search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


International Journal of Environmental Research
University of Tehran
ISSN: 1735-6865 EISSN: 2008-2304
Vol. 3, Num. 4, 2009, pp. 575-580

International Journal of Environmental Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2009, pp. 575-580

Artificial Neural Network Modeling of an Inverse Fluidized Bed Bioreactor

Rajasimman, M. 1*, Govindarajan, L.2 and Karthikeyan, C.1

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar-608002, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Caledonian University, Sultanate of Oman
*Corresponding author E-mail: raja_simms@yahoo.com

Received 20 May 2008; Revised 15 Aug. 2009; Accepted 25 Aug. 2009

Code Number: er09063

ABSTRACT

The application of neural networks to model a laboratory scale inverse fluidized bed reactor has been studied. A Radial Basis Function neural network has been successfully employed for the modeling of the inverse fluidized bed reactor. In the proposed model, the trained neural network represents the kinetics of biological decomposition of organic matters in the reactor. The neural network has been trained with experimental data obtained from an inverse fluidized bed reactor treating the starch industry wastewater. Experiments were carried out at various initial substrate concentrations of 2250, 4475, 6730 and 8910 mg COD/L and at different hydraulic retention times (40, 32, 24, 26 and 8h). It is found that neural network based model has been useful in predicting the system parameters with desired accuracy.

Key words: Artificial neural network, Inverse fluidized bed, Radial basis, Starch, Modeling

INTRODUCTION

Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) has been established as a tool for effortless computation and its application in environmental engineering field is very promising and has gained extensive interest (Hamoda et al., 1999; Hack and Kohne, 1996; Gontarski et al., 2000; Bongards, 2001; Hamed et al., 2004; Rene and Saidutta, 2008 ). ANN have been successfully employed in solving problems in areas such as fault diagnosis, process identification, property estimation, data smoothing and error filtering, product design and development, optimization, dynamic modeling and control of chemical processes, for the prediction of vaporliquid equilibrium (VLE) data and estimation of activity coefficients. The purpose of using artificial neural networks in wastewater treatment system is to reduce the number of experiments that are being carried out to characterize the system. ANN has remarkable ability to derive meaningful information from complicated or imprecise data. It can be used to extract patterns and detect trends, which are too complex to be noticed by other computational technique (Mehrotra et al., 1997). Neural networks, inspired by the information processing strategies of the human brain, are proving to be useful in a variety of engineering applications. ANN may be viewed as paralleled computing tools comprising of highly organized processing elements called neurons which control the entire processing system by developing association between objects in response to their environment. The researches have proposed many architectures of the network .Two widely used network for modeling the non-linear problems in engineering systems are the Backpropagation and Radial Basis Function (RBF) networks.

Radial basis networks require lesser neurons than the standard feed forward back propagation networks and they can be trained in a fraction of time (Govindarajan, 2002). In this work, radial basis network function has been successfully incorporated for the prediction of degradation of organic matter present in starch wastewater treated in an inverse fluidized bed reactor. The proposed technique of using radial basis function requires only limited experimental values to predict the behavior of the system. A simple well-trained neural network can be employed to overcome the modeling problems of reactor without prior knowledge of the relationships of process variables under investigation.

Radial basis function networks form one of the essential categories of neural networks.A RBF network is a two-layer network whose output units form a linear combination of the basis functions computed by the hidden units.A function is radially symmetric if its output depends on the distance of the input sample from another stored vector. Neural networks whose node functions are radially symmetric functions are referred to as Radial Basis Function Nets.

The transfer function for a radial basis neuron is radbas. The radial basis neuron receives as net input the vector distance between its weight vector w and the input vector p, multiplied by the bias b. The basis functions in the hidden layer produce a localized response to the inputs i.e each hidden unit has a localized receptive field. The basis function can be viewed as the activation function in the hidden layer. The outputs of the hidden unit lie between 0 and 1. The closer the input to center of the Gaussian, the larger the response of the node. The node produces an identical output for inputs with equal distance from the center of the Gaussian; it is called a radial basis. The output unit forms a linear combination of the nonlinear basis functions and thus the over all network performs a nonlinear transformation of the input. The radial basis neural networks have been designed by the using the function newrb available in the neural network toolbox supported by MATLAB 7.0. The function newrb iteratively creates a radial basis network by including one neuron at a time. Neurons are added to the network until the sum squared error is found to be very small or the maximum numbers of neurons are reached. At each iteration the input vector, which will result in lowering the network error most, is used to create a radial basis neuron.

During the training, each of the connecting weights of the individual neuron is compared with input signals. The distance between the connecting weights determines the output of hidden neurons and input vector, which is further, multiplied by bias an additional scalar quantity being added between neuron and fictitious neuron. The output is propagated in a feed forward direction to output layer neuron, which will give output if the connection weights are close to input signal. This output is compared with target vector. If the error reaches the error goal then training is completed otherwise the next neuron will be added. The connecting weights are modified each time by changing maximum neurons and spread constant. The value of maximum neuron and spread constant are kept on changing till the network is trained properly. Radial basis networks can be used to approximate functions.Newrb adds neurons to the hidden layer of a radial basis network until it meets the specified mean squared error goal.

The advantages of RBF are, the time taken in designing a radial basis network is often less when compared to the training a sigmoid / linear networks and the number of neurons required for designing the network is considerably less when compared to standard back propagation network (Govindarajan, 2005). The following steps are repeated until the network’s mean squared error falls below goal as given in Fig. 1.

  • The network is simulated

  • The input vector with the greatest error is found

  • A radbas neuron is added with weights equal to that vector

  • The purelin layer weights are redesigned to minimize error

MATERIALS & METHODS

Degradation of starch wastewater in Inverse Fluidized Bed Bioreactor (IFBBR) was carried out continuously in different stages by varying initial substrate concentration (2250 mg COD/L, 4475 mg COD/L, 6730 mg COD/L and 8910 mg COD/L) and hydraulic retention time (40, 32, 24, 16 and 8h). Various experimental runs were conducted to provide information of the process behavior and to train the network (Rajasimman, 2007).

The particles were introduced into the reactor along with the substrate and inoculum. The air flow rate was adjusted according to bed height, for biomass growth. The growth of the biofilm on the surface of the particles was monitored at regular intervals. The reactor inoculation and startup procedure were followed according to Rajasimman and Karthikeyan, 2007.

Continuous degradation in IFBBR was started with an initial concentration of 2250 mg COD/L and a HRT of 40 h. The reactor was monitored continuously by measuring effluent COD values. When the reactor reaches steady state, the HRT was reduced to 32 h and reduction in COD was monitored. Experiment was continued with various HRT (24, 16 and 8h). The performance of the reactor was studied based on COD removal efficiency. Experiments were repeated for various initial substrate concentrations at five different HRT by maintaining an optimum bed height (80 cm) and air flow rate (62.50 cc/s). The pH of the influent to the reactor was maintained at 6.0. The analyses were made according to the methods given in standard methods of analysis by American Public Health Association, APHA (1992). The experimental data were fed to the neural network to model the IFBBR in degrading the starch wastewater.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The structure of radial basis function network used in this work is given by net = newrb [net,tr] = newrb (P,T,Goal,Spread,MN,DF) Newrb adds neurons to the hidden layer of a radial basis network until it meets the specified mean squared error goal.

NEWRB (PR,T,GOAL,SPREAD,MN,DF) takes these arguments,

P RxQ matrix of Q input vectors.
T SxQ matrix of Q target class vectors.
Goal Mean squared error goal, default = 0.0.
Spread Spread of radial basis functions, default= 1.0.
MN Maximum number of neurons, default is Q.
DF Number of neurons to add between displays, default = 25 and returns a new radial basis network.

Newrb creates a two layer network. The first layer has radbas neurons, and calculates its weighted inputs with dist, and its net input with netprod. The second layer has purelin neurons, calculates its weighted input with netprod and its net inputs with netsum. Both layers have biases. Initially the radbas layer has no neurons. The following steps are repeated until the network’s mean squared error falls below goal or the maximum number of neurons are reached:

(i) The network is simulated
(ii) The input vector with the greatest error is found
(iii) A radbas neuron is added with weights equal to that vector.
(iv) The purelin layer weights are redesigned to minimize error.

Radial Basis Function Parameters used in this study are

P 2
Q 1
Goal 0
Spread 1000
MN 2
DF 10

The Radial Basis Function network was trained to predict the performance of IFBBR. The criterion used to evaluate the performance of the reactor is to determine the reduction in organic matter present in the starch industry wastewater. The neural network was trained with the influent substrate concentration, hydraulic retention time and effluent concentration of the reactor. The data used for the training at various hydraulic retention times of 40, 32, 24, 16 and 8 h and at different initial substrate concentrations of 2250, 4475, 6730 and 8910 mg COD/L. The input and output for the Neural Network were given in Table 1.

The neural network predicted data were compared with the experimental findings at the intermediate hours viz 36, 60, 84, 108, 132, 156, 180, 204, 228 hours of operation and at different initial substrate concentrations of 2250, 4475 and 6730 mg COD/L.For the initial substrate concentration 8910 mg COD/L, the data were predicted for 36, 60, 84, 108, 132, 156, 180, 204 and 228 h. The performance of the network was evaluated on the basis of an overall absolute error and root mean square error (RMSE) specified by the difference in the desired and actual outputs. A comparison of experimental values and the ANN predicted results were depicted in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5. From these Figures it has been observed that artificial neural network modeling of system-based parameters is found to match exactly with the experimental data at various operating conditions of the reactor. The use of neural network for the prediction of the performance of IFBBR has been found to be valid and robust, eliminating the need for the complex mathematical and computations involved in the modeling of the IFBBR performance.The absolute standard deviation and percentage root mean square error, used in this study for the evaluation of neural network model, is defined as:

Absolute Standard Deviation (ABSD)

Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)

The Absolute Standard Deviation and percentage RMSE were found for each run and were tabulated in Table 2. From the Table it has been found that the deviations were well within the permissible limit. These findings are well in agreements as those in the findings of Steyer et al., (1995). Thus artificial neural network modeling of IFBBR is highly justified for the treatment of starch industry wastewater.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the inverse fluidized bed bioreactor treating starch industry wastewater was modeled using artificial neural network. The Radial based artificial neural network has been trained with experimental data obtained from an inverse fluidized bed reactor treating the starch industry wastewater. The ANN predicted values are compared with the experimental values and it is very close to the experimental values. The low RMSE values (<10% for most cases) indicate the performance of ANN in predicting the system. The main conclusion of this work is that the use of neural networks can be used to establish a better operating condition, which has been defined by some variables such as hydraulic retention time. Neural networks represent a possible aid to operations in order to predict upsets and proactively act to minimize output fluctuations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors wish to express their gratitude for the support extended by the authorities of Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India in carrying out the research work in Environmental Engineering laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering.

REFERENCES

  1. APHA, (1999). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edition, Washington, DC, American Public Health Association.
  2. Bongards, M. (2001). Improving the efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant by fuzzy control and neural networks. Water Sci. Technol., 43, 189-196.
  3. Gontarski, C. A., Rodrigues, P. R. and Mori, M. (2000). Simulation of an industrial wastewater treatment plant using artificial neural networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering., 24, 1719-1723.
  4. Govindarajan, L. (2002). Radial Basis Neural Network Approach to VLE Data Predictions. M. E. Dissertation, Annamalai University, India.
  5. Govindarajan, L. (2005). Optimal design of reactors. Ph.D Dissertation, Annamalai University, India.
  6. Hack, M. and Kohne, M. (1996). Estimation of wastewater process parameters using neural networks. Water Sci. Technol., 33, 101-115.
  7. Hamed, M. M., Khalafallah, M. G. and Hassanien, E. A. (2004). Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ. Model. Softw., 19, 919-928.
  8. Hamoda, M. F., Al-Ghusain, I. A. and Hassan, A. H. (1999). Integrated wastewater treatment plant performance evaluation using artificial neural networks. Water Sci. Technol., 40, 55-66.
  9. Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C. K. and Ranka, S. (1997). Elements of Artificial Neural Networks, Penram International, Mumbai.
  10. Rajasimman, M. (2007). Treatment of industrial effluent in a fluidized bed bioreactor with alow density biomass support, Ph.D. Thesis, Annamalai University, India.
  11. Rajasimman, M. and Karthikeyan, C. (2007). Aerobic digestion of starch wastewater in a fluidized bed bioreactor with low densitybiomasssupport. J. Hazard. Mater., 143, 82-86.
  12. Rene, E. R. and Saidutta, M. B. (2008). Prediction of Water Quality Indices by Regression Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks. Int. J. Environ. Res., 2(2), 183-188.
  13. Steyer, J. P., Pelayo-Ortiz, C. and Gonzalez-Alvarez, V. (2000). Neural network modeling of a depollution process. Bioprocess Eng., 23, 727-730.

Copyright 2009 - International Journal of Environmental Research


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[er09063t1.jpg] [er09063f3.jpg] [er09063f2.jpg] [er09063f1.jpg] [er09063t2.jpg] [er09063f4.jpg] [er09063f5.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil