|
Indian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 65, No. 2, March-April, 2003, pp. 195-197 Case Report Axillary venous thrombosis following hyperabduction of shoulder K. V. Shanmugha Das, Ajo K. John and S. Vaidyanathan Department of Surgery, Medical College Hospital, Kottayam 686 008.
Paper Received: June 2001, Paper Accepted: November 2001. Source of Support: Nil Code Number: is03039 ABSTRACT We report a case of axillary venous thrombosis in a 30-year-old-man, sustained after hyperabduction of the shoulder during a fall from height. KEYWORDS: Thrombosis, axillary, venous, shoulder, hyperabduction How to cite this article: Das KVS, John A, Vaidyananthan S. Axillary venous thrombosis following hyperabduction of shoulder. Indian J Surg 2003;65:195-7. INTRODUCTION Venous thrombosis in the upper limb is relatively rare. The main causes of such thrombosis include anatomical abnormalities in the costoclavicular area, trauma, injuries sustained during central venous catheterization (CVC), use of intravenous drugs, and hypercoagulable states. We describe a case of right axillary venous thrombosis following hyperabduction of the shoulder during a fall from height. CASE REPORT A 30-year-old man presented with progressive pain and swelling of the right upper arm of two weeks duration. Some six weeks earlier, he had fallen from a tree when his shoulder had been hyperabducted with considerable force. There was no other contributory medical history. Clinical examination revealed a few dilated veins in the proximal part of the arm, which became more prominent during Valsalva's manoeuvre. The right upper limb showed normal arterial pulses and there was no neurological deficit or bony injury. A venogram showed intraluminal filling defects in the distal part of the axillary vein (Figure 1), diagnostic of thrombosis. Other investigations including x-rays of the right shoulder and chest, computerized tomography of the upper chest, coagulation and haematological profiles were normal. The patient was treated with intravenous heparin for 10 days and then maintained on oral warfarin for 6 weeks. A repeat venogram at the conclusion of the oral anticoagulant therapy (Figure 2) showed complete recanalization of the axillary vein and development of collateral circulation. DISCUSSION Venous thrombosis occurring in the upper limb accounts for about 2 per cent of all cases of deep venous thrombosis.1 It can be primary `effort' thrombosis related to the inherent anatomical structure of the thoracic outlet and axillary region or secondary to trauma, infection, congestive cardiac failure, CVC, neoplasms, septic phlebitis, intravenous drug use and hypercoagulable states.1-6 Zabroszky reported a case of axillary venous thrombosis following a blunt injury with a fractured clavicle.7 A literature search failed to reveal any previous cases of axillary vein thrombosis following hyperabduction of the shoulder. The clinical presentation of major venous thrombosis in the upper limb usually presents with oedema of the upper limb, prominence of superficial veins and neurological symptoms. The diagnosis is confirmed by either duplex ultrasonography or contrast venography1-4, 6-7 A survey of relevant surgical literature indicates that radionuclide venography using 99mTC-DTPA is the investigation of choice for diagnosing axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis, with venography being reserved for only when surgery is contemplated.8 The treatment options for axillary venous thrombosis include conservative therapy, anticoagulants, catheter-mediated thrombolysis and surgical intervention to remove the intravascular clot or to revise the anatomy of the abnormal costoclavicular space. Patients with axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis due to intrinsic damage (drug use, CVC, hypercoagulable states) require only anticoagulation therapy whereas those with extrinsic obstruction require correction of the surgical pathology as well.4-,7,9 An anticoagulation therapy includes heparin for one to two weeks followed by oral warfarin for a period of one week to five years.6 There is no consensus on the duration of anticoagulation therapy in individual cases. In our case as no anatomical abnormality existed in the costoclavicular area, which could have acted as a causative factor for the thrombosis, we believe that the thrombosis may have been initiated due to intimal damage to the axillary vein during the forceful hyperabduction of the shoulder. REFERENCES
Copyright 2003 - Indian Journal of Surgery. Also available online at http://www.indianjsurg.com The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[is03039f1.jpg] [is03039f2.jpg] |
|