search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 8, Num. 2, 2000, pp. 195-201
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 8. No. 2, pp. 195-201

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 8. No. 2, pp. 195-201

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Chemical composition of Ricinodendron heudelotii: an indigenous fruit tree in southern Cameroon

T. Tiki Manga, J. M. Fondoun, J. Kengue and C. Thiengang1
IRAD/CRRAN, P. O. Box 2067, Nkolbisson, Yaoundé, Cameroon
1Université de Ngaoundéré, P. O. Box, 455 Ngaoundéré, Cameroon

(Received 25 May, 1998; accepted 4 February, 1999)

Code Number: CS00021

INTRODUCTION

In Africa, tropical fruits provide essential dietary compliments. Nutritionists advise a daily intake of at least 100 g of fruit and as much variety as the season permits (Samson, 1986). In parts of East, Central and West Africa, banana, plantains and tuber crops are important parts of the diet and the daily consumption may exceed 2 kg per head. But these cannot provide all the mineral elements necessary for good human health (Jardin, 1967). Some native fruits are gathered in the forests such as durian in Malaysia and Indonesia, Sapucaia in the Guyanas and Brazil, and several palm fruits in South and Central America (de Foresta and Michon, 1994). Like vegetables, fruits provide vitamins, energy and minerals essential for human health (Saka and Msonthi, 1994). In Cameroon, wild fruit trees play an important role in the rural people’s life (Duckworth, 1966; Vivien and Faure, 1985; Campbell, 1987) as they provide substantial income to their economy (Ndoye, 1995). But it is not known to what extent these available wild fruits contribute to human dietary needs. In a farmers’ priority survey on local multipurpose trees in southern Cameroon (Mollet et al., 1995), Ricinodendron heudelotii (Bail.) was identified as one of the most important fruit species. A recent paper (Fondoun et al., 1999) documented the ethnobotany and uses of this species. This study was undertaken to provide information on chemical composition of the edible portions of the fruits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fruit collection and fruit processing. Mature fresh fruits of R. heudelotii trees were collected from six different locations in southern Cameroon (Fig. 1). Fruit samples were collected at 40-50 km intervals along the main road network from home gardens, food crop as well as cash crop fields, bush fallow and primary forest lands. At each sampling location, 100 fruits were randomly collected under a tree chosen by farmers. A total number of forty seven accessions or tree provenances were sampled from 47 villages within the six provinces of the region. Geographical characteristics of the main city in the six regions from where collections were made are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Geographical details of Ricinodendron heudelotii collections regions in the southern Cameroon rainforest
Region City Latitude Longitude Altitude (masl) Mean annual rainfall (mm) Mean temperature (°C)
Centre Yaoundé 3050’N 11032’E 783 1692 23
East Bertoua 4034’N 13038’E 602 1580 24
Littoral Loum 4040’N 9040’E 260 2600 26
South Ebolowa 2054N 11011’E 615 1720 24
South-West Kumba 4030’N 9020’E 245 2970 22
West Bafang 5010’N 10010’E 965 1830 21
masl = metres above sea level

The fruits collected from each tree provenance were kept for two weeks under ambient temperature to allow mesocarp decomposition and for seed extraction. The seeds were then boiled for 45 minutes and crushed. Kernels (the edible parts) were extracted from the seed and homogenised using a mortar and pestle.

Chemical analysis. Analar grade chemicals were used for all chemical analyses (Saka and Msonthi, 1994). Crude protein, total ash, crude fibre and total sugar were analysed using Wolff’s methodology (Wolff, 1968). Total ash was determined by dry-ashing method after being oven-dried for 48 hours at 65oC. Nitrogen was determined by Kjeldahl method and multiplied by 6.25 to obtain crude protein. Crude fat was determined using dilute acid hydrolysis and hexane soxhlet extraction technique. Crude fibre was analysed by solubilisation in sulphuric acid 0.255 N and alkaline hydrolysis method (Saka and Msonthi, 1994). Protein, fat and total sugar values were multiplied by 17, 37 and 16, respectively, and summed up to obtain the calorific values (Osborne and Voogt, 1978). Total sugar was extracted by hydrolysis in hydrochloric acid (HCl 4N) and by solubilisation in 50% ethanol. No analysis was done for minerals. Fatty acid spectrum was determined by gas chromatographic technique on 100 g dry matter basis for two provenances, FTKC 27 and FTKC 32 following the procedures of Christophersen and Glass (1969) and Christie (1989).

A Principal Component Factorial Analysis was done to assess the differences or similarities of the chemical composition of the provenances.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 2 shows the chemical composition of the 47 provenances of edible R. heudelotii kernels, and Figure 2 presents the similarity or difference distribution of the chemical composition of the provenances. Regardless of the chemical component considered FTKC 27 and 32 had the highest and lowest values, respectively.

TABLE 2. Chemical composition (100 g-1 DM) of Ricinodendron heudelotii kernels
Provenance codes Fat (%) Crude protein (%) Ash (%) Total carbohydrates Fibre Energy value
(kJ 100 g-1 DM)
FTKC 01 62.23 58.34 16.84 5.72 8.63 3385
FTKC 02 57.75 58.71 16.95 5.75 8.68 3226
FTKC 03 56.45 51.11 14.76 5.05 7.56 3038
FTKC 04 56.10 56.82 16.41 5.57 8.41 3130
FTKC 05 57.84 58.5 16.89 5.73 8.48 3226
FTKC 06 54.33 55.05 15.90 5.40 8.14 3032
FTKC 07 55.40 59.20 17.01 5.77 8.76 3196
FTKC 08 58.90 60.95 17.60 6.00 9.02 23.11
FTKC 09 53.04 53.85 15.55 5.28 7.97 2962
FTKC 10 57.20 54.70 15.80 5.36 8.09 3132
FTKC 11 57.07 55.69 16.08 5.46 8.24 3145
FTKC 12 58.95 55.70 16.08 5.46 8.24 3149
FTKC 13 63.48 54.14 15.63 5.31 8.01 3354
FTKC 14 59.20 51.83 14.96 5.08 7.67 3152
FTKC 15 63.07 59.82 17.27 5.86 8.85 3444
FTKC 16 60.15 58.50 16.89 5.73 8.65 3311
FTKC 17 60.43 57.95 16.73 5.68 8.57 3311
FTKC 18 61.86 62.59 16.50 5.60 9.26 3442
FTKC 19 56.90 54.36 15.70 5.33 8.04 3114
FTKC 20 55.90 57.13 16.5 5.60 8.45 3129
FTKC 21 59.10 55.46 16.01 5.43 8.20 3216
FTKC 22 54.29 57.90 16.72 5.68 8.57 3083
FTKC 23 61.44 53.08 15.32 5.20 7.85 3258
FTKC 24 53.43 54.35 15.69 5.33 8.04 2986
FTKC 25 59.91 59.98 17.32 5.88 8.87 3330
FTKC 26 57.61 58.37 16.86 5.72 8.63 3215
FTKC 27 63.46 65.16 17.76 6.39 9.37 3558
FTKC 28 63.18 51.68 14.92 5.06 7.64 3297
FTKC 29 55.90 56.64 16.36 5.55 8.38 3119
FTKC 30 56.46 57.20 16.52 5.61 8.46 3151
FTKC 31 61.81 55.59 16.05 5.45 8.22 3319
FTKC 32 49.25 49.89 14.41 4.89 7.38 2748
FTKC 33 59.04 56.25 16.24 5.51 8.32 3228
FTKC 34 52.28 52.97 15.30 5.19 7.84 2917
FTKC 35 60.90 55.25 15.95 5.41 8.17 3279
FTKC 36 56.70 57.40 16.58 5.63 8.54 3163
FTKC 37 50.09 50.76 14.66 4.97 7.50 2795
FTKC 38 56.35 57.09 16.49 5.60 8.45 3145
FTKC 39 54.26 54.98 15.88 5.39 8.13 3028
FTKC 40 59.91 57.70 16.66 5.66 8.54 3288
FTKC 41 58.94 59.52 17.42 5.91 8.80 3287
FTKC 42 51.57 53.79 15.53 5.20 7.96 2905
FTKC 43 55.36 56.09 16.20 5.50 8.30 3089
FTKC 44 59.21 55.26 15.03 5.10 8.17 3211
FTKC 45 53.46 52.14 15.06 5.11 7.71 2946
FTKC 46 60.28 55.62 16.06 5.45 8.23 3263
FTKC 47 55.20 53.91 15.57 5.25 7.97 3042

Fat content. Crude fat varied from 49.3 to 63.5% for FTKC 32 and 13, respectively, showing a large difference between the provenances, probably due to environmental effects (Ladipo et al., 1996). Similar results were obtained on samples from Ebolowa (Tchiegang et al., 1997) and Madagascar (Heim et al., 1919). Pieraerts (1917) found up to 67.1% crude fat on Ricinodendron samples from Congo. R. heudelotii therefore contains higher crude fat than classical oily plants, such as cotton (35 - 40 %) and soybeans (15 -25%) (Cheftel et al., 1977).

Crude protein. The highest and lowest protein contents were obtained from provenances FTKC 27 (65.2%) and FTKC 32 (49.9%), respectively. Most provenances had more than 50% crude protein, revealing that Ricinodendron kernels have high protein contents. Baumer (1995) found alkaloid traces in Ricinodendron kernels with nitrogen component that probably accounts for the high level of crude protein.

Total sugar. Similar incremental difference was observed as for crude protein between provenance FTKC 27 and FTKC 32, which yielded the highest (6.4%) and the lowest (4.9%) total sugar, respectively. Compared to soybeans (15%) and cotton (10%)[Cheftel and Cheftel, 1977], R. heudelotii has low total sugar content.

Crude fibre and ash. The highest levels of ash and fibre were obtained in provenances FTKC 27, (17.7 and 9.4%) while the lowest levels were in FTKC 32 (14.4% for ash and 7.4 % for fibre). In Malawi, Saka and Msonthi (1994) found higher values of ash (11.0 % for Ximenia caffra) and fibre (45.3 % for Azanza garckeana) in two eastern African edible wild fruits.

Fatty acid composition. Table 3 shows the fatty acid composition of two Ricinodendron provenance kernels, FTKC 27 and FTKC 32. Linoleic acid is the most common important fatty acid found in the cotyledons, with 60.3% for provenance FTKC 27 and 59.9% for FTKC32. Traces of oleic, stearic and palmitic acids were also found in the kernels.

TABLE 3. Fatty acid composition (g 100 g-1 of lipids) of two provenances of Ricinodendron heudelotii (Bail.) kernels from southern Cameroon
Fatty acid types Provenances
FTKC 27 FTKC 32
Lauric acid (C12:0) 0 0
Myristic acid (C14:0) 0 0
Palmitic acid (C16:0) 12.08 12.05
Stearic acid (C18:0) 12.95 12.87
Oleic acid (C18:1c) 13.90 13.91
Oleic acid (C18:1pi O) 0.76 0.77
Linoleic acid (C18:2c) 60.32 59.90

Energy value. The energy values varied from 2,748 to 3,558 kJ 100 g-1 DM for provenances FTKC 32 and FTKC 27, respectively. These values are very high compared to those reported for food crops, i.e., 84 to 2,500 kJ 100g-1 DM (Duckworth, 1966). These high values are mainly derived from the fat content and crude protein. Unbalanced diet is generally the main cause of malnutrition in tropical Africa as a consequence of protein, iron and minerals deficiencies. Consumption of R. heudelotii kernels can help to reduce this deficiency. Moreover, as game meat and fish are becoming more scarce in the humid forests, fruits such as Irvingia gabonensis, Ricinodendron heudelotii and Coula edulis, could partially rectify the deficiency caused by lack of animal protein. Balick and Gershoff (1981) reported up to 2,558 calories and 286 g of fat in 1 kg of Jessenia bataua. The calorific value of Ricinodendron kernels is high but the sugar content is low, thus, the fruit can be recommended as a high-energy consumption material for diabetics. Our results also revealed that Ricinodendron heudelotii is an important source of protein.

In general, the highest and lowest values of crude protein, fat, total carbohydrates, crude fibre and ash were recorded for provenances FTKC 27 and 32, respectively, indicating great variability in nutrient contents of R. heudelotii. This may be due to difference in soil type and climate as observed for fruit shapes and yields (Fondoun et al., 1999). The collected provenances should be considered as genetic "ideotypes" for futher improvement studies.

CONCLUSION

The species contains high level of crude oil that can be used for household consumption. Mineral composition of the species, however, needs to be determined.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Global Environmental Facilities (GEF) through UNDP office under the Systemwide Alternatives to Slash and Burn Project led by ICRAF. We are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

REFERENCE

  1. Balick, M. J. and Gershoff, S. N. 1981. Nutritional evaluation of the Jessenia bataua palm: source of high quality protein and oil from tropical America. Economic Botany 35:261-271.
  2. Baumer, M. 1985. Arbres et Arbriseaux Nouriciers en Afrique Occidentale. Enda Edition, Mbour, Senegal.
  3. Campbell, B. M. 1987. The use of wild fruits in Zimbabwe. Economic Botany 41:375-385.
  4. Cheftel, J. C. and Cheftel, H. 1977. Introduction à la Biochimie et à la Technologie Alimentaire. Vol. 1. Lavoisier, Paris, France. 381 pp .
  5. Christie, W. 1989. Gas Chromatography and Lipids, a Practical Guide. The Oil Press, Ayr, Scotland.
  6. Christophersen, S. and Glass, R. 1969. Fatty acid composition in edible fruits. Journal of Dairy Science 52:1289-1292.
  7. de Foresta, H. and Michon, G. 1994. Agroforestry in Sumatra: where ecology meets economy. Agroforestry Today 6:12-13.
  8. Duckworth, R. B. 1966. Contributions to human nutrition. In: Fruits and Vegetables. Pergamon Press, London. pp 140-169.
  9. Fondoun, J.M., Tiki Manga, T. and Kengue, J. 1999. Ricinodendron heudelotii: Ethnobotany and uses in southern Cameroon. (in Press).
  10. Heim, F., Garrigue, E. and Husson, M. 1919. Un nouvel oléagineux de Madagascar: "le Betrata" Jatropha mahafalensis Jum. (Euphorb.) Bulletin Agence Générale des Colonies 12:679-691.
  11. Jardin, C. 1967. Fruits. In: List of Fruits Used in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome, pp 118-170.
  12. Ladipo, D.O., Fondoun, J. M. and Ganga, N. 1996. Domestication of the bush mango (Irvingia spp.): some exploitable intraspecific variations in west and central Africa. In: Domestication and Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products in Agroforestry Systems. Leakey, R.R.B.,Temu, A.B., Melnyk, M. and Ventomore, P. (Eds.). FAO Non-Wood Forest Products 9:198-205.
  13. Mollet, M., Tiki Manga, T., Kengue, J. and Tchoundjeu, Z. 1995. The "top 10" species in Cameroon: a survey on farmers’ views on trees. Agroforestry Today 7:14-16.
  14. Osborne, D. R. and Voogt, P. 1978. The Analysis of Nutrients in Foods. Academic Press, London. 251 pp.
  15. Saka, J. D. K. and Msonthi, J. D. 1994. Nutritional value of edible fruits of indigenous wild trees in Malawi. Forest Ecology and Management 64:245 - 248.
  16. Samson, J. A. 1986. Tropical Fruits. Second Edition. Tropical Agriculture Series, Longman UK. 336 pp.
  17. Tchiegang, C., Kapseu, C., Ndjounkeu, R. and Ngassoum, M. 1997. Les amandes de Ricinodendron heudelotii (Bail.): matière première pour les huileries tropicales (in Press).
  18. Vivien, J. et Faure, J. J. 1985. Fruitiers Sauvages d’Afrique: Espèces du Cameroun. Nguila - Keroy Editions, Saint - Ceréré, France. 416 pp.
  19. Wolff, J. P. 1968. Manuel d’Analyse des Corps Gras. Azoulay, Paris, France. 524 pp.

 


The following images related to this document are available:

Line drawing images

[cs00021a.gif] [cs00021b.gif]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil