 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
European Journal of General Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 4, October-December, 2009, pp. 229-238 Article The conformance to standards of the medical waste practices at a university hospital Arzu İlce1 , Gülay Oyur Çelik2 , Fatma Demir Korkmaz2 1 Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu Health School of Higher Education Bolu Code Number: gm09048 Abstract Aim : The purpose of this descriptive-type study is to investigate the medical waste manangement at one of the largest university hospitals in Turkey. It is stated that when medical waste management is carried out in an effective and determined manner, it would provide great gains for the hospital economy and environmental health. Methods: The study was carried out between January- June 2006 in a total of 51 units. The research data was collected by examining the "Hospital Waste Management Program" and by making faceto-face talks with the nurses, the personnel in the Environmental Health Service Unit, the officials and personnel of the janitorial company and by making the necessary observations. Results: It was determined that the medical waste practices at the hospital where the study was conducted were in conformance with 70.65% of the 2005 Regulations of the Ministry of the Environment and Forestry, 47.7% of the standards of the Turkish Institute of Standards and 89.0% of the guidelines of the Center for Disease Control. Conclusion: The following is proposed: To hold short-term meetings for informing the personnel on the regulation of medical wastes in order to eliminate the deficiencies in the medical waste practices.Keywords: Standard, medical waste practices, waste management,regulated medical waste. Introduction The wastes from diagnosis and treatment, the medi-cal and pharmaceutical research wastes and the wastes in the production of medicine are considered to be medical wastes. It is possible to classify them as hazardous hospital waste materials, such as infec-tious, pathological, wastes having the attribute of sharp instruments, toxigenic, pharmaceutical, chemi-cal, heavy metal wastes, pressurized containers and radioactive wastes. The wastes should be separated according to their types for decontamination and dis-posal processes. Thus, the professional risk of expo-sure and hazard to the environment of each kind of waste can be reduced to a minimum [1],[2],[3] . The most important objective of medical waste management is to prevent the spread of infectious diseases [4] . Medical institutions also produce water, food and do-mestic wastes, as well as medical wastes. Different collection containers and different colored bags should be used in the collection of all of these wastes. Red bags should be used for medical wastes, blue bags for domestic wastes and black bags for recyclable (serum, medicine bottles, etc.) wastes [1],[2],[5],[6] . In a study made, it was determined that there was a 21% decrease in the monthly amount of wastes, thanks to the good training of the hospital personnel in medical waste management [7] . Another subject, which is as important as the sepa-ration of wastes, is the preservation of the health of the personnel transporting the wastes and the provi-sion of environmental safety during the transporta-tion of wastes. Consequently, putting the wastes into waste containers, collecting, transporting and storing of wastes should be carried out with safe practices [3],[4],[8] . It is stated that nurses have a great responsibil-ity in waste management for preserving the natural environment and global health and for setting forth the negative effects of medical wastes on the en-vironment [9] . The International Council of Nurses (ICN) states that nurses have great responsibilities as follows:
It is stated that when medical waste management is carried out in an effective and determined manner, then it would provide great benefits for the hospi-tal economy [7] . An effective waste management includes the training of the personnel, the separa-tion of the wastes, the calculation of the amount of wastes for each clinic and the determination in writing of the policies related to waste management. Thus, it is possible to reduce the costs. Almuneef et al. made a study on the subject of an effective medical waste management between 1999 and 2000. In this study, the amount of waste was 2000 kg per day. After an effective medical waste manage-ment (in-service training, feedback, separation of the waste type and variety and development of the writ-ten policies about waste management), this amount fell to 850 kg per day and the hospital budget was provided with a gain of 50% [7] . Every country should determine its own unique stan-dards for an effective waste management by taking into account the recommendations of committees, such as the CDC and the HICPAC [7] . In Turkey, The Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MEF) published "The Regulation for the Control of Medical Wastes" in 1993 with the objective of providing for its ap-plication by determining the administrative, technical and legal policies and programs aimed at the sepa-rate collection of medical wastes without harming public health and the environment, the temporary storage, recycling, transport and the destruction of medical wastes [10] . This regulation was rewritten in 2005 and adopted some sanctions for the hospi-tals and the previous regulation was abrogated [5] . The Turkish Institute of Standards (TSI) defined the rules and terms on the subject of "The Collection and Transport of Medical Wastes" in the TS 12129 Standard [6] . The purpose of this descriptive-type study is to inves-tigate the medical waste manangement at the one of the largest university hospitals in Turkey. Materials and Methods This is a descriptive study planned with the objective of examining the conformance to the national and international standards of the waste management at a university hospital. The study was carried out be-tween 2 January 2006 and 30 June 2006 in a total of 51 units at a university hospital. Of these, 30 were in the internal and surgical medical sciences services and 21 were in the intensive care units. The labora-tories and operating rooms were not included within the scope of the study. The conformance to stan-dards of the medical waste practices at the hospital was determined by comparing with the MEF, TSI and CDC. The data was collected with the data collection form, which was prepared by the researchers based on the literature, the national and international regu-lations, standards and guidelines. The proposals in the literature related to waste management and the expressions in the standards, regulations and guide-lines mentioned above were made into a table by adding a "yes" and "no" section. There are 3 parts and 82 items on the data collection form with 25 items for the collection of medical wastes, 36 items for the transport of medical wastes and 21 items for the characteristics of the temporary storage area. The research data was collected by examining the "Hospital Waste Management Program" and by making face-to-face talks with the clinical nurses, personnel in the Environmental Health Service Unit and the of-ficials and personnel of the janitorial company and by making the necessary observations. Furthermore, data, such as the nurse/patient ratio, the patient/ waste container and container for sharp instruments ratio, which could influence waste management, were also calculated. The data was calculated as number and percentage by using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) 11.0 program. The necessary permissions were obtained from the Ethics Board of the Ege University, Nursing School, the Chief Physician's Office at the Hospital and the Directorate of Nursing Services at the Hospital. Discussion The medical waste practices of a total of 51 units were investigated. Of these, 14 were in the surgical medical sciences service units, 16 were in the inter-nal medical sciences service units, 13 were in the surgical medical sciences intensive care units and 8 were in the internal medical sciences intensive care units. It is stated in the literature that the average daily waste amount per bed varies between 4.1-8.7 kg at the university hospitals, 2.1-4.2 kg at the general hospitals, 0.5-1.8 kg at the regional hospitals and 0.05-0.2 kg at the primary health care centers [11] . Bdour et al. stated that in general, the daily waste per patient was 6-10 kg [12] . It is proposed in the literature that the capacities of the waste containers should be a minimum of 10 liters and a maximum of 60 liters [1],[5] . According to this information, it could be considered that 1 waste collection container and 1 container for sharp instruments (with a volume of 20 cm ) would be suitable for use at 5 patients' beds at the university hospital where the study was car-ried out [3],[6] . Whereas, in the intensive care units where the patient care procedures and interventions are a lot more, the use of 1 waste container and 1 container for sharp instruments for each patient's bed would be more suitable. The waste collection containers, such as plastic bags, cardboard boxes, etc. hung on the edge of the dressing and treatment carts, which do not conform to the standards, were not evaluated in this study. Consequently, it shows the insufficiency in numbers of the waste containers, as there was one waste container and container for sharp instruments per approximately 26 patients in the service units and there was one waste container per approximately 10 patients and one container for sharp instruments per approximately 5 patients in the intensive care units. The Separation of Wastes The most important practice in the medical waste management is the separation of the wastes prior to collection and disposal. The separation of medi-cal wastes is a practice, which both protects the professional health of the health care personnel and a practice, which decreases the cost in the disposal process of the wastes [4] . The conformance to stan-dards of waste management contributes to the hos-pital budget and also provides contributions to the economy of the country [7],[13] . It is necessary to implement special processes for the control of medi-cal wastes and to be able to make them harmless. It is stated that this process brings an additional cost of US $ 0.60-US $ 2.00 per kilogram [14] . It is stated that the separation of wastes decreases the amount of wastes by 20-30% and that it also decreases the costs by approximately 25-30% [15] . Consequently, the separation of wastes is of great importance. In this study, it was determined that in a great ma-jority of the units (88.2%) there were wastes (domes-tic and recyclable), which were not medical wastes, inside the medical waste containers. It is stated in the literature that only 5-10% of the hospital wastes are medical wastes and in contrast to this, due to the fact that suitable procedures have not been specified for separation and that the required care is not shown for separation, more than 15% of the wastes are qualified as medical wastes [16] . A study by Birpinar et al. (2009) was found in the literature on a topic similar to our study. It was determined in Birpinar's study that 99% of the medi-cal wastes and 100% of the sharp instrument wastes were separated. The results were found to be simi-lar or even better than the ratios in our study. The reason for this may be that the healthcare staff was educated on the disposal of wastes at the hospitals. However, another study was not found in the litera-ture where a comparion was made with the national and international standards [17] . The fact that there is no brochure close to the waste containers that states which container is for which waste in 19.6% of the units can be considered as a reason paving the way for this situation [Table - 1]. Furthermore, it was determined in this study that the patient/nurse ratio was 5.05 in the services and that the patient/nurse ratio was 2.52 in the intensive care units. It can also be considered that as the number of patients per nurse increases, it would also nega-tively affect the waste management. Characteristics of the Waste Containers and Containers for Sharp Instruments The red bags that are used for medical wastes are important compared to the other bags. The MEF and TSI have specified the characteristics of these bags. Accordingly, they should be red plastic bags that are resistant to tearing, sharp instruments, bursting and transport, produced from medium-density poly-ethylene raw materials, that are leakproof and have double stitching and are without folds, with a double thickness and a minimum capacity of 10 kg and should have the "International Biohazard Emblem" and the statement "ATTENTION! MEDICAL WASTE" written on them [5],[6] . In our study, it was determined that the waste bags used in a majority of the units (76.5%) did not conform to the proposed characteristics. In our study, it was observed that over half (54.9%) of the units had containers with a foot-pedal, in over half (54.9%) of the units there was no lids on the medical waste containers and that there were no medical waste emblems on close to half (41.2%) of them [Table - 1]. In the literature it is proposed that the waste collection containers should be covered or preferably with a lid and they should be with a foot-pedal in order to prevent contamination by touching with hands [4],[6],[18] . Accordingly, it was determined that the waste collection containers were not quali-tatively suitable for use. Infections generally emerge as the result of contact with skin, splattering and generally with wounds pen-etrated with sharp instruments. It is known that the persons are infected with viruses (HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C) through blood and enteral infections [16] . Contaminated sharp instruments, which are not sepa-rated correctly and not thrown out in proper con-tainers, are the source of major infections [12] . Medical wastes should not be mixed with chemical, radioactive, pathological and chemotherapy wastes and sharp instruments should definitely be separated from medical wastes [1] . The characteristics of the waste containers for sharp instruments have been determined by the MEF, TSI and CDC. It is proposed that these containers should be made of plastic or boxes or containers made of laminated cardboard having the same characteristics, that they should withstand sharp instruments, tearing, breaking and bursting, that they should be waterproof and leak-proof, that it should not be possible to open and mix their contents and that they should have the "International Biohazard Emblem" and the statement "ATTENTION! SHARP WASTES" written on them. The waste containers for sharp instruments in the work area should be kept upright, changed before they are Ύ full, their tops should be tightly closed and they should be put into medical waste bags, tied up and transported [2],[5],[6],[19] . In our study, it was determined that the containers of close to all of the units (98.0%) were made of plastic or laminated cardboard having the same characteris-tics and that a great majority (88.2%) of the containers were waterproof, leakproof and had the charac-teristics of being impossible to open and mix their contents. Also, it was determined that close to all of the units (94.1%) had the "International Biohazard Emblem" on the waste container. However, it was de-termined that in a great majority of the units (82.4%) there was not the statement "ATTENTION! SHARP WASTE" written on the containers for sharp instru-ments. It was determined that the existing containers for sharp instruments in the units generally con-formed to the standards. It was determined during the observations made that in over one half (66.7%) of the units that the containers for sharp instruments were not changed despite the fact that they were Ύ full [Table - 1]. It is thought that this situation could lead to contamination and injuries. In a study by Birpinar et al. (2009), 77.5% of the hospitals have appropriate containers for medical wastes and 75% of these containers satisfy the MEF standards. Transport of Medical Wastes One of the important subjects related to medical wastes is the health of the hospital/municipality workers, who are in contact with the wastes during transport [4] . A risk for the waste collection per-sonnel is constituted by not separating the medical wastes properly, not selecting suitable waste contain-ers and suitable collection vehicles and not using suitable personnel clothing and auxiliary tools and instruments. This risk can be decreased by selecting the proper tools and instruments and by the health personnel throwing the wastes into the correct con-tainer according to the type of wastes [20],[21],[22] . In the MEF standard, it is stated that the personnel on duty should be trained periodically and that it is necessary to document that this training has been given and the institutions are responsible for provid-ing special clothing and work equipment for the per-sonnel on duty [4],[5] . In this study, the fact that the medical wastes in all of the units are continuously transported by the same persons and that the person-nel have in-service training certificates is a positive result. However, it is thought that a risk for the spread of infections is constituted in all of the units by not using protective goggles by those assigned to carry wastes, not using masks in a large majority of the units (90.2%) and not using rubber gloves in a small percentage of the units (7.8%) [Table - 2]. Medical Waste Transport Vehicles The characteristics of the waste collection vehicles, which are used with the objective of transporting the medical wastes without contaminating the environ-ment , are specified by the MEF , TSI and CDC . It is proposed that medical and domestic wastes should be transported separately with vehicles specifically allo-cated for this job, that the medical waste transport vehicles have wheels and lids and should be made of rustproof metal, plastic or similar materials. It is proposed that there are vehicles allocated only for this job, which do not have sharp corners that could lead to harming or piercing the bags during load-ing and unloading and that they are easy to load, unload, clean and disinfect. It is proposed that the color of these vehicles should be orange and that they have the "International Biohazard Emblem" and the statement "ATTENTION! MEDICAL WASTES" writ-ten on them [2],[5],[6],[19],[23] . When the characteristics of the medical waste trans-port vehicles are examined, the following have been determined: Almost all of the units (80.4%) use medi-cal waste transport vehicles and these vehicles have lids (86.3%) as specified in the regulation. It was determined that they are made from rustproof metal or plastic material (86.3%), they do not have sharp corners, which could cause the bags to tear dur-ing loading and unloading, that they are easy to clean and disinfect (78.4%) and that half of the units (51.0%) have the statement "ATTENTION! MEDICAL WASTE" written on the waste transport containers. In contrast to this, it was observed that a majority of the units (74.5%) did not have the "International Biohazard Emblem" on the waste transport vehicles, the external surfaces were not painted orange and they were also used for other jobs [Table - 3]. It was determined that in general the waste collection vehicles used for the transport of medical wastes without contaminating the environment conformed to the proposals. Temporary Waste Storage Depot According to the MEF, health institutions having a capacity of 20 or more beds are obliged to construct a temporary waste storage depot with the objective of being able to store medical wastes in a safe man-ner without harming human health [5] . These storage depots should have two sections for medical wastes and domestic wastes and should have the capacity to be able to store a minimum of two days of waste [10] . It is also stated that the color of the door of the medical waste section should be orange and that it should have the "International Biohazard Emblem" on it and that the statement "ATTENTION! MEDICAL WASTE" should be written on it [Table - 4] [5] . We have determined that the temporary waste storage depot at the hospital where we conducted our study conforms to the standards. In a study by Birpinar et al.(2009), 63% of the hospitals have a temporary storage depot and 94% of these depots satisfy the MEF standards. Furthermore, the conformances of the medical waste practices according to each standard (CDC, MEF, TSI,) were examined separately. It was determined that the medical waste practices conformed 70.65% to the MEF, 47.4% to the TSI and 89.0% to the CDC standards. Conclusion The practices not in conformance with the standards (waste bags not conforming to the standards, the personnel handling waste transports do not use masks and protective goggles and the deficiencies of warn-ing messages, etc.) are actually determined to be correctable practices. In our study, it was determined that there were separate waste collection containers in the major-ity of the units. However, there were wastes other than medical wastes within the majority of the con-tainers. Over half of the waste containers were in conformance with the standards. A majority of the waste bags and waste containers for sharp instru-ments were in conformance with the standards. It was determined that the personnel handling waste transports conformed to most of the proposals on the subject of transporting medical wastes. It was determined that a majority of the units used waste collection vehicles for the transports of wastes and that the waste collection vehicles conformed to the proposals in general, except for the color of the vehicles and the written warnings. It was also determined that the hospital conformed to the pro-posals for the temporary storage depot area char-acteristics.[24] The following is recommended at the conclusion of this study:
References
Copyright 2009 - European Journal of General Medicine The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[gm09048t2.jpg] [gm09048t4.jpg] [gm09048t3.jpg] [gm09048t1.jpg] |
| |||||||||
![[Table - 1]](/showimage?gm/photo/gm09048t1.jpg){kind=link}
![[Table - 2]](/showimage?gm/photo/gm09048t2.jpg){kind=link}
![[Table - 3]](/showimage?gm/photo/gm09048t3.jpg){kind=link}
![[Table - 4]](/showimage?gm/photo/gm09048t4.jpg){kind=link}