search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Human Genetics
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Society of Human Genetics
ISSN: 0971-6866 EISSN: 1998-362x
Vol. 11, Num. 1, 2005, pp. 39-43

Indian Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 11, No. 1, January-June, 2005, pp. 39-43

Original Article

Opportunity for natural selection among three endogamous subpopulations of Andhra Pradesh

Department of Human Genetics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam - 530 003

Correspondence Address: Department of Human Genetics, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam - 530 003, pvraju@rediffmail.com

Code Number: hg05006

ABSTRACT

The Crow's index of opportunity for natural selection has been calculated for three endogamous subpopulations namely Arya Vysya, Thrivarnika and Kalinga Vysya of North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. The total index is in the order Arya Vysya > Thrivarnika > Kalinga Vysya. However, the mortality component is more in Kalinga Vysya, reflecting the poor medical facilities available to them due to their low socio- economic profile compared to other two populations. The results of the present study are compared with those among the other caste populations of Andhra Pradesh.

Keywords: Fertility, mortality, Arya Vysya, Thrivarnika and Kalinga Vysya populations, Andhra Pradesh

INTRODUCTION

Selection is one of the important evolutionary factors, which brings about a change in the gene pool of a population. This change is brought about by differential fertility and differential mortality. Differential fertility and mortality are due to difference in genetic fitness of individuals which can be determined in terms of viable offspring produced by the individual.

Crow (1958)[1] devised the index of total selection which can be computed using the reproductive success of a population. The index assumes that the reproductive differentials are due to genotypic differences and fitness is completely heritable. In reality the effect of genetic component in differential fertility and mortality is rather small and reproductive outcome of an individual or population is the result of the interaction of a variety of sociocultural factors (Crow, 1966).[2] Therefore, the index sets an upper limit for the potential action of natural selection and is renamed as opportunity for natural selection. It has two components, due to differential fertility and differential mortality (Crow, 1972).[3] These two components determine the relative fitness of the populations. Later Johnston and Kensinger (1971) extended its scope to include prenatal mortality as the Crow′s method takes into consideration only postnatal mortality.

The object of the present work is to study the extent of variation provided for the natural selection to operate through differential mortality and also to find out the factors responsible for the variation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS 

The three populations, Arya Vysya, Thrivarnika and Kalinga Vysya are endogamous and according to Sherring (1881)[5] supposed to belong to one common stock. Arya Vysyas are distributed throughout Andhra Pradesh. Kalinga Vysyas are mostly spread in Srikakulam and Vijayanagaram districts whereas Thrivarnikas are small in number and spread in small pockets of Vijayanagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari and Warangal districts. Arya Vysyas are vegetarians whereas the other two populations are non-vegetarians. A detailed description of the three populations is given elsewhere (Lakshmi et al, 2002).[6]
Demographic information was collected from 846 married women (301 from Arya Vysya, 258 from Thrivarnika and 287 from Kalinga Vysya ). Out of these women, 183 Arya Vysya, 165 Thrivarnika and192 Kalinga Vysya women were found to have completed their reproductive life either by menopause or hysterectomy or permanent family planning measure such as tubectomy of the wife or vasectomy of the husband. A detailed schedule was used to collect the demographic data. Personal interview of both wife and husband of household were carried out. The women were requested to recollect the information about abortions and still births if any. They were assured that the information will not be revealed to anyone and not to conceal the information because of its significance in the present work. The information was cross checked with the husband and elders also in the case of joint families.

The indices of opportunity for natural selection are calculated after Crow (1958)[1] and Johnston and Kensigner (1971)[4] following the equations given below.

I = Im + If / Ps (Crow, 1958)[1]
Im = Pd / Ps
If = V / X2

where I is index of opportunity for total selection, Im is mortality component, Pd is proportion of deaths below 15 years of age, Ps is proportion of children surviving from birth to reproductive age, If is fertility component, V is variance in offspring number in completed sib-ship and X is mean number of live births per women who completed fertility.

I = Ime + Imc / Pb + If / Pb x Ps (Johnston and Kensinger, 1971)[4]
Ime  = Ped / Pb
Imc = Pd / Ps
If = V / X2

Where Ime is the index of selection due to prenatal mortality, Ped is the probability to die before birth and Pb is the probability to survive till birth. Imc is the index of selection due to postnatal mortality, Pd is proportion of deaths below 15 years of age, Ps is proportion of children surviving from birth to reproductive age. If is the index of selection due to fertility component, V is variance due to fertility and X is mean number of live births per women who completed fertility.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

[Table - 1] presents the parameters used in calculating the total selection intensity in the study populations. The mean number of live births is more in the case of Kalinga Vysya followed by Arya Vysya and Thrivarnika. The proportion of prenatal deaths is highest in Arya Vysya and least in Kalinga Vysya. The proportion of pre reproductive deaths is highest in Kalinga Vysya and least in Arya Vysya.

Both Crow′s and Johnston and Kensinger′s indices of selection intensity are presented in [Table - 2]. Crow′s and Johnston and Kensinger′s indices in the present study populations and other caste populations of Andhra Pradesh are given in [Table - 3] and [Table - 4] respectively for comparative study. When Crow′s index is considered the contribution of fertility component is more in all the three study populations and highest contribution is observed in Arya Vysya. The mortality component is highest in Kalinga Vysyas. It is well known that better medical facilities reduce the mortality component. There is considerable improvement of medical facilities in India in the last two decades. The Arya Vysya and Thrivarnika are fairly rich communities, which are conscious of health care. They can also afford medical and healthcare expenditure. These factors might have led to low mortality component among these populations. Most of the Kalinga Vysya are poor and hence a relatively higher mortality component.

The high post natal mortality in Kalinga Vysya may be due to the poor medical facilities available to them due to their low socioeconomic condition. According to Singh (1974),[7] the incidence of child mortality greatly depends upon social status, the higher the social status, the lower the incidence of mortality. The same is observed by Bharati (1981),[8] Rajani Kumari et al (1985),[9] Babu et al (1995),[10] Sengupta and Begum (1998),[11] Kapoor and Patra (2002)[12] and Dharanipriya et al (2003)[13] suggesting the influence of socioeconomic conditions. Kapoor et al (2003)[14] also found an inverse relationship between various indices (Im, If and IT) and social categories in their study of selection potential for 24 different Himalayan populations.

When compared to the other neighbouring caste populations (by omitting the populations whose sample size is <50), highest value of Crow′s index is observed in Kummari reported by Babu et al (1995).[10] Lowest value is observed in Jalari reported by Rajani Kumari et al (1985).[9] The genetic implications of these selective processes would be an increase in genetic load, especially inbreeding load and increase in fitness and genetic variation through fertility.

Reddy and Chopra (1990)[15] reviewed data on opportunity for natural selection (Crow′s index) in 96 Indian populations and analyzed them according to regional, habitat and socioeconomic backgrounds. It has been seen that the total index varies from 0.258 among a sub group of Yanadi tribe to 2.25 among the Kota. The It value of the present study populations are more towards the lower half of the range similar to the finding of Khongsdier (1994)[16] and Kapoor and Patra (1998).[17]

When the present Arya Vysya population is compared with the Vysyas reported by Rao and Murthy (1984)[18] there is a decline in the total index I (Crow′s index), with a decline in the mortality and increase in fertility components. This is in agreement with Sphuler′s review (1962, 1963, 1976)[19],[20],[21] of world wide data and studies at the National and State levels (Crow 1958,[1] 1972,[3] Jacquard and Ward, 1976,[22] Hed 1984[23] etc) which suggest that the effect of demographic transition on the opportunity for natural selection among the populations of industrialized nations are a marked reduction in the total index, a decline in selection due to pre reproductive mortality, an increase in the fertility index initially, followed by a gradual decline and increase in the relative contribution of fertility component to the total selection. It is interesting to observe the same trend in recently studied Brahmins (Sita Lakshmi, 2002)[24] when compared to earlier study on same population (Sree Krishna, 1989).[25]

Johnston and Kensinger index is also more due to fertility than the mortality components in Arya Vysya. But in Kalinga Vysya and Thrivarnika the contribution of mortality is more. As explained earlier, the high mortality component in Kalinga Vysya may be attributed to low education, poor medical facilities and poor economic status. The most interesting point is that the Thrivarnika have shown high mortality component despite good education, better economic position and better medical facilities. We have details of consanguinity among these populations. The inbreeding coefficients for autosomal and sex linked alleles are 0.0183 and 0.0253 respectively, among the Arya Vysya, 0.0248 and 0.0373 respectively among the Thrivarnika and 0.0233 and 0.0292 respectively among the Kalinga Vysya. The Thrivarnika is numerically smaller than the other two populations. Therefore a high incidence of consanguinity and recessive lethal factors might have been responsible for higher mortality component of Johnston and Kensinger index among the Thrivarnika. It should be mentioned here that one should be cautious in interpreting the Johnston and Kensinger index which may be highly influenced due to under reporting of prenatal mortality, especially in countries like India where literacy rate is low.

Three endogamous Vysya populations Arya Vysya, Thrivarnika and Kalinga Vysya from Andhra Pradesh are studied for selective differences in mortality and fertility. Prenatal deaths are more in Arya Vysya while pre reproductive deaths are more in Kalinga Vysya. A low mortality component of Crow′s Index in Arya Vysya and Thrivarnika and a relatively high component of mortality in Kalinga Vysya may be due to the relative differences in education, medical and healthcare and economic positions which are better in the Arya Vysya and Thrivarnika. The Thrivarnika are small in number and inbreeding coefficients are also high. Therefore recessive lethal factors may be responsible for a high component of prenatal mortality component of Johnston and Kensinger index among the Thrivarnika.

The total I is a measure of increase in fitness. Therefore it is a measure of the rate of evolution of the population. It is influenced by the socioeconomic conditions which include medical facilities. Therefore increase in medical facilities leads to survival of individuals suffering from genetic diseases for example invention and availability of insulin has greatly increased the survival of diabetes. This will lead to increase of genetic load in the populations. At the same time the diseased persons survive, marry and reproduce. Thus their fitness- measured through fertility performance - increases.-

Study of the same population over different periods are of much use to observe this trend. The studies of Brahmins by Sitalakshmi (2002) and Sree Krishna (1989) and the present study Arya Vysyas and Vysyas studied by Rao and Murthy (1984) exhibit the same trend.

REFERENCES

1.Crow JF. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol 1958;30:1-13.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Crow JF. The quality of people: Human evolutionary changes. Bioscience 1966;16:863-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Crow JF. Some effects of relaxed selection and mutation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Human Genetics. De GJ, Ebling FJG, Henderson IW, editors. 1972.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Johnston FE, Kensinger KM. Fertility and mortality differentials and their implications for micro-evolutionary change among Cashinahua. Hum Biol 1971;43:356-64.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Sherring MA. Hindu Tribes and Castes-The Brahminical Tribes of the Madras Presidency. Vol. II. Delhi: Cosmo Publications; 1881. p. 105-7.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Lakshmi N, Demarchi D, Veeraju P, Rao VT. Population structure and genetic differentiation among the sub-structured Vysya Caste population in comparison to the other populations of Andhra Pradesh, India. Ann Hum Biol 2002;29:538-49.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Singh KP. Child mortality, social status and fertility in India. Soc Biol 1974;21:385-8.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Bharati P. Economic condition and demography among the Mahishyas of Chakpota village, Howrah district, West Bengal. J Biosoc Sci 1981;13:345-6.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Rajani KJ, Srikumari CR, Rao TV. Variability of selection opportunities with changing sociocultural environments. Hum. Hered 1985;35:218-22.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Babu BV, Kusuma YS, Naidu JM. Opportunity for natural selection among four Andhra caste populations. J Hum Biol 1995;6:63-4.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Sengupta S, Begum S. Index of Opportunity for natural selection among the Sayed Muslim of Assam. J Hum Ecol 1998;9:95-7.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Kapoor AK, Patra PK. Raji-A food gatherer and hunter primitive tribe of Uttaranchal: A study of selection intensity 2002;4:253-6.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Dharani PB, Veerraju P, Rao VT. Selection intensity among Kshatriyas an endogamous population of Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Hum Genet 2003;9:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Kapoor AK, Kshatriya GK, Kapoor S. Fertility and mortality differentials among the population groups of the Himalayas. Hum Biol 2003;75;729-47.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Reddy BM, Chopra VP. Opportunity for natural selection among the Indian populations. Am J Phys Anthrop 1990;83:281-96.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Khongsdier R. Opportunity for Natural selection among the War Khasi of Meghalaya, India. J Hum Ecol 1994;5:307-10.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Kapoor AK, Patra PK. Selection intensity in a high altitude tribe of Central Himalayas. Ind Anthropol 1998;28:81-7.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Rao VV, Murty JS. Selection intensities and inbreeding among some caste groups of Andhra Pradesh, India. Soc Biol 1984;31:114-9.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Spuhler JN. Empirical studies on quantitative Human Genetics. In: Proceedings of UN/WHO seminar on the use of Vital and Health statistics for Genetic and Radiation studies. New York: United Nations; 1962.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Spuhler JN. The scope for natural selection in man. In: Genetic Selection in Man. Schull WJ, editor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1963.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Spuhler JN. The maximum opportunity for natural selection in some human populations. In: Demographic Anthropology: Quantitative Approaches. Zubro EBS, editor. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press; 1976.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Jacquard A, Ward RH. The genetic consequences of changing reproductive behaviour. J Hum Evol 1976;5:139-54.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Hed H. Opportunity for natural selection during the 17th-19th centuries in the Diocese of Linkoping as estimated with Crow's Index in a population of Clergy -men's wives. Hum Hered 1984;34:378-87.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Sita LD. A Study on Genetic Demography of Brahmins with Social Reference to Temporal Trends in Consanguinity and Consequences. Ph. D. Thesis. Visakhapatnam: Andhra University; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Sree KV. Genetic Diversity among Endogamous Subgroups of Brahmins.Ph.D thesis, Hyderabad: Osmania University; 1989.  Back to cited text no. 25    

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Human Genetics


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[hg05006t2.jpg] [hg05006t1.jpg] [hg05006t3.jpg] [hg05006t4.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil