search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Crop Science Journal
African Crop Science Society
ISSN: 1021-9730 EISSN: 2072-6589
Vol. 7, Num. 4, 1999, pp. 599-604
African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 7. No. 4, 1999

African Crop Science Journal, Vol. 7. No. 4,  pp. 599-604, 1999                                                             

Short Communication

Effect of fertiliser and mulching on bean infestation and damage by bean fly

S. Byabagambi, S. Kyamanywa and M.W. Ogenga-Latigo
Department of Crop Science,  Makerere University, P . O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda

Code Number: CS99051

 ABSTRACT

The damage caused by the bean fly (Ophiomyia sp.), which is the major insect pest of beans in Uganda, is more serious in poor soils and under drought conditions.  There is, however,  limited information on cause and effect.  This study investigated the relationship between fertiliser and the influence of moisture conservation through mulching on bean fly infestation. Fertiliser application significantly increased bean fly oviposition per leaf, number of pupae per plant and plant mortality.  Mulching also significantly reduced bean fly pupae density and bean plant mortality.  Mulching increased soil moisture content and there was a significant negative relationship between soil moisture content and bean fly pupae density.  The influence of fertiliser and mulching on bean fly damage is discussed based on nitrogen and water relationships in plant growth.

Key Words: Moisture, nitrogen, pest infestation, Ophiomyia sp., Phaseolus vulgaris  

RÉSUMÉ

Les dégâts causés par la mouche du haricot (Ophiomyia sp.), l’insect-peste majeur du haricot en Uganda, sont plus graves dans les conditions de sols pauvres et de sècheresse.  Les informations sur la cause et effet sont cependant  limitées.  Cette étude a examiné la relation entre l’engrais et l’influence de la conservation de l’humîdité par paillage sur l’infestation de la mouche du haricot.  L’application du a augmenté significativement l’oviposition de la mouche du haricot par feuille et le nombre de pupes par plante. Le paillage a réduit significativement la mouche du haricot, la densité des pupes et la mortalité de plantes du  haricot.  Le paillage  a augmenté la teneur en humîdité du sol et une relation négative a été établie entre la teneur en humîdité du  sol et la densité en pupes de la mouche du haricot.  L’influence de l’engrais et du paillage sur les dégâts de la mouche du haricot est discutée en se basant sur la relation de l’azote et de l’eau dans la croissance de la plante.

Mots Clés:  Humidité, azote, infestation de la peste, Ophiomyia sp., Phaseolus vulgaris

Introduction

The bean fly (Ophiomyia sp.) is one of the most important insect pests of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in East Africa, and Uganda in particular (Greathead, 1968; Nyiira, 1978; Karel, 1991;  Oonyu, 1992; Katwijukye, 1998).  The adult bean fly attacks mainly bean seedlings.  Infested plants are characterised by yellowing or wilting of leaves, which may drop prematurely, swelling and splitting of stems at the collar, which often result in death, leading to poor plant stand.

The damage by the bean fly is more pronounced in drought conditions or in soils of poor fertility (Greathead, 1968). However, studies by Letourneau (1994) and Byabagambi and  Kyamanywa (1997) indicated that nitrogen fertiliser increased population density and incidence of bean fly, yet yield was not affected.  On the other hand, mulching and earthing-up reduced bean fly pupae population density, wilting/yellowing symptoms and root damage (Ampofo, 1993; Letourneau, 1994; Byabagambi and Kyamanywa,1997). However, plant characte-ristics responsible for increased bean fly infestation on beans growing under fertilised soils, and reduced infestation in mulched and earthed-up beans are not clear. Because of this paucity of information, studies on effects of mulching and nitrogen-fertiliser application were conducted in green houses at Kabanyolo, Uganda with the objective of understanding  the relationship between bean fly damage and fertility levels and mulching.  

Materials and Methods

Two experiments, one on nitrogen fertiliser application rates and the other on mulching were conducted in 1997 in a greenhouse  at Makerere University Agriculture Research Institute, Kabanyolo (MUARIK).  In both experiments, bean plants were grown in 50 cm diameter plastic basins each filled with 20,000 cc of soil.

Effect of nitrogen fertiliser on bean fly damage. The approach used by Ogenga-Latigo and  Khaemba (1986) to provide contrasting levels of soil fertility was adopted for varying nitrogen fertiliser rates.  The soils used consisted of an equal mixture by volume of white sand and soil from plots on which beans had previously been grown.  Because of the high proportion of sand and the use of exhausted soil in the mixture, this type of soil  was considered to be low in available plant nutrients and was taken as a basis on which the following nitrogen-fertiliser treatments were applied:

*     Soils with low nutrient level: These consisted of white sand and soil from plots on which bean plants had previously been grown (experimental soils) i.e., control.

*     Soils with medium nutrient level: These consisted of experimental soils to which 1.5 gm of urea fertiliser      was added.  This was equivalent to 30 kg N ha-1.

*    Soils with high nutrient level: These consisted of experimental soils to which 3.0 gm of urea fertiliser  was added.  This was equivalent to 60 kg N ha-1.

*     Soils with very high nutrient level: These consisted of experimental soils to which 6.0 gm of urea fertiliser was added.  This was equivalent to 120 kg N ha-1.

For   all  the  treatments,  an equivalent of  30 kg ha-1 of K (K2O) and 30 kg ha-1 of P (P2O5) were added to cater for potassium and phosphorus, respectively.  Four basins were used to make up a plot for each of the treatments.  The experiment was laid in a completely randomised design with three replications.  A 50 cm distance was left in between the different plots and replicates.  Twenty seeds of K-131 bean variety were planted in each basin.  Five days after bean emergence (DABE), all the basins in their respective treatments were transferred to a bean field to allow for natural bean fly infestation.  The basins were kept in the bean field for 20 days and then at 26 DABE, they were transferred back to the greenhouse where data were taken on plant stand and leaf area index: The leaf area index was determined at 26 DABE using the method of Edje and Osiru (1987).       

Using a vernier calliper, the diameters of stems (at a height 5 cm from the  collar) from the six sample plants were measured and recorded in millimeters (mm). The number of bean fly   punctures  per leaf were determined at 26 DABE. All leaves on the six plants selected from each treatment were examined  using a hand lens, and the bean fly puncture per leaf counted. 

Percentage plant mortality was determined by counting all the dead plants at 28, 35, 42 and 49 DABE.  The dead plants were brought to the laboratory, dissected and the number of pupae per plant recorded. Subsequently, cumulative percentage plant mortality for all the treatments during the four sampling occassions was determined.

Effect of mulching on plant characteristics and bean fly damage.  To determine the effects of mulching on plant characteristics and bean fly damage, bean plants were grown in 24 plastic basins filled with soils of the medium nutrient level described  above.  Plants in 12 basins were mulched with spear grass (Imperata cylindrica), while the remaining were not mulched.  Mulching was done before bean plant emergence. Five days after bean emergence (DABE), all the basins were transferred to a bean field to allow for natural bean fly infestation.  At 26 DABE, they were returned  to the greenhouse.  Data were collected on plant stand, leaf area index, bean fly punctures per leaf, soil temperature and soil moisture content.  Soil temperatures were measured at  a depth of 6 cm at 28, 35, 42 and 49 DABE using a hand  thermometer. Soil moisture content was determined by taking soils from each treatment, sampled at a depth of 6 cm, weighed  and thereafter air dried for one week and then reweighed.  The moisture content was calculated as;

Initial weight (gm)  - Weight after drying (gm)   X 100    
Initial weight (gm)

Soil moisture measurements were at 28, 35, 42 and 49 DABE. Roots/root premodia numbers were established by uprooting six plants at 50 DABE.  The plants were carried  to the laboratory and the root system washed clean with water, and the number of  roots and root premodia were counted.

Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance.  Correlations were run to assess the relationship between bean fly damage and plant growth characteristics.  All analyses were conducted using the MstatC computer package.

Results

Effect of different nitrogen-fertiliser rates.  All plots treated with nitrogen fertiliser had significantly higher leaf area index (LAI) compared to the unfertilised plots (Table 1). However, the differences amongst the individual nitrogen-fertiliser rates on LAI and stem diameter were not statistically significant (P=0.05).

Table 1. Effect of different nitrogen fertiliser rates on  leaf area index and stem diameter of bean plants

Fertiliser level  (gm)          

LAI             

Diameter (mm)

     

0.0

0.51 + 0.02

4.63  + 0.09

1.5

0.60 + 0.01

4.90  + 0.09

3.0

0.58 + 0.01

4.85  + 0.03

6.0

0.62 + 0.00

4.73  + 0.08

     

C.V (%)

6.00

5.13

L.S.D (P=0.05)

0.06

NS

NS = not significant at P=0.05

Application of nitrogen significantly increased  the number of bean fly punctures per leaf, being higher  with higher level of nitrogen application (Table 2).  This was also true of pupae density per plant.  It was also observed that the medium nutrient level had more pupae per plant compared to the high nutrient level.  All the plots treated with the fertiliser had significantly higher mortality than  where no fertiliser was applied (Table 2).  Leaf area index was positively correlated with bean fly punctures,  pupae density per plant and percentage plant mortality (Table 3).  Similarly, bean fly leaf punctures were positively correlated with pupae density per plant, and percentage plant mortality with pupae density.  

TABLE 2 Effect of different nitrogen fertiliser rates on number of bean fly punctures per leaf, pupae per plant and percentage plant  mortality

Fertiliser level (gm)       

Punctures per leaf

Pupae per plant

  % Plant mortality
       

0.00

20  + 1.16

2.50  + 0.16

44.4  + 0.41

1.50

27  + 1.16

4.00  + 0.29

63.9  + 1.80

3.00

22  + 1.16

3.50  + 0.29

58.4  + 0.64

6.00

32  + 1.16

4.50  + 0.17

64.6  + 0.38

       

C.V (%)

2.0

2.8

  9.1

L.S.D (P=0.05)

1.0

0.2

10.6


Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient describing the relation between LAI, leaf punctures, % mortality, bean fly pupae per plant  on K-131 bean variety at Kabanyolo

Index

Leaf area index

Puncture per leaf

% Plant mortality

       

Leaf area index

     

Puncture per leaf

0.783 ( 0.002)

   

% plant mortality

0.926 ( 0.000)

0.743 ( 0.005)

 

Pupae per plant

0.823 ( 0.001)

0.935 ( 0.005)

0.815 ( 0.001)

*Figures in parenthesis indicate levels of statistical significance

Effects of mulching.  Mulching did not have statistically significant effects on LAI and bean fly leaf punctures (Tables 4 and 5).  Nevertheless, mulched plants had slightly  higher LAI while bean fly leaf punctures were slightly higher in the unmulched plots.  Also mulched plots had higher numbers of roots/root premodia compared to the unmulched (Table 4).

Table 4. Effect  of mulching on leaf area index, and Root/Root premodia numbers

Treatment

LAI

Roots/ Root premodia

     

Mulched

0.60 + 0.04

56.55 a + 2.20

Unmulched

0.58 + 0.04

46.15 b + 1.20

     

C.V (%)

9.59

1.93

L.S.D (%)

NS

3.48

NS = not significant at P=0.05

Table  5. Effect of mulching on number of leaf puncture, pupae per plant, and percentage plant mortality

Treatment

Leaf punctures

    Pupae density

% Plant mortality

Mulched

24.00 + 4.00

3.70 b + 0.08

58.75 b + 0.04

Unmulched

24.50 + 1.10

5.92 a + 0.10

80.00 a +  1.00

       

C.V (%)

2.98

4.40

  3.82

L.S.D (P=0.05)

NS

0.75

  9.32

NS = not significant at P=0.05

Significant differences were observed in pupae density per plant, with the mulched plots having lower infestation  than the unmulched (Table 5).  Likewise, percentage plant mortality was significantly higher in the unmulched plants compared to the mulched, unlike soil temperatures which were significantly higher in the unmulched than mulched plots. On the other hand, soil moisture content was significantly higher in the mulched than unmulched  plots (Table 6).

Table  6. Effect of mulching on soil moisture content and soil temperature

Treatment

  % Soil moisture content

 Soil temperature ºC

     

Mulched

16.98   +  0.44

21.70  + 1.05

Unmulched

11.63   +  0.42

24.50  + 0.35

     

C.V (%)

1.53

3.31

L.S.D (P=0.05) 0.77 2.68

The relationships between LAI, pupae density  per plant, percentage plant mortality, soil temperature and soil moisture content were statistically significant (Table 7).   Percentage plant mortality was positively correlated to pupae density per plant  and soil temperature, indicating that as the number of pupae per plant and soil temperature increases the higher the plant mortality.  Contrastingly, percentage plant mortality was negatively correlated to soil moisture.  On the otherhand, there was a positive correlation between soil moisture content and root/root premodia numbers (Table 7).         

Table 7. Pearson’s correlation coefficient describing the relation between leaf area index, % plant mortality, number of bean fly  pupae per plant, soil temperature and soil moisture on K-131 bean variety at Kabanyolo

  

LAI

% mortality

Pupae per plant

Soil temp (°C)

Soil moisture(%)

           

% Mortality

0.212 (NS)

       

Pupae per plant

-0.131

0.935

     
 

(NS)

(0.003)

     

Soil temp  (¡ C)

-0.041

0.919

0.909

   
 

(NS)

(0.005)

(0.007)

   

Soil moisture (%)

0.172

-0.922

-0.980

-0.967

 
 

(NS)

(0.005)

(0.000)

(0.001)

 

No. of Roots/Premodia per plant

0.542

-0.698

-0.879

-0.849

0.920

 

(NS)

(NS)

(0.014)

(0.024)

(0.005)


Discussion

Nitrogen fertiliser application increased LAI, bean fly leaf punctures, pupal density, and percentage plant mortality. Mulching also significantly affected pupal density per plant, percentage plant mortality, premodia number, soil temperature and soil moisture content. 

Gallagher and Boscoe (1978), Graham (1983), Fukai (1984) and Mackeroon and Waister (1985) associated this increase in leaf surface area to the increase of soluble amino compounds and proteins which allows the leaves to grow larger.  Our  results also showed that LAI was positively correlated to bean fly leaf punctures, which were in turn positively correlated to pupal density per plant.  Bean fly pupae density determines the level of bean fly induced mortality  (Karel, 1985; Talekar and  Lee,1988).  The present  study suggests that the bigger the leaf area, the greater the bean fly infestation.  Besides the increased surface area for oviposition, the cell walls become thin and succulent which makes them more prone to pest damage.  However, Byabagambi and Kyamanywa (1997) noted that whereas there were more bean fly pupae and root damage in nitrogen fertiliser treated plots, the grain yield attained was higher than in the unfertilised crop.  It is likely that the increased benefit from nitrogen application compensates for the bean fly damage.

Mulching significantly reduced pupal density per plant and percentage plant mortality.  These findings concur with those of Ampofo (1993), Letourneau (1994) and Byabagambi and Kyamanywa (1997).  The mulched plots also had lower soil temperature and  high soil moisture content.  According to Ogenga-Latigo and Khaemba (1986) increased soil moisture content enhances uptake of nutrients by plants and hence improves crop vigour and tolerance to harsh conditions e.g., pest attack.  However, Ampofo (1993) suggested that lower temperatures and increased soil moisture conditions do not favour the beanfly. 

We concluded that nitrogen fertiliser application probably weakens the cell structure of the bean plant  thereby promoting bean fly to lay eggs on weak, succulent leaves.  Also larval and pupal establishment and development is easy in the weakened  cell wall structures in the fertiliser applied plant tissues.  Mulching on the other hand, influenced bean fly damage through its effect of increased soil moisture content, which  adversely affects pupal survival, but also encourages better root development and plant crop growth which enhances tolerance to bean fly damage.  Therefore a combination of nitrogen fertiliser application and mulching offers a compromising package for bean fly control and increased yields.

Acknowledgement

The work reported in this paper was supported by Forum grant from the Rockefeller Foundation.               

References

Ampofo, J.K.O. 1993.  Host plant resistance and cultural strategies for bean stem maggot management.  In: Proceedings of Second Meeting of the Pan-Africa Working Group on Bean Entomology.  Harare, Zimbabwe 19-22 September, 1993. pp.  4-13. 

Byabagambi, S. and  Kyamanywa, S. 1997. Effects of some agronomic practices on bean infestation and damage by bean stem maggot.  African Crop Science Conference Proceedings 3:1117-1124.

Edje, O.T.  and Osiru, D.S.O.  1987.  Methods for determining leaf area in some crop plants.     In: First Annual Meeting of the Collaborative Group on Cassava-Based Cropping Systems Research.  IITA, Nigeria.  pp.  237-245.

Fukai, S. 1984.  LAI of four varieties of cassava. Field Crops Research 9:347-349.

Gallagher, J.N.  and Biscoe, P.J. 1978.  Leaf area index of 5 winter varieties of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge  99:47.

Graham, R.D. 1983.  The relationship between plant diseased and supply of nitrogen (and other nutrients). In: Advanced Botanical Research. Wolhouse, H.W.  (Ed.). 10:221.

Greathead, D.J 1968.  A study in East Africa of beanflies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) affecting  Phaseolus vulgaris and their natural enemies, with the description of a new species of Melanagromyza Hend.  Bulletin of Ento-mology  Research 59:541-561.

Karel, A.K. 1985.  A bibliography of  bean flies, Ophiomyia phaseoli (Tyron), O. centrosematis (de Meij) and Melanagomyzae spencerella (Greathead) (Diptera:Agromyzidae). Bean/cowpea CRSP monograph.  No.2. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. USA. 21pp.

Karel, A.K. 1991.  Effect of plant population and intercropping on population pattern of the beanfly on common beans.  Environmental Entomology 20:354-357.

Katwijukye, A.K. 1998.  Incidence, damage and yield loss caused by bean aphid, bean fly and bean flower thrips on common beans in Uganda. M.Sc. Thesis, Makerere University. 109 pp.

Letourneau, D.K. 1994.  Beanfly management practices and bioogical control in Malawian subsistence agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 50:103-11.

MacKeroon, D.K.l.  and Waister, P.D.  1985.  Leaf area index for 3 potato varieties.  Agri-culture and Forestry  Meteotolorogy 34:241.

Nyiira, Z.M. 1978.  Pests of grain legumes and their control in Uganda.   In: Pests of Grain Legumes:  Ecology and Control.  Singh, S.R., Van Emden, H.F. and Taylor, T.A. (Eds.), pp. 117-121. Academic Press, London.

Ogenga-Latigo, M.W.  and  Khaemba, B.M. 1986.  Influence of soil moisture and fertility on attack of Phaseolus vulgaris by Aphis fabae Scop. in Kenya.  Kenya Journal of  Science and Technology 7:39-44.

Oonyu, J.C. 1992.  Influence of time of planting and soil applied insecticides on bean infestation and damage by the bean aphids and beanfly. M.Sc. Thesis, Makerere University, Kampala.  100 pp.

Talekar, N.S. and Ying Hu Lee.  1988.  Biology of Ophiomyia centrosematis (Diptera: Agromyzidae), a pest of soybean.  Annals of Entomological Society 81:938-942.

©1999, African Crop Science Society

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil