|
Original Article Therapeutic efficacy and safety of propylthiouracil in psoriasis: An open-label study Pushpa Gnanaraj, Hemamalini Malligarjunan1, Haripriya Dayalan1, Subashini Karthikeyan2, Murali Narasimhan2 Code Number: dv11204 Abstract Background: Psoriasis is a common hyperproliferative disorder of the skin associated with
significant morbidity. Most of the drugs used in psoriasis provide only a temporary relief,
whereas they are riddled with potential toxicities and cost concerns. Hence, there is a
constant need to explore newer, effective, orally administered, and cost-effective drugs with
minimal adverse effects. In this scenario, propylthiouracil (PTU), an antithyroid thioureylene
has been shown to be effective in psoriasis which satisfies the above criteria. Key words: Antithyroid agents, hyperthyroidism, hyperproliferation, propylthiouracil, psoriasis INTRODUCTION Psoriasis is a common skin disorder affecting 1 to 3% of the individuals worldwide. It is associated with significant morbidity and degradation of quality-of-life which is comparable with other more serious illnesses.[1] Many agents are used in the management of this debilitating disease, with the newer “biologicals” being the most recent addition to the therapeutic options of this disorder. But most of the systemic treatment options available for psoriasis are potentially toxic, needing Psoriasis is a common skin disorder affecting 1 to 3% constant monitoring, and/or are very expensive and of the individuals worldwide. It is associated with out of the reach of the common man. Hence, there is a significant morbidity and degradation of quality-of-life constant need to explore newer therapeutic options for which is comparable with other more serious illnesses.[1] psoriasis which will offer long-term remission, with Many agents are used in the management of this less toxicity and more affordability to the masses. In debilitating disease, with the newer “biologicals” being this scenario, propylthiouracil (PTU) has emerged as the most recent addition to the therapeutic options of an effective drug in the treatment of psoriasis, with patients showing significant clearance of lesions without major adverse effects.[2] METHODS The objective of our study was to assess the clinical efficacy of PTU in psoriasis. All patients clinically and histologically diagnosed with chronic stable plaque psoriasis were included in the study. An exhaustive history was taken and all patients underwent detailed physical examination. Their clinical severity was assessed as per “Psoriasis Area and Severity Index” (PASI) score. A total of 25 patients with more than 20% body surface area involvement were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were unstable psoriasis, children, pregnancy, lactation, history of any thyroid disorder and severe systemic illnesses. Also, patients who had received any form of topical or systemic therapy in the previous one month were excluded from the study. Approval from the institutional ethics committee was obtained and all patients signed an informed consent document. It was an open clinical prospective study over a period of one year, between September 2009 and August 2010. The recruited patients underwent pretreatment baseline investigations like complete blood counts, blood sugars, liver, renal and thyroid function tests. A skin biopsy was done at the beginning of the study. The patients were then administered oral PTU 100 mg, three times a day for 12 weeks. They did not receive any other drug apart from topical liquid paraffin as emollient. The patients were assessed at the end of 2, 6, and 12 weeks. At each visit, clinical assessment was done and the PASI score was recorded by the same observer. Adverse reactions, if any, were noted. The blood parameters were repeated at the end of 6 and 12 weeks. All statistical evaluation was done using SPSS version 13.0. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. Student’s paired ‘t’ test was used for statistical analysis of the data. Level of significance was P<0.05. RESULTS Of the 25 patients included in the study, 15 were men and 10 were women (mean ± SD, 44.3 ± 11.8 years; range, 19 to 73 years). PTU was well tolerated and accepted by nearly all the patients. Two patients, both men, dropped out of the study due to the following reasons: one patient shifted to an indigenous therapy in the second week of treatment for unknown reasons and the other showed mild elevation of liver enzymes (which reverted to normal on cessation of PTU). The drug was well tolerated in the remaining patients, 13 men and 10 women. The mean PASI scores at the beginning of the study were 17.86 ± 9.9. At the end of 2 weeks, the PASI reduction was not significant (14.36 ± 12.6, P = 0.65). From then on, the PASI scores showed a steady decline with the values being 11.81 ± 10.0 (P = 0.04) at the end of 6 weeks. Finally, at the end of the study period of 12 weeks, the PASI scores were significantly lower, being 4.63 ± 4.1 [Figures 1 and 2]. The difference was statistically significant with P<0.001 [Figure 3]. The thyroid function tests remained normal throughout the study period. All the patients were followed up for a further three months after stopping PTU. Four patients developed relapse during this period (17.4%). DISCUSSION Psoriasis is a multifactorial disease with various factors involved in its pathogenesis. Hyperproliferation, abnormal differentiation, and activation of the inflammatory mediators are considered the dominant pathogenic mechanisms in psoriasis. In recent years, attention has focused on impaired apoptosis of cells arising from this hyperproliferative event.[3] Overexpression of c-FLIP, an antiapoptotic protein, has been demonstrated in lesional psoriatic skin.[4] The antithyroid drugs, PTU (6-n-propyl-2-thiouracil), and the related thioureylene, methimazole (1-methyl 2-mercaptoimidazole), have been used for decades as first-line treatment for patients with hyperthyroidism. The role of these drugs in the treatment of psoriasis has been addressed for several years. PTU has been shown to cause significant reduction in PASI scores within 4 to 6 weeks of commencement of therapy.[5] The exact mechanism of action of PTU in psoriasis is yet to be elucidated. PTU and the related thioureylene, methimazole, have been shown to have an antiproliferative effect, as demonstrated by Elias et al,[6] in 1995, who showed that they decrease the expression of proliferative cell nuclear antigen, a marker of cellular proliferation.[6] Thioureylenes also act as free radical scavengers, thus inhibiting oxidative events in the skin, thereby reducing activation of epidermal/dermal lymphocytes which might play vital roles in the initiation of skin lesions in psoriasis.[7] PTU has been found to have no effect on T or B cell activation, as shown by its inability to alter adenosine deaminase activity, ICAM 1 and IL-2 receptor levels,[8-10] or neither does it reduce CD 1a expression, a marker of differentiated skin antigen presenting cells.[11] PTU also does not seem to act through the pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines and the serum tumor necrosis factor α. Recently, Elias and Barr[13] reported that PTU enhanced the apoptosis in psoriatic plaques.[13] But the exact mechanism by which PTU induces apoptosis has not been fully elucidated. PTU has not been found to have any effect on the antiapoptotic proteins like p16 and Bcl-xl.[2,14] Hence, the probable mechanism of action of PTU in psoriasis has been postulated to be upregulation of apoptosis. Another proposed mechanism is the binding of the T3 receptor resulting in conformational changes which could lead to switching off of genes necessary for keratin synthesis.[15] Our study shows that PTU significantly clears the lesions in psoriasis. This experience is similar to other studies done earlier by several authors. Elias et al,[5] in 1993 have shown significant clearance of lesions at the end of 8 weeks of treatment with PTU.[5] A similar study done by Chowdhury and Marks[15] in 2001 has shown moderate clinical improvement in 75% of patients at the end of 6 weeks.[15] Kose et al,[8] in 2001 have demonstrated significant clinical response in all their patients at the end of 2 months.[8] The potential side effects of PTU include hypothyroidism, hepatotoxicity, agranulocytosis, arthralgia, headache, and urticaria. Vasculitis and Anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity have also been reported in patients on PTU.[16] In our study, PTU neither induced clinical hypothyroidism, nor did it cause any serious adverse effects like agranulocytosis or acute hepatotoxicity. The limitations of our study include its small sample size, it being an open-label study and lack of immunohistochemical and biochemical criteria to back up the clinical changes. Also, lack of long-term followup of the patients is another limitation to our study. Hence, we conclude that PTU can be safely included as a treatment option in psoriasis, especially in patients who are resistant to or unable to use the conventional drugs due to their toxicities. Also, PTU can be considered for use in the rotational or sequential therapy in psoriasis along with other drugs. However, the exact mechanism by which PTU acts in psoriasis needs to be further evaluated. REFERENCES
Copyright 2011 - Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[dv11204f1.jpg] [dv11204f3.jpg] [dv11204f2.jpg] |
|