European Journal of General Medicine, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2004, pp. 43-44
BRIEF REPORT
THE EYE SPLASH INJURIES OF ECHINOCOCCAL FLUID DURING SURGERY OF THE PERITONEAL
ECHINOCOCCOSIS: OUR EXPERIENCES DUE TO TWO CASES
Mustafa Aldemir1, İhsan Çaça2, Şerife
Akalın3, Ali Süner4,
Ziya Kaya5.
Dicle University, Faculty of Medicine, Departments of General Surgery1,
Ophtalmology2 , Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases3, Internal Medicine4 and
Anaesthesiology5
Correspondence: Mustafa Aldemir, MD
Dicle Üniversitesi, Tip Fakültesi
Ilk ve Acil Yardim AD.
21280, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Tel: +90 412 248 8155.
Fax: +90 412 248 8440.
Email: maldemir21@hotmail.com
Code Number: gm04031
The surgeon today is obliged to operate
on an increasing number of patients who
are classified at high risk. The hazards of
blood splashes at operation have also been
reported suggesting that Hepatitis B virus
(HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) can
be transmitted by conjunctival contamination
(1,2). The eye splash injuries due to peritoneal
echinococcal fluid have not been determined
in the literature. We reviewed our experiences
relevant to two surgeons exposed to the eye
splash injuries due to peritoneal echinococcal
fluid in order to emphasize the risks of
transmission of infections via the eye.
In 1996, a 54 years old woman who had
been operated due to hepatic echinococcosis
18 years ago decided to be operated
because of pelvic mass in General Surgery
Department. Anti-HCV antibody, HBs
Antigen (Ag), Anti-HIV and VDRL tests were
found to be negative preoperatively. During
the operation, multiloculated cysts masses
in various diameters were detected in liver
and in the abdomen. At the fourth hour of the
operation that lasted 6 hours, during the blunt
dissection of the cysts, hydatid fluid splashed
accidentally to the eyes of the secondary
surgeon (Assistant). Ophthalmologic
examination of the surgeon revealed nothing
but conjunctival hyperaemia.
Both of the two eyes were instantly
irrigated with 1000 cc normal saline (0.09%
Nacl) and 0.3% ciprofloxacin ophthalmic
drop was recommended for one week.
In 2002, a 32 year old woman underwent
operation because of secondary peritoneal
echinococcosis. Routine preoperative
serologic screening tests of the patient
were negative. At the operation, peritoneal
echinococcosis constituted from two
multiloculated cysts, located in the right
lower and median quadrants between the
omentum, small intestine and tubo-ovarian
structures were detected. Total cyst excision
was applied to the patient. During the
operation, at the 125th minute, hydatid fluid
splashed accidentally to the right eye of the
primary surgeon (Resident). Ophthalmologic
examination of the surgeon who complained
about the irritation revealed only conjunctival
hyperaemia. Instantly, eye irrigation with 500
cc normal saline (0.09% Nacl) was performed
and 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic drop was
recommended for one week.
Hydatid fluid splashed to the eyes of the
secondary surgeon in the first case and to
primary surgeon’s eye in the second case.
The splash of the first case was seen in the
last third part of the long lasted operation
during the extirpation of the cyst with the
blunt dissection. Inexperience of the surgeons
about the fragility of the cystic tissues and
application of blunt dissection instead of
sharp dissection may be the causes of eye
splash injuries with echinococcal fluid.
The rupture of a hydatid cyst is well
known in surgical practice. It can occur
spontaneously (3,4), as a result of trauma
(5) or surgery (6). In the English literature,
echinococcal fluid splash into the eye as a
result of iatrogenic hydatid cyst rupture was
not reported so far. The fluid splashed into
both of the two eyes of our first case while in
the other one it splashed to only one eye.
Anaphylactic reactions or allergic
conjunctivitis can be seen, if the surgeon
already exposed to hydatid fluid via the
eye is sensitive to hydatid fluid previously.
However, anaphylactic reactions due to
echinococcal fluid have not been reported
in the literature. In our cases, despite the
splashing of some cyst fluid into the eye, we
did not see any evidence of anaphylaxis.
As a result of splashing echinococcal
fluid into the eye, the scolices (or daughter
hydatids) can cause dacryocystitis or ductal
echinococcosis if it is located into the ductus
nasolacrimalis and although their entrance
to oropharingeal cavity and consequently
to gastrointestinal system is possible, any
clinical experience about it has not been
reported in the literature. The scolices can
also be located in Meibomian, Zeis and Moll
glands, leading to bacterial infections via
the contamination of infected cystic fluid.
Moreover, viruses such as HBV, HCV,
HIV those can be found in cystic fluid may
result in systemic infections by the way of
conjunctiva theoretically. However, there is
no information about the issue that whether
these viruses can be present in the hydatid
fluid.
After the contact of the eyes with hydatid
fluid, irrigation with normal saline (0.09%
Nacl) was implemented immediately and
antibiotic drops were used to the both of two
sufferers. The follow up lasted 6 years in the
first case and 6 months in the second one and
no ophthalmologic problem was developed.
Whether the transmission of viral infections
are possible via the hydatid cyst fluid is not
known currently.
In conclusion, it must be known that the
risk of eye splash injury in surgery is much
greater than that perceived by most surgeons
and trainees. Routine eye protection should be
mandatory for all personnel in the operating
theatre, in particular for emergency and
prolonged elective procedures. All patients
who underwent the operations should be
searched preoperatively for important viral
agents such as HBV, HCV and HIV.
REFERENCES