Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Medknow Publications on behalf of The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists (IADVL) ISSN: 0378-6323 EISSN: 0973-3922 Vol. 72, Num. 2, 2006, pp. 133-135

Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Vol. 72, No. 2, March-April, 2006, pp. 133-135

Brief Report

Chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) in psoriasis

Sridhar J, Desylva PLK*, Singh YD†

INHS Kalyani, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, *Departments of Dermatology and †Medicine, INHS Asvini, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Correspondence Address:Dr. J. Sridhar, INHS Kalyani, Gandhigram, Visakhapatnam 530 005, Andhra Pradesh, India. E-mail: sridharjandhya@yahoo.com

Code Number: dv06040

Abstract

Keywords: Biological therapy, Biologicals, Cytokines

Currently available systemic agents for psoriasis mostly target the proliferating keratinocyte, and their safety, tolerability and need for regular laboratory monitoring are often a concern. The efficacy of cyclosporine and related drugs in psoriasis in the 90s as well as fundamental research over the last decade have improved our understanding of psoriasis as a T-cell mediated disorder.[1],[2]

Though the antigenic triggers that initiate T-cell activation remain to be determined, subsequent steps in the psoriatic T-cell cascade have been well delineated.[1] A number of biologic agents have been designed to target and manipulate these steps. Of these, inhibitors of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) have yielded high response rates in patients with psoriasis.[2],[3] Infliximab is a murine-human chimeric monoclonal antibody specific for TNF-α that has been studied extensively in stable plaque psoriasis abroad.[4],[5],[6] In this study, we present our preliminary experience with the use of infliximab in Indian patients with the disease.

Materials and Methods

We conducted an open label pilot study among three patients having moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. All three patients had received methotrexate and PUVA therapy in the past. Additionally, patient 1 had received cyclosporine 1 year ago. Before commencement, a ′washout′period of 2 weeks for topical therapies and 4 weeks for systemic therapies was observed. Thereafter, baseline PASI assessment as well as hemogram, biochemical profile, ECG, chest radiograph and Mantoux skin tests were performed.

The study had two phases - a 10-week active phase, followed by a 12-week surveillance phase for relapse. During the active phase, infliximab was administered in a dose of 5 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion over 2 h, diluted into 500 ml of normal saline. The dose was repeated at weeks 2 and 6. Monitoring was done at 2-week intervals until week 10 and included PASI, adverse event and laboratory assessments (hemogram, liver and renal function tests). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage improvement in PASI at week 10.

During the surveillance phase, PASI assessments were carried out at 4-week intervals until week 22 for relapse. Relapse was defined as loss of 50% or more of the improvement attained in the PASI score at week 10.

Results

Demographic data
The average age was 48.3 years, while the mean duration of psoriasis was 10.3 years.

Effects of treatment
The mean PASI was 25.4 at presentation. At 10 weeks, it declined to 5.5 [Table - 1]. All patients attained PASI 50 (or 50% improvement) by 3.8 weeks. PASI 75 was attained at 9.6 weeks. The mean improvement in PASI at week 10 stood at 77.2%. Relapse occurred at a mean of 18.6 weeks after the first infusion [Table - 2]. Photographs illustrating the typical degree of improvement observed from baseline to week 10 are shown in [Figure - 1]. The first patient, who also had psoriatic arthropathy (PsA), reported partial improvement in spinal stiffness and pain at 2 weeks and peripheral joint stiffness at 6 weeks. These improvements did not diminish at 22 weeks, end of the surveillance period.

Adverse reactions
Infliximab was well tolerated; transient pyrexia and fatigue after infusions were common complaints. Patient 1 had headache and vertigo lasting 5 days after the third infusion, while patient 2 had arthralgia. No laboratory abnormalities were noted.

Discussion

Results from this pilot study indicate that infliximab monotherapy provided significant and rapid benefit to patients with psoriasis, with few adverse effects. Two out of three patients (67%) achieved PASI 75 by week 10, while one patient (Patient 2) showed PASI improvement of 68.6% at week 10, peaking to 70.1% at week 11. In two larger studies.[4],[6] PASI 75 was attained by 87.9% and 88% of patients at week 10. The mean time for onset of clinically meaningful benefit (PASI 50) was 3.8 weeks in this study as compared to 4 weeks in a similar study by Chaudhari et al .[4] Relapse occurred at a mean of 18.6 weeks in this study, as against 26 weeks in a similar study.[5]

Though only minor adverse reactions were encountered in this study, others have documented that infliximab therapy predisposed patients to a higher risk of serious granulomatous and opportunistic infections, particularly reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).[7],[8] This has potentially serious implications in India, where there is a high prevalence of tuberculosis. A thorough history, tuberculin testing and chest radiographs are mandatory during screening. In tuberculin-positive patients, the role of anti-tubercular therapy prior to or concurrently with infliximab administration needs further enquiry.

There is also concern that infliximab could precipitate congestive cardiac failure,[9] hence it is contraindicated in cardiac patients. HACA (Human anti-chimeric antibodies), produced against the murine component of infliximab, may potentially block its action. This has been partly overcome by starting infliximab therapy as a 0-, 2- and 6-week induction regimen and concomitant administration of methotrexate or corticosteroid.[10] Development of lymphoma, demyelinating disease and pancytopenia[9] have been reported with infliximab.

Infliximab therapy currently entails prohibitive costs. An induction regimen of infliximab such as the one used in this study could cost up to Rs. 3,00,000. Maintenance infusions, recommended at 8-week intervals, could cost up to Rs. 10,00,000 per year. With no structured health insurance systems in this country, infliximab is unaffordable for most psoriasis patients. Breakthroughs in biotechnology and large-scale production techniques hold the key to making this therapy more accessible in future.

References

Copyright 2006 - Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology

The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images