 |
| About Bioline | All Journals | Testimonials | Membership | News |
|
||||||
|
||||||
Growth Performance Of The African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus, Fed Varying Inclusion Levels Of Leucaena leucocephala Leaf Meal 1*Amisah, S; 1Oteng, M. A; 2Ofori, J. K. 1Department of Fisheries and Watershed Management, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Kumasi, Ghana;2 Water
Research Institute, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Akosombo, Ghana Code Number: ja09004 ABSTRACT The efficacy of treated Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal as an ingredient in diet of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, of mean weight 40.18±0.51g was evaluated over a 90-day growth period. Four experimental diets were formulated at 0% (control), 10%, 20% and 30% inclusion levels of treated Leucaena leaf meal. Leaves were treated by soaking in water for 3 days and sun-drying for another 3 days. A control diet of fish meal with fish meal serving as the only protein source was formulated. All diets were isonitrogenous (30% protein). The 90-day feeding experiment was conducted in concrete tanks, each treatment having three replicates. Fish fed 20% Leucaena leaf meal recorded the best growth performance in body weight gain and Specific Growth Rate (SGR), although the best Feed conversion Ration (FCR) was recorded for fish fed on the control diet of 0% Leucaena meal. There were no significant differences between fish fed the control diet and the other experimental (P>0.05). The study demonstrated that Leucaeana leucocephala leaf meal may be included in the diets of Clarias gariepinus at inclusion levels of up to 30% but it is efficacious and cost effective at 20% inclusion level. It is, therefore, recommended that Leucana leucocephala leaf meal be used to partially to replace the expensive and imported fish meal. @ JASEM Fish farming continues to make substantial contributions to Ghana’s animal protein requirements. On a global sale fish, crustaceans and molluscs production has increased from 3.9 percent of total production by weight in 1970 to 27.1 percent in 2000 and to 32.4 percent in 2004 (FAO, 2006). Ghana’s contribution to these global figures remains, largely, insignificant and more needs to be done to bridge the yawning gap. The greatest limitation of fish farming in Ghana is the lack of suitable fish feeds. Most feeds are farm-based and commercial fish feed have to be imported, using the limited foreign exchange of the state. In Ghana, the most cultured species are Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). The African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) is appreciated by consumers for the quality of its meat (Pruszyński, 2003) and is mostly smoked and used in soups. It is recognized by its long dorsal and anal fins, which give it a rather eel-like appearance. The catfish has a slender body, a flat bony head, and a broad, terminal mouth with four pairs of barbells. Its prominent barbells give it the image of cat-like whiskers. The fish is mostly cultured in earthen ponds. However, it can be cultured in other systems such as tanks and hapas. In the wild and riverine systems, the fish reproduces naturally but considerable effort is required to induce spawning under culture conditions. The African catfish is an excellent species for aquaculture as it is omnivorous, grows fast, and tolerates relatively poor water quality (Rad et. al., 2003). A number of plants continue to be investigated for their potential in supplementing or even replacing fish meal. Leucaena leucocephala has been identified to hold the potential to make contributions to fish nutrition with the possibility to reduce the total dependence of fish farming on fish meal in several locations in Ghana. Leucaena leucocephala is a leguminous, multipurpose tree and provides fuel wood, green manure, improves degraded lands and can be used as a cover crop. Leucaena leaf is known to contain about 22.7% crude protein (Atawodi et. al., 2008) and survives well on degraded soils which are low in nutrients. It has bipinnate leaves, lanceolate leaflets and has flat pods containing small seeds. The leaves and seeds contain the antinutritional factor mimosine (Francis et. al., 2001). Mimosine is known to inhibit the growth of animals, especially nonruminants. Leucaena leucocephala is available in almost every geographical location in Ghana and grows fast. Its leaves are a good source of protein and needs to be examined in greater detail on its suitability for the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. In Ghana, imported fishmeal, mainly from Israel and Brazil, is used in commercial production of catfish as the major source of protein. This has created a sustained dependence on these countries for the supply of fishmeal. The high cost of fishmeal makes commercial production of catfish capital intensive as it accounts for between 30 and 60 % of variable operating cost (Desilva and Anderson 1995). This has motivated the search for, local, cheap alternative sources of protein that aim to reduce production cost without compromising fish quality. These sources should hold the potential to supplement, replace or partly replace the imported fishmeal. Against this background, this study was conducted to: (a) Determine the optimum inclusion level of Leucaena leaf meal in formulated diets of Clarias gariepinus and (b) Examine the growth performance of Clarias gariepinus fed varying inclusion levels of Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS Study location The study was conducted at the Aquaculture Research Development Centre (ARDEC) of the Water Research Institute of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) at Akosombo in the Eastern region of Ghana between January and April 2008. Sources of ingredients and diets preparation Fishmeal, maize, wheat bran, and groundnut husk, were obtained locally from the market while Leucaena leaves were freshly plucked from their branches on the compound of Water Research Institute, Akosombo. The long, leaf stalks were removed by hand. Leucaena leaves were soaked in water for 3 days and afterwards sun dried for another 3 days. All ingredients were ground into powdery form using a corn mill. The milled Leucaena leaves were then sieved with a mosquito net to separate the fine powder from the remaining fibre. The proximate chemical composition of feed ingredients were estimated by the methods described by the (AOAC, 1984), to determine the crude protein content. Four isonitrogenous diets containing different levels of Leucaena leaf meal (0, 10, 20 and 30%) were prepared (Table 1).The experimental diets with crude protein levels of 30% were formulated using the trial and error method. The ingredients were then thoroughly mixed together by hand. Warm water was added to the premixed ingredients and homogenized to a dough-like paste. The diets were then pelletised using a 2-mm pellet press. The diets were sun-dried for 4 days and stored in airtight containers throughout the experimental period. Experimental procedure The experiments were carried out in rectangular concrete tanks of 2.5m x 0.7m x 0.58m with water volume maintained at 0.17 m level. A total of 16 concrete tanks were used. A total of 240 African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, juveniles with an average weight of 40.18± 0.51g were randomly allotted at the rate of 10 juveniles per tank into each of the 16 experimental concrete tanks, each tank having 2 other replicates. The fishes were allowed to acclimatise 14 days prior to the start of the experiment. Feeds were formulated from Leucaena leucocephala leaves to test their efficacy on the growth performance of the catfish. The experimental diets varied with increasing levels of Leucaena leaf meal, 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% with decreasing levels of fish meal. Most ingredients of standard catfish feed formulas can be substituted for, but whenever fish meal has been left out of catfish diets, poorer growth and food conversion have resulted (Stickney (1974). For this reason, feed were formulated with inclusions of varying quantities of fish meal combined and Leucaena leaf meal. The emphasis in this intervention is to formulate protein diets that can substitute or reduce the quantities of expensive fishmeal in formulated diets without compromising growth performance of the fish. Fish feeding and culture The fishes were fed twice daily, between 8.009.00am and 15.00-16.00pm at 2% body weight throughout the experiment. The ration was adjusted every two weeks when new mean weights of fish for the various experimental units were determined. Leftover feed and faeces in each tank were siphoned out each week. The water in the tanks was also changed with pre-conditioned pipe-borne water every week. Data collection and analysis Data on fish growth characteristics were recorded every two weeks. The weight of individual fish was determined with an electronic scale of model KERN 572, the Standard Length was determined with a measuring board. The experimental tanks were inspected daily to remove dead fish, if any. Fish weight gain, feed conversion ratio, specific growth rate and mortality were determined as follows. The initial and fortnightly mean weights per treatment were computed as follows:
Where: W2 = Weight of fish at time T2 (final) W1 = Weight of fish at time T1 (initial) (iii) Feed conversion ratio (FCR). This was calculated from the relationship of feed intake and wet weight gain.
(iv) Mortality (M) was calculated as: (3)
Where: No = Number at the start of the experiment Nt = Number at the end of the experiment
Where: W = Weight of fish L = Standard length of fish Water quality Water quality parameters were measured during each sampling. Temperature and dissolved oxygen were measured in situ, with a WTM, OxiCal – SL portable electronic probe. The water pH was also measured with Suntex model SP-701 pH meter. Ammonia and nitrite were also measured with the aid of a Visible Spectrophotometer after it had been treated with Nessler’s reagent. Statistical analysis Data was subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey’s multiple comparison test for the means at a significance level (P<0.05). The statistical package used for the analysis was the GraphPad InStat tm. The results are presented as mean ± SE (standard error) RESULTS The growth performances of Clarias gariepinus in response to difference inclusion levels of Leucaena leucocephala meals are presented in the sections that follow: Growth performance Growth performance of the African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, fed varying quantities of feed containing Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal (LLM) over a 90day period is presented (Table 2). Fish fed with LLM at 20% inclusion level gave the best growth performance which was marginally better than those fed on fish meal without the leaf meal (0% LLM). On the other hand fish fed 30% LLM (Diet 4) resulted in the slowest growth performance (Table 2). There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the initial body weight (IBW), final body weight (FBW), mean weight gain, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Specific Growth Rate (SGR), mortality, initial condition factor and final condition factor (Table 2). The highest weight gain and SGR were found in fish fed Diet 3 (20% LLM). The highest and least FCR was recorded in fish fed on Diet 4 (30 % LLM) and Diet 1 (0% LLM) respectively. The least weight gain and SGR were observed in fish fed Diet 2 (10% LLM). Water quality measurements Water temperatures and pH remained fairly stable in all the treatments (Table 3) There was no mortality throughout the experimental Water temperatures and pH remained fairly stable in period but a single case of cannibalism was observed all the treatments (Table 3) in fish fed the control diet (0% LLM) after the initial sampling. DISCUSSIONS Shortage in world production of fish meal, the conventional protein feed source, coupled with increased demand for fish meal in feeds for livestock and poultry is likely to reduce the dependence on fish meal as a single protein source in aqua-feeds. Throughout the world the efficiency of various alternative protein sources as partial or complete dietary replacements for fish meal has been evaluated in fish diets (Wee and Wang, 1987; Abdel-Fattah and El-Sayed, 1999; Ali et. al., 2003). On the other hand there is little or no work on alternative protein sources for fish feed in developing countries such as Ghana. The West Africa sub-region and several developing countries continue to rely on imported fish meal. Ghana has recently started a feed mill, GAFCO, which produces some feeds for livestock but the lack of an extruder means they cannot produce feeds that can float in the water and most farmers depend largely on imported feeds. The use of leaf meal as a possible fish meal substitute to reduce the cost of fish feed is receiving increasing attention by fish nutritionists around the world (Bairagi et. al., 2004). It is, however, important that the selected protein sources do not conflict with human food security interests. The use of Leucaena leucocephala leaves do not conflict with human food security issues and this study has demonstrated that the leaves have the potential to partly replace fish meal and considerably reduce expenditure on fish meal, without compromising growth performances of the African catfish When alternative food sources such as plant protein are used in fish diets, one of the common problems encountered is the acceptability of the feed by fish, and this frequently relates to the palatability of the diet (Rodriguez et. al., 1996). In the present investigation, all the experimental diets were accepted by Clarias gariepinus juveniles, indicating that the levels of incorporation of Leucaena leaf meal did not affect the palatability of the diets. This might be attributed to the processing technique which involved soaking and drying techniques that might have reduced the antinutrient in Leucaena leaf meal, thereby increasing its palatability in Clarias gariepinus. This observation corroborates the works of Siddhuraju and Becker (2003), Francis et. al., (2001) and Fagbenro (1999). These workers reported that reduction in antinutrient by different processing techniques resulted in better palatability and growth in fish. Wee and Wang (1987), reported that soaked Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal gave a significantly better growth response than sundried or commercial leaf meal in the diets of Nile Tilapia, possibly due to a destruction of the mimosine content by the processing technique. The potential of a feedstuff such as leaf meal in fish diets can be evaluated mainly on the basis of its proximate chemical composition, particularly the, crude protein content. The proximate composition of Leucaena leaf meal in the present investigation revealed that the crude protein content was 23.54%. This value was higher than the values reported by some earlier researchers such as Bairagi et. al. (2004) and Atawodi et. al. (2008). The difference might be attributed to differences environmental conditions such as soil types, provenances, harvesting time and processing methods. Although the nutritional quality of Leucaena leaf meal as determined by Clarias gariepinus body weight gain, specific growth rate and feed conversion ratio was higher in fish fed on Diet 3 (20% leaf meal), no significant (P > 0.05) differences were observed in other experimental diets. Available information on tilapia revealed that 1pil-1pil, Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal in the diets of Oreochromis niloticus at 12.5% inclusion did not affect growth, however, at high levels of inclusion, 25% or more, the growth of O. niloticus was adversely affected In the present investigation, inclusion of Leucaena leaf meal at level as high as 20% did not reduce the growth rate but rather gave the best weight gain in Clarias gariepinus juveniles. Various workers on Tilapine fishes have shown that leaf meal protein at low levels of inclusion (less than 50%) in fish diets were able to support growth (Ritcher et. al., 2003; . Santiago et. al., 1988; Afuang et. al., 2003). The growth performances of the fish (Table 2) agree with those of the earlier workers (Ritcher et. al., 2003). No mortalities occurred throughout the period and, therefore, the meal did not have any deleterious effects on the fish. Although body weight increases were generally low (Table 2) the Condition Factors were not significantly different for all the treatments. The slow weight gains might be attributed also to the fact that fish were fed exclusively on the formulated feeds with no vitamin supplements and no access to natural feed as may be found in pond or riverine conditions. The African catfish is omnivorous and feeds from a wide array of organisms under natural conditions. Conclusions The leaves of Leucaena leucocephala have the potential to make considerable contributions to growth of the Africa catfish. It also has the potential to partially replace fish meal in a feeding regime and, thereby, reduce feed cost to the fish farmer, whose most important production cost comes from feed. This study has demonstrated that, in general, Leucaena leaf meal could be included up to 30% level in Clarias gariepinus diets without any negative effects on the growth. However, study the best inclusion level was found in the diet containing the 20% Leucaena leaf meal. Leucaena leaves are locally available in the tropics and can be obtained throughout the year. The cost of 40 kg of imported fish meal ranges between 36-40 USD, whilst it cost little or nothing to collect Leucaena leaves from the wild. It is, therefore, more economical to partly replace fishmeal with LLM at the 20% inclusion level without reduction in growth. Experiments with the same feed formulations under natural earthen pond conditions and in re-circulating systems are recommended for future study to elucidate growth performances under natural conditions. It is also recommended that smaller catfish fingerlings, of about 25g be used in other feeding trial to elucidate response on early growth and the length class sizes that would best respond to growth of the Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the Water Research Institute of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for providing the facilities for this work. References for various sources are gratefully acknowledged. REFERENCES
Copyright 2009 - Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[ja09004t2.jpg] [ja09004t3.jpg] [ja09004t1.jpg] |
| |||||||||
