|
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 8, No.1, April, 2005 RESEARCH ARTICLE Immature embryo: A useful tool for oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) genetic transformation studies Ruslan Abdullah*1, Alizah Zainal2, Wee
Yew Heng3, Leaw Chui Li4,
Yeap Chee Beng5, Lee Mei Phing6, Salwa Abdullah Sirajuddin7,
Winnie Yap Soo Ping8,
Juanita
Financial support: Ministry of Science Technology and the Innovations, Received May 7, 2004 / Code Number: ej05005 ABSTRACT Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) is the highest yielding oil-bearing crop. However, being a perennial crop, genetic improvement of oil palm is extremely slow. Indeed, compared to other annual oil crops such as soybean and rapeseed, genetic manipulations remained less important. Therefore, to remain competitive, oil palm growers and breeders need new and novel approaches. In this report, the potential of immature embryos (IE) as a useful tool for oil palm genetic transformation studies was evaluated. It was evident that IEs were amenable to both direct and Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Due to the abundant supply of IE, optimization of biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer into IEs were easily carried out. Transient transformation frequencies were comparable to other plant systems reported, with as high as 97.4% recorded for biolistic and 64.4% for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer. Like most moncots, oil palm tissues were less sensitive to kanamycin, geneticin and chloramphenicol. Instead, both hygromycin and phosphinotrycin were toxic 20 mg/l, making both suitable candidates for selecting putative transformants. IEs were also more responsive to in vitro manipulations as compared to other explants such as leaf and root tissues. Rapid in vitro response to callusing and embryogenesis or rapid and highly efficient direct germination resulted in a shorter culture period. This would minimize the production of abnormal clonal palms, which has been associated to chromosomal aberration due to prolonged time in culture. In addition, IEs also allows rapid and direct introduction of elite genes into breeding programs and in biclonal seed production. Keywords: genetic transformation studies, immature embryos, in vitro culture, oil palm, plant regeneration. Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) is a perennial monocot with a long generation period of about 20 years. Thus, oil palm breeding is a very slow process. Innovative methods are needed to enhance the incorporation of new genetic resources into oil palm. Initially, tissue culture techniques were used to propagate elite oil palm clones (Jones, 1974). Unfortunately, some early clonal palms produced through tissue culture were abnormal (Corley et al. 1986). However, oil palm tissue culture techniques have undergone continuous improvement on over a period of more than 20 years. This resulted in the production of clonal palms with minimal abnormality (Jones, 1995; Rival et al. 1998). In addition, early results from several field trials on clonal palms have shown encouraging yield improvement (Corley et al. 1993). Therefore, clonal palms are expected to eventually replace seed-derived planting materials on a commercial scale. Complete plants have been successfully regenerated from various explants of oil palm. They include mature and immature embryos, apical meristems, embryogenic cell suspension cultures, friable embryogenic tissues and callus derived from seedlings, roots, inflorescences and young leaves (Texeira et al. 1993; Texeira et al. 1994). The frequencies for complete plant regeneration from some explants are still inefficient (Rival et al. 1999). Nevertheless, it has become almost routine in many laboratories. As in the case for most monocots, the introduction of foreign genes into oil palm has been limited due to the lack of an efficient, reliable and rapid regeneration system (Ayres and Park, 1994). But the ability to regenerate complete plants from all the above explants has made oil palm amenable to genetic manipulation for the incorporation of foreign gene(s) (Murphy, 1999). Not all explants, however, are suitable for genetic manipulation studies. Following recent advances in genetic transformation studies, it is possible to transfer any foreign genes into any targeted plant genome. Oil palm is no exception. One routine technique is by using Agrobacterium spp. (Gelvin, 2003). Unfortunately, until recently, the hosts for Agrobacterium have been limited to dicots and a few monocots. To date, there has been no report on the susceptibility of oil palm tissues to Agrobacterium infection. Alternatively, DNA could be delivered directly into protoplasts via electroporation. This, however, is not yet possible for oil palm since the system for complete plant regeneration from protoplasts is not fully established, with only first and second divisions observed (Sambanthamurthi et al. 1996). Nevertheless, the introduction of DNA mediated by particle bombardment would benefit genetic transformation of recalcitrant and perennial crops, like oil palm, the most since, the technique enables the transfer of any gene to virtually any tissues or cell types (Abdullah et al. 1999; Parveez, 2000). Preliminary studies on the influence of physical parameters and different promoters in assaying genetic transformation events have been reported for oil palm (Parveez et al. 1997; Chowdhury et al. 1997). However, these reports lack substantiated evidence for stable integration of transgenes transferred (Abdullah et al. 2003). Here, we report the potential role of immature embryos (IEs) in genetic transformation studies of oil palm. Results presented include studies on in vitro culture of IE for both direct and indirect plant regeneration, and preliminary studies on the susceptibility of IE to Agrobacterium infection as compared to biolistic-mediated gene transfer system. These would provide new avenues for rapid introduction of new and useful traits into oil palm, which until now, has been dependent solely on conventional means for improvement. Callus initiation, maintenance and plant regeneration. Alternatively,
IEs were cultured on either N62.5 or N6FET and incubated
in the dark at 28 ± Hardening. Plants with vigourous roots were transferred into polybags and maintained for two weeks in a plastic chamber at 80-95% relative humidity. Hardened plants were then transferred into bigger polybags and slowly exposed to external conditions over a period of another 2 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preparation of plant materials In this study, tenera, dura and pisifera varieties
of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) were used as sources for IEs.
In addition, IEs were also extracted from Elaeis oleifera for comparison.
Open-pollinated bunches were harvested 7-13 weeks after anthesis (WAA). Fruitlets
were detached from the stalk and washed in soap water. They were immediately
soaked in absolute ethanol for 15 min and air-dried in a laminar flow chamber.
Sterilized fruits were halved using scateurs and IEs were extracted from the
semi-solid kernel. Extracted IEs were cultured on the respective media (Table
1) and incubated either in light or dark at 28 ± In vitro culture of immature embryos Direct plant germination. For direct germination, IEs
were cultured on hormone-free N6 media (N6O, Chu
et al. 1975) and incubated in the dark at 28 ± In vitro tolerance of IEs to antibiotics commonly used as selectable markers Freshly extracted IEs, IE-derived primary callus (PC), IE-derived embryogenic callus (EC) and IE-derived friable embryogenic tissues (FET) were cultured on their maintenance media supplemented with different concentrations of antibiotics commonly used as selectable markers in genetic transformation studies. The antibiotics tested were kanamycin (Km), geneticin (G418), chloramphenicol, hygromycin (Hm) and phosphinotricin. Cultures were sub-cultured every two weeks and observed over a period of 8 passages. Genetic transformation assessment of IEs using biolistic Preparation of DNA-coated gold particles. DNA was isolated according to Abdullah et al. (2003) and was later coated on gold particles described by Sanford et al. (1993). pBI 121 (Clontech) containing neomycin phosphotransferase (NPT II) and b-glucuronidase (GUS) genes were used in all initial transformation experiment. Bombardment of IEs. Prior to bombardment, freshly prepared
DNA-coated gold particles were vortexed for 1 min. For each bombardment 6 µl
DNA-coated gold particles was placed on the macrocarrier. IEs were bombarded
using the Biolistic Particle Delivery System (PDS 1000/He; Bio-Rad). The optimum
parameters were determined empirically. They include varying the helium pressure
(900, 1100 and 1300 psi), distance between micro- and macrocarrier (6, Analyses of putative transformed IEs following bombardment. Bombarded
IEs were left undisturbed for two days on the same media (N6O).
They were then transferred onto N6 media containing 100 µg/ml Km
(N6Km100; Table 1) for selection and subsequent
regeneration. The presence of GUS activity in bombarded IEs was visualized
histochemically using methods described by Parveez and Christou
(1998). Assays were carried out at random on IEs, germinating IEs and tissues
from plantlets 7 days, 3, 9 and 18 months after bombardment. IEs and plants
expressing GUS activity were quantified and were used as the percentage of
transient transformation frequency. Callusing assay was carried out on germinating
Km-resistant (Kmr) IEs 2 months after bombardment. Germinating Kmr IEs
were randomly selected and cross-sectioned. They were then inoculated on N62.5
or N6FET media (Table 1) and maintained in
the dark at 28 ± Genetic transformation assessment of IEs using Agrobacterium Co-cultivation of IE. 7-day old IEs were co-cultivated for 30 min in N66 media (Table 1) containing Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404:pCAMBIA1301. Co-cultivated IEs were then transferred onto either N6O or N62.5 without blotting and incubated in the dark for 3 days. IEs were again transferred without rinsing onto the same media supplemented with 250 mg/l cefotaxime (N6Cf250 or N62.5Cf250) and maintained in the light for those cultured on N6Cf250, and in the dark for N62.5Cf250. Analyses of putative transformed IEs following co-cultivation with Agrobacterium. Histochemical assays were performed according to protocols described by Abdullah et al (2003). Assays were carried out on IEs, germinating IE, callus and tissue from plantlets 7 days, 3, 9 and 18 months after co-cultivation. Putative transformants expressing GUS activity were quantified. Plant regeneration of putative transformed tissues Plants regenerated from both bombarded and co-cultivated IEs were further maintained on the same media prior to transfer into soil. GUS assay was again carried out on leaves of developing plants 3, 9 and 18 months after transformation either by bombardment or Agrobacterium. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In vitro culture of immature embryos The main prerequisite for an efficient transformation system is the ability to regenerate complete plants from treated target tissues. Unlike other crops, oil palm tissue culture is a very slow process. On average at least 18 months are required to produce complete plants from callus derived from various explants, with callusing rate of about 20% for young leaf and root explants, as compared to as high as 100% for IEs. On the other hand, IEs isolated from 9-10 WAA fruits, readily germinated into complete plants on hormone-free medium (Figure 1). Germination could reach up to almost 100%. However, culture of IEs isolated from 8 WAA fruits or younger failed to germinate. Furthermore, endosperm from 8 WAA fruits or younger are still soft, thus, resulted in poor recovery of embryos. On an appropriate medium, in this case N62.5 and N6FET, IEs gave rise to callus within 4-6 weeks, much faster than other explants. Though, IEs were equally responsive both media, but those cultured on N6FET were less browned compared to those on N62.5. Cultured IEs started to swell and expanded after 3 days on callusing media and yielded primary calli within 4-6 weeks (Figure 2). While on the same media, the primary callus produced embryogenic callus with distinct somatic embryos of different shapes and stages. Upon transfer to N6O, torpedo-shaped embryos germinated into complete plants, completing the whole sequence of in vitro culture of IEs for complete plant regeneration via callus in just about 3-4 months. The reduced time required for IEs to produce callus (in this case 4-6 weeks) as opposed to 8-52 weeks for young leaves, would mean shorter periods in culture. This would reduce the possibility for the onset of chromosomal aberrations that would lead to the production of abnormal plants (Jaligot et al. 2000). Plants with vigorous root systems normally requires between 2-4 weeks to be hardened and were later transferred into polybags prior to transfer into soil (Figure 3). IEs are abundant, where on average between 300-500 IEs could be extracted from a single developing bunch. The numbers of IEs available enabled large-scale genetic transformation studies to be carried out on oil palm. It was also observed that, both biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer into oil palm IEs are not dependent on the variety. All three Elaeis guineensis varieties namely dura, pisifera and tenera and IEs from Elaeis oleifera tested for both biolistic and Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfers were found susceptible to both gene transfer systems. In addition, using IEs as target tissues for genetic transformation studies of oil palm offers an additional advantage where transgenic plants from transformed IEs could be used directly as crossing partners to introduce new or elite genes into specific breeding programs, and with minimum fidelity-associated problems. This would further shorten the breeding cycle for oil palm. However, since IEs are often the product of cross pollination between two separate parents, therefore, they are often non-uniform in terms of their genetic make up, especially if it involved open pollination. A more desirable case would be to transform a self-pollinated dura or pisifera of known parentage. Nevertheless, following theirabundance, highly responsive nature in vitro, reduced clonal fidelity-associated problems, and the ability to allow the introduction of elite genes rapidly, IEs are considered the most suitable target tissues for transformation studies of oil palm. In vitro tolerance of IE to antibiotics commonly used as selectable markers Since the efficiency of plant transformation is less than optimal for many important plant species, thus, the development of transgenic plant requires the use of suitable selectable marker genes. Like most monocots, selectable marker genes that were suitable for dicots may not be suitable for monocots. As such the in vitro tolerance study carried out on various potential target tissues of oil palm serves to facilitate future use of suitable antibiotics for the selection of putative transformants. This would be incorporated in the construction of chimaericgenes constructs for future genetic manipulation studies. In the in vitro tolerance studies conducted, IEs were insensitive to both Km and G418 (Figure 4a-b). It was observed that, N6O supplemented with as high as 250 mg/l Km or G418 did not have any effect on the IEs even after 16 weeks on the media. IEs were slightly sensitive to chloramphenicol where growth was affected when exposed to more than 100 mg/l (Figure 4c). However, the effect of chloramphenicol on the growth of IE was only observed after 10 weeks in culture. The survival rate after 16 weeks at 100 and 120 mg/l are 65%, and 45% at 150 mg/l. Unlike Km, G418 and chloramphenicol, both Hm and phosphinotricin were toxic to oil palm IEs. All IEs exposed to more than 50 mg/l hygromycin were dead within 8 weeks, and within 14 weeks for exposure at 20 mg/l (Figure 4d). Similar results were obtained for phosphinotrycin, where all IEs were killed when exposed to 20 mg/l or more (Figure 4e). The only difference between the effect of Hm and phosphinotrycin on IE was in the rate of IE death recorded. It was more rapid in the case for phosphinotrycin but slightly more gradual for Hm. In all cases, however, control IEs cultured on N6O continued to germinate and proliferate into complete plantlets. Similar results were obtained for other target tissues tested, including primary callus (PC), embryogenic callus (EC) and friable embryogenic tissues (FET), where all PC, EC and FET were insensitive to both Km and G418, slightly sensitive to chloramphenicol but very sensitive to both Hm and phosphinotrycin (data not shown). Genetic transformation assessment of IEs Conditions for biolistic-mediated gene transfer for oil palm
were optimized using IEs as target tissues, and pBI 121 as the DNA carrying
the reporter and marker genes. Determination for optimum conditions was based
on histochemical assay carried out randomly on IEs, 3 days after bombardment.
It was observed that, all 3 parameters evaluated did not significantly influence
transient transformation frequency. Varying the macrocarrier gap from 6, to
11 or This report presents for the first time, substantiated evidence on the susceptibility of oil palm tissues to Agrobacterium infection. However, since this study was not designed to elucidate factors affecting Agrobacterium infection on oil palm tissues, thus results presented are preliminary in nature. Nevertheless, it was evident that oil palm tissues upon pretreatments with 2,4-Dcan be made susceptible to Agrobacterium infection. Unlike freshly bombarded IEs, gus assay on freshly co-cultivated IEs exhibited uniform and well spread gus activity as shown in Figure 5d-f. Further evaluation on longitudinally sectioned-IE, also indicated some degree of localization of gus activity in putative transformants, suggesting possible influence of the promoter used in both gene delivery systems. These were expected since both the gus gene in pBI121 (biolistic) and pCAMBIA1301 (Agrobacterium) were driven by CaMV35S, a well established constitutive promoter that has been shown most efficient in meristematic region and in areas with actively dividing cells. However, it is noteworthy to note that IEs co-cultivated with pCAMBIA1301 exhibited stronger gus expression as compared to those bombarded with pBI121, suggesting the possible influence of the plasmids used to deliver the transgene into target tissues, and the possible role of pretreatments prior to transformation. Successful transgene integration was further substantiated from callusing assays on putative transformants. It was observed that callus developing from bombarded and co-cultivated IEs subjected to callus initiation on Km-containing (for pBI121) and Hm-containing (for pCAMBIA1301) media, exhibited gus activity as shown in Figure 5g-h. Gus assays were also positive on roots and leaves isolated from putative transformants derived from bombarded and co-cultivated IEs (Figure 5i-j). The ability of the above tissues to express gus activities after more than 4 months bombarded or co-cultivated further indicates that the transgene has been successfully and stably integrated into the genome of the putative transformants produced. CONCLUDING REMARKS Our results presented have showed that oil palm tissues especially IEs are amenable to gene transfer. Though this is expected of the versatile biolistic-mediated gene transfer approach, the ability to provide substantiated evidence of successful gene transfer, would add oil palm to the list of monocots, that are not natural hosts of this bacterium, to be successfully transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The frequency of gene transfer is comparable to other plants systems reported elsewhere. Thus the ability to transfer elite genes leading to the production of transgenic plants would mean oil palm could remain competitive against other oil producing crops such as the annuals, soybean and rapeseed. REFERENCES
Note: Electronic Journal of Biotechnology is not responsible if on-line references cited on manuscripts are not available any more after the date of publication. Supported by UNESCO / MIRCEN network © 2005 by Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso -- Chile The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[ej05005f5.jpg] [ej05005f3.jpg] [ej05005t1.jpg] [ej05005f2.jpg] [ej05005t2a.jpg] [ej05005f1.jpg] [ej05005f4.jpg] [ej05005t2b.jpg] [ej05005t2c.jpg] |
|