search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology
Medknow Publications on behalf of The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL)
ISSN: 0378-6323 EISSN: 0973-3922
Vol. 70, Num. 4, 2004, pp. 239-241

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, Leprology, Vol. 70, No. 4, July-August, 2004, pp. 239-241

Case Report

Nodular fasciitis

Departments of Dermatology, Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala
Correspondence Address:Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala - 686008 drmjcyriac@hotmail.com

Code Number: dv04079

ABSTRACT

A 24-year-old female presented with a firm, hyperpigmented, and gradually enlarging, tender, solitary dermal nodule of non-traumatic origin over the right suprascapular region. The lesion was extending into the subcutaneous tissue. She was otherwise normal. There was no calcification on X-ray. Biopsy revealed numerous large pleomorphic fibroblasts in a mucoid ground substance diagnostic of nodular fasciitis. No recurrence was noticed after surgical excision. This case is reported because of its rarity in the Indian medical literature.

Keywords: Nodular fasciitis, proliferative fasciitis

INTRODUCTION

Nodular fasciitis (NF) is a benign mesenchymal neoplasm that appears as a firm, solitary nodule with an average diameter of 1 to 5 cm, occasionally tender and located most often on the arm.[1],[2],[3],[4] It may extend into the subcutaneous tissue and muscles. It is seen in otherwise normal healthy individuals with peak occurrence between 20 and 35 years of age.[3] Histopathology reveals the nodule to consist of numerous large, pleomorphic fibroblasts in a highly vascularized stroma containing varying amounts of mucoid ground substance, reticulum and collagen fibers. Scattered erythrocytes along with small lymphocytes may also be present. The component cells have now been shown to be myofibroblasts.[5]

We are reporting a case of nodular fasciitis in a woman who presented with a hyperpigmented, hard, dermal nodule extending deep into the subcutaneous tissue over the right suprascapular region.

CASE REPORT

A 24-year-old woman presented with a gradually enlarging swelling over the right suprascapular region of eighteen months′duration. There was no prior history of trauma. On examination a dermal nodule of 5 cm, hard in consistency and tender on pressure, extending to the subcutaneous fat, was located just above the upper margin of the right scapula. Its surface was hyperpigmented with minimal dimpling at the centre [Figure - 1]. The margins were irregular and mobility was restricted in the horizontal plane. The mucosae, hair and nails were normal. There was no evidence of any systemic involvement.

The clinical findings prompted differential diagnoses of calcinosis cutis, dermatofibroma, granular cell myoblastoma and other tumors of fibroblastic origin. An X-ray of the soft tissue did not reveal any evidence of calcification. A biopsy was taken under local anesthesia cutting deep into the lesion. Histopathology revealed numerous large pleomorphic fibroblasts embedded in a mucoid appearing ground substance, features diagnostic of nodular fasciitis. Numerous well formed capillaries were also seen. An infiltrate composed of chronic inflammatory cells was present towards the periphery of the nodule [Figure - 2]. The lesion was surgically excised and no recurrence was noticed on follow up for one year.

DISCUSSION

Nodular fasciitis was first described by Konwaler and Weiss in 1955[6] and was called pseudosarcomatous fasciitis because of its rapid growth and histologic features.[2] It often begins as a solitary subcutaneous nodule that develops rapidly, reaching an ultimate size of 1-5 cm within a few weeks. The lesion is self-limited, regressing in a few months.[2],[4] The longest known duration is 26 months. Although the forearms and the arms are the most common sites, it may arise from the subcutaneous tissue, muscle or fascia at any location.[3] These tumors are also reported in the orbit and on the oral mucosa.[4] The sex distribution is equal. Symptoms such as numbness, paresthesia or shooting pain are less frequent, but when present indicate compression of a peripheral nerve.[3] The etiology of nodular fasciitis is unknown. The role of trauma in initiating the lesion is doubtful. The myofibroblast is thought to be the cell of origin. Nodular fasciitis is believed to occur as an unusual proliferation of myofibroblasts triggered by local injury or inflammatory processes.[3]

Nodular fasciitis occurs as three types according to the plane of tissue involved: subcutaneous, intramuscular and fascial. The lesion is usually attached to the fascia from which it arises and extends into the subcutaneous fat in an irregular fashion. Occasionally it arises from the fibrous septa of the subcutaneous fat and only secondarily extends to the fascia.

The nodule consists of numerous whorls of pleomorphic fibroblasts growing haphazardly in the stroma that is often highly vascular and contains varying amounts of mucoid substance, reticulum and collagen fibres.[5] Erythrocytes are present in the capillaries, in slit like spaces as well as free in the tissues. The fibroblasts show a fair number of mitoses which do not appear atypical. In about half the cases small spindle shaped giant cells are found. A scattered chronic inflammatory infiltrate is often present particularly at the periphery of the nodule. Immunohistochemistry has shown that the spindle cells in nodular fasciitis are positive for vimentin, variably positive for actin, and negative for desmin, keratin, or S100 protein.[7]

Variants of nodular fasciitis occur deep and are named proliferative fasciitis, cranial fasciitis and proliferative myositis. These variants tend to have clusters of large epithelioid cells with a slightly basophilic cytoplasm and large nuclei.[8]

Proliferative fasciitis appears to be related to nodular fasciitis, but histologically it shows giant cells resembling ganglion cells, showing an abundant irregularly outlined basophilic cytoplasm with one or more large vesicular nuclei. The cells are fibroblasts and are actin negative. The lesion may be occasionally misdiagnosed as rhabdomyosarcoma or ganglioneuroblastoma.[8]

Cranial fasciitis is an uncommon variant of nodular fasciitis, manifesting as a rapidly enlarging mass in the subcutaneous tissue of the scalp which invades the cranium. It affects the galea aponeurotica in infants under 1 year of age.

The dermal variant of nodular fasciitis has the typical histology of ordinary nodular fasciitis but may also extend within blood vessels in a manner similar to so-called intravascular fasciitis, a benign variant.[8]

The most frequent problem is differentiation between nodular fasciitis, fibrosarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma. The small size, sharp circumscription, myxoid matrix, and scattered erythrocytes and lymphocytes are helpful features for a diagnosis of nodular fasciitis.[8] Nodular fasciitis lacks nuclear atypia, but the appearance of the ganglion like cells in variants of nodular fasciitis can lead to diagnostic confusion with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Leiomyosarcomas may also be confused with nodular fasciitis, and both can have strong reactivity for actin and numerous mitoses. Leiomyosarcomas are also reactive for desmin and have more cytologic atypia than the cells of nodular fasciitis.

Local excision is the treatment of choice of nodular fasciitis and recurrences are rare.[1] The condition has an excellent prognosis. Spontaneous regression has been reported. Rapid resolution of the nodule has been reported to occur with intralesional corticosteroid injection by Graham et al.[3] This is recommended when the lesion cannot be completely excised as when it extends into the muscle. Our patient had a relatively slow evolution. The site reported commonly is the upper arm. In our patient the lesion was located over the upper back. The lesion showed hyperpigmentation which may have been due to hemorrhage occurring into the lesion. The diagnosis was based on the typical histological findings as it is difficult to arrive at a correct diagnosis clinically due to lack of clear cut clinical features. However we would suggest the following points as clinical clues for diagnosis of nodular fasciitis:

(a) rapidly growing dermal/subcutaneous nodule not more than 5 cm in size,
(b) minimal tenderness/pain,
(c) hard consistency, irregular borders,
(d) pigmentation suggestive of deeper hemorrhage in older lesions, and
(e) benign course following the initial rapid growth phase of a few weeks
An excision biopsy would be ideal as it would serve the purpose of diagnostic confirmation as well as treatment.

REFERENCES

1.Odom RB, James WD, Berger TG. Andrew's Diseases of the Skin: Clinical Dermatology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2000.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.From L, Assaad D. Neoplasms, pseudoneoplasms, and hyperplasia of the dermis. In: Reedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, et al, editors. Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999; p. 1161-75.   Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Graham BS, Barrett TL, Goltz RW. Nodular fasciitis: Response to intralesional corticosteroids. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;40:490-2.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
4.Chartier S, Allaire G, Toscano M. Nodular fasciitis of the upper lip mimicking a sarcoma. Int J dermatol 1994;33:503-4  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Heenan PJ. Tumours of Fibrous tissue involving the skin. In: Elder D, Elenitsas R, Jaworsky C editors. Lever's Histopathology of the Skin. 8th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997; p.847-87.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Konwaler BE, Keasbey L, Kaplan L.. Subcutaneous pseudosarcomatous fibromatosis (fasciitis). Am J Clin Pathol 1955;25:241-52   Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  
7.Montgomery EA, Meis JM. Nodular fasciitis: Its morphologic spectrum and immunohistochemical profile. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:942-8.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Menutt NS, Reed JA. Soft tissue tumours. In: Farmer ER, Hood AF, editors. Pathology of Skin. 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000; p. 1167-70.  Back to cited text no. 8    

Copyright 2004 - Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, Leprology


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[dv04079f1.jpg] [dv04079f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil