search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Surgery
Medknow Publications on behalf of Association of Surgeons of India
ISSN: 0972-2068
Vol. 67, Num. 3, 2005, pp. 145-146

Indian Journal of Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 3, May-June, 2005, pp. 145-146

Case Reports

Abdominal wall metastasis following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a case of carcinoma larynx

Department of Surgery, North Middlesex University Hospital, Sterling Way, London, UK
Correspondence Address:Department of Surgery, North Middlesex University Hospital, Sterling Way, London N18 1XR, UK, sudhir_kumar1@hotmail.com

Code Number: is05040

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a safe and easy procedure to provide enteral nutrition in patients suffering from advanced malignancy of upper aerodigestive tract. However, with published reports of abdominal wall metastasis after PEG in Head and Neck malignancies, a serious doubt has been raised about continuation of PEG in upper aerodigestive malignancies. In this communication, we report one such case along with relevant review of literature.

Keywords: Metastasis, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, PEG, carcinoma larynx

Case report

A 53-year-old gentleman presented in the A and E Department of Barnett and Chase Farm Hospital in the first week of May 2003 with sudden onset of stridor. Further investigations revealed large subglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Debulking of tumor was performed by ENT surgeons and the patient was referred to North Middlesex Hospital, London, for chemotherapy. The patient had recurrence of stridor in June 2003, and tumor was again debulked and postoperative radiotherapy was started, along with high doses of steroids. Ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and bone scan performed at that time was normal. Pathologically the tumor was graded as T3 No Mx. After starting radiotherapy, patient began having difficulty in eating, so it was decided to insert PEG in the middle of June 2003. Unfortunately, the transverse colon was perforated during insertion of PEG and the patient underwent subsequent laparotomy during which defunctioning loop transverse colostomy and closure of leaking gastrostomy opening were performed. The patient remained well till the end of September 2003, when he was readmitted under a surgical team with complaints of nonfunctioning of colostomy. The patient noticed a swelling around colostomy 2 weeks prior to this admission. On examination, there was an oval shaped 5-cm diameter nontender well-defined nodular surfaced, hard consistency mass on the medial aspect of colostomy, which was compressing the lumen of proximal stoma. Clinically the mass appeared to be arising from the abdominal wall. Computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a large lobulated parastomal mass with metastatic deposits in the liver. Trucut biopsy taken from the stomal mass revealed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. The patient underwent chemoradiotherapy for this metastatic abdominal wall lesion. Colostomy started functioning well after proximal stomal wash.

Discussion

Abdominal wall metastasis normally does not occur in carcinoma larynx. However, recently there are reports of abdominal wall metastasis around the stoma following PEG, [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] Thus giving rise to a serious doubt about the utility of PEG in patients with upper aerodigestive malignancy. Till date, there are reports of 21 cases of abdominal wall metastasis around the stoma following PEG in patients suffering from Head and Neck malignancy.[1],[2] Primary tumor in these cases included carcinoma of esophagus, pharynx, larynx, and oral cavity. Computed tomography is an effective method for evaluation of these patients. A lobulated mass around the stoma is highly suggestive of tumor implantation, especially if the thickness of one side exceeds 1cm.[2] The preponderance of evidence from existing literature points to direct implantation during endoscopic placement[2] rather than hematogenous spread. Chances of implantation increase many folds if the tumor is constricting with a high risk of losing tumor cells. After the experience of the present case and review of the literature, we strongly recommend operative or laparoscopic placement of gastrosotomy or jejunostomy tube rather than PEG, for enteral nutrition.

References

1.Thermann F, Marcy T, Dralle H. Primary operaive gastrostomy or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in progressive oesophageal carcinoma? A case report on abdominal wall metastasis following PEG. Chiurg 2002;73:1132-35.   Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Pickhardt PJ, Rohrmann CA Jr, Cossentino MJ. Stomal metastasis complicating percutaneous en-doscopic gastrostomy:CT findings and the argument for radiological tube placement. Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:735-39.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Ananth S, Amin M. Implantation of oral squaous cell carcinoma at the site of a the site of a cutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40:125-30.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Bhama G, Haus M K, Fisher WE. Spread of a pharyngeal cancer to the abdominal wall after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001;11:375-8.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Becker G, Hess CF, Grund KE, Hoffmann W, Bam M. Abdominal wall metastasis following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Support Care Cancer 1995;3:313-6.  Back to cited text no. 5    

Copyright 2005 - Indian Journal of Surgery

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil