|
Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology
Medknow Publications on behalf of The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL)
ISSN: 0378-6323 EISSN: 0973-3922
Vol. 70, Num. 4, 2004, pp. 251-252
|
Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, Leprology, Vol. 70, No. 4, July-August, 2004, pp. 251-252
Medicolegal Window
Claims of cosmetic products
Sirur Subodh
Consulting Dermatologist and Medical Law Consultant, Mumbai
Correspondence Address:8/16 Talmakiwadi, Tardeo Road, Mumbai -
400007 subodhsirur@yahoo.com
Code Number: dv04088
An advertisement may scream and extol the virtues of a hair lotion or a beauty cream. When that very lotion fails to grow even a single strand of hair or the beauty cream does not impart even a trace of beauty to that not-so-good looking one, the shine in the advertisement disappears.
What does a buyer do then apart from crying aloud, ′This is unfair!′?
Rising to the occasion, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices
Act and the more recent Consumer Protection Act incorporate provisions
relating to unfair trade practices.
Quite often false representations are made, e.g. the goods (like beauty
creams, hair tonics, hair dyes, etc.) are of a particular standard quality,
quantity, grade or composition. Sometimes, tall claims are even made regarding
the uses, benefits, approval, sponsorship or performance of such goods
or services. If the goods supplied or the services rendered do not live
up to the expectations created by the advertisements in the mind of the
consumer, a complaint can be filed alleging that the seller or service
provider has adopted an unfair trade practice.
The Consumer Disputes Redressal Agencies (Consumer Forums) can order the
return to the complainant of the price or charge paid and the discontinuation
of the unfair trade practice. They can also direct that corrective advertisements
be issued to neutralize the effects of the misleading advertisement and
their expenses to be borne by the person responsible for issuing the misleading
advertisement.
There could be certain advertisements which may seem to be misleading
although in fact they may not be. The following example will illustrate
this point.
A consumer purchased a hair dye lured by an advertisement which stated
that it was a permanent hair dye. His joy did not remain "permanent" as
he saw his gray hair sprouting back on his scalp within 20 days. He approached
the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission alleging that
the claim regarding the permanent character of the hair dye was not factually
correct. Expert witnesses produced before the Commission stated that hair
dyes were classified into three categories: temporary, semi-permanent and
permanent. While temporary dyes were washed off during the first shampooing,
semi-permanent ones lasted for shampooing 6-12 times. The consumer was
shocked to learn that the permanent label of a permanent hair dye indicates
that it would be washed off only after shampooing 12 or more times. He
did not know that this was the accepted connotation of a permanent hair
dye.
The MRTP Commission found that the allegations of unfair trade practice
were not substantiated. However, the manufacturer offered to remove the
vagueness of the word permanent. The Commission appreciated the move of
the manufacturer to enlighten the consumer through advertisements or displays
on the carton stating that the meaning of permanent indicates lasting for
about 30 days or shampooing 12 or more times.
The relevance of these issues to a dermatologist may be questioned.
However, these issues indirectly pertain to our specialty since a dermatologist
may be called as an expert witness before the Court or while opining on
various beauty product related queries from the media, general public or
our patients (although such products may not require our prescription for
purchase).
False or misleading claims made by a manufacturer may distress us but
it is not possible for a dermatologist to file a complaint before the
consumer
disputes redressal agencies except under certain circumstances. Since only
a consumer (a person who buys goods or avails or hires services for a consideration
or price) can file a complaint, it follows that only the patient who has
purchased the cosmetic or beauty product can file the complaint and not
the doctor. If there are numerous consumers who feel that there has been
an unfair trade practice, one of them can file a complaint on behalf of
all consumers. This is called a class complaint. A voluntary consumer association
can also file a complaint on behalf of the aggrieved patient. The State
or Central Government is also entitled to file a complaint. It is thus
clear that the dermatologist cannot sue the manufacturer on behalf of the
patient because the dermatologist has not suffered any loss or injury due
to the product used by the patient. If, however, the dermatologist has
purchased a product from the manufacturer and used it on his patient the
situation is different. If the product is found to be defective, then the
dermatologist may sue the manufacturer before the consumer disputes redressal
agencies. The following illustration will explain this point.
An ophthalmologist′s patients turned blind after a cataract surgery
performed on them. It was later proved that the blindness followed the
use of an irrigation solution which contained impurities. The ophthalmologist
filed a complaint against the manufacturer before the consumer forum claiming
compensation for the loss caused to his patients due to use of the defective
irrigation solution. The doctor was awarded compensation which he requested
be paid to a trust that would rehabilitate his patients.
If one is really public spirited then one can file a writ petition
before the High Court or the Supreme Court. In one case, a physician
filed a writ
petition before the Bombay High Court regarding vehicular pollution seeking
directions to the appropriate authorities to take effective steps to
contain pollution.
DISCLAIMER
The contents of this article are only to create awareness regarding
laws related to medical profession and not in the nature of legal advice.
Legal advice should be taken in specific cases.
This article is an extract
from the book "Dermatology and the law" by Dr. Subodh P. Sirur.
Copyright 2004 - Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, Leprology
|