (phytoestrogens). In Asian nations, the staple consumption of phytoestrogen-rich food correlates with a reduced incidence of breast cancer.[64] Phytoestrogens compete with endogenous estrogens for binding to estrogen receptor. Therefore, they may have beneficial effects in prevention of steroid hormone dependent cancers such as breast and prostate cancer.

Terpenoids are an extensive group of natural products whose structures are composed of isoprene units (synthesized from the five-carbon unit isopentenyl pyrophosphate). Therefore, the number of carbon atoms in different terpenoids is usually a multiple of five, which is the basis of their nomenclature such as hemiterpenes (one C5 unit), monoterpenes (two C5 units), sesquiterpenes (three C5 units), diterpenes (four C5 units), sesterterpenes (five C5 units), triterpenes (six C5 units), tetraterpenes (eight C5 units), etc. In general, these are cyclic unsaturated hydrocarbons where oxygen molecules in the constituent groups are attached to the isoprene units. From the nutritional standpoint, the major subclasses are monoterpenes (e.g., limonene, menthol, perillyl alcohol), diterpenes (e.g., retinoids) and tetraterpenes (which include carotenoids such as β-carotene, lutein, lycopene and zeaxanthine).[65] Monoterpenes are present only in plants and usually they are volatile substances. Both limonene and perillyl alcohol (a hydroxylated analog of limonene) have anti-cancer effects and can cause induction of phase II enzymes such as glutathione-S-transferase.[66] Among diterpenes, vitamin A or retinol is the most important compound which is found in animals. The term retinoids refers to all analogs of retinol. Plant-derived carotenoids such as β-carotene, α-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthine and lycopene are thought to provide health benefits in decreasing the risk of certain diseases including cancers. β-carotene is a limited precursor of vitamin A. In part, the beneficial effects of carotenoids are due to their antioxidant properties.[67] An inverse relationship was recorded between the intake of lycopene from tomatoes and the risk of cancers of the prostate, lung and stomach.[68]

Controversies exist on the question of supplementation with β-carotene. Both randomized chemoprevention trials in Finland and USA showed adverse effects of β-carotene.[69],[70],[71] In Finland study on male smokers, a higher incidence of lung cancer and 8% higher mortality were observed among the participants who received β-carotene.[69] The US study on heavy smokers and asbestos-exposed workers was stopped ahead of schedule time; because participants who received β-carotene and retinol were found to have a 28% increase in incidence of lung cancer, a 17% increase in incidence of death and a higher rate of cardiovascular disease mortality.[70],[71] On the contrary, a reduction in the risk of death among head and neck cancer patients assigned to receive β-carotene was observed.[72] However, two other randomized trials of β-carotene supplementation did not find any effect.[73],[74] On the other hand, Baron et al. noticed that β-carotene was associated with a marked decrease in the risk of recurrence of colorectal adenomas among subjects who neither smoked cigarettes nor drank alcohol.[75] Interestingly, they observed that β-carotene supplementation conferred an increase in the risk of recurrence among those who had the habit of cigarette smoking or taking alcohol or both. It is not clear, how the effects of β-carotene alter in presence of predisposing factors like smoking or in high-risk individuals! In one of the most recent studies, Liu et al. observed that cigarette smoke exposure and/or pharmacological doses of β-carotene in ferrets increased the levels of cytochrome P450 enzymes, particularly CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, resulting in enhanced retinoic acid catabolism in the lung tissue.[76] On the other hand, Bendich has suggested several biologically plausible explanations such as an increase in lung function due to β-carotene supplementation leading to a greater exposure to tobacco carcinogens and other oxidative compounds, and alteration in immune responses.[77] This complexity underscores the need of more studies to identify pathways signaling chemopreventive effects.[78],[79]

Fruits

A high fruit intake has also been considered to decrease the risk of most of the cancers.[36],[80] There are evidences that different berries such as black raspberries, blackberries and strawberries inhibit carcinogen-induced malignancy in animal models. Some of the known chemopreventive agents in berries include vitamin C, E and folic acid; small amount of calcium and selenium; β- and α-carotene; polyphenols such as ellagic acid, ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, several anthocyanins and phytosterols (triterpenes) such as β-sitosterol and stigmasterol. It has been observed that berries could inhibit the growth of premalignant cells through down-regulation of COX-2 and also expression of other genes associated with tumor development such as iNOS and VEGF. Moreover, berries might have the ability to inhibit tumor development by impairing signal transduction pathways mediated through the activation of AP-1 and NF- κB.[81] Amongst various chemopreventive ingredients in berries, ellagic acid (a polyphenol and an abundant component) appears to accumulate selectively in the epithelial cells of the aerodigestive tract and has been demonstrated to be preventive for esophageal cancer in animal models both at the initiation and promotion stages.[82]

Resveratrol is a phytoalexin (i.e., inhibitor of phytopathogenic organisms) and is present in grapes, berries, peanuts and several other plants. It is one of the best known natural food microcomponents with potent chemopreventive properties towards several important human diseases such as cardiovascular disorders, cancer and neurodegenerative pathologies.[83] Reveratrol has various pharmacological properties which include inhibition of arachidonate metabolism in leukocytes and platelets, modulation of lipid metabolism, inhibition of platelet aggregation and lipid peroxidation, suppression of expression and activity of COX-2, induction of cell-cycle arrest at the S/G2 phase transition and pro-apoptotic cell death in many types of cancer cells. All these biological effects help to explain the vasorelaxing, anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory activity of resveratrol.[84] Perillyl alcohol, a monoterpene and an analog of d-limonene found in citrus peel, is another important chemopreventive agent. It has been observed that perillyl alcohol inhibited AP-1 activation and Ras farnesylation.[85] Similarly, Ding et al. noticed that apple peel extract inhibited AP-1 transactivation and strongly scavenged hydroxyl and superoxide radicals.[86] Further, the fruit juice of noni (Morinda citrifolia), a plant originally grown in the Hawaiian and Tahitian islands, was found to be effective in suppressing 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)- and EGF-induced cell transformation and associated AP-1 activity.[87] Also, it has been found that garcinol, a polyisoprenylated benzophenone derivative of Garcinia indica fruit rind, inhibited the expression of iNOS and COX-2.[88] Thus, different chemopreventive agents of various fruits have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and may exert inhibitory action on tumor promoter-induced carcinogenesis and associated cell signaling.

Other Nutrients or Dietary Compounds

Tea

There are mainly two popular types of tea: green and black tea, which are used worldwide as a common beverage. Although, it has been suggested that consumption of tea may have a protective effect against the development of several cancers, but the epidemiological findings are inconsistent,[89],[90] like many other food constituents. Nevertheless, some recent studies have recorded beneficial effects of green tea against cancer. In Japan Public Health Center (JPHC)-based prospective study, an inverse association between green tea consumption and risk of gastric cancer was observed among women.[91] Zhang et al. observed a trend of better survival among ovarian cancer patients who were tea drinkers than non-drinker patients.[92] They concluded that increasing the consumption of green tea after diagnosis might be helpful in the prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Tea contains large quantities of polyphenolic compounds known as catechins. The leading catechins in green tea are epicatechin (EC), epigallocatechin (EGC), epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), and EGCG. Green tea contains catechins up to 40% of its dry weight; whereas black tea contains up to 10% catechins, about 5% theaflavins and more than 20% thearubigins.[93] Several studies based on cell culture and animal models have demonstrated the cancer preventive role of tea. Numerous mechanisms have been proposed for the cancer preventive activity of tea constituents. Both EGCG and theaflavins have been shown to inhibit the growth, induce cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in different cancer cell lines.[94] Studies have also demonstrated that tea polyphenols can inhibit activator protein 1 (AP1) which is a multifaceted transcription factor that affects a wide range of biological responses.[95] Moreover, Masuda et al. observed that EGCG suppressed the activation of EGFR and HER-2, and thereby inhibited related downstream signaling pathways.[96] This phenomenon was associated with the inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) activation, inhibition of c-fos and cyclin D1 promoter activity, decreased cellular levels of cyclin D1 and Bcl-XL proteins, inhibition of cellular production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and inhibition of constitutive NF- κB activation.[97]

Spices

Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is a yellow colored pigment isolated from the rhizome of the plant Curcuma longa, commonly called turmeric; it has been widely used in different Asian countries without any recorded toxic effects. Extensive research over the last 50 years has indicated that this yellow colored polyphenol could prevent cancer and might contribute to the lower rate of some types of cancer in these countries.[98] Curcumin possesses anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties.[16] Also, curcumin could induce apoptosis by targeting mitochondria, affecting p53-related signaling and blocking NF- κB activation.[99] In addition, it has been thought to inhibit lipooxygenase activity, COX-2 expression, initiation of carcinogenesis by suppressing cytochrome P-450 enzyme activity and increasing the levels of glutathione-S-transferase.[100] Moreover, a number of targets of curcumin have been identified such as aryl hydrocarbon receptor, matrix metalloproteinases, tyrosine kinases, etc.[99] Like curcumin, the oleoresin from rhizomes of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe, Zingiberaceae) contains [6]-gingerol, a pungent ingredient that has been found to exert various pharmacological effects such as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic and antioxidant activity.[101],[102] Gingerol is converted into shogaol during dehydration (shogaol is thus present in dried or powdered form). Ginger also contains gingerdiol, zingerone and [6]-paradol. The bioactive ingredients of different spices such as curcumin, gingerol, paradol, capsaicin etc. are the members of vanilloid compounds (which contain the vanillyl moiety, i.e., 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl). The chemopreventive effects exerted by these phytochemicals are often associated with their antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities.[103] Interestingly, data in the literature suggest that capsaicin (the major pungent principle of hot chili pepper) has dual effects on carcinogenesis. Capsaicin might increase the risk for gastric cancer.[104] However, many other factors such as excessive salt intake, diet and Helicobacter pylori infection play an important role in the development of gastric cancer.[2],[105] On the contrary, capsaicin apparently protects against experimentally induced mutagenesis and tumorigenesis in various model systems.[106]

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, cancer prevention by botanicals has received considerable attention. Different phenolic substances present in various types of vegetables, fruits and plants possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which can function in our physiological system in order to act as cancer chemopreventive agents. It is thought that oxidative damage to the cell has an important etiological role in cancer. In our physiological system, spontaneous generation of free radicals such as superoxide, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxide radicals occurs every day. These hazardous events are effectively counteracted by different mechanisms like antioxidants, DNA repair, apoptosis and immunological surveillance. Dietary ingredients may modulate these tools of the body′s defence. However, all natural dietary substances act in a complex and diverse manner. Unlike deficiency of vitamins and other micronutrients, still no clear clinical disorder has been detected due to deficiencies of various dietary ingredients that are supposed to prevent the process of cancer development. Also, the results of many epidemiological studies could not prove a beneficial role of high vegetable and fruit consumption with reference to cancer. Moreover, some glucosinolates may have goitrogenic effects. Despite this complexity, different studies have suggested an advantage from the use of some selective phytochemicals in the chemoprevention of cancer. Murakami et al. advocated an intake of various phytochemicals in combination as individual food phytochemicals have complex interactions that can be antagonistic, additive or synergistic depending upon many factors including concentrations and interactions or co-existence with other compounds.[107] However, more well-designed studies are needed to expand our current understanding on bioavailability, pharmacological action and adverse effects of different phytochemicals. Further, appropriate human interventional studies may be helpful to evaluate these dietary factors as proper chemopreventive agents for human cancer.

REFERENCES

1.Shibuya K, Mathers CD, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJL. Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. Results for the global burden of disease 2000. BMC Cancer 2002;2:37-62 and 2003;3:20-5.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Weisburger JH. Lifestyle, health and disease prevention: The underlying mechanisms. Eur J Cancer Prev 2002;11:S1-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Kritchevsky D. Diet and cancer: What's next? J Nutr 2003;133:3827S-9S.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Key TJ, Schatzkin A, Willett WC, Allen NE, Spencer EA, Travis RC. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. Public Health Nutr 2004;7:187-200.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Birt DF, Przybyszewski J, Wang W, Stewart J, Liu Y. Identification of molecular targets for dietary energy restriction prevention of skin carcinogenesis: An idea cultivated by Edward Bresnick. J Cell Biochem 2004;91:258-64.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Simopoulos AP. The traditional diet of Greece and cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004;13:219-30.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.de la Taille A, Katz A, Vacherot F, Saint F, Salomon L, Cicco A, et al. Cancer of the prostate: Influence of nutritional factors. A new nutritional approach. Presse Med 2001;30:561-4.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Prentice RL. Future possibilities in the prevention of breast cancer: Fat and fiber and breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Res 2000;2:268-76.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Reddy BS. Prevention of colon carcinogenesis by components of dietary fiber. Anticancer Res 1999;19:3681-3.   Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Reddy BS, Hirose Y, Cohen LA, Simi B, Cooma I, Rao CV. Preventive potential of wheat bran fractions against experimental colon carcinogenesis: Implications for human colon cancer prevention. Cancer Res 2000;60:4792-7.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Alberts DS, Martinez ME, Roe DJ, Guillen-Rodriguez JM, Marshall JR, van Leeuwen JB, et al. Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. New Engl J Med 2000;342:1156-62.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Astorg P. Dietary n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and prostate cancer risk: A review of epidemiological and experimental evidence. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:367-86.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Sinha R, Anderson DE, McDonald SS, Greenwald P. Cancer risk and diet in India. J Postgrad Med 2003;49:222-8.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Sporn MB, Roberts AB. Role of retinoids in differentiation and carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984;73:1381-7.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Wattenberg LW. Chemoprevention of cancer. Cancer Res 1985;45:1-8.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Surh YJ. Molecular mechanisms of chemopreventive effects of selected dietary and medicinal phenolic substances. Mutat Res 1999;428:305-27.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Kong AN, Yu R, Hebbar V, Chen C, Owuor E, Hu R, et al. Signal transduction events elicited by cancer prevention compounds. Mutat Res 2001;480-1:231-41.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Chen C, Kong AN. Dietary chemopreventive compounds and ARE/EpRE signaling. Free Radic Biol Med 2004;36:1505-16.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Gotay CC. Behavior and cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:301-10.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Shimizu H, Ross RK, Bernstein L, Yatani R, Henderson BE, Mack TM. Cancers of the prostate and breast among Japanese and white immigrants in Los Angeles County. Br J Cancer 1991;63:963-6.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Martinez ME. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer: Lifestyle, nutrition, exercise. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005;166:177-211.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Nowell SA, Ahn J, Ambrosone CB. Gene-nutrient interactions in cancer etiology. Nutr Rev 2004;62:427-38.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Rebbeck TR. Molecular epidemiology of the human glutathione S-transferase genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:733-43.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Mittal RD, Srivastava DSL, Mandhani A, Kumar A, Mittal B. Polymorphism of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes in prostate cancer: A study from North India. Indian J Cancer 2004;41:115-9.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Hursting SD, Lavigne JA, Berrigan D, Donehower LA, Davis BJ, Phang JM, et al. Diet-gene interactions in p53-deficient mice: Insulin-like growth factor-1 as a mechanistic target. J Nutr 2004;134:2482S-6S.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Patel AC, Nunez NP, Perkins SN, Barrett JC, Hursting SD. Effects of energy balance on cancer in genetically altered mice. J Nutr 2004:134:3394S-8S.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981;66:1191-308.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective. American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Stoeckli R, Keller U. Nutritional fats and the risk of type 2 diabetes and cancer. Physiol Behav 2004;83:611-5.   Back to cited text no. 29    
30.McCullough ML, Giovannucci EL. Diet and cancer prevention. Oncogene 2004;23:6349-64.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Michels KB. The role of nutrition in cancer development and prevention. Int J Cancer 2004;114:163-5.  Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Kritchevsky D. Caloric restriction and experimental carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci 1999;52:S13-6.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Platz EA. Energy imbalance and prostate cancer. J Nutr 2002;132:3471S-81S.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.Kaaks R, Lukanova A. Energy balance and cancer: The role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:91-106.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Kaaks R. Nutrition, insulin, IGF-I metabolism and cancer risk: A summary of epidemiological evidence. Novartis Found Symp 2004;262:247-60.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Fruit and vegetables (Vol 8). International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO), Lyon 2003.   Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Heber D. Vegetables, fruits and phytoestrogens in the prevention of diseases. J Postgrad Med 2004;50:145-9.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Casimiro C. Etiopathogenic factors in colorectal cancer. Nutritional and life-style aspects.2. Nutr Hosp 2002;17:128-38.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.Wardlaw GM, Hempl JS, DiSilvestro RA. Perspectives in Nutrition. 6th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004.   Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Moorman PG, Terry PD. Consumption of dairy products and the risk of breast cancer: A review of the literature. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80:5-14.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Gill HS, Cross ML. Anticancer properties of bovine milk. Br J Nutr 2000;84:S161-6.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Norat T, Riboli E. Dairy products and colorectal cancer. A review of possible mechanisms and epidemiological evidence. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:1-17.   Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Flood A, Peters U, Chatterjee N, Lacey JV Jr, Schairer C, Schatzkin A. Calcium from diet and supplements is associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:126-32.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Hawk ET, Levin B. Colorectal cancer prevention. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:378-91.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Talalay P, Fahey JW. Phytochemicals from cruciferous plants protect against cancer by modulating carcinogen metabolism. J Nutr 2001;131:3027S-33S.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Cruciferous vegetables (Vol 9). International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO), Lyon 2004.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Rosa EAS, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR, Portas CAM. Glucosinolates in crop plants. Hortic Rev 1997;19:99-215.  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Lampe JW, Peterson S. Brassica, biotransformation and cancer risk: Genetic polymorphisms alter the preventive effects of cruciferous vegetables. J Nutr 2002;132:2991-4.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 2001;56:5-51.  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Keck AS, Finley JW. Cruciferous vegetables: Cancer protective mechanisms of glucosinolate hydrolysis products and selenium. Integr Cancer Ther 2004;3:5-12.  Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Hecht SS. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by isothiocyanates. Drug Metab Rev 2000;32:395-411.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Singh SV, Herman-Antosiewicz A, Singh AV, Lew KL, Srivastava SK, Kamath R, et al. Sulforaphane -induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest involves checkpoint kinase 2 -mediated phophorylation of cell division cycle 25C. J Biol Chem 2004;279:25813-22.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Longcope C. Relationships of estrogen to breast cancer, of diet to breast cancer, and of diet to estradiol metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:96-7.  Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Michnovicz JJ, Adlercreutz H, Bradlow HL. Changes in levels of urinary estrogen metabolites after oral indole-3-carbinol treatment in humans. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:718-23.   Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Brignall MS. Prevention and treatment of cancer with indole-3-carbinol. Altern Med Rev 2001;6:580-9.   Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Williamson G, Plumb GW, Uda Y, Price KR, Rhodes MJ. Dietary quercetin glycosides: Antioxidant activity and induction of the anticarcinogenic phase II marker enzyme quinone reductase in Hepalclc7 cells. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:2385-7.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Finley JW, Davis CD, Feng Y. Selenium from high selenium broccoli protects rats from colon cancer. J Nutr 2000;130:2384-9.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Jiang C, Hu H, Malewicz B, Wang Z, Lu J. Selenite-induced p53 Ser-15 phosphorylation and caspase-mediated apoptosis in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2004;3:877-84.   Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Duthie GG, Gardner PT, Kyle JAM. Plant polyphenols: Are they the new magic bullet? Proc Nutr Soc 2003;62:599-603.   Back to cited text no. 59    
60.O'Leary KA, de Pascual-Tereasa S, Needs PW, Bao YP, O'Brien NM, Williamson G. Effect of flavonoids and vitamin E on cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) transcription. Mutat Res 2004;551:245-54.   Back to cited text no. 60    
61.Fujita T, Matsui M, Takaku K. Size and invasion dependent increase in cyclooxygenase-2 levels in human colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res 1998;58:4823-6.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Liang YC, Huang YT, Tsai SH, Lin-Shiau SY, Chen CF, Lin JK. Suppression of inducible cyclooxygenase and inducible nitric oxide synthase by apigenin and related flavonoids in mouse macrophages. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:1945-52.   Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Singh RP, Agarwal R. Prostate cancer prevention by silibinin. Curr Cancer Drugs Targets 2004;4:1-11.   Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Limer JL, Speirs V. Phyto-oestrogens and breast cancer chemoprevention. Breast Cancer Res 2004;6:119-27.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Wagner KH, Elmadfa I. Biological relevance of terpenoids. Overview focusing on mono-, di- and tetraterpenes. Ann Nutr Metab 2003;47:95-106.   Back to cited text no. 65    
66.Crowell PL. Prevention and therapy of cancer by dietary monoterpenes. J Nutr 1999;129:775S-8S.  Back to cited text no. 66    
67.Johnson EJ. The role of carotenoids in human health. Nutr Clin Care 2002;5:56-65.  Back to cited text no. 67    
68.Giovannucci E. Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: Review of the epidemiologic literature. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:317-31.  Back to cited text no. 68    
69.The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. The Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1029-35.  Back to cited text no. 69    
70.Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Grizzle J, Rosenstock L, Barnhart S, et al. The beta-carotene and retinol efficacy trial (CARET) for chemoprevention of lung cancer in high risk populations: Smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. Cancer Res 1994;54:2038s-43s.  Back to cited text no. 70    
71.Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Meyskens FL Jr, Omenn GS, et al. The Beta-carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial: Incidence of lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality during 6-year follow-up after stopping beta-carotene and retinol supplements. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1743-50.  Back to cited text no. 71    
72.Toma S, Bonelli L, Sartoris A, Mira E, Antonelli A, Beatrice F, et al. Beta-carotene supplementation in patients radically treated for stage I-II head and neck cancer: Results of a randomized trial. Oncol Rep 2003;10:1895-901.  Back to cited text no. 72    
73.Lee IM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. Beta-carotene supplementation and incidence of cancer and cardiovascular disease: The Women's Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:2102-6.  Back to cited text no. 73    
74.Cook NR, Lee IM, Manson JE, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. Effects of beta-carotene supplementation on cancer incidence by baseline characteristics in the Physicians' Health Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:617-26.  Back to cited text no. 74    
75.Baron JA, Cole BF, Mott L, Haile R, Grau M, Church TR, et al. Neoplastic and antineoplastic effects of beta-carotene on colorectal adenoma recurrence: Results of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:717-22.   Back to cited text no. 75    
76.Liu C, Russell RM, Wang XD. Exposing ferrets to cigarette smoke and a pharmacological dose of β-carotene supplementation enhance in vitro retinoic acid catabolism in lungs via induction of cytochrome P450 enzymes. J Nutr 2003;133:173-9.  Back to cited text no. 76    
77.Bendich A. From 1989 to 2001: What have we learned about the "biological actions of beta-carotene"? J Nutr 2004;134:225S-30S.  Back to cited text no. 77    
78.Dragnev KH, Rigas JR, Dmitrovsky E. The retinoids and cancer prevention mechanisms. Oncologist 2000;5:361-8.  Back to cited text no. 78    
79.Duffield-Lillico AJ, Begg CB. Reflections on the landmark studies of β-carotene supplementation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1729-31.  Back to cited text no. 79    
80.Riboli E, Norat T. Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:559S-69S.  Back to cited text no. 80    
81.Huang C, Huang Y, Li J, Hu W, Aziz R, Tang MS, et al. Inhibition of benzo(a)pyrene diol-epoxide -induced transactivation of activated protein 1 and nuclear factor kappa B by black raspberry extracts. Cancer Res 2002;62:6857-63.  Back to cited text no. 81    
82.Whitley AC, Stoner GD, Darby MV, Walle T. Intestinal epithelial cell accumulation of the cancer preventive polyphenol ellagic acid - extensive binding to protein and DNA. Biochem Pharmacol 2003:66:907-15.  Back to cited text no. 82    
83.Jannin B, Menzel M, Berlot JP, Delmas D, Lancon A, Latruffe N. Transport of resveratrol, a cancer chemopreventive agent, to cellular targets: Plasmatic protein binding and cell uptake. Biochem Pharmacol 2004;68:1113-8.  Back to cited text no. 83    
84.Granados-Soto V. Pleiotropic effects of resveratrol. Drug News Perspect 2003;16:299-307.   Back to cited text no. 84    
85.Einspahr JG, Bowden GT, Alberts DS. Skin cancer chemoprevention: Strategies to save our skin. Recent Results Cancer Res 2003;163:151-64.   Back to cited text no. 85    
86.Ding M, Lu Y, Bowman L, Huang C, Leonard S, Wang L, et al. Inhibition of AP-1 and neoplastic transformation by fresh apple peel extract. J Biol Chem 2004;279:10670-6.  Back to cited text no. 86    
87.Liu G, Bode A, Ma WY, Sang S, Ho CT, Dong Z. Two novel glycosides from the fruits of Morinda citrifolia (noni) inhibit AP-1 transactivation and cell transformation in the mouse epidermal JB6 cell line. Cancer Res 2001;61:5749-56.  Back to cited text no. 87    
88.Liao CH, Sang S, Liang YC, Ho CT, Lin JK. Suppression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in downregulating nuclear factor-kappa B pathway by garcinol. Mol Carcinog 2004;41:140-9.  Back to cited text no. 88    
89.Il'yasova D, Martin C, Sandler RS. Tea intake and risk of colon cancer in African-Americans and whites: North Carolina colon cancer study. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:767-72.  Back to cited text no. 89    
90.Laurie SA, Miller VA, Grant SC, Kris MG, Ng KK. Phase I study of green tea extract in patients with advanced lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005;55:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 90    
91.Sasazuki S, Inoue M, Hanaoka T, Yamamoto S, Sobue T, Tsugane S. Green tea consumption and subsequent risk of gastric cancer by subsite: The JPHC Study. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:483-91.  Back to cited text no. 91    
92.Zhang M, Lee AH, Binns CW, Xie X. Green tea consumption enhances survival of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer 2004;112:465-9.  Back to cited text no. 92    
93.Lambert JD, Yang CS. Mechanisms of cancer prevention by tea constituents. J Nutr 2003;133:3262S-7S.  Back to cited text no. 93    
94.Yang CS, Maliakal P, Meng X. Inhibition of carcinogenesis by tea. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2002;42:25-54.  Back to cited text no. 94    
95.Chung FL, Schwartz J, Herzog CR, Yang YM. Tea and cancer prevention: Studies in animals and humans. J Nutr 2003;133:3268S-74S.  Back to cited text no. 95    
96.Masuda M, Suzui M, Lim JT, Weinstein IB. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits activation of HER-2/neu and downstream signaling pathways in human head and neck and breast carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3486-91.   Back to cited text no. 96    
97.Masuda M, Suzui M, Lim JT, Deguchi A, Soh JW, Weinstein IB. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate decreases VEGF production in head and neck and breast carcinoma cells by inhibiting EGFR-related pathways of signal transduction. J Exp Ther Oncol 2002;2:350-9.   Back to cited text no. 97    
98.Aggarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC. Anticancer potential of curcumin: Preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res 2003;23:363-98.  Back to cited text no. 98    
99.Leu TH, Maa MC. The molecular mechanisms for the antitumorigenic effect of curcumin. Curr Med Chem Anti-Canc Agents 2002;2:357-70.  Back to cited text no. 99    
100.Chauhan DP. Chemotherapeutic potential of curcumin for colorectal cancer. Curr Pharm Des 2002;8:1695-706.  Back to cited text no. 100    
101.Mustafa T, Srivastava KC, Jensen KB. Drug development report (9): pharmacology of ginger, Zingiber officinale. J Drug Dev 1993;6:25-39.  Back to cited text no. 101    
102.Aeschbach R, Loliger J, Scott BC, Murcia A, Butler J, Halliwell B, et al. Antioxidant actions of thymol, carbacrol, 6-gingerol, zingerone and hydroxytyrosol. Food Chem Toxicol 1994;32:31-6.   Back to cited text no. 102    
103.Surh YJ. Anti-tumor promoting potential of selected spice ingredients with antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities: A short review. Food Chem Toxicol 2002;40:1091-7.  Back to cited text no. 103    
104.Lopez-Carrillo L, Lopez-Cervantes M, Robles-Diaz G, Ramirez-Espitia A, Mohar-Betancourt A, Meneses-Garcia A, et al. Capsaicin consumption, Helicobacter pylori positivity and gastric cancer in Mexico. Int J Cancer 2003;106:277-82.   Back to cited text no. 104    
105.Plummer M, Franceschi S, Munoz N. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. IARC Sci Publ 2004;157:311-26.  Back to cited text no. 105    
106.Hail N. Mechanisms of vanilloid-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003;8:251-62.   Back to cited text no. 106    
107.Murakami A, Takahashi D, Hagihara K, Koshimizu K, Ohigashi H. Combinatorial effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and food constituents on production of prostaglandin E2 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in RAW264.7 murine macrophages. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2003;67:1056-62.  Back to cited text no. 107    

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Cancer


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[cn05004t2.jpg] [cn05004t1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil