search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Surgery
Medknow Publications on behalf of Association of Surgeons of India
ISSN: 0972-2068
Vol. 66, Num. 3, 2004, pp. 164-168

Indian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 66, No. 3, June, 2004, pp. 164-168

Original Article

Removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous polyps improves outcome of anal fissure surgery

Consulting Proctologist, Gupta Nursing Home, D/9, Laxminagar, Nagpur-440022
Correspondence Address:Consulting Proctologist, Gupta Nursing Home, D/9, Laxminagar, Nagpur-440022 drpjg@nagpur.dot.net.in

Code Number: is04040

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The presence of Hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps are often ignored in the proctology practice. But the experience is that they tend to produce minor but disturbing symptoms. This study is aimed to assay the impact and utility of attending to these two conditions concurrently while dealing with cases of fissure in ano. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A study was carried out in 136 patients of chronic anal fissure having concomitant hypertrophied anal papillae or fibrous anal polyp. After relieving sphincter spasm by sphincterotomy, the polyps or papillae were destroyed using the radio frequency device. A comparison was made for the associated complaints like pruritus, pricking sensation, wetness, crawling in the anus etc. before and after removal of the papillae or polyps by an independent observer blinded to the procedure. RESULTS: After one month of the procedure, the associated symptoms were reduced to a significant amount along with a near total decline in the primary complaints of pain and bleeding. There was significant reduction in pruritus (P=0.0003), discharge per anus (P=0.0006), crawling sensation in the anus (P=0.0004) and sense of incomplete evacuation (P=0.001) At the follow up after 18 months, only 9% patients had recurrence of either anal fissure or symptoms like pruritus. CONCLUSION: This study establishes that removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous polyps should be carried out as a routine during surgical treatment of anal fissure. This would add to effectiveness and completeness of the procedure.

INTRODUCTION

Anal papillae,[1] which are also called as anal fibroma, papillitis hypertrophicans, or "cat tooth", are the fine points of projections of the extreme upper end of anal canal skin at the mucocutaneous junction.

Small Papillae remain usually asymptomatic. An elongated anal papilla associated with pain and/or bleeding at defecation is sometimes encountered in infancy. Hemorrhage into a hypertrophied anal papilla can cause sudden rectal pain. A prolapsed papilla may become nipped by contraction of the sphincter mechanism after defecation.[2] Occasionally, a red edematous papilla is encountered with local pain and a purulent discharge from the associated crypt. This condition2 is called as ′papillitis′ with `cryptitis.′

The enlargement of the existing anal papillae is a consequence of a chronic inflammatory process and fibrotic proliferation within the range of the Linea dentata, the ano rectal zone and the distal rectal mucosa. The hypertrophied anal papillae are prone to undergo considerable fibrous thickening to acquire a rounded expanded tip, which is then known as a fibrous polyp.[3] Occasionally the occurrence of hypertrophied anal papillae is reported after operational interferences in the anal region.

Dilated vein, white area and a large hypertrophied anal papilla are often found in prolapsing types of hemorrhoids.[4] In the literature, the prevalence of these papillae varies between 6% and 60% of all anoscopically-examined patients.[5] They are equally found in both the sexes. The anal papillae, if get hypertrophied or are converted into anal polyps, can produce a foreign body feeling and discharge from the anus. Subsequently, a toxic irritative anal eczema may develop.

Histologically, the papillae consists of an edematous, loosened up, fibrotic connective tissue in parts, with increase in capillary contents. Occasionally akanthosis and widened disk epithelium may be seen, but they never proceed to malignant degeneration.[6]

The papillae and polyps should be differentiated from subanodermal anal venous thrombosis, condyloma, and rectal adenoma.[7]

Patients with fibrous polyp complain of projection of something inexplicable from the anus. A case of giant hypertrophied anal papilla complicated by massive anal bleeding and prolapse is reported.[8]

The objective of this study was to demonstrate that hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps are responsible for minor but disturbing complaints on the part of the patient and hence should necessarily be attended to and be removed during surgical treatment of anal fissure and further that they can conveniently be removed by the radio frequency surgical device.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This non-randomized study was conducted at Fine Morning Hospital and Gupta Nursing Home, Nagpur, India, between July 1999 and December 2000.

In all, 136 patients of chronic fissures in ano with hypertrophied anal papillae and/or fibrous polyp were studied. All the patients under study had hypertrophied anal papillae. The numbers of papillae were ranging from 2 to 4 [mean of 3.2]. The papillae, which felt on digital examination, were considered ′large′. Papillae, which were not palpable and were visible only on anoscopy, were termed ′small′ papillae.

In 17 of the studied patients, anal polyp was found in association. 16 of these patients had a single polyp while in one patient, there were two. Out of these, 11 patients had polyps of prolapsing type, which used to project out during defecation and getting reduced spontaneously after the act. The remaining 6 were of non-prolapsing type.

Exclusion criteria
Only those patients of chronic fissure in ano who had associated anal papillae or fibrous polyps or both were selected. This was irrespective of the age, sex, or duration of pathology. Patients suffering from fissure but not having hypertrophied papillae or polyp were excluded from the study. This assessment was carried out using a pediatric anoscope after instilling a 5% lidocain ointment in the anal canal to reduce the pain during examination. Similarly, patients having associated sentinel piles, internal bleeding hemorrhoids were not considered.

An informed consent was obtained from all the patients. No special pre operative preparation was carried out. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and was carried out according to the declaration of Helsinki. All of the patients received a dose of laxative [Lactulose 20ml] on the night before the procedure.

Radio frequency surgery for the hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps.

Few surgeons practice removal of the papillae or polyps by snipping them with scissors or shaving them with scalpel or electrocautry after being crushed.[9] We, instead, have used the radio frequency technique to effectively destroy these papillae and polyps.

Radio frequency surgery is a method of simultaneous cutting and coagulating of the tissues.10 We used a dual radio frequency generator 4 MHz from Ellman International, Hewlett, N.Y. for this procedure.

An interchangeable ball electrode for coagulation and a round loop electrode for shaving the desired tissue were extensively used in the procedure.

Procedure
To begin with, lateral subcutaneous internal sphincterotomy was done in a short general anaesthesia with a muscle relaxant to relieve the spasm. This was followed by anoscopy to locate the anal polyp or papillae. Small papillae were directly coagulated with the ball electrode kept on the coagulation mode of the radio frequency unit.

The commonest sites where the papillae were seen were at 3, 7 and 11′O clock position with the patient in a lithotomy position. The next common sites were at 1, 5 and 9′O clock.

The base of large papillae and fibrous polyp were circumferentially coagulated by the ball electrode first and then they were excised by the round loop electrode of the radio frequency surgical unit. Minor bleeding, when encountered, was coagulated by touching the source with the ball electrode. This additional procedure of removal of papillae or polyps took a mean period of 2 minutes to complete.

The patients were given analgesics [Ketoprofen 250 mg twice a day] for a week and were prescribed a stool softener [Lactulose 15 ml at bed time] for a month. All the patients were discharged within 12 hours of the procedure. They were reviewed after 30 days.

Comparative study
An independent observer, blinded to this study noted down the symptoms in a questionnaire form especially prepared for this study. This included symptoms like itching, feeling of uneasiness in the anal canal, discharge, sense of incomplete evacuation, crawling sensation and prolapse. These complaints were noted down in each of the patients before and after the procedure.

Statistical analysis
Data were entered in to a database and analyzed using statistical software (Graph pad Software, San Diego, CA). An unpaired student′s t-test was used to measure pre and postoperative parameters. The level of statistical significance between groups was set at 5 per cent.

RESULTS

After one month, anoscopy showed total absence of these papillae. The fissures were healed and there was no sphincter spasm. Patients who were treated for fibrous polyps did have some amount of oedema and mild elevation at the site of destruction.

17 patients [12.5%] complained of postoperative bleeding which was minor, streaking the stool and lasted for a maximum period of four days.

The comparison of the findings at a follow up after 1 month is given in [Table - 1].

Subsequent follow up after 18 months
18 patients [13%] were lost to follow up. In the remaining 118 patients, 3 patients [2.5%] had recurrence of the fissure. 7 patients [6%] complained of pruritus. Out of these, 4 patients were found to have developed anal papillae. But none of the patients treated for anal polyp had any recurrence. Most of the associated complaints like feeling of uneasiness, discharge and sense of incomplete evacuation, crawling sensation, and prolapse were reported absent.

DISCUSSION

Anal papillae are present in almost 50-60% patients examined. Usually, these are small, cause no symptoms, and could be regarded as normal structures.[11]

However, if it is a case of hypertrophy and if the papillae start projecting in the anal canal, it requires attention and suitable treatment. In such cases, it may lead to increased mucus leak resulting in increased anal moisture. They are liable to cause trauma during the passage of stool and may become inflamed. In addition, when papilla is converted into a fibrous polyp, it gives rise to symptoms like prolapse, which may require frequent manual repositioning. The polyp is considered as one of the differential diagnosis of rectal prolapse.[12] Symptoms like pruritus,[13] foreign body sensation, pricking, a sense of incomplete evacuation and heaviness in the anal region have also been reported by the patients.

As a routine practice, these pathologies are not given any importance.[14] There is very brief account of this entity in the standard textbooks and other references. Secondary goals of fissure surgery sometimes require the removal of hypertrophied papilla and skin tag as well as the removal of inflammatory and fibrotic tissue surrounding the fissure.[15] Customarily, for symptomatic papillae or polyp, its removal by crushing the base, excision after ligation or electrocautrization has been suggested. We have instead, used the radiofrequency device to successfully tackle these pathologies.

Radio frequency surgery, not to be confused with electro surgery, diathermy, spark-gap circuitry, or electrocautry, uses a very high frequency radio wave.

Unlike electrocautry or diathermy, the electrode releasing radiofrequency waves remains cold. This is possible because of use of very high frequency current of 4 MHz, as compared to 0.5 to 1.5 MHz used in the electrocautry, which produces greatest amount of tissue alteration. In contrast to true cautery, which causes damage similar to 3rd degree burns, the tissue damage that does occur in radio frequency surgery is superficial and is comparable to that which occurs with Lasers. Histologically, it has been shown that tissue damage with radio frequency surgery is much less than that of a conventional scalpel and practically equals the one caused by a cold scalpel.[16]

The radio frequency device offers several unique advantages over conventional surgical modalities. It provides for a controlled balance in simultaneously cutting and coagulating through a single instrument.[17] Since it is used in direct contact with tissues, the surgeon gets the tactile feedback and continues to exert the same familiar and confident control over the job as is experienced during the traditional knife technique. The technique has a self-sterilizing effect and leaves behind a bacteria free zone around the place of application. The radiofrequency device allows cutting and coagulation of tissues in an atraumatic manner, contrary to the electric bistoury. The advantages of radiofrequency over electrocautery and laser energy surgery reside in its precision in ablating tissues and in its control of operation. With radiofrequency, the targeted tissue temperatures stay localized within a 60-900C range thus limiting heat dissipation and damage to adjacent tissue. In contrast, electrocautery, diathermy, and laser temperatures are significantly higher (750-9000C) which result in significant heat propagation in excess of the desired therapeutic need. These differences allow for radiofrequency being found more accurate, minimally invasive and less morbid without compromising the treatment efficacy and durability.

While techniques using conventional scalpel apparently works in an atraumatic way, the prominence of bleeding from the wound forces the surgeon to coagulate the bleeders with traditional electrocautery or diathermy more frequently than radiofrequency. The radio waves can seal the small blood vessels without creating any char, whereas the cautery or elcetrosurgical instruments create heat at the tip of the instruments to seal the affected portion with transferred heat, and in the process invariably damage the adjacent healthy tissues, which consequently cause more edema and postoperative pain.

Anal papillomata tend to produce a discharge resulting in a sodden perianal skin with itching and discomfort. Wallis believed that hypertrophied anal papillae played an important part in the etiology of pruritus ani. A large papilla that projects at the anus might conceivably interfere with proper anal closure and thus predispose to leakage of mucus, which could lead to pruritus. Hypertrophied anal papilla should be included in the differential diagnosis of a smooth mass located near the anal verge, especially in a patient with a history of chronic anal irritation or infection.18 The presence of a fibrous anal polyp is shown to have a statistically significant association with operative treatment.[19]

Though we have used the radiofrequency equipment to tackle these pathologies, we do not intend to promote the same. The procedure can also be carried out with sharp excision with scissors or electrocautery. The equipment used by us is significantly more expensive that other methods.

We, nevertheless, admit that the associated symptoms found in patients of anal fissure are partly due to the primary disease itself and are partly getting alleviated after the treatment of fissure. A prospective and randomized comparative study between removal and no removal of the papillae and polyps would have been more conclusive of this contention. But after comparing the symptoms before and after removal of the papillae and polyps, it seems that these pathological lesions too were also responsible for the minor but disturbing complaints. Their removal had definite therapeutic benefits,20 which results in improved patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

In our considered opinion, removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and polyps encountered during surgical treatment of chronic fissure in ano would add to effectivity of the procedure, better patient compliance and a sense of job satisfaction.

REFERENCES

1.Lenhard B. Guideline on the disease picture of hypertrophic anal papilla. Hautarzt 2002;53:104-5.   Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  
2.Williams NS. The anus and anal canal. In: Mann CV, Russell RCG, Williams NS, (Ed). Bailey and Love's short practice of surgery. 22nd (Ed). London: Chapman and Hall 1995:871.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Schinella RA. Stromal atypia in anal papillae. Dis Col Rectum 1976;19:611-3.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Sadahiro S, Mukai M, Tokunaga N, Tajima T, Makuuchi H. A new method of evaluating hemorrhoids with the retroflexed fiberoptic colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:272-5.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
5.Schutte AG, Tolentino MG. A second study of anal papillae Dis Col Rectum 1971;14:435-50.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  
6.Schutte AG, Tolentino MG. A study of anal papillae Dis Col Rectum 1962;5:217-23.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Groisman GM, Polak Charcon S. Fibro epithelial polyps of the anus: A histologic, immuno-histochemical, and ultra structural study, including comparison with the normal anal sub epithelial layer. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:70-6.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Kusunoki M, Horai T, Sakanoue Y, Yanagi H, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Giant hypertrophied anal papilla. Case report. Eur J Surg 1991;157:491-2.   Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  
9.Wehrli H. Etiology, pathogenesis and classification of anal fissure. Swiss Surg 1996;1:14-7.  Back to cited text no. 9  [PUBMED]  
10.Pfenninger JL. Modern treatments for Internal Hemorrhoids. BMJ 1997;26,314:1211-2.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Golighar J, Duthie H, Nixon H. Hemorrhoids or piles. In: Surgery of the anus rectum and colon. 5th (Ed), London: Bailliere Tindall 1992:145.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1997;84:904-11.  Back to cited text no. 12  [PUBMED]  
13.Park AG, Thomson JPS. The rectum and anal canal. In: Sabiston DC Jr, (Ed). Textbook of Surgery. 12th (Ed). London: WB Saunders Company 1981:1130.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Jensen SL. A randomized trial of simple excision of non-specific hypertrophied anal papillae versus expectant management in patients with chronic pruritus ani. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1988;70:348-9.  Back to cited text no. 14  [PUBMED]  
15.Weaver RM, Ambrose NS, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Manual dilatation of the anus vs. lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano: Results of a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:420-3.   Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  
16.Saidi MH, Setzler FD Jr, Sadler RK, Farhart SA, Akright BD. Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization. J Am Asso Gynecol laparosc 1994;1:135-9.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Pfenninger JL, DeWitt DE. Radio frequency surgery. In: Pfenninger JL, Fowler GC, editors. Procedures for primary care physicians. St Louis: Mosby 1994:91-101.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Heiken JP, Zuckerman GR, Balfe DM. The hypertrophied anal papilla: recognition on air-contrast barium enema examinations. Radiology 1984;151:315-8.  Back to cited text no. 18  [PUBMED]  
19.Lock MR, Thomson JP. Fissure-in-ano: The initial management and prognosis. Br J Surg 1977;64:355-8.  Back to cited text no. 19  [PUBMED]  
20.Fazio VW. Fissure-in-Ano. In: Keighley MRB, Pemberton JH, Fazio VW, Parc R. (Ed). Atlas of colorectal surgery. 1st (Ed). New York: Churchill Livingstone 1996:108-10.  Back to cited text no. 20    

Copyright 2004 - Indian Journal of Surgery


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[is04040t1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil