The Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition icddr,b ISSN: 1606-0997 EISSN: 2072-1315 Vol. 25, Num. 4, 2007, pp. 428-435

Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, Vol. 25, No. 4, December, 2007, pp. 428-435

Prevalence, Pathogenesis, Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles, and In-vitro Activity of Selected Medicinal Plants Against Aeromonas Isolates from Stool Samples of Patients in the Venda Region of South Africa

C.L. Obi¹, J. Ramalivhana², A. Samie², E.O. Igumbor²

¹College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of South Africa, PO Box 392, Sunnyside, Pretoria, UNISA 0003, South Africa and ²Department of Microbiology, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to: Prof. C.L. Obi , College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of South Africa, PO Box 392, Sunnyside, Pretoria, UNISA 0003, South Africa, Email: obicl@unisa.ac.za

Code Number: hn07057

ABSTRACT

The prevalence, pathogenic indices, such as haemolytic and haemagglutinating activities, antibiograms, and in-vitro activities of local medicinal plants against Aeromonas isolates in Vhembe district of Limpopo province, South Africa, were studied using standard microbiological methods. In total, 309 diarrhoeic stool samples were collected from patients attending five health centres in the region during December 2004-May 2005. Aeromonas species were identified using the API 20E system. The haemagglutinating and haemolytic activities of isolates on human, sheep, pig and chicken red blood cells were investigated. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of the isolates to several antibiotics and in-vitro activity of local medicinal plants were also ascertained using previously-reported schemes. Results showed that 104 (33.6%) of the 309 samples were positive for Aeromonas species, of which 89 (85.6%) were Aeromonas hydrophila, 12 (11.5%) A. sobria, and three (2.9%) A. caviae. All strains of A. hydrophila and A. caviae produced haemolysis on sheep blood, while eight of the 12 A. sobria strains were haemolytic on sheep blood. The haemolytic activities of the isolates were variable on other red blood cells tested. High level of resistance was observed to amoxicillin and ampicillin, followed by cefuroxime (79%), chloramphenicol (74%), and erythromycin (65%). The carbapenems were the most active drugs with only 7% resistance to meropenem and 11% to imipenem. About 12% of the isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin. The extracts of three of seven medicinal plants tested showed inhibitory activity against all Aeromonas isolates; these included acetone and hexane extracts of Pterocarpus angolensis, Syzygium cordatum, and Zornia milneana. The results suggest a high prevalence of Aeromonas species in the region. The isolates demonstrated multiple resistant profiles to different antibiotics tested. Some local medicinal plants were inhibitory to Aeromonas isolates, indicating a potential role in the management of Aeromonas-related infections. Structural elucidation of the active components may pave the way for the discovery of candidate templates for eventual drug design. Most isolates possessed important virulence characteristics based on their haemolytic and haemagglutinating ability. However, the genetic characterization of the isolates will further confirm their pathogenicity and the origin of multiple antibiotic resistance.

Key words: Aeromonas; Aeromonas hydrophila; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Microbial sensitivity tests; Plants, Medicinal; South Africa

Introduction

Aeromonas spp. are pathogenic in fish and several cold-blooded animals (1,2). Over the last few years, interest in Aeromonas spp. has gone beyond the boundaries of fish pathology due to the surge of diseases in humans caused by it. Seven Aeromonas spp., currently recognized as human pathogens, include Aeromonas hydrophila, A. caviae, A. veronii biovar sobria, A. veronii biovar veronii, A. jandaei,A. trota, and A. schubertii. Other species, such as A. eucrenophila, were incriminatedas acause of fluid accumulation in the rabbitileal loop test after serial passages, indicating a pathogenicpotential (3). It has also been demonstrated that at leastone strain of A. trota produces aerolysin (4). Although Aeromonas species are opportunistic pathogens for humans, studies have shown that they may also act as primary pathogens for humans in a number of infections (4).

Aeromonas spp. are distributed worldwide and have been implicated in various infections, including diarrhoeaand extraintestinal infections, such as septicaemia, wound infections,burn-associated sepsis, and respiratory tract infections (5-7).Aeromonads were implicated in cases of gastrointestinal infections in children and in wound infections (8-12).Although incriminated in several disease states, the mechanisms of pathogenicity of aeromonads are notclearly understood, and several virulence factors have been proposed.These include the production of endotoxins, extracellular enterotoxins, haemolysins, haemagglutinins, cytotoxins, proteases, and siderosphores and the ability to adhere to cells and possession of certain surface proteins (13,14). Studies have revealed the close association between the expression of a cell-free haemolysin by aeromonads and enterotoxigenic activity (13-15). Various studies also indicated that enterotoxigenic strains of Aeromonas strongly produce haemagglutinins (16,17). Therefore, haemolysis and haemagglutinating activities could be strong indicators of enterotoxigenicity by Aeromonas species in humans. 

Although infections due to Aeromonas may be self-limiting, treatment with antibiotics is generally necessary to curb the progression and persistence of the disease, particularly in vulnerable groups, such as the young, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. The growing antibiotic resistance of pathogenic bacteria worldwide is a compounding factor for the effective management of bacterial infections. An increase in antibiotic resistance of the genus Aeromonas, particularly to antibiotics, has been reported (1,17-19). Attempts have been made to elucidate the occurrence and persistence of antibiotic resistance among isolates but this was mainly on aquatic species (20,21). Relatively, low attention has been accorded to the study of antibiotic resistance among human isolates of Aeromonads, particularly in Africa. The need for the periodic monitoring of occurrence of Aeromonas-associated infections and their susceptibility to commonly-used antibiotics is urgent for effective healthcare delivery. The present study evaluated the prevalence, pathogenic indices, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and in-vitro activity of medicinal plants against Aeromonas isolates from diarrhoeic stool samples of patients attending five major health centres in Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa.

Materials and Methods

Study site and patients

The study was carried out in Vhembe district in the Venda region, Limpopo province of South Africa during December 2004-May 2005. Diarrhoeic stool samples were collected from patients attending the Donald Frazier, Elim, Tshilidzini, Siloam and Makhado hospitals.

Isolation and identification of Aeromonas spp. from stool samples

In total, 309 stool samples were collected and investigated for Aeromonas spp. Microscopic examination was done with methylene blue stain for faecal leucocytes, red blood cells, and mucus. The specimens were cultured using the method as previously described (14). Briefly, freshly-collected stool specimens were plated onto MacConkey agar and xylose deoxycholate citrate agar (XDCA). Faeces were enrinched in peptone water (pH 8.6) overnight at 37 ºC. Cultures were incubated at 37 ºC for 18-24 hours, after which non-lactose-fermenting colonies on MacConkey agar and non-xylose-fermenting colonies on XDCA were screened for the production of oxidase. Oxidase-positive colonies were subcultured onto nutrient agar plates. All oxidase-positive colonies were further confirmed as Aeromonas using the API 20E system (Analytab Product). Aeromonas isolates were identified to species level using the following tests: esculin hydrolysis, Voges-Proskauer, lysine decarboxylase, growth in potassium cyanide broth, oxidation of gluconate to 2-keto-gluconate, gas production from glucose and glycerol, acid production from cellobiose, mannose, and lactose, and cell-free activity against rabbit erythrocytes (Tables 1 and 2).

Determination of haemolytic activity

The previously-described methods were employed for haemolytic activity using sheep, human, horse, pig and chicken blood agar. A single colony of each isolate was streaked across blood agar plates using sterile inoculating wire loop. Plates were incubated at 37 ºC for 18-24 hours. After incubation, the haemolytic activities were determined by observing haemolysis on blood agar.

Determination of haemagglutination activity

The method of Atkinson and Trust was used for the detection of haemagglutinin (15). Erythrocytes were collected from human, horse, pig, and chicken into a bottle containing 5% EDTA and stored at 4 ºC. Before use, they were washed three times in a 0.04-M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with ph 7.4, and a 3% suspension was prepared in PBS. Colonies of overnight cultures of Aeromonas on nutrient agar plates were incubated in Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid Ltd., London, England) for 18 hours at 37 ºC. These cultures were centrifuged and washed twice in PBS. Haemagglutination tests were performed at room temperature by mixing 20 µL of erythrocyte suspension with 20 µL of bacterial suspension on a slide alongside a control suspension of erythrocytes and PBS and gently rocking by hand. Strains were considered haemagglutination-positive if agglutination occurred within five minutes and negative if agglutination was absent within this period.

Testing of antibiotic susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined using the disc-agar diffusion technique (12). Several antibiotics were tested and were obtained from Oxoid; these included: ciprofloxacin (5 µg), erythromycin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), chloramphenicol (10 µg), amoxacillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (110 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cephazolin (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), and ceftrizone (30 µg).Briefly, five pure colonies of each bacterial strain were inoculated into 2 mL of sterile Mueller-Hinton broth in bijou bottles and incubated at 37 ºC for six hours. The turbidity was adjusted to match a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard. A sterile cotton-tipped swab was dipped into the standardized bacterial suspension, and the swab was rotated against the wall of the tube above the liquid level to remove excess inoculum. The inoculum was swabbed on the entire surface of a Mueller-Hinton agar plate. The automatic disc dispenser, adjusted to dispense six antibiotic discs, was applied on the surface of the agar, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours.

Preparation of plants extracts and essential oils

The following medicinal plants were collected from the Venda region. Bauhinia galpinii (family Fabaceae), Carissa edulis (family Apocynaceae), Ficus sycomorus (familyMoraceae), Mormodica balsamina (family Cucurbitaceae), Syzygium cordatum (family Myrtaceae). Pterocarpus angolensis (family Fabaceae), Ximenia caffra (family Olacaceae),and Zornia milneana (family Papilionaceae).A 50-g sample of each ground material was soaked in 500 mL of methanol, acetone, or hexane for at least 72 hours with frequent shakings. The samples were suction-filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure, collected in 10 mL of the solvent, placed in the tube and allowed to dry at room temperature. A stock solution of 0.2 g/mL in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) was made for each extract. Essential oils were prepared by hydrodistillation for three hours using a Cleveland-type apparatus. All the extracts and essential oils were kept at 4 ^oC in the dark until further use as described (22).

Antimicrobial assay of plant extracts

The disc-diffusion method was used as described by Nostro et al. (22). Briefly, Mueller-Hinton agar was supplemented with 0.01% tween 80 to enhance the solubilization of oils and extract. 100 µL of 18-hour old culture of each test organism was spread on the agar plate and left for 30 minutes to dry. Whatman paper was used for preparing discs of 6-mm diameter and sterilized by autoclaving. The blank sterile discs were deposited on top of the seeded Mueller-Hinton agar and 15 µL (3 mg) of each extract or essential oil was added on top of the disc. The plate was incubated at 37 ^oC for 24 hours. All tests were performed in triplicates using 10 µL of 50 mg/mL gentamycin as a positive control and 15 µL (6%) of DMSO as a negative control. Each test was repeated four times, and the antibacterial activity was expressed as the mean of inhibition diameters (mm) produced by the plant extracts (23).

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration

Serial dilutions of the extracts and essential oils were made in microtitre wells with Mueller-Hinton broth (0.01% tween 80) to cover the range of 0.08 mg/mL to 12 mg/mL for a volume of 100 µL with a final concentration of 2.5% DMSO (Merck, Germany). A McFarland no. 1 standard suspension of test bacteria was made in Mueller-Hinton broth, from which 100 µL of the final inoculum containing approximately 1.5x10⁶ colony-forming units (CFUs) was used for filling each well to a final volume of 200 µL. Inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. One hour before the end of incubation, 40 µL of a 0.2% solution of iodo-nitro tetrazolium (INT) (Merck, Germany) was added to the wells, and the plate was incubated for another hour. Inhibition of growth was detected when the solution in the well was clear after incubation with INT. The assay was repeated three times. The lowest concentration of each extract showing no visible growth was recorded as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

Statistical analysis

The proportion difference was determined by the chi-square test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Isolation rate of Aeromonas

In total, 104 (33.66%) Aeromonas spp. were isolated from 309 samples screened. A breakdown of results showed that 89 (85.6%), 12 (11.5%), and three (2.9%) were A. hydrophilia, A. sobria, and A. caviae respectively. A. hydrophilia was the most frequently-isolated species, and the difference was significant (p<0.05). The isolation rates of Aeromonas species were higher among male than among female patients (p<0.05). A. hydrophila was most commonly isolated from the age-group of 11-15 years and 31-40 years in females. No Aeromonas spp. was isolated in the age-group of 6-10 years and above 51 years in males (Fig. 1).

Haemagglutinating and haemolytic activity

Haemagglutination activity of the Aeromonas strains tested showed 49% of activity against human red blood cells (HRBCs), 41% against sheep red blood cells (SRBCs), 26% against pig red blood cells (PRBCs), and 12% against chicken red blood cells (CRBCs) (Table 3). A. hydrophila demonstrated beta-haemolytic activity on all the red blood cells tested; 96%, 100%, 58%, and 85% to HRBCs, SRBCs, CRBCs, and PRBCs respectively; while A. sobria showed no haemolytic activity on HRBCs and SRBCs. All the A. caviae isolates showed beta-haemolysis on HRBCs and SRBCs (Table 4).

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Results obtained showed a high incidence of resistance of the isolates to several antibiotics (Fig. 2). Resistance to cephalosporins was variable: 34% to cefotaxime, 79% to cefuroxime, and 26% to cefepime. Resistance to meropenem (7%), imipenem (11%), and ciprofloxacin (12%) was less observed.

Medicinal plants

The results relating to the plant extracts are reported in Figure 3. Of eight extracts of eight different plants obtained, four exhibited activity against Aeromonas spp. isolates. Extracts of four plants showed little activity against the isolates with MIC of three mg/mL. The extracts of P. angolensis, S. cordatum, and Z. milneana using acetone and hexane as the extractant showed a significant inhibitory effect against all the strains of Aeromonas spp. tested.

Discussion

It has been reported that there is a great variability in the isolation and distribution of Aeromonas species from clinical samples, particularly from stool specimens (3).According to Maluping et al., Aeromonas spp. were responsible for more dysentery than Shigella species (24). Studies elsewhere revealed that 12.3% of 210 patients screened harboured Aeromonas spp. in their faeces (18). In the present study, 33% of the diarrheic stool samples examined were positive for Aeromonas spp. Although results of some studies showed that Aeromonas spp. were more prevalent in children aged less than five years, the present study recorded a higher occurrence in adults aged 21-50 years. The higher prevalence (33%) underlines the need to include Aeromonas spp. in the list of routinely-analyzed enteropathogens in all diarrhoeal stool samples as previously suggested (14). Our results showing the incrimination of A. hydrophila, A. sobria, and A. caviae in diarrhoeic cases are consistent with results of previous reports (1,2,7,17) and justify further studies, such as determination of pathogenic indices and antimicrobial activities.

In the present study, A. caviae and A. hydrophilia showed high haemolytic activity on human and sheep red blood cells. Several authors have shown that production of haemolysin is mainly associated with strains belonging to the phenospecies-A. hydrophila and A. sobria (13,14,17). However, in contrast to these reports, A. sobria isolates in this study showed no haemolytic effect on either sheep or human red cells. This indicates a variation in haemolytic activities of Aeromonas species and could be linked to the sources of the Aeromonas isolates. The present study investigated Aeromonas spp. in clinical samples, while previous authors studied environmental isolates, such as from water and food. These variations may indicate the need for detailed studies on the pathogenicity and relationships between environmental and clinical isolates of Aeromonas spp.

Haemolytic activity is an index of pathogenicity, and the relationship between the production of haemolysin and the enterotoxigenicity in Aeromonas is well-documented (14,15,17). The reported haemolytic activities of the isolates in the present study point to the potential pathogenic significance, although haemolytic activities varied with species.

Erythrocytes from small laboratory animals are more sensitive than human, horse, or sheep erythrocytes in Aeromonas haemoylsin and haemagglutinins assay (16). However, if the haemoylsin assay is to be used routinely in clinical laboratories to detect enteropathogenic aeromonads, small animals are not practical sources of erythrocytes because of difficulty in obtaining blood from these animals. The result of this study has demonstrated that human, horse, or sheep red blood cells may be adequate for haemolysin and haemagglutination assay of Aeromonas. This finding is in harmony with reports of other investigators (13,17). Although pig and chicken erythrocytes had not been previously reported to detect haemolytic and haemagglutinin activities of Aeromonas spp., they offer promise in the detection of haemagglutinating and haemolytic activities of Aeromonas species, as exemplified by results of this study.

Other major pathogenic features, such as cytotoxic enterotoxin (Act) and Type111 secretion system, had been described for Aeromonas (25) but were not investigated in the present study. A major observation of the present study was the demonstration of multiple antibiotic resistance among Aeromonas isolates. This poses a major public-health concern and calls for concerted efforts to unravel alternative sources of treatment. Medicinal plants offer such promise. Results have revealed the strong in-vitro activity of P. angolensis, S. cordatum, and Z. milneana against Aeromonas isolates. Medicinal plants are useful sources of drugs (26,27),and the majority of individuals in developing countries rely on their uses. Medicinal plants offer cheaper and more natural remedies to infections. Structural elucidation of the active components of the plants may be a prelude to the discovery of candidate drug templates for eventual drug designs and development.

It is concluded that diarrhoeagenic Aeromonas species were commonly encountered in the region studied and could be the cause of diarrhoea in both children and adults. Although species of Aeromonas studied showed haemagglutinating and haemolytic activities, these may not be conclusive of their pathogenicity. Other major pathogenic factors, such as heat-labile cytotoxin, heat-stable cytotoxin that have enterotoxic activities, will be the subject of another investigation.

In the empiric management of Aeromonas-related infections, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and imipenem may be effective as demonstrated by results on antibiograms. Further studies are needed to fully confirm the strong antimicrobial activity observed for P. angolensis, S. cordatum, and Z. milneana against Aeromonas isolates.

References

1. Sinha S, Shimada T, Ramamurthy T, Bhattacharya SK, Yamasaki S, Takeda Y et al. Prevalence, serotype distribution, antibiotic susceptibility and genetic profiles of mesophilic Aeromonas species isolated from hospitalized diarrhoeal cases in Kolkata, India. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:527-34.
2. Altwegg M, Geiss HK. Aeromonas as a human pathogen. Crit Rev Microb 1989;16:253-86.
3. Janda JM, Abbott SL. Evolving concepts regarding the genus Aeromonas: an expanding panorama of species, disease presentations, and unanswered questions. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:332-44.
4. Ormen O, Ostensvik O. The occurrence of aerolysin-positive Aeromonas spp. and their cytotoxicity in Norwegian water sources. J Appl Microbiol 2001;90:797-802.
5. Singh DV, Sanyal SC. Enteropathogenicity of Aeromonas jandaei and A. trota. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1997;17:243-50.
6. Taneja N, Khurana S, Trehan A, Marwaha RK, Sharma M. An outbreak of hospital acquired diarrhea due to Aeromonas sobria. Indian Pediatr 2004;41:912-6.
7. Martins LM, Marquez RF, Yano T. Incidence of toxic Aeromonas isolated from food and human infection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2002;32:237-42.
8. Vally H, Whittle A, Cameron S, Dowse GK, Watson T. Outbreak of Aeromonas hydrophila wound infections associated with mud football. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:1084-9.
9. Kienzle N, Muller M, Pegg S.Aeromonas wound infection in burns. Burns 2000;26:478-82.
10. O'Ryan M, Prado V, Pickering LK. A millennium update on pediatric diarrheal illness in the developing world. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2005;16:125-36.
11. Obi CL, Bessong PO. Diarrhoeagenic bacterial pathogens in HIV-positive patients with diarrhoea in rural communities of Limpopo province, South Africa. J Health Popul Nutr 2002;20:230-4.
12. Obi CL, Coker AO, Epoke J, Ndip R. Aeromonas and Plesiomonas species as bacterial agents of diarrhoea in urban and rural areas of Nigeria: antibiogram of isolates. Cent Afr J Med 1995;41:397-403.
13. Kudinha T, Tswana SA, Simango C. Virulence properties of Aeromonas strains from humans, animals and water. South Afr J Epidemiol Infect 2000;15:94-7.
14. Monfort P, Baleux B. Haemolysin occurrence among Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas caviae and Aeromonas sobria strains isolated from different acquatic ecosystems. Res Microbiol 1991;142:95-102.
15. Atkinson HM, Trust TJ. Hemagglutination properties and adherence ability of Aeromonas hydrophila. Infect Immun 1980;27:938-46.
16. Handfield M, Simard P, Couillard M, Letarte R. Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from food and drinking water: hemagglutination, hemolysis, and cytotoxicity for a human intestinal cell line (HI-29). Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:3459-61.
17. Albert MJ, Ansaruzzaman M, Talukder KA, Chopra AK, Kuhn I, Rahman M et al. Prevalence of enterotoxin genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from children with diarrhea, healthy controls, and the environment. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3785-90.
18. Palu AP, Gomes LM, Miguel MA, Balassiano IT, Queiroz ML, Freitas-Almeida AC et al. Antimicrobial resistance in food and clinical Aeromonas isolates. Food Microbiol 2006;23:504-9.
19. Ghenghesh KS, El-Ghodban A, Dkakni R, Abeid S, Altomi A, Abdussalam T et al. Prevalence, species differentiation, haemolytic activity, and antibiotic susceptibility of aeromonads in untreated well water. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2001;96:169-73.
20. Saavedra MJ, Guedes-Novais S, Alves A, Rema P, Tacão M, Correia A et al. Resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics in Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Int Microbiol 2004;7:207-11.
21. Imziln B. Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of mesophilic Aeromonas in three riverine freshwaters of Marrakech, Morocco. Sci World J 2001;1:796-807.
22. Nostro A, Germano MP, D'angelo V, Marino A, Cannatelli MA. Extraction methods and bioautography for evaluation of medicinal plant antimicrobial activi-
    ty. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000;30:379-84.
23. Eloff JN. A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Med 1998;64:711-3.
24. Maluping RP, Lavilla-Pitogo CR, DePaola A, Janda JM, Krovacek K, Greko C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas spp., Vibrio spp. and Plesiomonas shigelloides isolated in the Philippines and Thailand. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005;25:348-50.
25. Rebecca S, Wong Y, Chow AW. Identification of enteric pathogens by heat shock protein 60 kDa (HSP60) gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002;206:107-13.
26. Fennell CW, Van Staden J. Crinum species in traditional and modern medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2001;78:15-26.
27. Fabricant DS, Farnsworth NR. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109(Suppl 1):69-75.

© 2007 ICDDR,B: Centre for Health and Population Research

The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images