|
African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 7, Num. 1, 1999, pp. 47-57
|
African Crop Science Journal,
African Crop Science Journal,
Vol. 7 No. 1 1999 pp. 47-57
Evaluation Of Cassava Cultivars For Canopy
Retention And Its Relationship With Field Resistance To Green
Spider Mite
E.N. NUKENINE, A.G.O. DIXON, A.T. HASSAN1
and J.A.N. ASIWE
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB
5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
1Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan,
Nigeria
*Current address for correspondence: Department of Biological
Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Ngaoundere, B.P. 454,
Ngaoundere, Cameroon
(Received 20 December, 1997; accepted 15 December, 1998)
Code Number: CS99005
ABSTRACT
Three field trials were conducted at IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria
between 1993 and 1995 to identify a rapid method of screening
cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivars for canopy
retention and to determine the association between canopy retention
and resistance to green spider mite (Mononychellus tanajoa
Bondar) in cassava. Three methods (I, II and III) were used to
assess canopy retention in 70 cultivars. Method I involves visual
estimation and it takes the longest time; method II involves visual
estimation and it takes the shortest time; and method III involves
taking measurements and it takes a longer time than method II, but
with a much shorter time than method I. Method II was the best
method for screening cassava cultivars for canopy retention during
dry periods. The cultivars showed significant (P < 0.01)
differences for canopy retention, stay green ability, mite
population density and damage scores, but not for relative water
content. Canopy retention was positively correlated (P < 0.01)
with stay green ability at the peak of the dry season (January).
Generally, canopy retention and stay green ability were inversely
associated (P < 0.01) with mite density in March 1994 and 1995,
and with damage during the dry season (December to March 1994 and
1995, respectively). It is proposed that cassava cultivars which
are tolerant to drought may also be resistant to M. tanajoa
and that the genetic potential of cassava to retain many green
leaves during the dry season may be a major factor of resistance to
M. tanajoa.
Key Words: Manihot esculenta, Mononychellus tanajoa,
relative water content
RÉSUMÉ
Trois essais en champs ont été menés
à l=IITA à
Ibadan au Nigeria entre 1993 et 1995 pour identifier une
méthode rapide de criblage des cultivars de manioc
(Manihot esculenta Crantz) pour la rétention foliaire et
la capacité de rester vert, et de déterminer la
relation entre la rétention foliaire et la resistance
à l=acarien vert
du manioc (Mononychellus tanajoa Bondar). Trois
méthodes (I, II et III) ont été
utilisées pour évaluer la rétention foliaire
chez 70 cultivars. La méthode I implique l=estimation visuelle et elle prend le
temps plus long; la méthod II implique l=estimation visuelle et elle prend le
temps plus court; et la méthode III implique les mesures et
elle prend un temps plus long que celui de la méthode II,
mais beaucoup plus court que celui de la méthode I. La
méthode II a été la meilleure méthode
de criblage des cultivars de manioc pour la rétention
foliaire pendant les périodes sèches. Il y avait des
différences significatives (P < 0,01) entre les cultivars
pour la rétention foliaire, la capacité de rester
vert, la densité des acariens et des dégâts
causés par des acariens mais pas pour la teneur relative en
eau. Des corrélations positives ont été
notées entre la rétention foliare et la
capacité de rester vert au pic de la saison seche (Janvier).
En général, la rétention foliaire et la
capacité de rester vert étaient inversément
associées (P < 0,01) à la densité des
acariens en Mars 1994 et 1995, et avec des dégâts
causés par l=acarien pendant la saison sèche
(de Décembre à Mars 1994 et 1995). Il ressort de ces
résultats que les cultivars de manioc qui sont
tolérants à la sécheresse semblent aussi
résistants à M. tanajoa et que le potentiel
génétique du manioc à retenir ses feuilles
pendant la saison sèche peut être un facteur majeur de
résistance au M. tanajoa.
Mots Clés: Capacité de rester vert,
manioc, Mononychellus tanajoa, teneur relative en eau
INTRODUCTION
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz [Euphorbiaceae]) is
a species native to South America that was introduced to Africa in
the 1600s where it quickly became an important food. This crop now
provides more than half of the dietary calories for over 200
million people of sub-Saharan Africa (IITA, 1992). Cassava has long
been considered a hardy crop resistant to pests and diseases. In
1971, the green spider mite (Mononychellus tanajoa Bondar),
new to Africa, was discovered on cassava in Uganda (Nyiira, 1972).
The mite has since spread to 27 countries in the cassava belt,
causing serious damage to cassava by feeding on its leaves (Yaninek
et al., 1989). Production losses caused by M. tanajoa
have been estimated to range from 13 to 80% (Lyon, 1974;
Nyiira, 1976; Shukla, 1976; Ndayiragije, 1984).
Chemical control is not a viable option because the crop is of
long duration (8-24 months in the field). In addition, chemical
control is expensive and leads to environmental pollution. Host
plant resistance and classical biological control were identified
as environmentally sound control options for M. tanajoa in
the early eighties (IITA, 1992). Many cassava cultivars have shown
some level of resistance to M. tanajoa (Hahn et al.,
1989; IITA, 1993). However, research on the mechanisms of
resistance is scanty. In Nigeria, population and damage peaks of
M. tanajoa occur in January (the middle of the dry season)
and cultivars which retain fewer leaves appear to sustain heavy
mite damage, whereas those which retain many leaves sustain little
mite damage (Dixon and Nukenine, personal observation). There is,
thus, a need to screen cassava cultivars for canopy retention and
to investigate the relationship between canopy retention and
resistance to M. tanajoa. The objectives of this study were
therefore to devise a rapid, simple screening method to estimate
canopy retention in cassava and to determine the association
between canopy retention and resistance to M. tanajoa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field trials. One and two field trials were established
in 1993 and 1994, respectively, in a research farm at the
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan,
Nigeria. Planting was done in May for both years. The 1993, first
1994 and second 1994 trials were composed of 38 (27 improved and 11
local), 25 (24 improved and 1 local) and 25 (24 improved and 1
local) entries, respectively. Eighteen cultivars from the 1993
trial were repeated in the 1994 trials. Three of them (91/02319,
30572 and TME 1) were repeated in the two trials, while 15 of them
(91/00453, 91/00455, 91/00458, 91/00459, 91/01730, 91/02312,
91/02316, 91/02317, 91/02325, 91/02327, 92/0057, 92/0067, 92/0342,
92/0402 and 92/0427) were repeated in one of the two trials.
Each trial was arranged in a randomised complete block design.
In the 1993 trial, some cultivars were replicated two times, while
others were replicated three times. In the 1994 trials each
cultivar was replicated four times. A single 10 m row (ridges 30 cm
high) plot spaced 1 m apart was used for the 1993 trial, while in
the 1994 trials, each plot consisted of four rows of the same
length and distance apart. Plant spacing was 1 m x 1 m for all the
trials, giving a population of 10,000 plants ha-1.
Estimation of canopy retention (CR) using three methods (CR
methods I, II and III). Three methods (CR methods I, II and
III) were used to assess cassava cultivars for canopy retention,
with the aim of identifying the simplest and fastest method. CR
methods I and II were used in the 1993 trial, while CR methods II
and III were used in the 1994 trials. Method II was common to both
years, making comparison among the three methods possible. In each
plot, two plants (1993 trial) and five plants (1994 trials) were
randomly selected for data collection.
For CR method I, the portion of the main stem with leaves was
visually estimated as a percentage of the total length of the main
stem (CA). Scoring was done in September (baseline data) and
December 1993, as well as January and March 1994. CR method I was
estimated as the CA at a given time during the dry period
(CAt) as a function of the maximum CA during the wet
period (baseline) (CAb) for each cultivar. The amount of
canopy lost as a result of drought (the dry season) is given
as
(CAb - CAt)(%)/CAb(%), so %
cancels out
The amount of canopy lost in percentage is given as:
[(CAb - CAt)/CAb] x
100
Therefore the percentage of canopy retained or CR method I (%)
is:
100 - {[(CAb - CAt)/CAb] x 100}
[Eqn. 1]
Since CR method I involves a long period of estimation (wet and
dry season), CR method II was introduced with the aim of reducing
the time by not necessitating the collection of data in the wet
season. Thus, with CR method II, the CA at any given period
(usually in the dry season) was taken as canopy retention.
Therefore,
CR method II (%) = CAt [Eqn. 2]
If CR method I correlates with CR method II, then it will be
unnecessary to use CR method I with a much longer estimation time.
However, since the two methods involve visual estimation, they may
not be accurate enough. In the second year, CR method III involving
measurements was introduced. It was thought that since CR III
involves measurements, it could be more accurate, and could also be
used to test the accuracy of CR method II. There was a strong
positive correlation between CR methods I and II, hence, only CR
method II was estimated in the second year. CR method III was
estimated in December 1994, and January and March 1995. The
distances from the ground level to the tip of a mainstem of a plant
(Cu) and from the ground level to the level of insertion
of the first leaf from the bottom of the same stem (Cl)
were measured using a graduated wooden rod. CR method III was then
calculated as follows:
CR method III (%) = [(Cu - Cl)/Cu)] x 100
[Eqn. 3]
Estimation of stay green ability. Stay green ability
(SGA) which is the number of leaves retained on the mainstem as a
ratio of the total number of leaves present was also assessed only
in the 1993 trial. SGA was estimated in September and December
1993, as well as January and March 1994.
Estimation of relative water content. Relative water
content (RWC) was determined in December 1993 and January 1994 for
all test cultivars, and in March 1994 for 14 cultivars with varying
levels of resistance, following the procedures described by Smart
and Bingham (1974). On each sampling date, leaf 3 (leaf 1 being the
first fully expanded leaf from the tip of the main stem) was
plucked from two plants in a plot between 0700 and 0800 hrs. Ten
leaf discs (ca. 3.14 cm2) were taken from each leaf
using a number 15 cock borer. The fresh weight of the 20 leaf discs
from each plot was determined using an electronic balance, model GT
210. The leaf discs were floated in distilled water in petri-dishes
and placed in a dark growth chamber at 26± 2 °
C for 3.5 hr. Floated leaf discs were surface-dried using tissue
paper, and turgid weights were immediately taken. Leaf discs were
then oven-dried at 85 °
C for 24 hr. The dry weights of the discs were measured. The RWC,
an indicator of the plant water status, was determined as the ratio
of the amount of water in the leaf tissue at sampling to that
present when fully turgid, using the formula:
RWC (%) = (fresh weight - dry weight)/ (turgid weight - dry
weight) x 100 [Eqn. 4]
Estimation of the population and damage of M.
tanajoa. Cassava green mite population was estimated once
in January and March of 1994 (1993 trial) and of 1995 (1994 trials)
.
From each plot, leaf 3 was plucked from two and five randomly
selected plants for the 1993 trial and 1994 trials, respectively,
on each sampling date. The leaves were carried to the laboratory in
paper bags and refrigerated for at least two hours to immobilize
the mites. The actives (sum of all developmental stages less the
eggs) of M. tanajoa on the abaxial leaf surface were counted
under a stereomicroscope (model WILD M5A; WILD HEEBUGG,
Switzerland). Leaf area was determined using an electronic leaf
area meter (model LI-3000A; LI COR Inc., U.S.A.). Mite density cm-2
of leaf surface was calculated as:
Mite density = (no. of actives)/(leaf area) [Eqn. 5]
Data analysis. Data were subjected to analysis of
variance using SAS software (SAS Institute, 1993). Mite population
data were transformed [(square root (x + 0.5)] prior to the
analysis. The standard errors of the mean were calculated for all
the parameters. Correlation analysis (across cultivars: N = 38 (38
cultivars) for 1993 trial; N = 25 (25 cultivars) for each of the
1994 trials) was conducted to determine linear relationships among
M. tanajoa population density and damage, canopy retention
methods (CR methods I, II and III), RWC and SGA.
RESULTS
Evaluation of cassava cultivars for canopy retention. Canopy
retention (CR methods I, II and III) varied significantly (P <
0.01) among the cultivars on all dates, irrespective of trial
(Tables 1, 2 and 3). At the peak of the dry season (January
1994), the three cultivars with the highest CR method I for the
1993 trial were 92/0401, 92/0067 and 92/0427, whereas those with
the lowest were ISU, 30001 and 30572 (Table 1). For CR method II,
MS-20, 92/0067 and 92/0427 had the highest values while 30572, 2ND
AGRIC and ISU had the lowest values.
In the first 1994 trial, cultivars 92/0427, 92/0342 and TME 1
had the largest canopy retention assessed by CR methods II and III,
irrespective of sampling period. However, in March 1995, the
cultivar 92/02312 replaced TME 1 as one of the first three
cultivars for CR method II, while in December 1994, the cultivar
91/02322 replaced 92/0342 for CR method III. Except for March 1995,
the cultivars 91/0427, 91/02163 and 91/01363 were among the
cultivars with the smallest canopy retention, regardless of canopy
retention method or sampling period (Table 2). In the second 1994
trial, cultivars TME 1, 91/02325 and 91/02319 recorded the largest
values for canopy retention in January 1995, irrespective of the CR
method (Table 3). Cultivars 82/00661, 90/02030 and 90/01718, and
82/00661, 90/02030 and 88/02555 had the smallest values for CR
method II and CR method III, respectively.
Variation in stay green ability, relative water content and
mite responses among cultivars. Except in September, SGA varied
significantly (P < 0.01) among the cultivars (Table 4). There
were no significant (P > 0.05) differences in RWC among
cultivars in December 1993, as well as in January and March 1994.
Mite population density and damage varied (P < 0.01) among the
cultivars in all field trials during the dry season (Tables 1, 2
and 3).
TABLE 1. Canopy retention (CR) methods I
and II of 38 cassava cultivars at different periods in the 1993/94
trial
Cultivar |
CR method I (%) |
CR method II (%) |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
Sep |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
92/0427 |
47 |
54 |
54 |
63 |
20 |
33 |
27 |
92/0067 |
42 |
48 |
42 |
60 |
25 |
29 |
25 |
MS-20+ |
48 |
37 |
39 |
77 |
37 |
28 |
22 |
92/0401 |
33 |
41 |
41 |
62 |
20 |
25 |
25 |
91/02312 |
31 |
31 |
38 |
75 |
23 |
23 |
28 |
TME 1+ |
44 |
28 |
32 |
83 |
37 |
23 |
26 |
91/02319 |
46 |
36 |
33 |
68 |
32 |
23 |
23 |
92/0326 |
48 |
29 |
28 |
78 |
38 |
23 |
21 |
91/02317 |
41 |
28 |
29 |
80 |
33 |
23 |
23 |
92/0342 |
44 |
36 |
38 |
63 |
28 |
23 |
24 |
91/01730 |
28 |
26 |
33 |
83 |
23 |
22 |
27 |
91/02327 |
54 |
29 |
38 |
68 |
37 |
21 |
27 |
91934 |
40 |
29 |
21 |
64 |
25 |
18 |
13 |
91/02324 |
39 |
24 |
33 |
75 |
28 |
18 |
24 |
91/02316 |
40 |
24 |
27 |
75 |
30 |
18 |
20 |
91/02325 |
41 |
22 |
20 |
76 |
32 |
16 |
15 |
91/00455 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
60 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
ALICE LOCAL+ |
38 |
18 |
34 |
85 |
30 |
15 |
27 |
92/0396 |
29 |
14 |
17 |
85 |
25 |
13 |
15 |
91/00458 |
24 |
22 |
27 |
57 |
13 |
13 |
15 |
ATU+ |
32 |
22 |
27 |
55 |
18 |
13 |
15 |
91/00379 |
25 |
16 |
29 |
80 |
20 |
13 |
23 |
TOKUNBO+ |
25 |
20 |
21 |
60 |
15 |
12 |
12 |
BAGI WAWA+ |
27 |
20 |
25 |
55 |
15 |
11 |
14 |
4(2)1425P |
28 |
14 |
16 |
77 |
22 |
11 |
12 |
91/00453 |
42 |
19 |
27 |
56 |
23 |
10 |
15 |
92/0402 |
37 |
11 |
27 |
63 |
23 |
9 |
20 |
92/0057 |
28 |
12 |
21 |
73 |
20 |
9 |
15 |
92/0430 |
47 |
13 |
26 |
70 |
33 |
9 |
18 |
91/00459 |
30 |
11 |
13 |
77 |
23 |
8 |
9 |
AMALA+ |
30 |
10 |
6 |
83 |
25 |
8 |
5 |
OKO IYAWO+ |
34 |
15 |
29 |
57 |
17 |
8 |
16 |
LAPAI-1+ |
29 |
13 |
22 |
57 |
17 |
8 |
13 |
91/00385 |
31 |
12 |
14 |
65 |
20 |
8 |
9 |
30572 |
29 |
5 |
10 |
82 |
24 |
7 |
8 |
2ND AGRIC+ |
36 |
11 |
41 |
58 |
20 |
6 |
23 |
ISU+ |
22 |
9 |
11 |
68 |
15 |
6 |
7 |
30001 |
29 |
8 |
18 |
70 |
20 |
4 |
13 |
Mean |
35 |
22 |
27 |
69 |
25 |
15 |
18 |
S.E. |
1.4 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
F-test |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
+ Local cultivar
** Significant at the 1% level
TABLE 2. Canopy retention (CR) methods II
and III, and M. tanajoa density (Pop) and damage (dam) of 25
cassava cultivars at different periods in the first of the 1994/95
trials
Cultivar |
CR method II |
CR method III |
Popa |
Damb |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
92/0427 |
14 |
12 |
22 |
22 |
16 |
22 |
0.7 |
1.6 |
92/0342 |
14 |
12 |
22 |
19 |
17 |
25 |
0.5 |
1.4 |
TME 1+ |
16 |
11 |
20 |
24 |
16 |
22 |
0.3 |
1.6 |
91/02312 |
11 |
10 |
20 |
19 |
14 |
17 |
0.3 |
1.9 |
92/0398 |
9 |
9 |
18 |
14 |
14 |
18 |
0.4 |
1.7 |
92/0067 |
10 |
9 |
20 |
16 |
14 |
18 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
91/02317 |
13 |
9 |
13 |
20 |
10 |
14 |
1.3 |
3.1 |
89/00250 |
10 |
8 |
12 |
15 |
9 |
12 |
0.9 |
2.7 |
91/02319 |
9 |
8 |
13 |
19 |
12 |
14 |
0.7 |
3.1 |
92/0397 |
11 |
8 |
13 |
19 |
8 |
14 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
91/02322 |
11 |
8 |
16 |
20 |
11 |
18 |
0.6 |
2.7 |
91/02316 |
11 |
8 |
13 |
23 |
11 |
14 |
1.0 |
3.2 |
92/0402 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
15 |
9 |
15 |
0.6 |
2.1 |
92/0429 |
11 |
7 |
11 |
22 |
10 |
13 |
0.8 |
3.0 |
91/00424 |
9 |
7 |
12 |
16 |
9 |
11 |
1.7 |
3.1 |
91/00420 |
10 |
7 |
10 |
22 |
7 |
11 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
91/00416 |
12 |
6 |
14 |
18 |
5 |
14 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
91/00450 |
8 |
6 |
13 |
13 |
7 |
13 |
0.8 |
3.3 |
30572 |
10 |
5 |
12 |
18 |
6 |
15 |
1.0 |
3.5 |
92/0057 |
10 |
4 |
14 |
17 |
9 |
17 |
0.6 |
2.7 |
91/00438 |
7 |
3 |
12 |
13 |
7 |
13 |
1.0 |
3.5 |
91/00419 |
8 |
3 |
16 |
13 |
5 |
17 |
0.6 |
2.6 |
91/00417 |
6 |
2 |
14 |
10 |
1 |
14 |
0.5 |
2.4 |
91/02163 |
6 |
1 |
15 |
12 |
4 |
16 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
91/01363 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
11 |
3 |
13 |
0.6 |
3.7 |
Mean |
10 |
7 |
15 |
17 |
9 |
17 |
0.8 |
2.6 |
S.E. |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.11 |
0.14 |
F-testc |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
+ Local cultivar
a and b Mean values of
two and six sampling periods, respectively
c **, F-test significant at the 1%
level
TABLE 3. Canopy retention (CR) methods II
and III of 25 cassava cultivars in December (Dec) 1994, January
(Jan) and March (Mar) 1995 as well as M. tanajoa density
(Pop) and damage (Dam) in the second of the 1994/95 field
trials
Cultivar |
CR method II |
CR method III |
Popa |
Damb |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
|
|
TME 1+ |
14 |
8 |
26 |
17 |
16 |
24 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
91/02325 |
14 |
7 |
15 |
21 |
13 |
18 |
2.1 |
3.0 |
91/02319 |
16 |
7 |
19 |
21 |
11 |
20 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
91/00457 |
9 |
5 |
13 |
13 |
6 |
15 |
1.1 |
3.5 |
30572 |
15 |
5 |
12 |
21 |
4 |
17 |
1.0 |
3.6 |
90/01058 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
16 |
5 |
18 |
1.3 |
3.5 |
91/00453 |
8 |
5 |
11 |
13 |
9 |
15 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
90/00350 |
17 |
4 |
14 |
23 |
5 |
17 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
91/00455 |
7 |
4 |
12 |
14 |
5 |
13 |
1.1 |
3.1 |
91/00459 |
8 |
4 |
11 |
14 |
6 |
14 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
90/00330 |
12 |
4 |
15 |
18 |
4 |
18 |
1.3 |
2.7 |
90/00099 |
11 |
4 |
14 |
14 |
5 |
19 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
81/00110 |
16 |
3 |
14 |
20 |
4 |
16 |
1.4 |
3.5 |
91/01730 |
17 |
3 |
19 |
19 |
11 |
20 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
82/00058 |
19 |
3 |
18 |
23 |
3 |
19 |
1.5 |
3.5 |
91/00458 |
8 |
3 |
15 |
10 |
6 |
17 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
88/02555 |
12 |
2 |
19 |
12 |
2 |
20 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
90/01204 |
6 |
2 |
15 |
11 |
4 |
20 |
0.6 |
2.8 |
81/01635 |
12 |
2 |
14 |
18 |
3 |
16 |
1.5 |
3.7 |
91/02314 |
13 |
2 |
21 |
18 |
3 |
21 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
90/01554 |
9 |
1 |
22 |
17 |
2 |
23 |
1.4 |
2.9 |
91/02327 |
15 |
1 |
22 |
19 |
2 |
22 |
1.4 |
2.6 |
90/01718 |
5 |
1 |
21 |
6 |
3 |
21 |
1.7 |
2.7 |
90/02030 |
6 |
1 |
17 |
11 |
0 |
18 |
1.2 |
2.0 |
82/00661 |
9 |
1 |
22 |
13 |
2 |
23 |
0.9 |
3.0 |
Mean |
12 |
3 |
17 |
16 |
5 |
19 |
1.5 |
2.9 |
S.E. |
0.8 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
F-testc |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
** |
+ Local cultivar
a and b Mean values of two and six sampling
periods, respectively
c **, F-test significant at the 1% level
Relationships among canopy retention methods (CR methods I,
II and III), SGA, RWC, M. tanajoa population density and
damage. In the 1993 trial, CR method I was positively
correlated with CR method II on all sampling dates (Table 5). The
CR method II in September was positively but weakly correlated with
CR method I in December 1993 (r = 0.35; P < 0.05); it, however,
was not correlated (P > 0.05) with either that of January or
March 1994.
Stay green ability was positively correlated with CR method I
and CR method II on all sampling dates, except in December 1993 and
September 1993, respectively. RWC was not correlated with CR
methods and SGA. In the two 1994 trials, CR method II was
positively and closely associated with CR method III in all the
sampling dates.
In January 1994, the cultivars (92/0427, 92/0067 and MS-20) with
highest CR methods I (37-54%) and II (25-33%) had low mite
densities (0.60-2.07 actives cm-2) and low mite damage scores
(1.36-1.54) (Tables 1 and 4) for the 1993 trial. In contrast, the
cultivars (30572, 2ND AGRIC and ISU) with the lowest canopy
retention (CR methods I (5-11%) and II (4-7%) ) had high mite
densities (1.06-5.81 actives cm-2) and damage scores (2.5-4). In
general, cultivars with high canopy retention values had low mite
densities and damage scores, whereas cultivars with low canopy
retention values had high mite densities and damage scores,
irrespective of the canopy retention method and sampling period.
Generally, in the first 1994 trial, cultivars with high canopy
retention assessed by both CR methods II and III recorded
relatively low mite density and significantly lower mite damage
scores, while cultivars with small CR values had high mite density
and damage scores (Table 2). Apart from TME 1, the cultivar with
the overall highest CR value did not show a consistent trend with
either low mite density or damage score in the second 1994 trial
(Table 3). A similar observation was made for cultivars with low CR
values and mite density and damage.
In the 1993 trial, mite damage was inversely associated with CR
methods I and II in all sampling dates. Except for December 1993,
mite damage was also inversely associated with SGA on all the other
dates. Significant correlations in December 1993 were generally
weaker than those for January and March 1994. Mite density was
negatively correlated with SGA, CR methods I and II, and SGA in
March 1994, but there were no significant relationships in January
1994 (Table 5). RWC did not correlate with mite density and damage.
In the first 1994 trial, CR method II was negatively correlated
with mite damage in all the sampling dates whereas CR method III
was negatively correlated with mite damage in January and March
1995. In March 1995, mite density was positively and negatively
correlated with CR method II and CR method III, respectively. For
the second 1994 trial, neither CR method II nor CR method III was
correlated with mite damage in either December 1994 or March 1995.
Mite density did not correlate with either CR method II or CR
method III.
TABLE 4. Stay green ability (SGA),
relative water content (RWC) and mite density (Pop), and damage
(Dam) of 38 cassava cultivars at different periods in the 1993/94
field trial
Cultivar |
SGA (%) |
RWC (%) |
Popa |
Damb |
Sep |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
Dec |
Jan |
Mar |
92/0427 |
97 |
87 |
98 |
97 |
89 |
89 |
87 |
0.6 |
1.4 |
92/0067 |
97 |
86 |
98 |
95 |
87 |
89 |
87 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
MS-20+ |
93 |
92 |
95 |
92 |
86 |
85 |
88 |
1.8 |
1.4 |
92/0401 |
98 |
57 |
97 |
95 |
93 |
89 |
nc |
0.7 |
1.5 |
91/02312 |
100 |
95 |
93 |
97 |
90 |
95 |
nc |
2.0 |
1.8 |
TME 1+ |
97 |
88 |
92 |
95 |
83 |
84 |
87 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
91/02319 |
97 |
88 |
88 |
90 |
92 |
87 |
nc |
3.9 |
2.6 |
92/0326 |
100 |
95 |
98 |
100 |
93 |
84 |
nc |
1.9 |
1.8 |
91/02317 |
98 |
85 |
90 |
95 |
89 |
84 |
nc |
3.6 |
2.5 |
92/0342 |
100 |
90 |
95 |
98 |
90 |
84 |
nc |
0.8 |
1.4 |
91/01730 |
100 |
98 |
97 |
92 |
88 |
83 |
97 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
91/02327 |
97 |
87 |
92 |
98 |
87 |
86 |
nc |
0.9 |
2.1 |
91934 |
99 |
85 |
95 |
91 |
87 |
89 |
nc |
1.9 |
2.3 |
91/02324 |
98 |
93 |
88 |
92 |
89 |
88 |
nc |
2.4 |
2.0 |
91/02316 |
98 |
75 |
85 |
98 |
91 |
84 |
nc |
4.5 |
3.0 |
91/02325 |
95 |
86 |
88 |
85 |
87 |
88 |
84 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
91/00455 |
100 |
88 |
90 |
90 |
86 |
90 |
nc |
2.7 |
2.9 |
ALICE LOCAL+ |
100 |
85 |
92 |
100 |
85 |
91 |
nc |
9.5 |
1.8 |
92/0396 |
100 |
90 |
90 |
85 |
de |
de |
de |
1.9 |
2.6 |
91/00458 |
100 |
88 |
de |
93 |
89 |
89 |
87 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
ATU+ |
98 |
75 |
83 |
90 |
88 |
84 |
nc |
1.0 |
2.0 |
91/00379 |
100 |
95 |
de |
90 |
de |
de |
nc |
2.6 |
2.6 |
TOKUNBO+ |
93 |
72 |
80 |
80 |
92 |
87 |
85 |
2.1 |
2.6 |
BAGI WAWA+ |
95 |
73 |
83 |
90 |
86 |
85 |
nc |
0.9 |
2.3 |
4(2)1425P |
100 |
88 |
85 |
93 |
85 |
87 |
84 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
91/00453 |
96 |
85 |
90 |
85 |
85 |
89 |
86 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
92/0402 |
100 |
78 |
38 |
95 |
91 |
90 |
nc |
5.2 |
2.3 |
92/0057 |
100 |
78 |
78 |
98 |
92 |
84 |
nc |
4.3 |
3.5 |
92/0430 |
100 |
90 |
80 |
93 |
91 |
85 |
nc |
6.4 |
2.8 |
91/00459 |
100 |
98 |
93 |
78 |
92 |
91 |
89 |
2.6 |
3.8 |
AMALA+ |
98 |
82 |
83 |
85 |
90 |
89 |
nc |
2.9 |
3.8 |
OKO IYAWO+ |
95 |
78 |
85 |
88 |
88 |
89 |
86 |
1.6 |
2.4 |
LAPAI-1+ |
100 |
77 |
80 |
83 |
88 |
87 |
86 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
91/00385 |
100 |
98 |
85 |
75 |
90 |
88 |
nc |
1.7 |
3.6 |
30572 |
100 |
92 |
83 |
70 |
86 |
90 |
85 |
5.8 |
4.0 |
2ND AGRIC+ |
95 |
75 |
80 |
95 |
87 |
83 |
nc |
3.7 |
2.5 |
ISU+ |
95 |
83 |
78 |
65 |
90 |
88 |
nc |
1.1 |
4.0 |
30001 |
100 |
85 |
38 |
83 |
92 |
83 |
nc |
4.5 |
4.0 |
Mean |
98 |
85 |
86 |
89 |
89 |
87 |
86.4 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
S.E. |
0.35 |
1.4 |
2.2 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.30 |
0.12 |
F-testc |
ns |
** |
** |
** |
ns |
ns |
ns |
** |
** |
+ Local cultivar
nc = Not considered; de = deleted
a and b Mean values of two and six sampling
periods, respectively
c ns and **, F-test nonsignificant at the 5%
level and significant at the 1% level, respectively
TABLE 5. Correlation coefficients among
stay green ability (SGA), canopy retention (methods I, II and III),
relative water content (RWC), and mite density (pop) and damage
(dam) at different periods in the 1993 and 1994 trials
Correlated variables |
Correlation coefficients |
December |
January |
March |
1993 Trial |
CR (method I) vs CR (method II) |
0.86*** |
0.95*** |
0.90*** |
CR (method I) vs SGA |
0.14 |
0.58*** |
0.71*** |
CR (method II) vs SGA |
0.35* |
0.61*** |
0.77** |
CR (method I) vs dam |
-0.58*** |
-0.77*** |
-0.69*** |
CR (method II vs dam) |
-0.52*** |
-0.80*** |
-0.78*** |
SGA vs dam |
-0.05 |
-0.46** |
-0.69*** |
SGA vs pop |
- |
-0.24 |
-0.65*** |
CR (method I) vs pop) |
- |
-0.11 |
-0.46** |
CR (method II vs pop) |
- |
-0.09 |
-0.54*** |
RWC vs CR (method I) |
-0.01 |
0.05 |
0.33 |
RWC vs CR (method II) |
-0.04 |
-0.00 |
0.25 |
RWC vs SGA |
-0.15 |
0.14 |
0.11 |
RWC vs dam |
-0.15 |
-0.00 |
-0.13 |
RWC vs pop |
- |
-0.19 |
-0.21 |
1994 Trial I |
CR (method II) vs CR (method III) |
0.83*** |
0.90*** |
0.91*** |
CR (method II) vs dam |
-0.51** |
-0.75*** |
-0.85*** |
CR (method III) vs dam |
-0.29 |
-0.82*** |
-0.75*** |
CR (method II) vs pop |
- |
0.04 |
0.59** |
CR (method III) vs pop |
- |
-0.22 |
-0.48* |
1994 Trial II |
CR (method II) vs CR (method III) |
0.90*** |
0.84*** |
0.93*** |
CR (method II) vs dam |
-0.08 |
-0.71*** |
-0.21 |
CR (method III) vs dam |
0.07 |
-0.08 |
-0.22 |
CR (method II) vs pop |
- |
0.08 |
-0.29 |
CR (method III) vs pop |
- |
-0.15 |
-0.27 |
*, **, *** Significant at the 5, 1 and 0.1% levels,
respectively
DISCUSSION
Plant water deficit (drought stress) causes reduction in
leaf area, increase in leaf abscission, low stomatal conductance
and reduced transpiration rate (Hsiao, 1973). Baker et al.
(1989) noticed increased leaf senescence and leaf fall, and
reduced leaf production in cassava during drought stress. It is
implicit that cultivars that lose more leaves and with a higher
rate of leaf senescence may be more susceptible to drought stress
than cultivars that lose less leaves and have a lower rate of leaf
senescence. Cultivars with higher CR and SGA may be less affected
by drought stress than those with lower CR and SGA. Thus, cultivars
with higher CR and SGA may maintain a higher water status during
dry periods than those with lower CR and SGA.
The positive and close relationships obtained between the CR
methods I and II, and methods II and III, show an agreement between
these methods in estimating canopy retention, indicating that each
method could be a reliable indicator of the other. Although method
I appeared to have the highest accuracy, it may not be the most
efficient since it takes the longest time (wet to dry season) to
measure. Both CR methods II and III can equally be estimated just
within the dry season. However, method II is better than method III
because it is less tedious, rapid and simple to measure without
necessarily sacrificing accuracy. In terms of resource allocation,
the methods could be ranked in increasing order of importance for
screening for CR thus: method I < method III < method II. The
use of these methods does not require use of sophisticated and
expensive equipment.
The consistently close, but inverse associations obtained over 2
years between mite damage and canopy retention during the peak of
the dry periods (January) indicates that the genetic potential of
cassava to retain green leaves during these periods may be a major
factor of resistance to M. tanajoa. The absence or presence
of a relatively low correlation between mite damage and canopy
retention in December was not surprising because a cultivar with a
genetically conditioned large canopy may not necessarily retain
many leaves during dry periods. This is supported by the absence of
a significant linear relationship between the baseline canopy
retention (September) and canopy retention in January and March.
January (mid-dry season) is the most appropriate period for
screening for canopy retention, since correlation coefficients
between mite damage and CR were consistently high in January of
both years, regardless of the trial. March would have also been
appropriate if there were no rainy days that reduced the
correlations between CR and mite damage. Rain boosts canopy
development and dislodges mites (Yaninek et al., 1989). The
close, positive association between CR and SGA and between CR and
mite damage in January implies that cultivars which are tolerant to
drought are resistant to M. tanajoa. The results also show
that there is no need for estimation of SGA along with CR, owing to
the high degree of correlations obtained between SGA and CR in
January and March.
In all trials, mite density was not correlated with CR methods
I, II and III in December and January. Except for the second of the
1994/95 field trials, mite population density was not correlated
with CR only in March. The absence of a relationship between CR and
mite density in January was not unexpected since susceptible
cultivars dropped most or all of their leaves during this period,
while some resistant cultivars retained many green leaves. The
mites were, thus in a no-choice situation of migrating to resistant
cultivars, resulting in a higher mite population on some resistant
than susceptible cultivars during relatively severe dry periods,
especially in January 1994.
Owing to the differential effects of drought on resistant and
susceptible cultivars, the correlation of mite population and CR
during dry periods, for the evaluation of cassava cultivars for
resistance to M. tanajoa cannot be relied upon. Instead,
mite damage and CR should be correlated during such periods. Since
there is a positive relationship between drought tolerance (as
measured by canopy retention) and mite resistance, future research
should focus on other indicators of drought tolerance such as
rooting depth, bark thickness and stomatal sensitivity among
cassava cultivars; these could provide a more quantitative and
physiological basis of resistance to M. tanajoa.
During drought stress, the plant suffers a reduction in
turgor pressure that causes a decline in cell expansion and cell
wall synthesis (Hsiao, 1973). In addition, reduced transpiration
during drought stress (Hsiao, 1973) causes leaf temperature to
increase and relative humidity (RH) to decrease (Holtzer et
al., 1988). It is possible that the resistance to M.
tanajoa in cultivars with high CR and SGA may be caused by high
turgor pressure and RH and low temperature. Higher turgor pressure
leads to thicker cell walls (Hsiao, 1973), which makes it difficult
for mites to feed. Higher RH and lower temperatures are not
conducive for the survival of M. tanajoa and other
tetranychid mites (Holtzer et al., 1988; Yaninek et
al., 1989).
Failure to detect variations in RWC among the cultivars may be
because RWC is a rather insensitive indicator of water status when
water deficit is not severe (Hsiao, 1973). Hsiao (1973) explained
that in nearly saturated tissues, a small change in water content
corresponds to a change in RWC which is about the random error in
RWC measurements in several studies. However, Pillai and
Palaniswami (1990) obtained a strong negative correlation between
RWC in cassava and damage by a different species of spider mite in
India.
In conclusion, canopy retention method II is a simple, rapid and
cheap method of screening cassava cultivars for canopy retention.
Breeding of cassava cultivars with the ability to retain large
canopy during dry periods may reduce cassava leaf damage caused by
M. tanajoa.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This is a contribution for the International Institute of
Tropical Agriculture (IITA/JA/97/56). It is part of a PhD Thesis
that was submitted to the Department of Zoology, University of
Ibadan, Nigeria by the first author.
REFERENCES
- Baker, G.R., Fukai, S. and Wilson, G.L. 1989. The response
of cassava to water deficits at various stages of growth in the
subtropics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
40:517-528.
- Hahn, S.K., Isoba, J.C.G. and Ikotun, T. 1989. Resistance
breeding in root and tuber crops at the International Institute of
Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. Crop Protection
8:147-168.
- Holtzer, T.O., Norman, J.M., Perring, T.M., Berry, J.S. and
Heintz, J.C. 1988. Effects of microenvironment on the dynamics of
spider mite population. Experimental and Applied Acarology
4:247-264.
- Hsiao, T.C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annual
Review of Plant Physiology 24:519-570.
- IITA. 1992. Sustainable Food Production in Sub-Saharan
Africa 1: IITA=s
contribution. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture,
Ibadan, Nigeria. 208 pp.
- IITA. 1993. Crop Improvement Division: Activity Report and
Workplan for 1993. International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. 119 pp.
- Lyon, W.F. 1974. A green cassava mite recently found in Africa.
Plant Protection Bulletin 22: 11-13.
- Ndayiragije, P. 1984. Cassava green mite (Mononychellus
tanajoa (Bondar)) in Burundi. In: Integrated Pest Management
of Cassava Green Mite. Greathead, A.H., Markham, R.H., Murphy,
S.T. and Robertson, I.A.D. (Eds.), pp. 67-73. Proceedings of a
Regional Training Workshop in East Africa, 30 April-4 May,
1984.
- Nyiira, Z.M. 1972. Report of investigation of cassava mite,
Mononychellus tanajoa Bondar. Kampala, Uganda, Kwanda Res Sta.
14pp.
- Nyiira, Z.M. 1976. Advances in research on the economic
significance of the green cassava mite Mononychellus tanajoa
in Uganda. In: The International Exchange and Testing of
Cassava Germplasm in Africa. Terry, E. and Mclntyre, R. (Eds),
pp. 22-29. Proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop held at
IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria, 17-21 November, 1975.
- Pillai, K.S. and Palaniswami, M.S. 1990. Evaluation of cassava
accessions resistant to spider mite and factors governing
resistance in India. In: Tropical Root Crop and Tuber Crops
Changing Role in a Modern World. Howeler, R.H. (Ed.), pp.
341-350. Proceedings of the 8th Symposium of the International
Society for Tropical Root Crops. Bangkok, Thailand, 30 October-5
November, 1988.
- SAS Institute. 1993. SAS Companion for Microsoft Windows
Environment, Version 6 1st ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina,
U.S.A.
- Shukla, P.T. 1976. Preliminary report on green mite
(Mononychellus tanajoa Bondar) resistance in Tanzania local
cassava varieties. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal
42:55-59.
- Smart, R.E. and Bingham, G.E. 1974. Rapid estimation of
relative water content. Plant Physiology 58:258-260.
- Yaninek, J.S., de Moraes, G.J. and Markham, R.H. 1989.
Handbook on the Cassava Green Mite Mononychellus tanajoa in
Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. 210 pp.
Copyright 1999, African Crop Science Society
|