search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
World Bank assisted National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) - University of Port Harcourt
ISSN: 1119-8362
Vol. 9, Num. 1, 2005, pp. 15-17

Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2005, pp. 15-17

Enteric Pathogen modification by Anaecic Earthworm, Lampito Mauritii

A.GANESH KUMAR; G. SEKARAN*

Department of Environmental Technology, Central Leather Research Institute, Adyar, Chennai –600 020, Tamilnadu, India. Fax No: 91-044-24911589 Tel. No: 044 – 24911386 (Ext. 341)

Code Number: ja05003

ABSTRACT: The biosolids from municipal wastewater treatment plant contains several enteric microbial pathogens, predominantly Salmonella and Escherichia species in the range of 15-18 × 104 CFU/g and 11-12 × 104 CFU/g respectively. The present study investigates the influence of earthworm, Lampito mauritii on enteric pathogen during vermicomposting of municipal sewage sludge. The Biosolids (B), Rice straw (R) and Cow dung(C) were used in this study. The BR (3:1) and BRC (3:1:1) combination proved to be best in the removal of enteric pathogens. Both these combinations reduced the bacterial pathogens like Salmonella and Escherichia species to nil during 60 days stabilization period of vermicomposting. The gut analysis also proved that Salmonella species ranging 15-17 × 103 CFU/g and Escherichia species ranging 10- 14 × 102 CFU/g were completely eliminated in the gut after 70 days of vermicomposting period. @JASEM

The methodology of biosolid waste management has shifted from conventional disposal strategies to conversion into value added products (Liang et al 2003). The technique for proper management of biosolids was vermicomposting, which uses earthworms for breakdown of the organic wastes. However, a broad spectrum of pathogenic microorganisms has been reported to be present in biosolids (Abdennaceur Hassen et al 2001). Many researchers on solid waste management suggested bio composting of solid wastes before applying to soil in order to achieve biological transformation of the organic matter and to avoid potential risks of pathogens (Gliotti et al 1997 and Masciandaro et al 2000). Biocomposting of solid wastes bring about stabilization of the organic matter and effectively reduces pathogen concentrations in sludges to very low levels (Burge et al 1987). However, absolute removal of pathogens becomes difficult to achieve and many survives the composting process (Sidhu et al 2001). Various researchers have established the viability of vermi-technology for treatment of different wastes (Ndegwa et al 2000; Elvira et al 1997).

In the vermireactors the earthworms maintain aerobic conditions in the organic wastes through proper mixing, moreover the biochemical process is enhanced by microbial decomposition of the substrate in the intestines. The earthworms convert a portion of the organic present in the wastes into worm biomass and excrete undigested/partially-digested matter as worm cast, which are rich in nutrient source (Benitez et al 1999). The earthworms also enhance the biological activity in the soil by improving the environment suitable for microbes (Mulongoy et al 1989). However, the information on the fate of enteric pathogenic microorganisms during vermicomposting was less. This paper aims to study the fate of major enteric pathogens like Salmonella sp. and Escherichia sp. in the biosolids during vermicomposting process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sewage sludge was obtained from municipal sewage treatment plant. The adult Anaecic earthworms, Lampito mauritii were used in this study. The worms were collected by hand sorting and maintained in soil amended with cattle manure.

Different mixture of substrates used in treatments were

a.             Mixture of Biosolids and Rice straw, 3:1 (BR)

b.             Mixture of Biosolids, Rice straw and Cow dung, 3:1:1 (BRC)

c.             Control sample containing biosolids alone (B)

The vermicomposted sample was extracted in buffer solution and appropriate dilutions were made and plated using pour plate technique and incubated at 37°C.  Salmonella was enumerated using Salmonella Shigella Agar (SS agar) and Escherichia using Eosin Methylene Blue agar (EMB agar). The results were calculated after 24 hours of retention time and were expressed as CFU g-1 (Colony Forming Units per gram of biosolids). In midgut analysis whole body was dissected under sterile environment and analysis were carried out.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Salmonella sp. and Escherichia sp. decreased gradually from 7th day itself in both BR and BRC, and decreased to nil level after 50th day but in control experiments these populations were not reduced (Fig 1 and 2)

In the initial stages of the vermicomposting pathogens like Salmonella sp. and Escherichia sp. were found to be dominant in the mid gut. The Salmonella sp. from 15-18 x103 CFU g-1 decreased in the treatments of BR and BRC up to 1x101 CFU g-1 in the midgut. The Escherichia sp. was found in gut of earthworm grown in control but it was completely removed in 35th day of both BR and BRC grown earthworm (Table 1).

Although earthworms enhances the soil microbial activity by improving the environment favorable and much more suitable for its growth (Syers et al 1979) the fate of microorganisms during the gut transit through earthworms is still controversial (Wolter et al 1999). The experimental results of gut analysis proved the removal of Salmonella and Escherichia in 35 days under suitable substrate. Moreover, these enteric bacterial populations were decreased at the end of vermicomposting period, indicating the nature of earthworms in the removal of microorganisms. These results correlates with the findings of various researchers proving earthworms include microorganisms in their substrates as a food source and can digest them selectively (Edwards et al 1996; Bohlen et al 1995). Many researchers also proved that the indigenous microflora play a significant role in the suppression of pathogenic bacterial population regrowth in composted sludges (Sidhu et al 2001).These results suggest that vermicomposting can be used for safe management of solid waste generated from wastewater treatment plant and its bioconversion into valuable compost free from enteric bacterial populations.

Acknowledgement: The author A. Ganesh Kumar is thankful to Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) India, for awarding Research Fellowship and providing all facilities to carryout this work.

REFERENCES

  • Abdennaceur Hassen; Kaouala Belguith; Naceur Jedidi; Ameur Cherif; Mohamed Cherif; Abdellatif Boudabous (2001) Microbial characterization during composting of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology 80 : 217-225.
  • Benitez, E; Nogales, R; Elvira, C; Masciandaro, G; Ceccanti, B (1999) Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabilization of sewage sludges composting with Eisenia foetida. Bioresource Technology 67 : 297-303.
  • Bohlen, P.J; Edwards, C.A (1995) Earthworm effects on N dynamics and soil respiration in microcosms receiving organic and inorganic nutrients. Soil Biology and Biochemistry  27 : 341-348.
  • Burge, W.D; Enkiri, N.K; Hussong, D (1987) Salmonella regrowth in compost as influenced by substrate. Microb. Ecol. 14 : 243-253. 
  • Edwards, C.A; Bohlen, P.J (1996) Biology and Ecology of earthworms. Chapman andHall, London.
  • Elvira, C; Sampedro, L; Dominguez, J; Mato, S (1997) Vermicompositing of wastewater sludge from paper-pulp industry with nitrogen rich materials. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29 : 759-762.
  • Gliotti, C; Giusquiani, P.L; Businelli, D; Machioni, A (1997) Composition changes of dissolved organic matter in a soil amended with municipal waste compost. Soil Science 162: 919-926.
  • Liang, C; Das, K.C; McClendon, R.W (2003) The influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresource and Technology 86 : 131-137.
  • Masciandaro, G; Ceccanti, B; Garcia, C (2000) `In situ' vermicomposting of biological sludges and impacts on soil quality. Soil Biol. and Biochem. 32 : 1015-1024. 
  • Mulongoy, K; Bedoret, A (1989) Properties of worm casts and surface soil under various plant covers in the humid tropics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21 : 197- 203.
  • Ndegwa, P.M; Thompson, S.A; Das, K.C (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresource Technology 71 : 5-12.
  • Sidhu, J; Gibbs, R.A; Ho, G.E; Unkovich, I (2001) The role of indigenous microorganisms in suppression of Salmonella regrowth in composted biosolids. Water Research 35 : 913-920.
  • Syers, J.K; Sharpley, A.N; Keeney, D.R (1979) Cycling of nitrogen by surface-casting earthworms in a pasture ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 11 : 181-185.
  • Wolter, C; Scheu, S (1999) Changes in bacterial numbers and hyphal lengths during the gut passage through Lumbricus terrestris (Lumbricidae, Oligochaeta). Pedobiologia           43 : 891-900.


Copyright 2005 - Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ja05003f2.jpg] [ja05003t1.jpg] [ja05003f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil