search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 16, Num. 2, 2008, pp. 119-131

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 16. No. 2, June, 2008,  pp. 119-131

Occurrence Of Plant Parasitic Nematodes And Factors That Enhance Population Build-up In Cereal-based Cropping Systems In Uganda

H.L. Talwana, M.M. Butseya and G. Tusiime

Department of Crop Science, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

(Received 3 December 2007; accepted 5 May, 2008)

Code Number: cs08015

ABSTRACT

Plant parasitic nematodes remain a major challenge to crop production that has hitherto received minmum research attention in sub-Saharan Africa. This paper gives the diversity of nematode genera and species associated with cereal crops and indicates the possibility of nemadode population build up due to production intensification especially in soils with high sand content. Twenty-two nematode species from 10 genera of plant parasitic nematodes were recovered in root samples collected from 5 cereal crops (barley, maize, millet, sorghum and wheat) collected from 293 sites in five major cereal growing areas of Uganda (230 maize samples, 18 millet samples, 21 sorghum samples, 18 wheat samples and 6 barley samples), grown singly or as intercrops. Of these, 12 nematode species were encountered in maize roots, namely Aphelenchoides arachides, Aphelenchoides eltaybi, Ditylenchus spp, Helicotylenchus dihystera, Meloidogyne spp., Pratylenchus brachyurus, Pratylenchus goodeyi, Pratylenchus zeae, Scutellonema brachyurus, Scutellonema paralabiatum, Scutellonema clathricaudatum and Rotylenchulus borealis. Based on populations of the nematode species recovered, four distinct nematode groupings were observed: those that were widespread and abundant (Pratylenchus zeae and P. brachyurus); those that were widespread but less abundant (Scutellonema spp., Meloidogyne spp., Rotylenchulus spp. and Helicotylenchus spp.); those that were localized but very abundant (Pratylenchus goodeyi), and those that were localized but less abundant (Aphelenchoides spp. and Ditylenchus spp.). Intensified maize cropping systems with/without noncereal rotations increased risk of Pratylenchus zeae, Scutellonema spp. and Helicotylenchus spp. infection of maize.

Key Words: Barley, maize, Meloidogyne spp., millet, Pratylenchus spp., Scutellonema spp., sorghum, wheat

RÉSUMÉ

Les nématodes parasites des plantes demeurent un défi important à la production végétale qui a jusqu’ici suscité une faible attention de la part de la recherche en Afrique sous-Saharien. Cet article présente la diversité des genres et des espèces de nématode associés aux plantes céréalières et indique la possibilité d’accumulation de population de nemadodes due à l’intensification de la production, particulièrement dans les sols avec teneur élevée en sable. Vingt-deux espèces de 10 genres de nématodes parasites de plantes ont été récupérées dans des échantillons de racines colectées à partir de 5 plantes céréalières (orge, maïs, millet, sorgho et blé) rassemblées à partir de 293 sites dans cinq principales régions de production céréalières de l’Ouganda (230 échantillons de maïs, 18 échantillons de millet, 21 échantillons de sorgho, 18 échantillons de blé et 6 échantillons d’orge), cultivés en monoculture ou en cultures mixtes. De ces derniers, 12 espèces de nématodes ont été identifiées dans les racines de maïs. Il s’agit de Aphelenchoides arachides, Aphelenchoides eltaybi, Ditylenchus spp, Helicotylenchus dihystera, Meloidogyne spp., Pratylenchus brachyurus, Pratylenchus goodeyi, Pratylenchus zeae, Scutellonema brachyurus, Scutellonema paralabiatum, Scutellonema clathricaudatum et Rotylenchulus borealis. En référence aux populations de nématodes récupérées, quatre regroupements distincts de nématodes étaient observés : ceux qui étaient plus répandus et abondants (Pratylenchus zeae et P. brachyurus); ceux qui étaient très répandus mais moins abondants (Aphelenchoides spp. et Ditylenchus spp.) ; ceux qui ont été localisés mais très abondant (Pratylenchus goodeyi), et ceux qui ont été localisés mais moins abondant (Aphelenchoides spp. et Ditylenchus spp.). Le système de cultures intensifiées de maïs avec ou sans rotations d’autres cultures non céréalières augmente le risque d’infection du maïs par Pratylenchus zeae, Scutellonema spp. et Helicotylenchus spp.

Mots Clés: Orge, maïs, Meloidogyne spp., millet, Pratylenchus spp., Scutellonema spp., sorgho, blé

INTRODUCTION

Cereals constitute the world’s most important food crops. This is due to their great adaptability, permitting successful colonisation in every type of ecological habitat; relative ease of cultivation; tillering habit giving higher yield per unit area; and good nutritive values (Vasil, 1999).

Among cereals, wheat, maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa) occupy the most eminent positions in terms of production, acreage and source of nutrition, particularly in developing countries (CIMMYT, 1992). In Uganda, maize (Zea mays), finger millet (Eleusine coracana), sorghum (Sorghum bicolar) and rice (Oryza sativa) are the major cereal crops grown, maize being the most important cereal crop grown countrywide. It is a major staple in many rural and urban communities and has also recently been identified as one of the non-traditional cash crops.

Finger millet is the principal cereal grain and staple in northern, eastern and parts of western Uganda. Sorghum is drought-resistant and regularly out-yields maize in many drier parts of Uganda, it is more resistant to water logging and yields well in infertile soils and can be ratooned. Rice has gained popularity in Uganda because of its diversity and adaptability, high commercial value, high acceptance as food (because of its palatability and ease to cook), and ease to store and transport. It is grown as a rain-fed lowland crop in much of the Eastern and part of Northern Uganda, or upland crop in other parts of Northern and Western Uganda (Laker-Ojok, 1994; MAAIF, 1997).

Several introductions of new cereal varieties with various improved traits have been made to improve cereal production worldwide, but in many instances the yield potential of the new varieties has not been fully expressed. Production constraints of cereals are many including both abiotic and biotic factors, but establishing the relative importance of individual production constraints is often challenging. Pests and diseases of cereals have long been recognised as important constraints to cereals production worldwide and have received extensive research. However, plant parasitic nematodes have remained largely excluded from research attention. Data on the importance of nematodes, particularly individual species occurrence and community composition, population densities and pathogenicity are meagre. Moreover, plant parasitic nematodes have been reported to constitute serious impediment to cereal production in different areas of the world (De Waele and McDonald, 2000; Kollo, 2002; Nicol, 2002; Bridge et al., 2005; McDonald and Nicol, 2005).

In Uganda, nematological research on cereals has not received much attention, and there is no record of nematode pests occurring on cereals in the country. Previous studies have listed plant parasitic nematodes associated with banana (Kashaija et al., 1994) and root and tuber crops (Coyne et al., 2003); with some species found to be more parasitic and pathogenic causing economic losses to these crops; for example, Meloidogyne spp. on cassava (Manihot esculenta) (Coyne and Talwana, 2000), Radopholus similis, Pratylenchus goodeyi and Helicotylenchus multicinctus on banana (Speijer and Kajumba, 2000), Meloidogyne spp. and Pratylenchus sudanensis on yams (Dioscorea spp.) (Mudiope et al., 1998). Therefore, it is anticipated that plant parasitic nematodes do occur on cereals and can pose a significant threat to their production in Uganda.

The objective of this study was to assess the occurrence and distribution of the most common plant parasitic nematodes on cereal crops in Uganda and identify factors that enhance their population build-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During 2004, root samples were collected at 293 sites in Uganda from maize (230 fields), millet (18), sorghum (21), wheat (18) and barley (6) in the districts of Iganga, Kapchorwa, Kumi, Masindi and Sironko, which represent the major cereal growing areas in Uganda (Laker-Ojok, 1994). For each field, the geographical position coordinates and altitude were taken using a Magellan® Geographical Positioning system. All fields were situated between 1080-2071m altitudes, the lowest being Kumi and the highest Kapchorwa.

Roots were sampled from 10 individual plants that were randomly selected in each field 10 -12 weeks after planting. Note was made of the aboveground plant symptoms, for examples stunting and chlorosis/yellowing; and below-ground symptoms, for example root necrosis, pruning, and stunting, that may be associated with nematode damage. Roots were pooled per crop per field and when in the laboratory, they were washed, surface-dried using paper tissue, chopped into about 2 cm segments and thoroughly mixed.

A 5 g (fresh weight) sub-sample per sample was taken for nematode extraction using a modified Baermann funnel technique (Hooper et al., 2005) after maceration in a kitchen blender. Nematodes were identified to species level using morphometric parameters and counted under a compound microscope. Where no adults existed, nematodes were identified to genus level only. Identifications were confirmed by Drs. Antoinette Swart Mariette Marais and Esther van den Berg, Plant Protection Research Institute, Rietondale, Pretoria, South Africa.

Mean population densities were calculated for each species observed and the maximum density recorded. The nematode counts are presented as numbers in 100 g of fresh root. Nematode numbers consisted of adult females, males and second-stage juveniles. The exception was for sedentary endoparasitic nematodes for which only vermiform males and second-stage juveniles are reported. The frequency of occurrence for each species identified was calculated for each of the five districts. For each species, frequency and relative abundance were determined using the method applied by Adiko (1988) and Kashaija et al. (1994). Frequency corresponds to the number of sites where a species occurred. A species was considered widespread when it appeared in more than 30% of the sites. Abundance corresponds to the average number of individuals of a species over the sample sites where the species was present. A species whose mean number was more than 10 individuals per 100 g of roots was considered abundant (Adiko, 1988).

Additionally, two maize fields in each of the districts of Iganga, Kumi, Masindi and Sironko were monitored for nematode population buildup during one growing season. The 4 districts were selected on the basis of maize having higher densities of plant parasitic nematodes during the survey. The fields were monitored for nematodes build-up at 3, 5 and 11 weeks after planting. Weeks 3 – 5 is a period of flower initiation in maize, while week 11 is a period of tassel emergence, which is followed by a long post floral period of 7 – 8 weeks (Purseglove, 1988). Information on cropping patterns, the cropping history, crop phenology, pests, diseases, crops grown, source of planting material, and frequency of cereal cropping, were collected from field observations and through informal farmer interviews. Other parameters included frequency of planting non-cereal crops where cereals were grown, and land and crop (maize) management practices.

Maize roots were sampled from 10 plants randomly selected along two pre-selected rows of 5m length, pooled and processed as described above. Additionally, a representative composite soil sample was obtained from each field for analysis of soil physical and chemical properties, such as soil texture (contents of sand, silt and clay); concentration of phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, nitrogen and pH. Soil texture was determined by total rapid hydrometer method based on Day’s (1965) technique. Total nitrogen was determined by the Kjeldal method; available phosphorus by spectrometry exchangeable; potassium, calcium and magnesium by atomic absorption spectrometry (Okalebo et al., 2002).

Regression analysis (backward elimination procedure) was carried out to explore respective causal relationships amongst these variables with nematode populations in roots as the response variable and soil physical properties, chemical properties, and cropping history in eight farmers’ fields as the fixed variables.

RESULTS

Across sites, the major above-ground symptom of nematode damage was stunting and chlorosis (yellowing) which occurred in patches at 37% and 45% of the sampled sites, respectively; while the major below-ground symptom was root necrosis observed at 51% of the sites (Table 1). Small black lesions, which are characteristic of lesion nematodes were observed in 40, 42 48, 60 and 64% of samples collected from Kumi, Masindi, Iganga, Kapchorwa and Sironko, respectively. The lesions were frequently accompanied by root pruning especially of the feeder roots and slight to severe discolouration, especially on samples from Kapchorwa and Iganga.

There were, in total, 22 species of plant parasitic nematodes representing 10 genera that were identified in root samples collected from the 5 cereal crops (Table 2). By crop, 15 nematode species were recovered from maize roots, 14 from millet roots, eight from sorghum roots, five from wheat roots and three from barley roots (Table 2). The 15 species associated with maize were from seven genera, of which six species were associated with maize only (Aphelenchoides arachidis Bos, 1977, A. eltaybi, Pratylenchus goodeyi Sher and Allen, 1953, Scutellonema paralabiatum, S. clathricaudatum Whitehead, 1959 and Rotylenchulus borealis). Meloidogyne spp., Pratylenchus spp. and Helicotylenchus spp. occurred on all cereals.

Similar to the taxonomic composition (Table 2), frequency of occurrence of the nematodes varied between crops and districts (Table 3). Pratylenchus zeae was the common nematode on maize in Iganga (94%) and Masindi (86%), on millet in Kumi (100%), Masindi (75%) and Sironko (100%), and on sorghum in Kumi (100%), Masindi (83%) and Sironko (100%) (Table 3). Higher nematode population densities were recorded on maize than any other crop sampled, with P. goodeyi and P. zeae having the highest populations/fresh root weight (Table 4), although in many cases the mean nematode population was far below the maximum number recorded. From the 293 cereal crops root samples, the most prevalent endoparasitic nematodes encountered were P. zeae, Scutellonema spp., Helicotylenchus spp., P. goodeyi, Meloidogyne spp and P. brachyurus with frequency occurrences of 70.9, 30.4, 19.1, 11.7 and 10.9%, respectively (Table 5; Fig. 1).

Six endoparasitic nematode genera were recovered from the maize fields monitored during the growing season, namely, Aphelenchoides spp., Helicotylenchus spp., Meloidogyne spp., P. zeae, P. brachyurus and Scutellonema spp. (Table 6). In general, the nematode population built up from the 3rd to the 5th week after planting and then decreased at 11 weeks after planting, except in Iganga in field 1 where plant parasitic nematode numbers increased continuously and in Kumi in field 2 where the nematodes population first decreased before increasing later in the growing season (Table 6). Throughout the monitoring period, P. zeae was the most frequently encountered and prominent nematode species (Table 7).

From regression analysis, the apparent relationships between densities of the six nematode species and soil physical/chemical properties (Table 8) and cropping history (Table 9) were estimated (Table 10). Backward elimination regression procedure retained seven variables, namely, sand, clay and silt content, soil pH, nitrogen content, frequency of growing noncereals, and years since maize was first grown in the field. Generally, nematode root infections were favoured by reduced silt-ness and clay-ness of the soil. For example, Meloidogyne spp., P. zeae and Scutellonema spp. populations in maize roots tended to increase with the sand content in the soil and reduced clay-ness of the soil. The soil type under which this study was conducted was loamy sand in Iganga; sandy loam in Kumi; clay loam in Masindi; and sandy clay loam in Sironko (Table 10). Additionally, soil pH was associated with a decline in P. zeae and P. brachyurus populations while nitrogen content was associated with a decrease in nematode population densities except P. brachyurus. Whether maize (and possibly other cereal) was grown continuously or frequently interrupted with growing of non-cereal crops increased nematode populations (Table 10).

DISCUSSION

The observation of the genera Ditylenchus, Helicotylenchus, Meloidogyne, Pratylenchus, and Scutellonema to occur more frequently on cereals than the other genera corroborate with other reports (De Waele et al., 1998; McDonald and Nicol, 2005). The presence of Meloidogyne spp. on cereals in Uganda suggests that rootknot nematodes can be important pathogens of maize although damage caused by Meloidogyne spp. on cereals is greatly under estimated worldwide (De Waele et al., 1998; McDonald and Nicol, 2005). Whereas some species, for example, Aphelenchoides arachidis, Aphelenchoides eltaybi and Aphelechus cf. deckeri, were found associated with cereals, their apparent threat to cereals is difficult to ascertain. Aphelenchoides arachidis is a seed-borne endoparasitic nematode of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) and cereals (McDonald et al., 1979) and was reported to be restricted in distribution to Nigeria where it is of significant economic importance (Khan and Misari, 1992). However, recently Lesufi et al. (2005) reported its occurrence in South Africa and, therefore, this current report indicates that the nematode might be more widespread than zeae being widespread and abundant suggests previously known. Generally, Pratylenchus zeae that it is the major plant-parasitic nematode on was widespread and abundant; Aphelenchoides cereals also in Uganda. It is well distributed spp., Meloidogyne spp., Pratylenchus across maize growing regions in Kenya (Kimenju brachyurus, Rotylenchulus spp. and et al., 1998), where it is regarded as a serious Helicotylenchus spp. were localized and scarce; maize pest and it is among the most common lesion Scutellonema spp. were widespread but not nematodes associated with maize in the tropics abundant, while Pratylenchus goodeyi were (De Waele et al., 1998; McDonald and Nicol, abundant but localised (Table 5). Pratylenchus 2005).

The increase in nematode populations with season would be probably due to moisture (Wallace, 1983; Vrains, 1986; Jordaan et al., 1989) and ease of movement of the nematodes through the large soil pore diameter and soil particle size (Taylor and Sasser, 1978; Idowu, 1981; Prot and Van Gandy, 1981), which are typical properties of a generally sandy soil which was the predominant soil where the study was conducted. The results further show that intensifying maize-based cropping systems has a risk of nematodes population increases especially in fields located on soils with high sand content. This implies that maize-based cropping systems in Uganda have the potential of maintaining nematode populations at damaging levels and increasing nematode reproduction, thus reducing their potential use as rotation crops for other crops long known to be susceptible to nematodes, for example, vegetables, bananas and tobacco.

The associated decrease of nematode populations with soil nitrogen is a relevant indication that use of fertilisers may mitigate nematode infestation in cereals. This could be an effect on carbon – nitrogen ratio (Spiegel et al., 1982) or effect on soil pH (Norton, 1989; Cadet et al., 1994; Korthal et al., 1996).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from this study indicates that nematodes are widespread on cereal crops in Uganda. Their incidence and distribution is not dependent on the kind of cereal crop grown but intensification of cereal cropping in an area with sandy soils significantly increases the predominance of Pratylenchus zeae. The pathogenicity of many of these nematodes has never been studied in Uganda and thus, their individual influence on growth and development of cereal crops will have to be established.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Drs Antoinette Swart Mariette Marais and Esther van den Berg Plant Protection Research Institute in South Africa, for their help in confirming nematode identifications. The International Foundation for Science (IFS contract (C – 3504/1) and Innovations at Makerere Committee (I@mak.com, Makerere University) funded the study.

REFERENCES

  • Adikom, A. 1988. Plant parasitic nematodes associated with plantain, Musa paradisiaca (AAB), in the Ivory Coast. Revue du Nematologie 11:109-113.
  • Bridge, J., Plowright, R. A., and Peng, D. 2005. Nematode parasites of rice. In: Luc, M, Sikora, R.A and Bridge, J. (Eds.), pp. 87- 130. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical and tropical Agriculture, Second edition. CAB International U.K.
  • Cadet, P., Thicubouse, J. and Albcecbe, A. 1994. Relationship between ferrisol properties and the structure of plant-parasitic nematode communities on sugarcane inMartinique (French West Indies) Acta. Ecologica 15:767-780.
  • CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), 1992. CIMMYT world maize facts and trends: maize research investment and impacts in developing countries1991-1992. CIMMYT Mexico. CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), 1992. CIMMYT world maize facts and trends: maize research investment and impacts in developing countries1991-1992. CIMMYT Mexico.
  • Coyne, D. L. and Talwana, L. A. H. 2000. Reaction of cassava varieties to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in pot experiments and farmer managed field trials in Uganda. International Journal of Nematology 10:153– 158.
  • Coyne, D. L., Talwana, L. A. H. and Maslen, N. R. 2003. Plant parasitic nematodes associated wih root and tuber crops in Uganda. African Crop Protection 9: 87-98.
  • Day, P.R. 1965. Particle fractioning and particle size analysis. In: Black, C.E., Evans, D.D., White, J.L., Ensminger, L.A. and Clark, F.E. (Eds.), pp. 547-567. Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy.
  • De Waele, D. and McDonald, A. H. 2000. Diseases caused by nematodes. In: Frederiksen, R.A. and Odvody, G.N. (Eds.), pp. 50 - 53. Compendium of Sorghum diseases, second edition. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  • Hooper, D.J., Hallmann, J. and Subbotin, S. 2005. Methods for extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes. In: M. Luc, M., Sikora, R.A. and Bridge, J. (Eds.), pp. 53 – 86. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical Agriculture. Second Edition. CAB international, Walling ford, U.K.
  • Idowu, A.A. 1981. The distribution of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. in relation to elevation and soild type in vegetable growing areas of upper Northern Nigeria. In:
  • Proceedings of the 3rd Research Planning Conference on root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., November 16 - 20 1981. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Jordan, E.M., De Waele, D. and van Rooyen, P.J. 1989. Endoparasitic nematodes in maize roots in the Western Transvaal as related to soil texture and rainfall. Journal of Nematology 21:356-360.
  • Kashaija, I.N, Speijer, P.R, Gold, C.S and Gowen, S.R. 1994. Occurrence, distribution and abundance of plant parasitic nematodes of bananas in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 2: 99-104.
  • Khan, A. and Misari, S.M. 1992. Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with groundnut crop in four ecological zones of Nigeria. Journal of African Zoology 106: 263-271.
  • Kimenju, J.W., Waudo, S.W., Mwangombe, A.W., Sikora, R.A. and Schuster, R.P. 1998. Distribution of lesion nematodes associated with maize in Kenya and Susceptibility of maize cultivars to Pratylenchus zeae. African Crop Science Journal 6: 367 – 375.
  • Korthals, G.W., Alexiev, A.D., Lexmond, T.M., Kammenga, J.E. and Bongers, T. 1996. Longterm effects of copper and pH on the nematode community in an agroecosystem. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15:979-985.
  • Laker-Ojok, R. 1994. The rate of return to agricultural research in Uganda: The case of oilseeds and maize. Michigan Stage University International Development Working Papers No. 42.
  • Lesufi, M.M., Swart, A. and Tiedt, L.R. 2005. The introduction and possible spread of Aphelenchoides arachidis in South Africa. Proceedings of the 17th Symposium of the Nematological Society of Southern Africa, 2525 May 2005, Hans Merensky Estate, South Africa African Plant Protection 12:36-37 [Abstract].
  • MAAIF (Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Uganda). 1997. Modernisation the way forward. Annual Report for the year 1996. MAAIF, Entebbe, Uganda.
  • McDonald A. H. and Nicol J. M. 2005. Nematode parasites of cereals. In: Luc, M, Sikora, R.A and Bridge, J. (Eds.), pp. 131-192. Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical and tropical Agriculture, Second edition. CAB International U.K.
  • McDonald, D., Bos, W. S. and Gumel, M. H. 1979. Effects of infestation of peanut (groundnut) seed by the testa nematode, Aphelenchoides arachidis, on seed infection by fungi and on seedling emergence. Plant Disease Reporter 63: 464-467.
  • Mudiope, J., Speijer, P. R., Maslen, N. R. and Adipala, E. 1998. Evaluation of yam host plant response to root-knot nematodes in Uganda. African Plant Protection 4:119 - 122.
  • Nicol, J. M. 2002. Important nematode pests of cereals. In: Bread wheat production and improvement. FAO plant production and Protection Series, FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 345-366
  • Norton, D.C. 1989. Abiotic soil factors and plantparasitic nematodes. Journal Nematol 13:299-307.
  • Okalebo, J.R. Gathua, K.W. and Woomer, P.L. 2002. Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working mannual. Second Edition. 128 pp. TSBF-CIAT/SACRED Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Prot, J.C. and Van Gandy, S.D. 1981. Effect of soil texture and the clay component on migrationof Meloidogyne incognita second stage juveniles. Journal Nematol. 13:213-217.
  • Speijer, P. R. and Kajumba, C. 2000. Yield loss from plant parasitic nematodes in East African highland banana (Musa spp. AAA). In: Craenen, K., Ortiz, R., Karamura, E.B. and Vuylsteke,D.R. (Eds). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Banana and Plantain for Africa, Kampala, Uganda, 14 – 18 October 1996. Acta Horticulturae 540: 453– 459.
  • Spiegel, Y., Cohn, E., Kafkafi, E., and Sulami, M. 1982. Influence of potassium and nitrogen fertilizer on parasitism by root-knot nematode, M. javanica. Journal of Nematology 14: 530-535.
  • Taylor, A.L. and Sasser, J.N. 1978. Biology, identification and control of root knot nematodes Meloidogyne spp. I.M.P. North Vrain, T.C. 1986. Role of soil water in poulation Carolina State University Graphics. 111pp. dynamics of nematodes. In: Plant Disease
  • Vasil, I.K. (Ed.) 1999. Molecular improvement of Epidemiology. Leonard, K. and Dry, W. (Eds.). cereal crops. Advances in cellular and pp. 101-128. Macmillan, New York, USA. molecular biology of plants Vol. 5. Kluwer Wallace, H.R. 1983. Interactions between Academic Publishers/Spriyer. 402pp. nematodes and othre factors of plants. Journal of Nematology 15:221-227.

©2008, African Crop Science Society


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[cs08015t1.jpg] [cs08015t5.jpg] [cs08015t9.jpg] [cs08015t2.jpg] [cs08015t10.jpg] [cs08015t8.jpg] [cs08015t4.jpg] [cs08015t6.jpg] [cs08015t3.jpg] [cs08015t7.jpg] [cs08015f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil