|
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, Vol. 10, No. 1, January-March, 2005, pp. 41-43 Original Article Role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of children with acute abdomen in the emergency set-up Aviral, Chana R.S., Ahmad Ibne Pediatric Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, J.N.M.C., Aligarh Code Number: ip05010 Abstract Background: Acute abdomen in children has been aptly described as Pandora's box. Unlike computerized tomography (CT scan), ultrasonography (USG) has no radiation hazard and the present study analyses the diagnostic yield of the USG in acute abdomen in children.
Key words: Acute abdomen, sonography, laparotomy, sensitivity INTRODUCTION Acute abdomen can be defined as "A syndrome induced by wide variety of pathological conditions that require emergent medical or more often surgical management". There are a plethora of cases ranging from benign conditions like viral gastroenteritis to intussusception that can lead to acute abdomen in children. This vivid etiology, the occult nature of disease and difficulties encountered in examining these children prompted surgeons to look for some reliable diagnostic adjuncts for accurately diagnosing the intra-abdominal pathology in order to prevent negative celiotomies; which is not uncommon in children. Materials and methods During a period from September 2001 to October 2003, 75 patients (<15 yrs) presented with acute abdomen in the surgical emergency section of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College were included in this prospective study. There were 49 males (65.33%) and 26 females (44.67%), their mean age was 6.5 years (age range 6 days-13 years ) and 7.9 years (age range 9 months-15 years ) respectively.Clinical Diagnosis: All patients underwent routine workup consisting of history, clinical examination by the attending surgeon and hematological investigations during the first hour after admission; on the basis of these a clinical diagnosis was made by the senior most surgeon of emergency team with more than three years of experience in abdominal surgery. The conventional plain radiograph abdomen/chest were taken routinely. Diagnosis after Ultrasound: Immediately after the radiography abdomen, the attending ultrasonologist did an ultrasound using Logic 500 proseries GE machine or ADARA (Siemens) machine using a 50-90 MHz curved/ linear array probe in the emergency. Final Diagnosis: If the diagnosis was still uncertain after the basic investigations and ultrasound, supplementary investigations including barium examination, intravenous pyelograms, CT scanning etc were done to reach the final diagnosis. The final diagnosis was based on the investigations made, the clinical course, the intraoperative finding and histopathological examination in relevant cases. Results Acute abdominal pain was the most common symptom (88.6%) followed by fever (56%) and vomiting (50.67%). Tenderness of abdomen (90.67%) was the commonest sign followed by abdominal distention (72%) and rigidity / guarding (56%) of abdomen. The final diagnosis of the 75 patients are listed in [Table - 1]. Of the 75 patients, 45 patients were correctly diagnosed by the clinical examination alone (60%). Similarly when ultrasound was used as the only diagnostic modality then 50 patients (66.6%) were correctly diagnosed. When clinical examination was combined with radiography, diagnosis was established in 48 patients (64%). However, when clinical evaluation, radiography abdomen and ultrasound abdomen all were combined; then diagnosis was established in 74 patients (98.67%). In one patient, no conclusive diagnosis could be established even after additional diagnostic work-up. Use of ultrasound in the diagnostic workup of children with acute abdomen
led to a change in the management plan in significant number of patients.
Pre-ultrasonography, surgery was planned in 62 patients (82.67%) but after ultrasonography surgical intervention incidence decreased to 52 patients (69.33%), thus management plan was changed in 10 patients (16.33%). Discussion Conventionally plain radiograph of the abdomen/ chest are used as a first diagnostic modality in children with acute abdomen presenting in the emergency. In our study we found plain radiograph to be diagnostic in 32% of cases only. Similarly in another study (5) plain radiograph was found to be diagnostic in 35% of cases. Thus, in more than 50% of cases it is non-specific. Because of the diagnostic limitations of plain film of the abdomen, any cross-sectioning technique, such as sonography or Computed Tomography (CT), is likely to provide more and sometimes entirely different information about acute abdominal pathology. Computed Tomography, since its advent has established its effectiveness
as well as its efficacy in the diagnosis of certain acute abdominal conditions.
Wittenberg and his coworkers[7] in
their study found that CT made a substantial contribution to diagnostic
understanding in 41% of the patients, change in therapeutic plans in 17% and improved precision of previously planned therapy in 10%.
Finberg et al.[8] also showed
that 53% of CT examinations produced a substantial or unique contribution to diagnostic understanding and 15% contributed
to a change in treatment. However, CT has certain drawbacks, the equipment
is bulky, non-mobile, the procedure is time consuming, it requires sedation
and is sometimes difficult to interpret in children. These factors limit
its use in emergency settings. Emergency sonography has shown similar results
in the diagnostic work-up of children with acute abdomen. Surgery was planned in 82.67% patients prior to performing ultrasound but after performing it the need for surgical intervention decreased to 69.33% of patients. Thus ultrasonography changed the management plan in 16.13% of patients. These patients did not require any surgical intervention and responded well to the conservative treatment. Walsh et al[10] and Davis et al[11] in their studies also found the change in the plan of management in 11-22% of cases. Nothing can replace the clinical acumen of the physician, ultrasonography should however be used as an adjunct to the clinical evaluation and plain abdominal radiographs rather than replacing them as it adds to useful diagnostic information in 34.67% of patients. It will lead to faster diagnosis and earlier institution of necessary operative or radiological intervention procedures. Also it significantly changes the management plan in about 16% of patients thereby lowering not only the financial outlay for managing the acute abdominal pathology but also the mortality and morbidity rates in these patients with acute abdomen who otherwise would have undergone unnecessary laparotomies. References
Copyright 2005 - Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[ip05010t1.jpg] |
|