|
Indian Journal of Human Genetics
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Society of Human Genetics
ISSN: 0971-6866 EISSN: 1998-362x
Vol. 8, Num. 1, 2002, pp. 11-14
|
Indian Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 8, No. 1, Jan-Jun, 2002 pp. 11-14 Detection
of Human Aneuploidies in Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis using Molecular Cytogenetics
Kiran Kucheria, Vaidehi Jobanputra, Rashmi Talwar, M. E. Ahmed, Rima Dada,
T. A.Sivakumaran Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi-110029, India. Address for correspondence: Dr. Kiran Kucheria, Professor
and Head, Division of Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India, Fax: 91-11-6862663, 6521041, E-mail:
kkucheria@hotmail.com Code Number: hg02003 Chromosomal aneuploidies
especially trisomies 13, 18, 21, monosomy X and 47, XXY account for up to 95%
of live born cytogenetic abnormalities. The diagnosis of aneuploidies usually
done by conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) is associated with technical difficulties
and requires about 1-3 weeks for providing a result, especially in prenatal diagnosis.
In the present study, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) was used on interphase
cells for rapid prenatal and postnatal detection of aneuploidies. The frequent
indications of high pregnancies included for prenatal diagnosis were previous
child with chromosomal abnormalities, abnormal ultrasound scan and advanced maternal
age (> 35 years). Interphase FISH was done using probes specific for chromosomes
13, 18, 21, X and Y on uncultured chorionic villi and amniotic fluid samples.
All samples were analyzed subsequently using conventional cytogenetics. The analysis
of aneuploidies for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y using FISH was
extended to abortuses from spontaneous abortion cases. In cases where cytogenetics
was not informative, a diagnosis could be made using interphase FISH. For postnatal
diagnosis, interphase FISH was done to confirm low-level mosaicism in patients
with primary amenorrhea, suspected cases of Klinefelter syndrome, and mental retardation
using probes specific for various autosomes, X and Y chromosomes. FISH was also
done using probe specific for the sex-determining region (SRY) on the Y chromosome
in cases with ambiguous genitalia. The SRY region could be identified in cases
that lacked the Y chromosome on conventional cytogenetic analysis thereby emphasizing
on the high resolution of FISH technique in detecting sub-microscopic rearrangements.
To conclude, interphase FISH decreases the time interval between sampling and
diagnosis. This is of tremendous value in prenatal diagnosis of urgent high-risk
pregnancies, management of ambiguous genitalia and low-level mosaicism where result
can be obtained within 24 hours. Key words: FISH, prenatal, postnatal,
ambiguous genitalia, interphase, mosaicism Chromosomal imbalance has been identified
as a major cause for spontaneous pregnancy loss and childhood disability thereby,
contributing significantly to the genetic burden on society. The incidence of
karyotypic abnormalities at birth is about 0.5%-1%, most of which are aneuploidies
(Handyslide and Delhanty, 1997). The cytogenetic abnormalities that account for
up to 95% of liveborn cytogenetic abnormalities include trisomies 13, 18, 21,
monosomy X and 47, XXY (Whiteman and Klinger, 1991). Classically, the diagnosis
of aneuploidies was made by conventional cytogenetic analysis. This involves karyotyping
of GTG banded chromosome preparations obtained from various prenatal and postnatal
tissues. Although this technique is highly accurate and reliable, it can be applied
only to mitotic (dividing) cells. But it is often difficult to obtain good quality
metaphases from certain tissues like amniocytes and chorionic villi (Jobanputra
et al., 1998). Further, the time required for reporting especially in prenatal
diagnosis is about 1-3 weeks, as most of the prenatal tissues (amniotic fluid
and chorionic villus sampling) require long-term culturing. Hence, there was a
need for highly sensitive technique that could provide a rapid and accurate postnatal
as well as prenatal diagnosis. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technique
is a highly sensitive molecular cytogenetic technique that has the potential to
detect genetic changes in the interphase nuclei (Jobanputra et al., 1998;
Vosanova et al., 2000). The use of interphase FISH can therefore be exploited
for obtaining faster results. In the present study, FISH technique was used
on interphase cells for rapid prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of aneuploidies.
The diagnostic value of interphase FISH was evaluated by comparing FISH results
with those of conventional cytogenetics. Materials and Methods
Prenatal diagnosis was carried out in high-risk pregnancies (singleton and
twin). The pregnant women were classified as high-risk pregnancies on the basis
of following indications: previous child with chromosomal abnormalities, advanced
maternal age (age>35 years), fetal abnormality detected through ultrasound
examination, abnormal levels of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MS-AFP) and
b-human chorionic gonadotropin (bhCG)
or occurrence of chromosomal abnormality in either of the parents. The twin pregnancy
had a hydatiform mole. The cytogenetic and FISH analysis was carried out in amniotic
fluid or chorionic villi samples depending on the gestational age at which these
women presented to the antenatal clinic. The analysis of aneuploidies was also
conducted in abortuses from spontaneous abortion cases. Postnatal diagnosis
for various autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies was carried out in peripheral
blood samples from patients with primary amenorrhea, suspected cases of Klinefelter
syndrome, ambiguous genitalia and mental retardation to analyze minor cell lines
with aneuploidies. Conventional cytogenetic analysis Chromosome
preparations were obtained from chorionic villus and amniotic fluid samples by
direct preparations and long-term cultures (1-2 weeks). The remaining tissues
(spontaneous abortion and peripheral blood samples) were cultured for 72 hours
(Roulston and Beau, 1997). Karyotyping was done on GTG banded metaphases according
to the ISCN nomenclature (ISCN, 1995). Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
(FISH) analysis FISH analysis was performed on interphase nuclei using
commercially available centromeric and locus specific probes. For prenatal diagnosis,
interphase FISH was done on uncultured chorionic villus and amniotic fluid samples
using centromeric probes for chromosomes 18, X and Y and locus-specific probes
for chromosomes 13 and 21. The probes used for detection of aneuploidies in abortuses
from spontaneous abortion cases were specific for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18,
21, 22, X and Y. Postnatal detection of aneuploidies was done using centromeric
probes for chromosomes X and Y in sex chromosomal aneuploidies and locus-specific
probe for chromosome 21 in mentally retarded cases. The cases with ambiguous genitalia
were analyzed using locus specific probe for sex-determining region (SRY) on the
Y chromosome. All the probes were standardized previously in peripheral blood
samples from normal, healthy individuals. The slides prepared from fixed cell
suspension obtained during cytogenetic analysis were denatured in 70% formamide/2X
SSC at 73°C for 2-5 minutes. The slides were then dehydrated in ethanol (70%,
85% and 100%) series. After the slide was dried, 10ml of denatured probe was applied
to the marked area of the slide with highest cell density. Hybridisation was carried
out overnight at 37°C in a humidified chamber. Post-hybridisation washes
were given as per manufacturers' instructions. The slide was then counterstained
with DAPI and viewed under a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope (Lichter et
al., 1998). Images were captured using a CCD camera attached to the microscope
and analysed using CytoVision software (Applied Imaging). A minimum of 200 interphase
nuclei was scored for each probe. Clumped cells and cells with low fluorescence
intensity signals were excluded. Aneuploidy was identified when >15 per cent
cells showed abnormal signals (Jobanputra et al., 1998; Vosanova et
al., 2000). Results FISH analysis in prenatal diagnosis
was successful in all the cases. FISH results revealed 5 aneuploid samples. Of
the 5 abnormal samples, 3 revealed trisomy 21 in all cells while 2 were mosaics
for trisomy 21. The hybridization efficiency of the 5 probes used for detection
of aneuploidies in prenatal tissues was 100%. Some samples showed mosaicism using
interphase FISH but no correlation was found between the percentage of nuclei
with abnormal FISH results and conventional cytogenetic analysis. Further, FISH
showed normal chromosome compliment on uncultured chorionic villus sampling in
the case where conventional cytogenetics was not informative. The detection
of aneuploidies was extended to analyze abortuses from spontaneous abortion cases
to determine the accuracy and efficiency of using multiplex FISH as a preliminary
screening tool in these cases. In 3 cases cytogenetics was not informative due
to culture contamination. Interphase FISH could identify mosaic trisomy 21 in
one of these samples. Twenty-eight abortuses samples revealed chromosomal aneuploidies:
4 were triploid, 3 had monosomy X, 1 was mosaic twins and 1 had monosomy 21. Among
the abnormal samples, trisomy for chromosome 16 was predominant within the single
trisomies. The cytogenic results in some cases of primary amenorrhea, suspected
cases of Klinefelter syndrome and mental retardation revealed minor cell lines
(1-5%) with abnormal chromosome constitution. FISH analysis was done on interphase
cells and metaphase chromosomes to confirm the presence of these abnormal cell
lines in these samples. Twelve cases with primary amenorrhea revealed monosomy
X in 20-30% cells using FISH while 1 case revealed 3 cell lines: 46, XX (70%),
45, X (20%) and 47, XXX (10%). Similarly, 6 males with suspected Klinefelter syndrome
revealed 47, XXY in 10-30% cells using FISH. Trisomy 21 was observed in all cases
with mental retardation using FISH. The difference in the percentage of aneuploid
cells using FISH and conventional cytogenetics was probably due to the larger
number of cells analyzed by FISH (200-300) as compared to conventional cytogenetics
(20-30). All patients with ambiguous genitalia were analyzed using probe specific
for the centromere of chromosome X and locus-specific probe for sex-determining
region (SRY) on the Y chromosome. Conventional cytogenetics revealed 46, XX karyotypes
in most cases while the remaining had 46, XY karyotypes. FISH could detect the
presence of SRY region on the X chromosome in 2 cases that were 46, XX by conventional
cytogenetics. Discussion Conventional cytogenetics plays
an important role in the identification of chromosomal aneuploidies associated
with various human disorders in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. Although traditional
chromosomal banding techniques are critical in the assessment of karyotypic changes,
these techniques have certain inherent limitations that complicate accurate characterization
of genomes. These limitations which apply particularly to prenatal diagnosis are:
(a) difficulty in culturing of fetal tissues (amniotic fluid, chorionic villus
and fetal blood), which typically produce chromosomes of poor quality; (b) maternal
cell contamination (in case of fetal tissues) that makes subsequent analyses problematic;
(c) time-consuming (2-3 weeks) ; (d) labor intensive and (e) the presence of complex
karyotypes, which often precludes reliable, comprehensive identification and characterization
of chromosomal abnormalities (Cremer et al., 1996; Jobanputra et al.,
1998). The most stress-laden cytogenetic analysis is in case of prenatal diagnosis
that demands accuracy and speed as the potential abnormal outcome and time constrains
may limit possible intervention (Cremer et al., 1996). The rapid identification
of aneuploidies can have a major impact on patient care and further reduce anxiety
in pregnant women. The advent of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) that
can be used in non-dividing (interphase) cells eliminates the need for dividing
cells and reduces the time interval between sampling and diagnosis (Schwartz,
1993; Divane et al., 1994). In the present study, Interphase FISH has been
used as a tool for providing rapid prenatal diagnosis. The results of prenatal
diagnosis using FISH indicate that Interphase FISH is of immense importance in
urgent high-risk pregnancies as it not only eliminates the need for long-term
culturing procedures but can also provide accurate diagnosis within 24 hours.
Interphase FISH could also provide a result in spontaneous abortion cases with
culture failure and maternal contamination. In the present study, multiplex
FISH has been used on abortuses from spontaneous abortion cases for simultaneous
detection of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in a single experiment
(Divane et al., 1994; Feldman et al., 2000; Vorsonova et al.,
2000). This advanced technique provides an unprecedented opportunity for screening
of commonly occurring aneuploidies in a single experiment thereby enabling rapid
diagnosis and patient management. However, the use of specific probes in FISH
does not exclude other chromosomal abnormalities that may or may not be associated
with a particular disorder. The results of postnatal diagnosis using interphase
FISH indicate that this technique is highly efficient, accurate and reliable tool
for screening low-level mosaicism in autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies.
The high resolution of FISH technique in detecting sub-microscopic rearrangements
was highlighted in two patients with ambiguous genitalia who revealed the presence
of sex determining region (normally present on the Y chromosome) using SRY-specific
probe even in the absence of Y chromosome. The SRY gene has been known to be responsible
for the initiation of a cascade reaction leading to male differentiation of the
primitive gonad (Okada et al., 2001; Domenice et al., 2001). According
to few reports, patients with ambiguous genitalia having Y chromosome or segments
of Y chromosome have greater susceptibility for developing malignancies especially
prostrate cancer (Berkovitz et al., 1992; Aviv et al., 2001). Hence
it is essential to screen such patients for genes on Y chromosome (like SRY gene)
using highly sensitive and powerful techniques like FISH. To conclude, the
present study stresses that interphase FISH is a highly sensitive, efficient,
accurate and reproducible technique that can be used independently for screening
of aneuploidies in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis and in abortuses from spontaneous
abortion cases. Further, Interphase FISH can provide a result within 24 hours
thereby aiding the patients as well as health-providers in rapid decision-making,
management and counseling. Acknowledgement Authors acknowledge
the financial support from Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi (BT/PRO 824/Med/15/031/97)
and Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi (54/1/98). Two of the authors
(VJ and RT) are grateful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New
Delhi and one of the authors (TAS) is grateful to Indian Council of Medical Research,
New Delhi for their Senior Research Fellowship. References - Aviv
H, Heller D, Fajardo A, Hoot A, Mavaro L (2001). Sex chromosome mosaicism in gonads
of a fetus with cystic hygroma and deletion of the short arm of Y chromosome including
loss of SRY. Am J Med Genet, 102: 157-160.
- Berkovitz GD, Fechner
PY, Marcantonio SM, Bland G, Stetten G, Goodfellow PN, Smith KD, Migeon CJ (1992).
The role of the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome (SRY) in the etiology
of 46, XX true hermaphroditism. Hum Genet, 88: 411-416.
- Cremer
T, Landegent J, Brickner A, Scholl HP, Schardin M, Hager HD, et al. (1986).
Detection of chromosome aber
- rations in human interphase nucleus by visualization
of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization
techniques: Diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84. Hum Genet, 74:346-352.
- Divane A, Carter NP, Spathas DH, Ferguson-Smith MA (1994). Rapid prenatal
diagnosis of aneuploidy from uncultured amniotic fluid cells using 5 colour fluorescence
in situ hybridization. Prenat Diagn, 14:1061-1069.
- Domenice
S, Nishi MY, Billerbeck AE, Carvalho FM, Frade EM, Latronico AC, Arnhold IJ, Mendonca
BB (2001). Molecular analysis of SRY gene in Brazilian 46, XX sex reversed patients:
absence of SRY sequence in gonadal tissue. Med Sci Monit, 7: 238-241.
- Feldman
B, Ebrahmin SAD, Hazan SL, Gyi K, Johnson MP, Johnson A, et al. (2000).
Routine prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies by FISH studies in high-risk pregnancies.
Am J Med Genet, 90:233-238.
- Handyslide AH, Delhanty JDA (1997).
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: strategies and surprises. Trends Genet,
13: 270-275.
- ISCN 1995: An international system for Human Cytogenetic
nomenclature, Mitelman F. ed., Basel: Karger.
- Jobanputra V, Kripalani
A, Chaudhry VP, Kucheria K (1998). Detection of chromosomal abnormalities using
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Natl Med J India, 11: 259-263.
- Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, et al. (1998). Delineation of individual
chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization
using recombinant DNA libararies. Hum Genet, 80:224-234.
- Okada
H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S, Kamidono S (2001). Fluorescence
in situ hybridization analysis of sex-chromosome mosaicism in azoospermic men.
J Androl, 22: 970-972.
- Roulston D, Beau MML (1997). Cytogenetic
analysis of hematologic malignant diseases. In: Barch MJ, Knutsen T, Spurbeck
(ed) : The AGT Cytogenetics Labor Manual, Third edition, The Association of Genetic
Technologists, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
- Schwartz S
(1993). Efficacy and applicability of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization
for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet, 92: 851-853.
- Vorsanova
SG, Iurov IUB, Solov'ev IV, Demidova IA, Sharonin VO, Male R, Zhiollant M, Beresheva
AK, Kolotii AD, Kravets VS, Ruazes ZH (2000). Current methods of molecular cytogenetics
in pre- and postnatal diagnosis of chromosome aberrations. Klin Lab Diagn,
8: 36-39.
- Whiteman DAH, Klinger K (1991). Efficiency of rapid in situ
hybridization methods for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities causing
birth defects. Am J Hum Genet, 49 (Suppl) : A1279.
Copyright
2002 - the Indian Society of Human Genetics
|