|
African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 7, Num. 4, 1999, pp. 355-363
|
African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 7. No. 4, pp. 355-363, 1999
INTERCROPPING PERENNIAL LEGUMES FOR GREEN
MANURE ADDITIONS TO MAIZE IN SOUTHERN MALAWI
B.C.G. KAMANGA, G.Y. KANYAMA-PHIRI and S. MINAE1
University of Malawi, Bunda College of Agriculture, P. O. Box 219, Lilongwe,
Malawi
1The First Financial Services, National Insurance Company Centre,
P. O. Lilongwe, Malawi
Code Number: CS99026
ABSTRACT
A three-year study was conducted in Zomba, southern Malawi to
assess agroforestry-based soil management technologies in smallhold farmers
fields. Sesbania (Sesbania sesban), Tephrosia (Tephrosia vogelii)
and pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan) provided green manure that was incorporated
with maize stover. In the control plots, maize stover alone was applied. Forty-eight
fields representing three landscape positions; dambo valleys (0 12% slope),
dambo margins (0 12%) and steep slopes (> 12%) were selected. The
agroforestry legumes were relay intercropped with maize at first weeding in
every other furrow using seedlings for Sesbania and seeds for Tephrosia and
pigeon peas. At the end of the growing season, legume leafy biomass and maize
stover were incorporated into the soil. Half of each plot was supplemented with
48 kg N ha-1 as Calcium Ammonium Nitrate. There were significant differences
in maize yields (P = 0.018) from the organic inputs in all the landscape positions.
Effects of mineral N additions also resulted in significant increases in maize
grain yield (P= 0.001). Sesbania relay intercrops had the highest maize yields
(2937 kg ha-1) followed by Tephrosia (2592 kg ha-1) and then pigeon peas (2122
kg ha-1). Maize yields were highest in dambo margins (2912 kg ha-1) followed
by dambo valleys (2709 kg ha-1) and steep slopes (1648 kg ha-1). These results
have shown that resource-poor farmers can obtain higher maize yields when organic
inputs are combined with inorganic fertilisers, however, such innovations should
target the lower landscape positions, as the upper slopes require different
approaches to land resource improvement.
Key Words: Cajanus cajan, grain yield, landscape
positions, nitrogen fertilizer, soil fertility replenishment, Sesbania sesban,
Tephrosia vogelii
RÉSUMÉ
Une étude de trois ans a été conduite en Zomba au sud
du Malawi pour évaluer les technologies de gestion de sols à base
dagroforesterie en champs de petits agriculteurs. Sesbania (Sesbania
sesban), Tephrosia (Tephrosia vogelii) et le pois cajan (Cajanus
cajan) ont fourni lengrais vert qui a été incorporé
avec les fanes du maïs. Les fanes du maïs étaient appliquées
seules dans les parcelles témoins. Quarante huit champs représentant
trois positions du paysage: les vallées dambo (0 12% de pente),
les bords de dambo (0 12%) et les fortes pentes (> 12%) ont été
sélectionnés. Les légumineuses dagroforesterie étaient
en relai intercalée avec le maïs au premier sarclage dans chaque
autre sillon utilisant des plantules pour Sesbania et des semences pour Tephrosia
et le pois cajan. A la fin de la saison agricole, la biomasse feuillue de légumineuses
et de fanes du maïs a été incorporée au sol. La moitié
de chaque parcelle était complémentée avec 48 kg N ha-1
dammoniatre. Il y avait des differences significatives (P = 0.018) des
rendements du maïs pour les intrants organiques dans toutes les positions
du paysages. Des effets daddition dN mineral a abouti aussi à
une augmentation significative (P= 0.001) du rendement en grains du maïs.
Le Sesbania en relai intercalé a eu le rendement le plus élevé
du maïs (2937 kg ha-1) suivi par Tephrosia (2592 kg ha-1) et du pois cajan
(2122 kg ha-1). Les rendements du maïs étaient plus élévés
dans le bords du dambo (2912 kg ha-1) suivi des vallées dambo (2709 kg
ha-1) et enfin de fortes pentes (1648 kg ha-1). Ces résultats ont montré
que les pauvres agriculteurs peuvent obtenir des rendements élevés
du maïs quand les intrants organiques sont combinés avec les engrais
inorganiques, cependant, telles innovations devraient viser les bas-fonds paysage,
puisque les pentes supérieures nécessitent de recherche additionnelle
ou autres approches pour lamélioration de la resource-terre.
Mots Clés: Pois cajan, rendement en grains, positions de paysage,
en grais dazote, restauration de la fertilité, Sesbania sesban,
Tephrosia vogelii
INTRODUCTION
Agriculture is the mainstay of Malawis economy, contributing 34% to the
gross domestic product with smallholder agriculture contributing 25% between
1984 and 1994 (Malawi Government, 1995). It has also contributed 85% to the
countrys export earnings over the same period (Msukwa, 1994). Agriculture
is a principal occupation for more than 80% of Malawis population (Kachule,
1994; Malawi Government, 1995).
Maize is the major staple food in Malawi with little competition
from secondary staples such as cassava, rice and sorghum. Despite the importance
of maize in smallholder agricultural production, yields remain consistently
low and food insecurity is a chronic problem. One of the contributing factors
to low crop production is the increase in human population estimated at 3.5%
per annum (Ngongola et al., 1992). This has led to reduced land holding
sizes, deforestation and soil degradation. Decline in soil fertility ranks high
among the factors limiting food production in Sub-Saharan Africa (Buresh et
al., 1997), and there is a need to develop more nutrient efficient food
production systems. Increased use of hybrid maize and mineral fertilisers are
the most promising route for improving crop yields (Malawi Government, 1995;
Snapp, 1995). Although fertilisers may produce greater maize yields (Smale,
1991), their use is not widespread because their prices are prohibitive to subsistence
farmers.
Research on soil fertility has focussed upon traditional knowledge
in using organic resources to improve crop yields (Blackie and Jones, 1993).
In the past when land was plentiful, farmers maintained soil fertility through
shifting cultivation. With increased unavailability of fallow lands, the system
is no longer viable. Some farmers incorporate crop residues to improve soil
fertility but these residues are often low in nutrients (MacColl, 1990). Fundikila
is also common in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia. In this system, dry grass is
collected, buried and burnt in mounds where crops are subsequently grown. However,
these practices do not contribute to long-term soil fertility improvements.
Onim et al. (1990) reported that the use of green manure
increased maize yield. They found that 13603 kg dry matter ha-1 of Sesbania
contained 448 kg N, 31 kg P and 125 kg K. Addition of 4806 kg dry matter ha-1
of pigeon pea residues provided 161 kg N, 4 kg P and 26 kg K while 7793 kg ha-1
of maize stover added 120 kg N, 5 kg P and 7 kg K. Maize grain yield following
these additions were largest with Sesbania (6667 kg ha-1) followed by pigeon
peas (6380 kg ha-1) and maize stover (5156 kg ha-1). Phombeya et al.
(1989) reported that Tephrosia vogelii provided 2883 kg ha-1 of maize
yield when incorporated in the soil. It was also shown that the N content is
substantial in Sesbania and pigeon peas such that when incorporated they can
improve crop growth and yield (Giller and Wilson, 1991).
A study was performed in Songani, an area in Southern Malawi
with a high percentage of resource poor farmers. Farmers predominantly practice
continuous maize-based intercropping with little use of inorganic fertilisers.
It has been shown that 1.0 ha is required for enough food production for a household
of five people (World Bank, 1990) but average land holdings are often less than
1.0 ha making it difficult to produce sufficient food from the average farm.
Farming practices that allow for increased use of organic inputs from nitrogen-fixing
plants and tight recycling of crop residues is one means of improving food production
under these impoverished smallholder conditions (Woomer et al., 1998).
The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of inter-planting
nitrogen-fixing perennial legumes into maize fields as a source of periodic
addition of green manures. Three candidate legumes were evaluated in farmers
fields occupying different landscape positions over two consecutive cropping
seasons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted in Songani watershed, Malosa Extension Planning Area
in Machinga Agricultural Development Division. The site is located at 15º 18.5'
S and 35º 23.5' E and is 785 metres above sea level. Songani is relatively level
but 10% of the farmers fields are on slopes >12%.
Mean annual rainfall averages 1150 mm. Soils are classified
as Ultisols and Alfisols with a pH in calcium chloride ranging from 5.3 to 6.5.
Nitrate-N content in the soil ranges from 0.09 to 0.14%.
Transect sampling was used in characterising the cropping systems.
Forty-eight farmers were selected at random along six transects spaced at 0.6
km. Each transect runs in an east/west direction originating from the Zomba-Lilongwe
road at the lowest elevation and terminating in the highest area of the catchment
on the Zomba Mountain forest reserve boundary.
The baseline survey. A survey involving 101 farmers in eleven villages
was conducted prior to implementation of the trials in the first year using
semi-structured questionnaires. The baseline survey was performed to collect
socioe-conomic characteristics about households and farming systems. Data from
the baseline survey was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists.
Descriptive analysis and cross tabulation were performed.
Field experimentation. Field experimentation was researcher-designed
and farmer-managed. Three landscape positions were identified to determine the
effect of slope on soil fertility and its management. These positions included
the dambo valleys (0 - 12 % slope), the dambo margins (0 - 12 % slope) and the
steep slopes (> 12 %). The experiments were arranged as a 3 x 4 factorial
in a split plot design with 16 replicates. Slope positions were the main plots
and legume inter-planting the subplot. Four 15 m x 15 m maize plots were demarcated
on each of the 48 participating farmers fields. At the onset of rains,
maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid variety MH18 was planted in the four plots
at a population of 37,000 plants ha-1. The plots were relay intercropped
with Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr, Tephrosia vogelii and Cajanus
cajan (L.) Mills at the first maize weeding while the fourth plot remained
as a maize monocrop control.
The maize/Sesbania and maize/Tephrosia plots were new to farmers
while the maize/pigeon peas and maize monocrop represented existing systems.
Bare-rooted seedlings of Sesbania were transplanted at 75 cm x 180 cm providing
7,400 plants ha-1. Tephrosia and pigeon peas were directly sown at 3 seeds per
hole in ridge shoulders at 24, 691 plants ha-1. These were later thinned to
one per hole to provide the same plant density as Sesbania.
In the second year, the procedure was repeated in all plots.
Before the onset of rains, each plot was split with one half recieving 48 kg
N ha-1 Calcium Ammonium Nitrate as top dressing. The splitting of the plots
changed the design to 3 x 4 x 2 factorial in a split-split plot design. Researchers
applied fertilisers in the plots as many farmers were inexperienced in its uniform
application. The same planting and management patterns were repeated in the
third year.
Data collection. Maize was harvested at physiological maturity from
sample areas of 5 m x 5 m, cobs collected, shelled and weighed to determine
total biomass and grain yield. Grain yields were adjusted by assuming 12.5%
moisture content. The legumes remained in the field until shortly before the
subsequent rains, then felled, fresh dead leaves and fine branches (< 0.05
cm) stripped and incorporated into the soil by hand ridging. Sub-samples of
plant residues (500 g) were collected from maize at harvest and for the legumes
at incorporation for nitrogen determination (Onim et al., 1990). The
samples were oven-dried to a constant weight at 60 º C for 48 hours and a sub-sample
retained for subsequent chemical analysis. The dry weight of the sample was
used to adjust the fresh weights per net plot to dry weights per plot. Woody
biomass from Sesbania was also collected and weighed from sample areas of 5
m x 5 m. The woody stems of Tephrosia and pigeon peas were also removed from
the field to facilitate field operations.
Analytical procedure. Data were compiled onto a computer spreadsheet
with columns representing experimental variables or measurements and rows consisting
of individual cases (farms). The spread sheet was inspected and then imported
into MSTATC computer statistical software.
Analyses of Variance were performed for a split plot in the
first season and a split-split plot for the second with all interactions included
into the model statement.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Farm survey. Land holding sizes were small in the area as reflected
by the average farm size (0.56 ha) as well as the proportion of farmers with
land < 1 ha. Sixty-eight percent of farmers reported land holdings of <
1 ha and 25% cultivated between 1 and 2 ha. Concurring with these results, the
Malawi Government (1991) reported that 79% of farmers in Machinga Agricultural
Development Division, southern Malawi cultivate less than < 1 ha and only
6% had more than 2 ha.
Table 1 shows the dominant cropping systems in Songani, Zomba.
Out of 163 fields surveyed, 57% had mixed intercrops of maize with pigeon peas,
sorghum, cassava and other crops. Strip intercropping was observed in 32% of
the fields where cassava formed the main strips with maize and other crops planted
in between. Eight percent of the fields were planted to one crop while 3% of
the cropping systems in the fields could not be defined.
TABLE 1. Cropping systems in Songani
Cropping system
|
% fields
|
Monocropping
|
8
|
Strip cropping
|
32
|
Mixed cropping
|
57
|
Undefined
|
3
|
According to Shaxson and Tauer (1992), 95% of the total area cultivated in
Zomba was intercropped to various degrees, with 84% of the land planted to maize.
These results support the findings of this study where 90% of the farmers in
the study area practice maize-based intercropping. The large proportion of intercropping
suggests a scarcity of land, forcing farmers to make optional use of limited
field areas. In so doing, more nutrients are being mined from soils, identifying
the need for farm interventions that contribute to nutrient inputs and recycling,
as does interplanting with perennial legumes.
Table 2 presents information on household availability of food
throughout the year. The results show that well over 80% of the households had
no food by December, seven months after the most recent harvest. Alarmingly,
2% of the sample households exhaust food supplies by April, the month that maize
is normally harvested. This is ominous considering that families generally have
very limited or no income to purchase food. The months of critical food insecurity
in the study area coincide with the peak period of high labour demands. Selling
ones labour is an important strategy for survival in the face of food shortage
but this may in turn result in domestic labour shortages on ones own farm.
Furthermore, less than 1% of the farmers reported having no food problems throughout
the year. In a similar study in Zomba, 80% of the farmers were reported to have
depleted their food stocks by December (Malawi Government, 1991; Barbier, 1991).
Table 2. Maize provision ability of farm families in Songani
Month
|
Food supply exhausted (%)
|
Households lacking food (%)
|
April
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
May
|
2.1
|
4.1
|
June
|
4.0
|
8.1
|
July
|
4.6
|
12.7
|
August
|
6.1
|
18.8
|
September
|
8.2
|
27.0
|
October
|
9.0
|
36.0
|
November
|
12.8
|
48.8
|
December
|
31.9
|
80.7
|
January
|
8.5
|
89.2
|
February
|
6.8
|
96.0
|
March
|
3.6
|
99.6
|
Biomass yields, nitrogen content and nitrogen equivalents. The slope positions
and legume interplanting significantly (P<0.001) influenced biomass production.
Yield of Sesbania (2217 kg ha-1) was significantly higher than that
of Tephrosia (850 kg ha-1) and pigeon peas (579 kg ha-1)
(Table 3). Stover yield (1546 kg ha-1) was highest (P = 0.094) in
the maize/Sesbania interplanting (1714 kg ha-1) and lowest in the
maize/pigeon pea interplanting (1370 kg ha-1). Biomass production
on different landscape positions was highest in the dambo valleys followed by
the margins and least in the steep slopes. High biomass obtained in the lower
slopes may be attributed to residual moisture. In the steep slopes, production
of Sesbania was poor. Tephrosia and pigeon peas produced low biomass probably
due to poor growth which could be attributed to their susceptibility to waterlogging
conditions (Nene et al., 1990) which occurred shortly after planting.
Table 3. Plant biomass, nitrogen content and partial economic
analysis for the different production systems (n = 45)
System
|
Biomass kg DM ha-1a
|
% N
|
N (kg ha-1)
|
N equiv. (kg ha-1)
|
Value of N (MK ha-1)
|
Production
(MK ha-1)
|
Diff.
(MK ha-1)
|
Sesbania
|
2217a
|
3.0b
|
66.5
|
246.3
|
1453.2
|
589.7
|
863.5
|
Maize stover
|
1714
|
0.9c
|
15.4
|
57.0
|
336.3
|
786.3
|
(450.3)
|
Tephrosia
|
850c
|
3.1a
|
26.4
|
98.0
|
578.2
|
480.0
|
98.2
|
Maize stover
|
1537
|
0.8d
|
12.3
|
45.6
|
269.0
|
659.1
|
(390.1)
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
143.6
|
847.2
|
1139.1
|
(291.9)
|
Pigeon peas
|
570d
|
3.1a
|
17.7
|
65.5
|
386.5
|
373.1
|
3.4
|
Maize stover
|
1370
|
0.7e
|
9.6
|
35.6
|
210.0
|
618.8
|
(408.2)
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
101.1
|
596.5
|
991.9
|
(395.4)
|
Sole maize
|
1546b
|
0.8d
|
12.3
|
45.4
|
267.9
|
618.8
|
(350.9)
|
CV (%)
|
75.6
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Means followed by different superscript letters in a column are significantly
different at P < 0.05. Column three was obtained by multiplying columns 1
and 2. Column four was obtained by using the percentage N (27%) in the CAN fertiliser.
Column 5 is the value of the fertiliser equivalents while column 6 is the cost
of producing the fertiliser
The nitrogen contained in both maize stover and legumes were combined to calculate
total nitrogen inputs. Analysis for nitrogen contents showed that Sesbania biomass
contained 3.0% N, Tephrosia and pigeon peas 3.1% and maize stover had 0.8%.
These findings on N contents are in general agreement with Giller and Wilson
(1991) and Gitteridge (1991) who reported N contents of 3.6% and 3.5%, respectively.
Small difference may be attributed to the fertility of the soils where they
were planted and other environmental conditions.
In comparison of N contributions, Sesbania provided 66.5 kg N ha-1
and maize stover 15.4 kg N ha-1. The maize/Tephrosia and maize/pigeon
pea inter-planting contributed 38.7 and 27.3 kg N ha-1, respectively.
The maize monocrop provided 12.3 kg N ha-1. Crop nitrogen use efficiency
from legume biomass is reported to be approximately half as effective as inputs
from mineral nitrogen fertiliser (Giller and Wilson, 1991). The factors regulating
nutrient supply from an organic input are decomposition and mineralisation and
their synchronisation with crop nutrient demands (Myers et al., 1994).
Sesbania decomposes rapidly and as such provides more nutrients to the soil.
Based on the effectiveness of the organic N, it follows that the nitrogen values
reported in Table 3 might not all be available to the crop at the same time
as the inorganic N. The advantage, however, is that the organic N accumulates
slowly and it is less subject to loss with more biomass incorporation.
Comparing the nitrogen in plant biomass to commercial N fertiliser
such as CAN (27% N), the biomass incorporated into the soil added the equivalent
of 303.3, 143.6, 101.1 and 45.4 kg ha-1 of CAN from the Sesbania, Tephrosia,
pigeon pea and maize treatments, respectively. At the current US$14 per 50 kg
bag, this is a substantial saving for the financially constrained smallholder.
In a similar a study, Onim et al. (1990) measured nitrogen yields of
488 and 161 kg ha-1 from 13.6 and 4.8 tonnes of Sesbania and pigeon pea biomass,
respectively.
The first year production cost of establishing the Sesbania
inter-planting was US$30 ha-1 offering farmers savings of US$9 in terms of
N purchases alone. This does not take into account the potential regrowth in
subsequent seasons or the value of fuelwood. In this experiment, legume inter-plants
were re-established during each cropping season, harvested late in the following
dry season and woody biomass removed for use as fuel. Other options exist including
regrowth of the perennial legumes, resulting in reducing the costs of establishing
the legumes. This management option deserves attention, as it may prove more
economical in the long-term.
Some difficulties exist in accounting for plant nutrients in
the treatments. Root biomass of maize and the legumes was not measured. Presumably,
legume root biomass contained considerable N inputs through symbiotic N fixation
(Giller and Wilson, 1991). Many of the lower maize leaves were shed during grain
ripening, resulting in unaccounted nutrient recycling as surface mulch. The
legume inter-plants, however, remained green throughout the dry season and their
biomass was monitored with reasonable accuracy.
Maize response to organic inputs and N fertiliser. The main effects
on maize grain were all significant with fertiliser N levels being strongest
(P< 0.001) followed by residues (P = 0.001) and slope positions (P = 0.038).
The interactions were significant except for landscape positions x N addition
(P = 0.018) in the second season, suggesting that mineral nitrogen inputs are
more strategic on maize yields in dambo margins followed by dambo valleys and
steep slopes. Table 4 shows maize yields at different seasons, landscape positions
and N treatments. Dambo margins yielded 2912 kg ha-1 followed by
dambo valleys 2709 kg ha-1 while the steep slopes gave 1648 kg ha-1
when supplemented with 48 kg N ha-1. In the first year of the study,
maize yields were low. In the second year, there was a depression in maize yields
despite the incorporation of legume residues. In the third year, yields were
higher than the second year in all landscape positions (Table 4). The depression
in yield might have resulted from the immobilisation of nitrogen in the soil.
However, marked improvements were observed in the third year of the study. When
biomass was supplemented with 48 kg N ha-1 as CAN, a strong yield
response of maize to nitrogen addition was noted.
Table 4. Maize grain yield at different landscape positions and
nitrogen treatments
|
Maize grain yields by landscape postiona
|
N treatments
|
Dambo valley (0 - 12%)
|
Dambo margins (0 - 12%)
|
Steep slopes (> 12%)
|
CV%
|
|
Kg ha-1
|
1996/97 growing season
|
|
|
|
|
Biomass + 0 kg N ha-1
|
1055
|
978
|
621
|
46.4
|
1997/98 growing season
|
|
|
|
|
Biomass + 48 kg N ha-1
|
2709b
|
2912a
|
1648c
|
67.3
|
Biomass + 0 kg N ha-1
|
923d
|
824e
|
395f
|
|
1998/99 growing season
|
|
|
|
|
Biomass + 48 kg N ha-1
|
3072a
|
5078b
|
2305d
|
34.8
|
Biomass + 0 kg N ha-1
|
1977e
|
2748c
|
1479e
|
|
aMeans followed by different superscript letters in a row or column are significantly
different (P =0.0175) for 1997/98 and (P=0.002) for 1998/99 growing seasons
Table 5 shows the domestic impacts of maize yields resulting from the legume
inter-planting. The Sesbania inter-planting with 48 kg N ha-1 of
mineral fertiliser provided sufficient food for the average family of 5.8 people
from 1 ha and also resulted in a surplus of 20% that the household could market.
Tephrosia also showed similar benefits of producing sufficient food with 6%
surplus. Pigeon pea and maize inter-planting each produced 87% and 83% of the
household maize requirements, respectively. However, the same inter-plantings
without inorganic fertilisers provided insufficient food for the household.
Forty three percent of the total food requirement would be met from Sesbania
with 40%, 25% and 24% from Tephrosia, pigeon peas and maize inter-planting,
respectively. This implies that yield benefits obtained from the legume systems
with mineral N fertilisers are sufficient to overcome food insecurity of many
households, particularly within smaller land holdings.
Table 5. Maize yields and food security from the legume based
systems for 1998
System
|
Yield (kg ha-1)
|
Maize production1 (kg ha-1)
|
% maize produced
|
% maize difference
|
Sesbania + 48 kg N ha-1
|
2937
|
1644.7
|
120
|
+20
|
Sesbania biomass only
|
1055
|
590.8
|
43
|
57
|
Tephrosia + 48 kg N ha-1
|
2592
|
1451.5
|
106
|
+6
|
Tephrosia biomass only
|
978
|
547.7
|
40
|
60
|
Pigeon peas + 48 kg N ha-1
|
2122
|
1188.3
|
87
|
13
|
Pigeon peas biomass only
|
621
|
347.8
|
25
|
75
|
Maize + 48 kg N ha-1
|
2032
|
1137.9
|
83
|
17
|
Maize stover only
|
584
|
327.0
|
24
|
76
|
1Maize production was based on the mean landholding of 0.56 ha
Fuelwood production is an additional benefit from legume inter-planting. Fuelwood
consu-mption by households is presented in Table 6. The survey revealed that
women required 4 hours to collect 40 kg of fuelwood that lasted about eight
days. The mean distance covered was 6 km from homestead to the protected forest
where only deadfall may be removed. A family of 5.8 people required about 1920
kg of fuelwood per year. These figures are similar to those reported by Jane
et al. (1984) that per capita fuelwood consumption varies from 0.5 to
1.2 m-3 yr-1. The wood density of Sesbania is 432 kg m-3.
From Sesbanias wood production (1777 kg ha-1), 4.4 m3
were obtained (Table 7). Fuelwood consumption also depends on the availability
of alternative sources of energy, as wood burning is not preferred in some households.
However, when one considers the fraction of Sesbania fuelwood production to
total fuelwood required, 0.92 of the domestic fuelwood needs were met from an
hectare during the second season and 1.01 in the third season. These findings
are important because greater domestic fuelwood sufficiency within smallholdings
would impact positively on both labour allocation and neighbouring woodland
ecosystems.
TABLE 6. Fuelwood consumption and production in Songani
Variable
|
Mean
|
SD1
|
Hours spent to collect one headlord
|
3.74
|
1.39
|
Distance from home to forest (km)
|
5.61
|
1.90
|
Days to finish one headload
|
8.26
|
3.37
|
Weight per headlord (kg)
|
39.50
|
8.84
|
Local market price (T kg-1)2
|
0.67
|
28.65
|
1 stands for standard deviation of the mean
2T = Tambala (100 T = 1 Kwacha, and 1 US$ = 42 Kwacha)
TABLE 7. Fuelwood production from sesbania inteplanting in maize
in Songani
Variable
|
Year
|
|
1997/98
|
1998/99
|
Fuelwood required per year (kg household-1)
|
1920
|
1920
|
Labour spent to collect wood (hr)
|
488
|
488
|
Fuelwood produced from sesbania (kg ha-1)
|
1776.9
|
1944.8
|
Labour required to produce sesbania wood (hr)
|
943
|
976
|
Fraction of sesbania wood to total fuelwood required
|
0.92
|
1.01
|
CONCLUSION
Potential exists for installing legumes into maize-based farming systems as
sources of organic inputs but this intervention alone is insufficient to obtain
domestic food security. The benefits are not realised in the first year but
start in the second year. This is particularly true in dambos. Farmers who cultivate
fields in these niches have high potential of improving domestic food security
by using the technologies examined in this study, particularly mineral N fertilisation
from the legume inter-plants. Sesbania with an additional benefit of fuelwood
production sufficient to meet the needs of most households was the most promising.
Farmers with limited resources to purchase fertilisers are able to improve maize
production through the strategic use of inter-planted legumes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thank Paul Woomer for providing useful comments during the preparation
of this paper. The Rockefeller Foundation under Forum for Agricultural Resource
Husbandry is gratefully acknowledged for the financial assistance.
REFERENCES
Blackie, M.J and Jones, R.B, 1993. Agronomy and increased maize productivity
in eastern and southern Africa. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture
9:144 -160.
Barbier, E. 1991. The Role of Smallholder Production Prices in Land Degradation.
The case of Malawi. London Environmental Economics Centre Discussion Paper,
pp. 91-105. London.
Buresh, R.J., Sanchenz, P.A. and Calhoon, F. 1997. Replenishing Soil Fertility
in Africa. SSSA Special Publication Number 51, Soil Science Society of
America, Madison, Winscosin. 251 pp.
Giller, K.E. and Wilson, K.J. 1991. Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping
Systems. CAB International. Wallingford, U.K. 313 pp.
Gitteridge, R.C. 1991. Evaluation of the leaf of a range of tree legumes
as a source of nitrogen for crop growth. Experimental Agriculture 28:195-202.
Jane, M., Vietmeyer, E.N.D and Ruskin, F.R. 1983. Firewood Crop; Shrubs
and Tree Species for Energy Production. National Academy Press, Washington
D.C. 2:6-21.
Kachule, R.N. 1994 . Economic Analysis of Bean Production in Northern
Malawi: Implications for Agricultural Policy. M.Sc. Thesis, Bunda College,
Lilongwe, Malawi, pp. 1-10.
MacColl, D. 1990. The effects of lime, minimum tillage and return of stover
to the soil on yields of maize over seven years. Bunda College Journal
of Agricultural Research 2:85 - 95.
Malawi Government, 1991. Household Food Security in Malawi. 1991 FSNM
report 1. Ministry of Agriculture. Lilongwe, Malawi, pp. 7-19.
Malawi Government, 1995. Economic Report. 1995. Ministry of Economic
Planning and Development. Zomba, Malawi, pp. 20 -34
Msukwa, L.A.H. 1994. Food Policy and Production towards Increased Household
Food Security. Centre for Social Research. University of Malawi, Zomba,
pp. 1-6.
Myers, R.J.K., Palm, C.A., Cuevas, E., Gunatilleke, I.U.N. and Brossard,
M. 1994. The synchronization of nutrient mineralization and plant nutrient
demand. In: The Biological Management of Tropical Soil fertility. Woomer,
P.L. and Swift, M.J. (Eds.), pp. 81-116. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester,
UK.
Ngongola, D.H., Mtimuni, B.H., Kanyama-Phiri, G.Y., Nothale,
D.W. and Wiyo, K.A. 1992. Socio-economic Forecasts for Land Uses
in Malawi. Bunda College, Lilongwe, Malawi, pp. 1- 15.
Nene, Y.L., Hall, S.D. and Sheila, V.K. 1990. The Pigeonpeas. International
Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. CAB International, Cambridge
Press, U.K. 490 pp.
Onim, J. F.M., Mathuwa, M., Otieno, M. and Fitzhugh, H.A. 1990. Soil fertility
changes and responses of maize and beans to green manures of leucaena, sesbania
and pigeon peas. Agroforestry Systems 12:197-215.
Phombeya, H.S.K., Saka, A.R., Bunderson, W.T., Itimu, O.A. and Mtupanyama,
Y. 1989. Comparison of Leaf Manure rates from Different Tree Species on
Maize Yields. Agroforestry Commodity Team, Ministry of Agriculture, Chitedze
Agricultural Research Station. Working paper. Lilongwe, Malawi, pp.15-17.
Shaxson, L. and Tauer, L.W. 1992. Intercropping and diversity. An economic
analysis of cropping patterns on smallholder farms in Malawi. Experimental
Agriculture 28:211- 228.
Smale, M. 1991. Chimanga Chamakono, Hybrids and Composites: An Analysis
of Farmers Adoption of Maize Technology in Malawi. CYMMYT, Lilongwe,
pp. 17 - 23.
Snapp, S.S. 1995. Improving fertilizer efficiency with small additions of
high quality organic inputs. In: Report on the First Meeting of the Network
for Maize-based Farming Systems in Selected Countries of Southern Africa.
Waddington, S.R. (Ed.), pp. 60-65. The Rockefeller Foundation/CIMMYT, Lilongwe,
Malawi.
Woomer, P.L., Bekunda, M.A., Karanja, N.K., Moorehouse, T. and Okalebo, J.R.
1998. Agricultural resource management by smallhold farmers in East Africa.
Nature and Resources 34:22-33.
World Bank, 1990. Malawi Food Security Report. Agriculture Operations
Divisions, Southern Africa Development, African Region. Washington D.C. U.S.A.
98 pp.
©1999, African Crop Science Society
|