|
African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 3, Num. 2, 1995, pp. 185-189
|
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 3. No.2, pp. 185-189,
1995
Foliar and head diseases of sorghum
J.P. ESELE
Serere Agricultural and Animal Production Research Institute.
P.O. Soroti. Uganda
Code Number: CS95025
Size of Files:
Text: 16.3K
No associated graphics files
ABSTRACT
The major foliar and head diseases of sorghum are discussed in
this paper. Some, especially anthracnose, leaf blight and grain
moulds cause considerable economic losses. Host plant resistance
is certainly the most cost-effective means of controlling these
diseases. With the advent of biotechnology, opportunities now
exist for more accurate diagnosis of disease etiology, and most
likely will facilitate breeding for resistance to these
diseases.
Key Words: Anthracnose, biotechnology, breeding, grain
moulds, leaf blight
RESUME
Le papier passe en revue les maladies foliaires et celles de tete
de sorgho. Certaines comme l'anthracnose, la rouille et la
moisissure de graines causent des pertes economiques
considerables. La resistance est certainement le moyen de
controle le plus economique. Avec l'avenement de la
biotechnologie, des perspectives existent maintenant pour u n
diagnostic plus sur de l'etiologie de maladies et plus
probablement cela facilitera l'amelioration pour la resistance
a ces maladies.
Mols Cles: Anthracnose, biotechnologie, amelioration,
moisissures de graines, rouille
INTRODUCTION
Among the cereals, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)
is known to have the greatest number of diseases. This is partly
because it is cultivated under a wide range of environmental
conditions. Sorghum diseases are caused by fungi, bacteria,
viruses and mycoplasma-like organisms. The crop suffers from both
systemic and local lesion infections. Diagnosis is often
complicated by variations inplant characteristics such as height,
head shape, pigment, vigour and maturity.
FOLIAR DISEASES
Foliar infections are, sometimes difficult to diagnose because
of the response of plant pigments to the infections. Depending
on the pathogen, the lesion may appear tan, purple or red to
straw-coloured, brown, dark-red or black. Most infections result
in senescence. Some of the most common and important foliar
infections are listed below.
Anthracnose. Anthracnose is caused by Colletotrichum
graminicola (Ces.) Wilson. This is the conidial state of
Glomerella graminicola Politis. The fungus, or related
species, attacks maize, sugarcane and other grasses.
The disease occurs wherever sorghum is grown, especially in
areas of warm, and humid conditions. The leaf blight phase of the
disease is the most serious. In severe cases, yield losses can
be as high as 50% or more, especially under alternating wet and
dry cycles and high temperatures. Disease symptoms are typically
circular lesions with straw coloured centres. On these centres
appear numerous small black areas which constitute the fruiting
bodies (acervuli) of the fungus (Warren. 1986).
The most effective control measure is through the use of
resistant cultivars. The disease can be managed by cultural
practices such as crop rotation, field sanitation or removal of
plant debris at the end of the season.
Leaf blight. Leaf blight is caused by Exserohilum
turcicum (Pass.) Leonard & Suggs (teleomorph of
Trichometasphaeria turcica Luttrell). The perfect state
rarely occurs in nature. In the laboratory, it may occur as
black, globose pseudothecia. The disease occurs wherever sorghum
and maize are grown. It is favoured by mild temperatures and
humid weather conditions with heavy dew (Bergquist, 1986).
Sudangrass. johnsongrass. teosinte and other grass species are
also attacked by E. turcicum. The disease occurs as long
elliptic tan lesions that develop first on the lower leaves and
progress upward.
Resistance offers the best method of control. Two types of
resistance are known: polygenic resistance, characterized by few
and small lesions; and monogenic resistance, characterized by a
hypersensitive fleck and little or no lesion development
(Bergquist, 1986).
Downy mildew. Sorghum is attacked by two different downy
mildew pathogens namely; Sclerophthora macrospora (Sacc.)
Thirum et al., causing crazy top, and Peronosclerospora
sorghi (Weston and Uppal) Shaw which causes sorghum downy
mildew.
Sorghum downy mildew is a devastating disease on both sorghum
and maize, both in the tropics and sub-tropics (Frederiksen et
al. 1969). Peronosclerospora sorghi produces two forms
of inoculum, oospores and conidia. Oospores are the sexual
resting structure of the fungus. They reside in the soil and
allow the pathogen to survive from one season to another in the
absence of a host. Oospores germinate by a germ tube in response
to host root exudate (Pratt, 1978), which then infects the
sorghum seedling to give rise to systemic infection. Conidia
disseminated from systemically-infected plants infect leaves and
produce local lesions. Conidial infections of very young
seedlings may induce systemic infection (Yeh and Frederiksen,
1980). Systemically infected seedlings are chlorotic, stunted and
may die prematurely. In cool, humid weather. the abaxial
surfaces of chlorotic leaves become covered with a white, downy
growth consisting of the conidiophores and conidia of the fungus.
Later stages of the disease result in death of interveinal tissue
of the leaves which eventually shred. Diseased plants are
usually barren or partially barren. Localized infections appear
as brown necrotic lesions on leaf blades. Three pathotypes
(physiological races) of P. sorghi (P1 . P-2 and P-3),
have been identified in Texas (Craig, 1986).
Other foliar diseases. There are foliar diseases which
frequently occur on sorghum but of relatively minor importance.
These include bacterial leaf stripe (Pseudomonas andropogonis
(Smith) Stapp), gray leaf spot (Cercospora sorghi Eli.
& Ev.), zonate leaf spot (Gloeocercospora sorghi Bain &
Edg.), sooty stripe (Ramulispora sorghi (Ell. & Ev.) Olive
& Lefebvre, and rust (Puccinia purpurea Cooke).
HEAD DISEASES
Sorghum panicle disease occur in two forms: pathogens may
colonize the grain (grain moulds) or they may infect the
inflorescence, thereby replacing grain with fungal masses (smuts
and ergot). They are invariably caused by fungi.
Grain moulds. Sorghum grain mould is probably the most
important biotic constraint to grain sorghum production (Williams
and Rao, 1981). Grain mould is a condition of sorghum grain
resulting from the infection of the developing floret by one or
more parasitic fungal species.
Forty or more fungal genera have been associated with grain
mould. Most of these are unspecialized or facultative parasites
and the predominant species vary with location, year and season.
However, Fusarium moniliforme Sheld. and Curvularia
lunata (Wakker) Boed. are the most important (Williams and
Rao, 1981; Bandyopadhyay and Mughogho, 1988).
The most obvious sign of grain mould is the appearance of
pink, orange, gray, white or blackish mycelium on the grain
surface. For example, F. moniliforme produces pinkish
white mycelium which is powdery in appearance, whereas C.
lunata infected grain appear as shiny, velvety black
growths. Severely moulded grain are generally lighter in weight
than clean grain and disintegrate easily when pressed.
Alternate wetting and drying coupled with prolonged rainfall,
high humidity and high temperature favour grain deterioration.
Damage caused by grain mould is both quantitative and qualitative
(Williams and Rao, 1981). Quantitatively grain mould causes
actual yield losses. Qualitatively, the disease results in loss
in market value, processing and nutritive values. Mycotoxin
contamination, resulting from grain mould infection, has received
some attention (McMillian et al., 1983). Mycotoxins
decrease growth rates of livestock on feed, predispose animals
to toxicity and may be carcinogenic.
Avoidance and the use of resistant cultivars are the only two
methods recommended for controlling sorghum grain mould.
Ergot. Ergot, sometimes also known as "sugary disease" is
caused by Sphacelia sorghi McRae, which is a conidial
state of Claviceps spp. (Bandyopadhyay, 1992). It occurs
in many sorghum growing areas of the semi-arid tropics. The
disease is largely a problem in cool, moist weather, mostly in
highland sorghums and offseason plantings. Ergot is particularly
important on male sterile lines. Hence, it is a factor in hybrid
seed production.
Symptoms appear as turbid drops of honey dew dropping from
infected spikelets. Individual spikelets scattered in the ear
or in groups are infected. The honey dew droplets are sweet to
taste and attract flies and ants. In the affected spikelets, the
grains are replaced by soft masses of mycelia. In severe
infections, yield losses are considerable. In advanced stages,
sclerotia can be found in the spikelets. Often the infected
spikelets are overgrown by a hyperparasitic fungus, Cerebella
sp., affecting grain quality. The sclerotia of the fungus
also contain alkaloid mycotoxins.
Several strategies for the control of sorghum ergot have been
advocated. Quarantine has been effective in excluding the
pathogen especially in USA and Australia. Cultural practices such
as early planting or the use of early maturing cultivars or
pathogen free seed have also been used successfully.
Smuts. There are four distinct sorghum smuts, which are
widely distributed. These are covered kernel smut (Sporisorium
sorghi Ehrenberg (Link)), loose smut (Sphacelotheca
cruenta (Kuhn) Potter), head smut (Sporisorium reilianum
(Kuhn) Langdon & Fullerton) and long smut (Tolyposporium
ehrenbergii (Kuhn) Patouillard). Of these, covered kernel
smut is the most economically important in Africa.
Covered kernel smut replaces ovules as a smut sorus, which
is covered by a persistent peridium. The sori are conical or oval
and resemble an elongated sorghum seed. They may occupy all the
florets in the head or only a portion of them. In many cases, the
infected plants are not affected in height or other agronomic
characters.
The teliospores of S. sorghi are seedborne and
germinate with the seed. Infection occurs at seedling stage, and
the fungal mycelium grows with the plant, eventually occupying
the florets. Mature sori rupture, releasing teliospores, which
contaminate seed. Only seedborne spores cause infection
(Frederiksen, 1986). The disease can be controlled by seed
fungicides used as dressings.
Loose kernel smut is less important than covered kernel smut.
Usually, all spikelets are affected, although sometimes the
unaffected ones may be hypertrophied. Affected plants are often
shorter, have thinner stems and tend to tiller. Sphacelotheca
cruenta is primarily seedborne and the disease is controlled
by fungicide seed dressings. Head smut is widely distributed
geographically. The intensity of the disease appears to increase
as sorghum is more intensively cultivated. The disease affects
the whole inflorescence. Long smut commonly develops in the drier
regions of the Sahel. This floral infecting smut rarely causes
extensive loss, but occasionally plants in some fields are
severely damaged. While there are some genetic differences
in reaction, little has been done to control long smut.
OPPORTUNITIES AND APPLICATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TO SORGHUM
DISEASE CONTROL
Molecular biotechnology can be used for sorghum pathology in
two main areas: Diagnosis and utilization of resistance
sources.
Diagnosis. Biotechnology permits accurate diagnosis of
plant disease. ELISA and PCR techniques are used in the
identification of viral and bacterial diseases. Biotechnical
procedures can also be used to determine the type and extent of
variability existing in the pathogen. An understanding of
pathogen variability leads to identification of more durable
sources of host resistance.
Variability enables a pathogen to overcome cultivar
resistance. The pathogen continuously produces a variety of
pathotypes (virulence forms). For sorghum, variability of C.
graminicola makes it difficult to control anthracnose by
conventional breeding strategies. Molecular genetic markers, such
as RAPDs (Random Amplified polymorphic DNA) and RFLPs
(Restriction Fragment Length polymorphisms), can help identify
variation among pathogen isolates. RAPDs have been successfully
used to define the genetic lineage of C. graminicola
isolates from USA and Brazil (Casela, 1992).
Use in disease resistance breeding. An important use of
biotechnology in crop improvement will be to facilitate
resistance breeding. Gene technology is an essential element in
modern plant breeding. The genetic code is universal. Therefore,
it is theoretically possible to express virtually any genetic
trait of an organism in plants. The development of recombinant
DNA technology makes it possible to isolate individual genes
and
incorporate resistance genes into otherwise agronomically
acceptable cultivars. Gene pyramiding is made easier with
molecular markers. Since plant genetic engineering is based on
transfer of defined genes, the risks are predictable
REFERENCES
Bandyopadhyay, R. 1992. Sorghum Ergot. In: Sorghum and
Millets Diseases:A Second World Review. de Milano,
W.A.J.,Frederiksen R.A. and Bengtson, G .D. (Eds .), pp.235-244.
ICRISAT, Patancheru, 502324, A.P., India.
Bandyopadhyay, R. and Mughogho, L. 1988. Evaluation of field
screening techniques for resistance to grain molds. Plant
Disease 72: 500-503.
Bergquist, R. 1986. Leaf blight. In: Compendium of Sorghum
Diseases. Frederiksen, R.A. (Ed.), pp. 9 - 10. American
phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Casela, C.R. 1992. Investigations on the Variability of the
Sorghum Anthracnose Fungus Colletotrichum graminicola.
Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station,
TX, USA.
Craig, J. 1986. Downy mildews. In: Compendium of Sorghum
Diseases. Frederiksen, R.A. (Ed.), pp. 24-27. American
phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA
Frederiksen, R.A. 1986. Head smut. In: Compendium of Sorghum
Diseases. Frederikesen, R.A. (Ed.), pp. 17-18. American
Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA Frederiksen,
R.A-, Amador, J., Jones, B.L. and Reyes, L. 1969.
Distribution, symptoms and economic loss from downy mildew
caused by Sclerospora sorghi in grain sorghum in
Texas
Plant Disease Reporter 53: 995-998.
McMillian, W.W., Wilson, D.M., Mirocha, C.J. and Windstrom,
N.W. 1983. Mycotoxm contamination in grain sorghum from fields
in Georgia and Mississippi. Cereal Chemistry 60:
226-227.
Pratt, R.C. 1978. Germination of oospores of Sclerospora
sorghi in the presence of growing roots of host and non-host
plants.
phytopathology 68:1606-1613.
Yeh, Y. and Frederiksen, R.A. 1980. Sorghum downy mildew:
Biology of systemic infection by conidia and of a resistant
response in sorghum. Phytopathology 70: 372-376.
Warren, H.L. 1986. Leaf anthracnose. In: Compendium of
Sorghum Diseases. Frederiksen, R.A. (Ed.), pp. 1O- 11.
American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN., USA.
Williams, R.J. and Rao, K.N. 1981. A review of sorghum
grain moulds. Tropical Pest Management
27:200-211.
Copyright 1995 African Crop Science Society
|