search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


European Journal of General Medicine
Medical Investigations Society
ISSN: 1304-3897
Vol. 7, Num. 1, 2010, pp. 104-106

European Journal of General Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, January-March, 2010, pp. 104-106

Case Report

Craniosynostosis associated with lacunar skull: Three-dimensional computed tomography features

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics1 and Diagnostic Radiology2 , Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Correspondence Address: Dr. Mehmet Davutoglu, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kahramanmaras, 46050, Turkey.
drmdavutoglu@hotmail.com

Code Number: gm10018

Abstract

Craniosynostosis is the premature closure of the cranial sutures. We present the radiological findings of a six-month old case who presented with small head and frontal triangular shape and who was found to have generalized pitting and softness on palpation of the head. The three-dimensional images computed tomography (CT) showed a sagittal, coronal and metopic suture synostosis with exaggerated convolutional markings in the form of lacunar skull. This case report showed that patients with craniosynostosis should be evaluated by three-dimensional images CT

.

Keywords: Craniosynostosis, Three-dimensional computed tomography, Lacunar skull

Introduction

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures and can occur as part of a syndrome or as an isolated defect [1] . The prevalence of craniosynostosis was estimated to be one per 1,800 to 2,200 births [2] . The process of growing inhibition due to craniosynostosis is not always restricted to the neurocranium, it may have an influence on the development of the viscerocranium too. In this article, the importance of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of patients with craniosynostosis was discussed by presenting a 6-month-old male patient.

Case

A 6-month-old male patient with narrow, triangular forehead and small cranium was referred to our pediatric clinic for microcephaly. The breast-feeding patient was delivered by cesarean section after a normal prenatal period. There was collateral consanguinity between the parents and one of the siblings older than him had craniosynostosis. On physical examination, both anterior and posterior fontanels were closed, but there was generalized softness on palpation of the head. The patient was below 3 percentile for weight, length and head circumference, the measurements being 5200 g, 56 cm and 36,5 cm respectively. Both the other physical examination and the laboratory findings such as biochemistry, complete blood count and also TORCH panel were unremarkable. Cranial CT showed that both the posterior fossa and the supratentorial region was normal. Whereas the cranial vault had multiple thinned areas, convexities of which were facing outwards and focal defects, especially in the parietooccipital region. There was also slight triangulation of the frontal region [Figure - 1] a,b. Coronal sutures were not observed and the lambdoid suture patency could not be differentiated and evaluated in between the defective regions previously mentioned. The patient underwent thin-slice high resolution cranial CT examination using multislice CT scanning and reconstruction images were obtained for three-dimensional analysis. Metopic suture was closed with a resultant slight triangular configuration of the frontal region, better depicted in anterior oblique projection [Figure - 2]a. Lambdoid sutures were patent, while the sagittal suture was closed almost totally [Figure - 2]b. On lateral projections, three-dimensional images revealed that both of the coronal sutures were prematurely fused [Figure - 2]c, d. Cranial vault demonstrated multiple exaggerated convolutional markings in the form of lacunar skull, especially in the parietooccipital region [Figure - 2]b-d. The diagnosis of compound craniosynostosis was established by the basis of radiological findings.

Discussion

Craniosynostosis is premature closure of one or multiple cranial sutures. The sagittal suture is affected in 40 to 60 percent of cases, the coronal suture in 20 to 30 percent of cases, and the metopic suture in less than 10 percent of cases; true lambdoid synostosis is rare [3] . Suture and fontanelle closure takes place in different times [4] . For example, range of normal closure of the anterior fontanel is 4 to 26 months and posterior fontanel is birth to 2 month. Cranial development and mature sutural closure occurs by the age of 12, while the completion of sutural fusion by ossification is an ongoing process until the third or fourth decade of life [4],[5] .

Of affected individuals, 2-8% have primary craniosynostosis. Secondary causes include rickets, hyperthyroidism, hypercalcaemia, bone marrow hyperplasia, or inadequate brain growth (microcephaly and shunted hydrocephalus). Usually, craniosynostosis is present at birth, but it is not always diagnosed when mild. Generally it is diagnosed as a cranial deformity in the first few months of life.

The diagnosis of craniosynostosis depends on physical examination, plain radiography, and cranial CT. The diagnostic value of the CT scan outweighs that of plain radiography because the sutures can be identified more accurately on a CT scan. Modalities of suture imaging such as three-dimensional and spiral CT have improved the accuracy in diagnosis [6] . Three-dimensional surface reconstruction using CT scanning can help the surgeon to accurately describe the craniofacial deformity and plan surgical reconstruction [5] . In addition suture patency and range of craniosynostosis is shown well three-dimensional CT. To better understand the suture anatomy, CT evaluation provides valuable intelligence for correction of the deformity [7] . In our case, there were increased convolutional images, lacunary skull with bilaterally synostotic sutures in CT examinations of the case. These were probably secondary to pulsatile pressures toward the internal tabular of cranium. The aggregated convolution images may have prevented an evident deformity development as a compensatory mechanism for the brain. Our case is unique for presence sagittal, coronal and metopic suture synostosis in one case.

In conclusion, we accentuated the importance of three-dimensional CT scan in patients with craniosynostosis.

References

1.Kabbani H, Raghuveer TS. Craniosynostosis. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:2863-70  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Shaw GM, Romitti PA. Fertility treatments and craniosynostosis: Clifornia Georgia, and Iowa, 1993-1997. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1163-6  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Sun PP, Persing JA. Craniosynostosis. In: Albright AL, Pollack IF, Adelson PD, eds. Principles and practice of pediatric neurosurgery. New York: Thieme Medical: 1999;219-42  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Aviv RI, Rodger E, Hall CM. Craniosynostosis. Clin Radiol 2002;57:93-102  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Ghali GE, Sinn DP, Tantipasawasin S. Management of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2002;10:1-41  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Tartaro A, Larici AR, Antonucci D, et al. Optimization and diagnostic accuracy of computerized tomography with three-dimensional spiral technique in the study of craniosynostosis. Radiol Med 1998;96:10-17  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Kotrikova B, Krempien R, Freier K, Muhling J. Diagnostic imaging in the management of craniosynostoses. Eur Radial 2007,17:1968-78  Back to cited text no. 7    

Copyright 2010 - European Journal of General Medicine


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[gm10018f2.jpg] [gm10018f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil