search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 8, Num. 4, 2000, pp. 411-418
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 8. No. 4, pp. 411-418

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 8. No. 4, pp. 411-418

EFFECT OF CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT AND CROPPING SYSTEM ON PEARL MILLET AND COWPEA YIELD

Adama Coulibaly, Minamba Bagayoko, Samba Traore and S.C. Mason1

Institut d’Economie Rurale, Bamako, Mali
1University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915 U.S.A.

(Received 6 January, 1999; accepted 30 July, 2000)

Code Number: CS00043

INTRODUCTION

Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Br.] is the most common crop produced and consumed in the Sudano-Sahelian zones of Mali. Over 1.7 million hactares are produced annually in Mali with low grain yield levels of 450 to 735 kg ha-1. Despite increasing population growth the area under millet production is expanding with shorter traditional fallow periods, stagnant crop yields, and the soil nutrient status is declining (Bagayoko et al., 1996; van der Pol, 1992).

Leaving crop residues in the field and using a pearl millet-legume rotational system have been suggested as ways to simultaneously increase yields and replenish soil nutrient levels.

Crop residue application to fields in West Africa has resulted in increased pearl millet grain yields (Muehlig-Versen et al., 1997; Marschner et al., 1995; Bationo and Mokwunye, 1991, Verma et al., 1992), reduced crusting, enhanced seedling growth and improved N, P, and K nutrition of seedlings (Muehlig-Verson et al., 1997), reduced wind erosion losses and improved crop stands (Michels et al., 1995a; 1995b), and enhanced root growth (Bababe, 1997; Hafner et al., 1993; Kretzschmar et al, 1991; Rebfaka et al., 1994). Crop residues trapped wind-blown dust with high nutrient levels (Bationo et al., 1993; ), and higher soil pH and lower Al and Mn levels (Bationo et al., 1993; Hafner et al., 1993; Kretzschmar et al., 1991). In addition, crop residue application increased N fixation and dry matter of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)(Rebafka et al., 1993), but legumes have generally been affected less than cereal crops (Buerkert et al., 1997). Although retaining crop residues on the field reduces the export of nutrients (Bationo et al., 1993), a net loss of nutrients commonly occurs (Buerkert, 1995). Crop response to residue application is greater in the lower rainfall Sahelian zone than in the Sudanian zone (Buerkert et al., 1997), and is greater on unfertile degraded soils than on more fertile soils (Buerkert, 1995). Crop residue application is commonly used by producers to regenerate soils with wind and water-eroded surfaces (Taylor-Powell et al., 1991).

Crop residues are used for many other purposes in West Africa, reducing the amount of residues available for soil replenishment. Lamers and Bruentrup (1996) studied the use of crop residue and found that the highest gross marginal returns for land was mulching with crop residues, but the highest gross marginal returns for total labour was using residues for livestock feeding and for weeding labour was burning residues. Linear programing indicated that the multiple uses of crop residues for soil improvement, livestock feeding and weed control, as already practiced, was an economically sound approach for crop residue utilisation.

Cropping systems research in West Africa indicates that crop rotation of pearl millet with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] or groundnut enhances pearl millet grain yields (Bagayoko et al., 1996; Nicou, 1978; Bationo et al., 1996; Reddy et al., 1994). Buerkert et al. (1997) indicated that yield increases from rotation cropping systems with cowpea varied from 4 to 37% and was site specific. Bagayoko et al. (1996) reported varied grain yield responses across years from 17 to 31% at one site in Mali, and that the pearl millet-cowpea rotation and continuous pearl millet both removed soil nutrients at rates greater than they were being naturally replenished.

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of two cropping systems and three crop residue management practices on the grain and stover yields of pearl millet and cowpea. In addition, the paper also discusses changes in soil nutrient status resulting from the experimental treatments used in the study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A long-term pearl millet crop residue management and cropping system study was initiated in 1990 at the Cinzana Agricultural Research Station near Segou, Mali and was conducted over a period of 7 years. The area is characterised by an average annual rainfall of 650 mm and has low soil organic matter and nutrient levels on an acidic, sandy, leached ferriginous (Paleustalf) soil. The experimental site had been kept under fallow for approximately 10 years, and we assumed that the soils possessed great microvariability for N, P, K, Ca, Mg and cation exchange capacity as is commonly found in the region (Bagayoko et al., 1996).

The experiment was conducted in a randomised complete block design with four replicates. The treatments consisted of a factorial combination of three crop residue management treatments and two cropping systems on fixed plots over time. Crop residue management treatments included total removal of residues by hand gathering, incorporation of pearl millet residues produced the previous year using animal traction, and retention of pearl millet residues produced the previous year on the soil surface. Cowpea residues were constantly removed from the plots by hand gathering. The cropping system treatments were continuous pearl millet, continuous cowpea, and pearl millet-cowpea rotation. Only one phase of the rotation was included in the study; thus, in the crop rotation treatment pearl millet was present in even-numbered years and cowpea in odd-numbered years.

The local pearl millet variety ‘Boboni’ and the indeterminate cowpea variety ‘Suvita 2’ were used throughout the duration of the experiment. Pearl millet was planted in hills spaced 0.8 x 0.8 m apart, and thinned to two plants per hill two weeks after emergence giving a seedling population of 31,250 plants ha-1. Cowpea was planted in hills at a spacing of 0.8 x 0.5 m and thinned to two plants per hill giving a plant population of 50,000 plants ha-1. Pearl millet and cowpea were planted on the same day for each year planting was done in July.

All plots received a basal broadcast application of 300 kg ha-1 Tilemsi rock phosphate (equivalent to 36 kg ha-1 P) prior to planting in 1990, 1993 and 1996. Rock phosphate particle size distribution was 20% by weight less than 0.5 mm diameter, and 85% less than 3 mm. Annual application of 21 kg ha-1 N as urea was done as a side-dress applied near the pearl millet hills at the early tillering growth stage. Soil samples were taken at 0-20 cm depth in 1990 prior to the establishment of the study, and again before planting in 1996 when three cycles of the crop rotation were completed. The soil samples were analysed in 1990 and 1996 for pH, Bray-2 P, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and exchangeable K, Ca and Mg at the Institut d’Economie Rurale Soil Testing Laboratory in Sotuba, Mali. The same soil analysis methods were used in both years.

Plots consisted of 6 rows, 8 m long (38.4 m2 ) and the center 5 m of the middle four rows (16 m2) was harvested for grain and stover. Yields were reported on a dry matter basis. Grain and stover yields were analysed separately for each year and across years using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Where the F statistics indicate significance between treatments, mean separations were done using the LSD test at the 5% level of significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Rainfall. Annual rainfall at the experimental site in 1991, 1995, 1996 and 1997 was similar to the long-term average of 650 mm (Table 1). Seasonal rainfall was below average in 1993, and above average in 1992 and 1994. Rainfall distribution was variable across the growing season with June rainfall ranging from 22 to 138 mm, July from 99 to 259 mm, August from 155 to 279 mm, and September from 22 to 195 mm. August rainfall was the most uniform, and over 32% of the annual rainfall occurred in August, except in 1992 when high rainfall amounts occurred in July and September, and in 1995 and 1997 with the highest rainfall received in September.

TABLE 1. Monthly rainfall distribution during the growing season at Cinzana, Mali in 1991-1997
Month 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
mm
May 29 14 15 60 73 44 0
June 57 123 25 138 22 62 108
July 174 259 99 184 158 160 139
August 279 155 205 274 173 173 203
September 79 164 25 120 192 195 141
October 22 5 11 71 18 37 44
Total 640 720 380 847 636 671 635

Residue management. Crop residue management treatments had no influence on pearl millet grain or stover yields from 1991 to 1997 (Tables 2 and 3), except for grain yield in 1993 when plots with incorporated crop residues yielded more than plots with residues retained on the soil surface. This year had the lowest seasonal rainfall of the seven years of the study (Table 1). However, crop residue incorporation consistently increased grain and stover yields (Tables 2 and 3). The seven-year mean pearl millet grain yield for plots with incorporated crop residues was 180 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (12%) greater than plots with residues removed (P = 0.07). The mean pearl millet stover yield in plots with crop residue incorporated was 211 to 247 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (15 to 18%) greater than plots with residues removed or retained on the surface (P=0.19). Although the short-term benefit of retaining crop residues in the field for this non-degraded soil was small, as reported by Buerkert et al. (1997), the long-term benefits of crop residue incorporation appeared to be important. In this study, the beneficial effect on pearl millet yield of retaining crop residues in the field were optimised by residue incorporation treatments. This is in agreement with the report of Bababe (1997).

TABLE 2. Effect of crop residue management on continuous pearl millet grain yields
Residue management 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Mean
kg ha-1
Removed 1266 1472 1392 1322 1861 1820 1154 1469
Surface 1403 1687 1095 1424 1800 1896 1297 1515
Incorporated 1413 1750 1596 1429 1907 1981 1468 1649
LSD(0.05) NS NS 375 NS NS NS NS NS
C.V.(%) 22 28 16 23 15 18 18 22
NS = Not significant
Significant at P = 0.07; LSD (0.05) = 184

TABLE 3. Effect of crop residue management on continuous pearl millet stover yields
Residue management 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Mean
kg ha-1
Removed 3174 2604 3296 3825 4557 4150 1302 3273
Surface 3703 3066 2116 3845 4598 4028 1303 3237
Incorporated 2848 3662 3296 3805 4313 4359 2116 3484
LSD(0.05) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
C.V.(%) 28 34 28 19 17 27 42 27
NS = Not significant

Crop residue management treatments did not over the years, influence cowpea grain and stover yields (Table 4). However, the mean yields over 1991, 1993, 1995 and 1997 indicated that, relative to residue removal, surface retention of residues increased cowpea grain yields by 240 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (25%) and residue incorportion increased grain yield by 186 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (19%). Cowpea stover yield over the years increased by an average of 316 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (41%) due surface retention of crop residues, and by 350 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 with residue incorporation, as previously found by Rebafka et al. (1993) for groundnut. In this study, the grain and stover yields increases from retaining crop residues in the field were slightly greater for cowpea than for pearl millet, contrasting with results of Buerkert et al. (1997).

TABLE 4. Crop residue management effect on cowpea grain and stover yields
Residue management Grain Stover
1991 1993 1995 1997 Mean 1991 1993 1995 1997 Mean
kg ha-1
Removed 1689 669 1079 392 955 1016 734 898 461 777
Surface 1814 823 1349 792 1195 1641 1180 1035 516 1093
Incorporated 1823 701 1566 475 1141 1895 836 1074 781 1147
LSD(0.05) NS NS NS NS 208 NS NS NS NS 242
C.V.(%) 13 30 31 44 26 30 25 38 29 33
NS = Not significant

Cropping systems. Rotation of cowpea with pearl millet increased pearl millet grain yields in 1996, as well as mean yields over 1992, 1994 and 1996 (Table 5). Over the years, pearl millet grain yields increased by an average of 228 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (15%) and stover yields increased by 628 kg-1 ha-1 year-1 (19%) in response to rotation with cowpea. This is less than the 17 to 31% yield increase reported by Bagayoko et al. (1996), but well within the range of the 4 to 37% yield increase reported by Buerkert et al. (1997). Cowpea grain and stover yields were not significantly (P=0.05) increased by rotation with pearl millet (data not presented) similar to results found by Bagayoko et al. (1996).

TABLE 5. Previous crop effect on pearl millet grain and stover yields
Previous crop Grain Stover
1992 1994 1996 Mean 1992 1994 1996 Mean
kg ha-1
Pearl Millet 1489 1371 1724 1528 2780 3920 3472 3390
Cowpea 1784 1412 2074 1756 3441 3730 4883 4018
LSD(0.05) NS NS 241 155 NS NS 723 360  
C.V.(%) 27 22 15 21 33 19 20 24
NS = Not significant

Soil nutrient levels. Regardless of crop residue treatment, all cropping systems over the six-year period increased soil pH, carbon and phosphorus concentration, and decreased potassium and cation exchange capacity (Table 6). Phosphorus concentration increase was certainly due to basal rock phosphate application in 1990 (after soil sampling) and in 1993 prior to planting. The 1996 rock phosphate application was applied after the soil samples were collected. Crop residue treatments had little influence on soil pH, carbon and cation exchange capacity after six years. However, leaving crop residues on the soil surface resulted in higher soil P concentrations than other residue treatments, possibly due to entrapment of wind blown dust with higher phosphorus concentrations previously observed by Bationo et al. (1993). Both treatments of incorporating and retaining crop residues on the surface of plots resulted in higher soil K concentrations than for crop residue removal treatment.

TABLE 6. Crop residue management effect on soil properties
Crop residue management pH P (Bray 2) Organic carbon K Ca Mg CEC
1990 1996 1990 1996 1990 1996 1990 1996 1990 1996 1990 1996 1990 1996
ppm % c mol kg-1
Removed 4.8 5.3 8.0 24 0.17 0.37 0.24 0.05 1.47 1.10 0.30 0.13 3.6 1.2
Surface 4.7 5.5 11 35 0.19 0.40 0.33 0.16 0.93 0.94 0.31 0.19 2.8 1.1
Incorporated 4.7 5.5 10 26 0.21 0.36 0.26 0.12 0.88 1.04 0.28 0.18 2.5 1.0
ANOVA summary
Cropping System (CS) NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Crop Residue Management (CR) NS *** NS ** NS NS *
Year x CS NS * NS NS NS NS NS
Year x CR NS * NS NS NS NS NS
CS x CR NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
Year x CS x CR NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
C.V. (%) 4 24 36 51 52 28 30
* ,**, and *** + Significance at P = 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively; NS = Not significant

CONCLUSIONS

Crop residue management had apparent short-term effects on the productivity of pearl millet and cowpea. Incorporation of crop residues increased pearl millet grain and stover yields over seven years of production. Also both incorporation or surface retention of residues on the surface increased cowpea yields over the same time period. Crop residues retained on the surface helped maintain soil P and K concentrations, suggesting that this treatment reduced the rate of soil degradation. These results suggest leaving crop residues in the production fields is an important practice that would help reduce nutrient mining and thus ensure sustainable production of these two important crops. Producers need to weigh the long-term benefits to grain and stover production, and soil maintenance against the short-term economic benefits associated with burning crop residue, using crop residues for livestock feed or construction, and other alternate uses.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Contribution of the IER (Institut d’Economie Rurale), B.P. 258, Bamako, Mali and Dept. of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915 U.S.A. Paper No. 12490 of the Journal Series of the Nebraska Agricultural Research Division are highly appreciated. This research was supported by USAID Grant No. DAN 1254-G-0021 through INTSORMIL, the International Sorghum and Millet Collaborative Research Program.

REFERENCES

  1. Bababe, B. 1997. Crop residue application systems and efficiency of water use by pearl millet in northern Nigeria, In: Soil Fertility Management in West African Land Use Systems. Renard, G., Neef, A., Becker, K. and von Oppen, M. (Eds.), pp. 61-66. Magraf Verlag. Weikersheim, Germany.
  2. Bagayoko, M., Mason, S.C., Traore, S. and Eskridge, K.M. 1996. Pearl millet/cowpea cropping system yields and soil nutrient levels. African Crop Science Journal 4: 453-462.
  3. Bationo, A., Christianson, C.B. and Klaij, M.C. 1993. The effect of crop residue and fertilizer use on pearl millet yields in Niger. Fertilizer Research 34:252-258.
  4. Bationo, A. and Mokwunye, A.U. 1991. Role of manures and crop residue in alleviating soil fertility constraints to crop production: With special reference to the Sahelian and Sudanian zones of West Africa. Fertilizer Research 29: 117-125.
  5. Bationo, A., Ntare, B.R., Pierre, D. and Christianson, B.C. 1996. Crop rotation and N effects on crop yield and soil chemical properties in a sandy soil of West Africa Semi-Arid Tropics. Fertilizer Research 37: 75-81.
  6. Buerkert, A. 1995. Effects of Crop Residues, Phosphorus and Spatial Soil Variability on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) in Southwest Niger. Verlag Ulrich E. Grauer, Stuttgart, Germany. 272 pp.
  7. Buerkert, A., Bagayoko, M., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. 1997. Site specific differences in the response of ceareals and legumes and rock phosphate, crop residue mulch and nitrogen in the Sudano-Sahelian Zone of West Africa. In: Soil Fertility Management in West African Land Use Systems. Renard, M. (Eds.), pp. 53-59. Margraf. Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.
  8. Hafner, H., George, E., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. 1993. Effect of crop residues on root growth and nutrient acquisition of pearl millet in an acid sandy soil in Niger. Plant and Soil 150:117-127
  9. Kretzschmar, R.M., Hafner, H., Bation, A. and Marschner, H. 1991. Long- and short-term effects of crop residues on aluminium toxicity, phosphorus availability and growth of pearl millet in an acid sandy soil. Plant and Soil 136:215-223
  10. Lamers, J.P.A. and Bruentrup, M. 1996. Comparative advantage of single and multi-purpose uses of millet stover in Niger. Agricultural Systems 50:273-285.
  11. Marschner, H., Rebafka, F.-P., Hafner, H. and Buerkert, A. 1995. Corp residue management for increasing production of peral millet on acid sandy soils in Niger. In: Plant Soil Interactions at low pH. Date, R.A., Grundon, N.J., Rayment, M.E. and Probert, M.E. (Eds.), p. 767-770. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  12. Michels, K., Sivakumar, M.V.K. and Allison, B.E. 1995a. Wind erosion control using crop residue I. Effects on soil flux and soil properties. Field Crops Research 40:111-118.
  13. Muehlig-Versen, B., Buerkert, A., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. 1997. Crop residue and phosphorus management in millet based cropping systems on sandy soils of the Sahel. In: Soil Fertility Management in West African Land Use Systems. Renard, G. Neef, A., Becker, K. and Von Oppen, M. (Eds.), pp. 31-40. Magraf Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.
  14. Nicou, R.1978. Etude de successions culturales au Senegal: resultants et methods. Agronomique Tropical 33:51-61.
  15. Rebafka, F.-P., Ndunguru, B.J. and Marschner, H. 1993. Crop residue application increases nitrogen fixation and dry matter production in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) grown on an acid sandy soil in Niger, West Africa. Plant and Soil 150:213-222
  16. Rebafka, F.-P., Hebel, A., Bationo, A., Stahr, K. and Marschner, H. 1994. Short- and long-term effects of crop residues and of phosphorus fertilization on pearl millet yield on an acid sandy soil in Niger, West Africa. Field Crops Research 36:113-124.
  17. Reddy, K.C., Visser, P.L., Klaij, M.C. and Renard, C. 1994. The effects of sole and traditional intercropping of millet and cowpea on soil and crop productivity. Experimental Agriculture 30:83-88.
  18. Taylor-Powell, E., Manu, A., Geiger, S.C., Ouattara, M. and Juo, A.S.R. 1991. Integrated Management of Agricultural Watersheds: Land Tenure and Indigenous Knowledge of Soil and Crop Management. Trop Soils Bulletin 91-04. Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.
  19. van der Pol, F. 1992. Soil Mining: An Unseen Contributor to Farm Income in Southern Mali. Bulletin 325. Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 48 pp.
  20. Verma, P.K., Easin, J.D., Reddy, K.C. and Maman, N. 1992. Effect of crop residues on pearl millet production in Niger. Cereal Research Communications 20:295-296.
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil