About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News

The Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
ISSN: 1606-0997 EISSN: 2072-1315
Vol. 25, Num. 3, 2007, pp. 382-386
Untitled Document

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, Vol. 25, No. 3, September, 2007, pp. 382-386

Assessment of Effects of Pre- and Post-training Programme for Healthcare Professionals about Breastfeeding

Ruhuşen Kutlu1 , Fatih Kara2 , Yasemin Durduran2 , Kamile Marakoglu1 , Selma Çivi1

1 Department of Family Physician, Meram Medical Faculty, University of Selçuk, Konya, Turkey and 2 Provincial Health Administration, Konya, Turkey
Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to: Dr. Ruhuşen Kutlu, Selçuk Universitesi MeramTıp Fakültesi, Aile Hekimligi AD. 42080, Konya, Turkey, Email:, Fax: + 90 332 2236181

Code Number: hn07050 

This retrospective study assessed the effects of pre- and post-training programme for healthcare professionals about breastfeeding. The study included 3,114 mothers who had children aged 1-72 month(s). Their knowledge and behaviours relating to breastfeeding were evaluated. The mothers were randomly divided into two groups: the ‘before’ group included 2,000 women who were not informed about breastfeeding, and the ‘after’ group comprised 1,114 women who had been informed about breastfeeding. 56.2% and 66.1% of the mothers started breastfeeding within 30 minutes after delivery, respectively, in the before and the after group (χ2=29.31, p<0.001). 16.7% and 36.5% gave exclusive breastfeeding for six months (χ2=72.85, p<0.001), and 28.5% and 23.7% stopped breastfeeding within the first five months (χ2=17.20, p=0.002). Ninety-four percent delivered in a hospital or in a primary healthcare centre.Therefore, prenatal and postnatal breastfeeding education and support courses may improve a woman’s chance of starting and continuing to breastfeed her baby. In terms of the number of antenatal check-ups, since the differences between the two groups were significant (χ2=390.67, p=0.000), the importance of the training programme about breastfeeding was highlighted. Follow-up interventions after training are suggested.
Key words: Breastfeeding; Impact studies; Retrospective Studies; Training; Turkey


Benefits of breastfeeding for both mothers and babies have been well-documented (1). Breastfed babies are at a significantly reduced risk of gastrointestinal, urinary and respiratory infections, and breastfeeding enhances neurodevelopment, especially in premature infants. Breastfeeding also protects women from developing postpartum haemorrhage, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer (2).
Recognizing the health implications of appropriate breastfeeding practices, various breastfeeding-promotion and support strategies have been established worldwide with varying effects (3). This concern was reflected on a global scale when the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) launched the Baby-Friendly Initiative (BFI) in 1991, in response to the Innocenti Declaration 1990. Both physicians and nurses can significantly influence the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of mothers on the initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding, if health professionals themselves have adequate knowledge on the benefits of breastfeeding, a positive attitude, and the necessary clinical management skills for counselling (4).
In mid-2002, the Provincial Health Administration in Konya city organized a three-day training on the WHO/UNICEF guidelines of breastfeeding for all chiefs of paediatrics and gynaecological units in the state, the army, private and university hospitals. It was perceived that, after the training, these doctors would train the healthcare staff in their hospitals. In this context, we, the training team of this research, evaluated the breastfeeding knowledge and behaviours of mothers before and after the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) in Konya, Turkey. The main objective of the study was to evaluate whether the healthcare professionals changed their care practices with regard to provide breastfeeding information or support.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective review of breastfeeding outcomes at delivery-sites before and after a specific intervention of lactation education of health professionals. The study, organized by the Provincial Health Administration, was conducted during 15 June 2002–20 February 2004. Before 2002, the BFHI was unknown. In 2003, paediatricians, gynaecologists, family doctors, and nurses participated in a course on appropriate breastfeeding and the principles of BFHI. We evaluated the knowledge and behaviours of 3,114 mothers relating to the first initiation, duration of, weaning time, and factors affecting breastfeeding. Exclusively-breastfed infants received only breastmilk and no other liquids or solids, except vitamins, mineral supplements, or medicines. Weaning time means giving up ‘breastfeeding’ completely.
The participants were randomly chosen from among mothers who had babies aged 1-72 month(s) and who came to a medical institution for any reason. They were randomly divided into two groups. The first group, comprising 2,000 women, never attended a training programme on breastfeeding (the before group), and the second group comprised 1,114 women who participated in the training programme (the after group). Women were asked about their opinions about breastfeeding before the training of health staff. Then, all the health personnel participated in an educational programme related to supporting and protecting breastfeeding. The trained health personnel informed the mothers in the second group about breastfeeding after their delivery or during the vaccination of their babies.
The chi-square tests were used for assessing the statistical significance between the two groups. The p value of <0.05 was considered significant.


The mean ages of the mothers in the before group and the after group were 26.90 (SD±5.57) and 26.81 (SD±7.13) years respectively. Their age composition was similar (p>0.05). Table 1 presents their sociodemographic characteristics. Both the groups were comparable in terms of prenatal characteristics and the place of delivery (Table 2). Table 3 summarizes the breastfeeding characteristics. 56.2% and 66.1% of the mothers started breastfeeding in the first 30 minutes after delivery, respectively, in the before and the after group (χ2=29.31, p<0.001). 16.7% and 36.5% breastfed exclusively for six months (χ2=72.85, p<0.001). Breastfeeding was terminated within the first five months respectively by 28.5% and 23.7% of them (χ2=17.20, p=0.002). The percentage of mothers using an artificial nipple was higher in the before group (51.8%) than that in the after group (41.1%) (χ2=42.76, p<0.001).


Generally, breastfeeding is widespread, and family members in Turkey support it. Recently, under the management of the Provincial Health Administration, the healthcare personnel in the hospitals were trained. Prenatal support, hospital management, and subsequent paediatric and maternal visits are all important components of breastfeeding promotion (4).
In our study, most (92.2%) mothers were at middle/low educational level and were housewives. The rates of seven and more antenatal check-ups in the two groups were 26.0% and 44.3% respectively. This ratio was statistically higher in the second group than in the first group (χ2=390.67, p<0.001). Because of the mother’s instinct, the important experiences relating to rearing a baby, especially breastfeeding, are kept in mind and re-applied for their future babies. The rates of time of initiating breastfeeding within 30 minutes of delivery were 56.2% and 66.1% in the before and the after group respectively. The rate of breastfeeding initiation within the first 1-2 hour(s) of normal spontaneous delivery significantly showed a higher prevalence than cesarean section (p<0.001). Cesarean delivery had a negative effect on early and successful breastfeeding (4). Dewan et al. recommend that an attempt must be made to initiate lactation before the end of the first hour of birth following cesarean delivery (4). According to Merewood, in 2001, the mean initiation rate of breastfeeding in US baby-friendly hospitals was 84.8% compared to a national breastfeeding initiation rate of 69.5% (5). This rate is higher than that in our study.
When we asked about the type of breastfeeding, we found that the rates of breastfeeding whenever the baby demanded in the two groups were 89.7% and 92.7% respectively. The rates of breastfeeding with scheduled periods (i.e. every three hours or at fixed times whenever the mother plans) were 10.3% and 7.3% respectively. These findings are comparable with the recommended breastfeeding practices of WHO (6,7). In this study, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding for six months in the two groups were 16.7% and 36.5% respectively. The second rate was significantly higher than the first rate (χ2=72.85, p<0.001). Lack of knowledge and failure of training programmes decrease the rates of exclusive breastfeeding (8). According to Kramer et al., the exclusive breastfeeding rate at sixth months in the Republic of Belarus in 1997 was 7.9% (8). Durand M et al. reported that exclusive breastfeeding rates of a pre- and post-sample survey were 14.0% and 28.0% respectively. In the same study, the initiation rate of breastfeeding was 76.0% (9). In our study, this ratio was also significantly different (16.7% vs 36.5%) in the after group compared to the before group.
Before the BFHI project, there was no room for breastfeeding at the hospitals in Konya. Mothers breastfed and changed the diapers of their babies in the hospital’s hall and in front of the polyclinics. Implementation of the project resulted in many rooms for breastfeeding purposes in all the health facilities.
The rates of using artificial nipples in the two groups were 53.4% and 41.1% respectively. This ratio was significantly lower in the second group than in the first group. The use of an artificial nipple is an unhealthy habit (10). Unfortunately, the before group had a great tendency to use an artificial nipple.
Moreover, sharing of the same house with grandparents is a Turkish traditional custom; approximately 40% share the same house. Having a grandparent in the same house positively supports and encourages breastfeeding as an ideal form of nutrition for infants.
In our study, the weaning rate of breastfeeding within six months was significantly lower in the after group than that in the before group (χ2=17.20, p=0.002). As a result, breastfeeding knowledge, training experiences, and activities of healthcare professionals encouraged and helped women successfully to initiate and continue breastfeeding their babies.
Our results demonstrate that successful implementation of baby-friendly policies was associated with an increase in the rates of breastfeeding education. Breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes, and practices among healthcare professionals should be improved worldwide. Finally, if all mothers and all health personnel are aware of the benefits of breastfeeding, the percentage of improved health of children will increase.


The authors thank Z. Gözde Kutlu and Mustafa Tasbent for their help for reviewing the language of this article.


  1. Parker L. Breast-feeding and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:155-8.
  2. Earle S. Why some women do not breast feed: bottle feeding and fathers` role. Midwifery 2000;16:323-30.
  3. Moran VH, Bramwell R, Dykes F, Dinwoodie K. An evaluation of skills acquisition on the WHO/UNICEF Breastfeeding Management Course using the pre-validated Breastfeeding Support Skills Tool (BeSST). Midwifery 2000;16:197-203.
  4. Dewan N, Wood L, Maxwell S, Cooper C, Brabin B. Breast-feeding knowledge and attitudes of teenage mothers in Liverpool. J Hum Nutr Diet 2002;15:33-7.
  5. Merewood A, Philipp BL. Implementing change: becoming baby-friendly in an inner city hospital. Birth 2001;28:36-40.
  6. Young D. Baby-Friendly Expert Work Group in the United States: blowing the whistle. Birth 1995;22:59-62.
  7. Deshpande AD, Gazmararian JA. Breast-feeding education and support: association with the decision to breast-feed. Eff Clin Pract 2000;3:116-22.
  8. Kramer MS, Chalmers B, Hodnett ED, Sevkovskaya Z, Dzikovich I, Shapiro S et al. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): a randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. JAMA 2001;285:413-20.
  9. Durand M, Labarère J, Brunet E, Pons JC. Evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals about breastfeeding. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;106:134-38.
  10. Sinusas K, Gagliardi A. Initial management of breastfeeding. Am Fam Physician 2001;64:981-8.

© 2007 ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research

The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[hn07050t3.jpg] [hn07050t1.jpg] [hn07050t2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil