search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Cancer
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Cancer Society
ISSN: 0019-509X EISSN: 1998-4774
Vol. 47, Num. 3, 2010, pp. 349-349

Indian Journal of Cancer, Vol. 47, No. 3, July-September, 2010, pp. 349

Letter To Editor

Surgical misadventure of transecting tumor infiltrated infrarenal vena cava in a patient of Wilms tumor

Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Cardiothoracic and 1 Vascular Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address: Dr. Ravi Kanojia, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Cardiothoracic, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
drravikanojia@yahoo.com

Code Number: cn10085

PMID: 20587920

DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.64710

Sir,

We had an unusual case of a patient with Wilms tumor who underwent surgery as an adjuvant treatment after primary chemotherapy. This 1-year-old male baby had a large right renal tumor with tumor thrombus extending up to the level of hepatic veins in the inferior vena cava (IVC). Doppler examination showed absence of blood flow in the IVC due to thrombus. He underwent 4 cycles of chemotherapy. There was a significant reduction in the size of the renal lump after chemotherapy. He was taken up for nephrectomy with the intent of removing the tumor thrombus from the IVC. Peroperatively, the IVC was densely adhered to the tumor and additionally, due to anatomical misjudgment, it was accidently transected during nephrectomy. Even after transection, there was no bleeding from both the cut ends of the IVC as they were filled with tumor thrombus. The upper end of the transected IVC was further explored to retrieve tumor thrombus, but it was densely adhered to the walls of the vessel. In the end, after ensuring that the opposite renal vein was intact, both ends were left ligated. Intraoperatively, after the transection, the patient did not show any evidence of hemodynamic instability. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well with no hemodynamic consequences in the lower limbs and has been undergoing chemo- and radiotherapy. It was analyzed in retrospect that the patient was having chronic IVC obstruction due to tumor and had already developed collaterals to bypass the infrarenal IVC obstruction.

A review of cases where IVC was transected either accidently or deliberately revealed that renal cell carcinoma in adults is the most common instance where IVC is involved, where it is either ligated or resected as part of a tumor excision. [1],[2] Many times it has been left ligated or reconstructed using prosthetic grafts.[3] Although a few reports for pediatric cases exist, it is not advisable to perform a ligation. The presented experience made us aware that if the IVC is disrupted at the infrarenal level, the clinical consequences in terms of the venous return from the lower limbs is minimal as collateral circulation is established due to chronic obstruction. In one of the reports of a trauma victim, the IVC was ligated as a damage control measure for severe bleeding. [4] The patient recovered with some edema in postoperative period, which resolved completely in the follow-up. An obvious anatomical query arises as to where the collaterals form, which are able to facilitate the venous return from the lower extremity. Anatomically, collateral circulation develops via the retroperitoneal and vertebral venous plexuses, ascending lumbar veins, and paravertebral veins, which drain into the azygos and the hemi-azygos systems. Testicular and ovarian veins may also contribute as accessory pathways. [5] These collaterals may take some time to develop in trauma patients who had a good IVC flow prior to the ligation.

It can be remarked that IVC ligation is a possible complication of renal tumor with tumor thrombus in the vena cava, and the operating surgeon should be aware of the possible consequences in the occurrence of such an event. Even if it is a chronic venous obstruction, it is unlikely that the patient will have any lower limb venous drainage problems.

References

1.Shirodkar SP, Ciancio G, Soloway MS. Vascular Stapling of the inferior vena cava: Further refinement of techniques for the excision of extensive renal cell carcinoma with unresectable vena-caval involvement. Urology 2009;74:846-50.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Wei B, Chen L, Li PY, Wu Y, Tang Y, Hao L, et al. Ligation and resection of the inferior vena cava during surgical removal of the retroperitoneal tumors involving the inferior vena cava: Feasibility and safety assessment. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2009;29:922-4.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
3.Hollenbeck ST, Grobmyer SR, Kent KC, Brennan MF. Surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:575-9.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.DeCou JM, Abrams RS, Gauderer MW. Seat-belt transection of the pararenal vena cava in a 5-year-old child: Survival with caval ligation. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1074-6.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Jones VS, Shun A. Is the inferior vena cava dispensable? Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23:885-8.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

Copyright 2010 - Indian Journal of Cancer

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil