search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News  Donations


Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
World Bank assisted National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) - University of Port Harcourt
ISSN: 1119-8362
Vol. 11, Num. 4, 2007, pp. 133-135

Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2007, pp. 131-135

Role of Macrophytes in improving water quality of an aquatic eco-system.

SANGEETA DHOTE

Research Scholar Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal E. mail sangeetadhote@yahoo.com 91 0755-2485770

DR. SAVITA DIXIT Head of the Department, Department of Chemistry, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, BhopalE. mail , 91 755-2670875

* Corresponding author: Sangeeta Dhote

Code Number: ja07109

ABSTRACT

Macrophytes plays important role in balancing Lake Ecosystem. They have capacity to improve the water quality by absorbing nutrients, with their effective root system. At the same time death & decay of the macrophytes increases nutrient concentration, this leads to eutrophication. A rational setup between these two simultaneous activities is required to maintain the water quality of an aquatic ecosystem. The objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of different macrophytic species (Bio-filters) in reducing the nutrient content of the water i.e. to reduce the pollution level of water. The paper is the outcome of ex–situ experiments conducted on samples collected from Shahpura Lake, Bhopal. Two macrophyteic Species Eicchornia crassipes & Hydrilla verticillata were selected for ex-situ study. Both the plant species indicates that macrophytes are capable in improving water quality by reducing nutrient concentration.

Macrophytes are the common features of an aquatic ecosystem. Accumulation of nutrients in an aquatic ecosystem leads to eutrophication resulting into massive growth of the macrophytes and weeds. Main cause of nutrient accumulation is rapid urbanization and anthropogenic pressure. Storm water runoff and discharge of sewage into the lakes are two common ways that various nutrients enter the aquatic eco-system, resulting into the death of those systems (Sudhira & Kumar 2000). The washing of large amount of clothes by dhobis, laundry workers, and continued entry of domestic sewage in some area death & decay of macrophytes are posing pollution problems. Of all the water quality issues regarding lakes everywhere, eutrophication is of great concern. Eutrophication of a water body signifies the aging of a lake. It is caused by the accumulation of nutrients, sediments, silt and organic matter in the lake from the surrounding watershed.

Macrophytic vegetation plays an important role in maintaining the ecosystem of a lake. Various types of macrophytes emergent, free floating, submerged are generally observed in an aquatic ecosystem. Free-floating macrophytes leaves & roots are floating; roots are not attached in sediment. Eichhornia crassipes is free floating aquatic plant in which roots play important role in removing nutrients (Reed crites and Middle brooks 1995). It has tremendous capacity of absorbing nutrients and other substances from the water (Boyed, 1970) and hence brings the pollution load down. It is found to be most effective in removal of BOD, COD, nitrogen, phosphorus, organic carbon, suspended solids, phenols, pesticides, heavy metals etc from waste water (Gupta 1982).

In Hydrilla verticillata (submerged macrophyte) the whole plant plays an important role in absorbing nutrients. Submerged plants grow well in oxygenated water and therefore cannot be used in treating wastewater high in the BOD. They have more area for attachment for denitrifying bacteria then emergent macrophytes (Weisner et al. 1994).

In India, all most all the water resources are occupied with various types of macrophytes viz. rooted shoreline, free floating and submerged etc, which are an integral part of the ecosystem and acts as bio-filters. As we know conventional treatment process is very costly with high operational and maintenances cost therefore efforts are for the use of natural devices, which can be used as an eco-friendly and effective source of treatment.

The need of the study is because of the deterioration of water quality of Shahapura Lake day by day. Accumulation of residential waste, toxic chemicals and sediments are very common (Suchi Tiwari, 2005). Due to excessive pollution load massive growth of macrophytes are commonly seen. Commonly found macrophytes are Eichhornia crassipes., Hydrilla verticillata. & Phragmities sp. The purpose of the study is to utilize these macrophytes as bio-filters & to observe efficiency of various macrophytes to remove pollutants available in lake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in water of Shahapura Lake (Mansarover Lake) of Bhopal city. The Lake is situated in the center of Bhopal city, the state capital of Madhya Pradesh India (latitude 23012’00’’E and longitude 77° 25’30’’N). The lake is a shallow aquatic ecosystem mostly muddy due to accumulation of silt. The main inlet joins at northern end, through which maximum sewage inflows into the lake.

Two Ex-situ studies were also conducted by taking two Macrophytes Eicchornia Crassipes & Hydrilla verticillata. For observing the rate of nutrient uptake water container (approx. 5.0 liters) is required. Add 2.0 liters of raw water from inlet and introduce 100.0 grams of Eicchornia crassipes. Observe initial concentration of nutrients in raw inlet sample. Collect the samples at regular intervals of one week and observe nutrient concentration.

Similar experiment was also conducted by taking macrophytes Hydrilla Verticillata (Submerged macrophytes) as a bio-filter. Samples at regular interval were collected from ex-situ experiment set-ups.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The nutrient rich water i.e. raw sewage was taken as liquid media for experiment. Hydrilla verticillata shows affection towards phosphate, nitrate, sodium and potassium ions in large amounts. The aquatic plants absorb the major plant nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus that is also major pollutants of the domestic wastewater for luxuriant growth. There is a great reduction in nitrate (33.4 %). BOD & COD both reduces by (37.5 %). Other parameters like pH, TDS, TSS etc also reduces by using Hydriila verticillata. The actual reduction in percentage we can see in Fig. 1

Eichhornia Crassipes is very common macrophytes of Indian wetland. It is a good bio-filter. It is efficient to reduce conductivity by (38.88 %), turbidity by (25%), TSS by (50%). The detailed percentage reduction we can see in Fig.2.

Eichhornia Crassipes (Water Hyacinth) regarded as world’s worst weeds (Abbasi and Nipaney, 1991) High Productivity and resilience of the weed make them ideal macrophytes for wastewater treatment.

CONCLUSION

The self-purification of wetlands can be largely attributed to the macrophytic vegetation. This ability of macrophyte to absorb nutrient in large quantities can be utilized for wastewater treatment.

Eichhornia Crassipes is efficient in reducing COD, TSS, Nitrate, and Phosphate. Dunigan,et al; 1967, Schultze, 1966 also reported same type of findings i.e. water hyacinth reduces quantities of suspended particles, algae, dissolved impurities, nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients, BOD,COD turbidity organic carbon etc.

Hydrilla Verticillata can be used as a better bio-filter for phosphorus. There is great reduction in TSS (60%), BOD & COD reduces by 37.5%, nitrate reduces by 33.41%, and phosphate reduces by 46.01 %. Weisner et. al.1994 observed that hydrilla grow well in oxygenated water and therefore cannot be used in treating wastewater high in the BOD. High oxygen concentration also create favorable conditions for the mineralization of organic matter and thus help in reduction if the BOD.

For non-point source of pollution, the root zone method of wastewater treatment is most suitable. The technology is cost effective, maintenance free, self-sustained and Eco-friendly.

REFERENCES

  • Abbasi; Nipaney, (1991), “World’s worst weed – control and utilization” International/book Distributor, Dehradun 226.
  • APHA AWWA (1999) Standard Methods for Analysis of Water and Wastewater 19th edition 1999.
  • Boyd, C.E. (1970) vascular aquatic plants for mineral nutrient removal from polluted waters. Econ.Bot.24: 95-103.
  • Cornwell, D.A., J.Zoltek, Jr., C.D.Patrinely, T.S.Furman ; J.I.Kim. 1977. Nutrient removal by water hyacinths. J. Water pollut. Control Fed.49: 57-65.
  • Gupta G.C. (1982) Use of water hyacinth in wastewater treatment. Journal of Environ. Health 43 (2) 80-82.
  • Oki, Y. (1992). Effect of aquatic weeds on nutrient removal from domestic sewage. Proc. of the 1st International Weed Control Congress 2:365-371.
  • Reed Crities (1995). Natural systems for waste management and treatment, 2nd edition Chapter 5 .Mcgraw Hills Publications.
  • Seidal, K (1976). Macrophytes and water purification. P.109-121.
  • Sudhira, H. S.; Kumar, V. S. Monitoring of lake water quality in Mysore city, proceedings of Lake 2000. International symposium on restoration of lakes and wetlands, 27 – 29 Nov. 2000, CSIC Auditorium, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, (2000), 1–10.
  • Suchi Tiwari,(2005), Nutrient Overloading of a Freshwater Lake in Bhopal, India, Electronic Green Journal ISSN: 1076-7975.
  • Russel, A. (1987) Guiness book of world records. Bantam Books, New York. 105.
  • USEPA. 1998 Design manual: Constructed wetland and aquatic plant system for municipal wastewater treatment EPA/625/1-88/022.
  • Western Consortium for Public Health (WCPH). EOA, Inc.1996.Total Resources Recovery Project, Final Report. City of San Diego Water Utilities Department.
  • Wolverton B .C. and M. M. McKown. 1976. Water hyacinth for removal of phenols from polluted waters. Aquat. Bot. 30: 29-37.
  • Wolverton B .C. and R. C. McDonald. 1977. Wastewater treatment utilizing water hyacinths (Eichhornea crassipes) (Mart) soins. p. 205-208.In Treatment and Disposal of Industrial Wastewater and Residues. Proceeding of the National Conference on Treatment and Disposal of Industrial Wastewater s and Residue, Hauston, TX.
  • Wolverton B .C.;R. C. McDonald. 1979b. Upgrading facultative wastewater lagoons with vascular aquatic plants. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 51:305-313.
  • Wooten, J. W. and J. D. Dodd. 1976. Growth of water hyacinth in treated sewage effluent. Econ. Bot. 30: 29-37
  • Weisner, S. E.;B, Eriksson.; P. G., Graneli, W.; Leonardson, L.(1994) Influence of macrophytes on nitrogen removal in wetlands. Ambio. 23,(6),363-66.

Copyright 2007 - Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[ja07109f1.jpg] [ja07109f2.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2019, Site last up-dated on 11-Sep-2019.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Internet Data Center of Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa, RNP, Brazil