About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News  Donations

Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
World Bank assisted National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) - University of Port Harcourt
ISSN: 1119-8362
Vol. 14, Num. 2, 2010, pp. 43-49
Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, June, 2010, pp. 43-49

Ecological and socio-economic utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Mart Solms)

N Jafari

Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran E-mail:, Tel: +981125242161

Code Number: ja10025


Around the world, there is an increasing trend in areas of land, surface waters and groundwater affected by contamination from industrial, military and agricultural activities due to either ignorance, lack of vision, or carelessness. In the last three decades a special interest in the world is aroused by the potential of using the biological methods in the waste water treatment. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) constitutes an important part of an aquatic ecosystem. Water hyacinth as a very promising plant with tremendous application in wastewater treatment is already proved. Water hyacinth is used to treat waste water from dairies, tanneries, sugar factories, pulp and paper industries, palm oil mills, distilleries, etc. All the efforts of scientists and technocrats all over the world to eliminate these weeds by chemical and biological means have met with little success. The water hyacinth have been found to have potential for use as phytoremediation, paper, organic fertilizer, biogas production, human food, fiber, animal fodder. @ JASEM

The fast technological and industrial development, and tumultuous demographic growth and rapid urbanization, especially in the last two decades, are confronting the mankind with four large problems: water, food, energy and environment. The water problem is particularly pronounced, because it is implicitly present in other three problems, that is in the food and energy production which depend primarily on the water and the key environmental problems are water quality protection and water damage control.

In the last three decades a special interest in the world is aroused by the potential of using the biological methods in the waste water treatment, whose application as of natural and not artificial procedures of tertiary processing of effluents provides the effluents of required quality in a economically acceptable way in the technically simple structures. The capacity of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Martius) Solms-Laubach) as a very promising plant with tremendous application in wastewater treatment is already proved (Jafari and Trivedy, 2005; Trivedy, 2001).

Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is a free floating (but sometimes rooted) freshwater plant of the family Pontederiaceae that has proven to be a significant economic and ecological burden to many sub-tropical and tropical regions of the world. Water hyacinth is listed as one of the most productive plants on earth and Water hyacinth shows logisitic growth as does another floating aquatic weeds. Water hyacinth has invaded freshwater systems in over 50 countries on five continents; it is especially pervasive throughout Southeast Asia, the southeastern United States, central and western Africa, and Central America (Bartodziej and Weymouth, 1995; Brendonck et al., 2003; Lu et al., 2007; Martinez Jimenez and Gomez Balandra, 2007).

Geographic distribution: This tropical plant spread throughout the world in late 19and early 20century (Wilson et al., 2005). It is widely reported that water hyacinth is indigenous to Brazil having first been described from wild plants collected from Francisco river in 1824. In Africa it was first reported in Egypt between 1879; in Asia around 1888 and about 1900 in Japan; in Australia it arrived in about 1890 (Cook, 1990). Water hyacinth originated in tropical South America, but has become naturalized in many warm areas of the world: Central America, North America (California and southern states), Africa, India, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is the most predominant, persistent and troublesome aquatic weed in India. It was first introduced as an ornamental plant in India in 1896 from Brazil (Rao, 1988). In india, water hyacinth has stretched over 2,00,000 ha of water surface un the country (Murugesan et al., 2005) and its exuberance has been highly notived throughout the course of the river Thamirabarani, a prerennial river in south India (Murugesan et al., 2002; Murugesan, 2001). Because of its beautiful blooms and foliage, water hyacinth has been carried by tourists, plant collectors and botanists to over 80 countries around the world in the last 100 years.

Chemistry of Water Hyacinth: Fresh plant contains 95.5% moisture, 0.04% N, 1.0% ash, 0.06% P2O5, 0.20% K2O, 3.5% organic matter. On a zero-moisture basis, it is 75.8% organic matter, 1.5% N, and 24.2% ash. The ash contains 28.7% K2O, 1.8% Na2O, 12.8% CaO, 21.0% Cl, and 7.0% P2O5. The CP contains, per 100 g, 0.72 g methionine, 4.72 g phenylalanine, 4.32 g threonine, 5.34 g lysine, 4.32 g isoleucine, 0.27 g valine, and 7.2 g leucine (Matai and Bagchi, 1980). Water hyacinth roots naturally absorb pollutants, including such toxic chemicals as lead, mercury, and strontium 90 (as well as some organic compounds believed to be carcinogenic) in concentrations 10,000 times that in the surrounding water.

Water Hyacinth Habitats and Characteristics: Water hyacinths grow over a wide variety of wetland types from lakes, streams, ponds, waterways, ditches, and backwater areas. The treatment of textile wastewater with water hyacinth has some effects on the growth of the plant, the small size of which may be due to nutrient imbalance mainly of nitrogen in water (Thomas, 1983). The plant height may vary from a few inches to 3 ft (0.9 m). The leaves, growing in rosettes, are glossy green and may be up to 8 in (20 cm) long and 6 in (15 cm) wide. The showy, attractive flowers may be blue, violet, or white and grow in spikes of several flowers. The leaf blades are inflated with air sacs, which enable the plants to float in water. The seeds are very longlived.

High levels of salinity in wastewater can limit the growth of water hyacinth and other aquatic macrophytes (Sooknah and Wilkie, 2004). The plant has very prominent black, stringy roots, and when it occasionally becomes stranded in mud, it may appear rooted. Its growth rate is among the highest of any plant known, and populations can double in as little as 12 days (Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation, 2005). Habitats for the water hyacinth have ranged from shallow temporary ponds, marshes and sluggish flowing waters to large lakes, rivers and reservoirs. A broad spectrum of physico-chemical environments characterizes these habitats. In temporary water bodies, the plants often have to survive on moist mud for prolonged periods, or perennate in the form of seeds Gopal (1987). The nutrient bases provided by the various habitats differ widely. They range from clean waters that are poor in major nutrients such as rivers and reservoirs to highly polluted waters with large amounts of nutrients and organic matter, as is the case in sewage lagoons. In addition such waters may receive a variety of organic and inorganic industrial effluents containing heavy metals. The water hyacinth plants can stand both highly acidic and highly alkalinic conditions, but more vibrant growth is supported by neutral water bodies (Gopal, 1987). Wilson et al., (2001) assumed a logistic growth model in their analysis of water hyacinth population dynamics in temperate and tropical zones. Their results revealed that growth rates in temperate regions vary with seasons. In tropical zones the intrinsic rate of growth for the weed was estimated to be in the range 0.04 to 0.08 per day. In waters with high nutrient contents, the plants have shorter roots, which are extensive laterally, longer shoots and relatively bigger leaves. In nutrient poor waters, the plants have longer roots, set deeper in search for food, relatively shorter shoots and smaller leaves. High multiplicative rates may seem to suggest that such an unhealthy competition will impose negative externalities for the community members and retard growth.

Ecological Factors: Water hyacinth is heliophyte plant growing best in warm waters rich in macronutrients (Center et al., 2002). Optimal water pH for growth of this aquatic plant is neutral but it can tolerate pH values from 4 to 10 (Center et al., 2002). This is very important fact because it points that Eichhornia crassipes can be used for treatment of different types of wastewater. Optimal water temperature for growth is 28-30° C (Center et al., 2002). Temperatures above 33° C inhibit further growth (Center et al., 2002). Optimal air temperature is 21-30° C (U.S. EPA, 1988). If lasting for 12 hours temperature of -3° C will destroy all leaves and temperature of -5° C during the period of 48 hours will destroy whole plant (U.S. EPA, 1988). Work of other authors also presents similar data about water hyacinth sensibility to low temperatures. Eichhornia crassipes can survive 24 hours at temperatures between 0.5 and -5 C, but it will die at -6 to -7° C and can not be grown in open where average winter temperature drops under 1° C (Stephenson et al., 1980). So if aquatic systems with water hyacinth are constructed in colder climates it would be necessary to build greenhouses for maintaining optimal temperature for plant growth and development (Reed and Bastian, 1980). Low air humidity from 15% to 40% can also be limiting factor for undisturbed growth of water hyacinth (Allen, 1997). Eichhornia crassipes tolerates drought well because it can survive in moist sediments up to several months (Center et al., 2002). Salinity is the main obstacle for growth of water hyacinth in costal areas (Olivares and Colonnello, 2000). De Casabianca and Laugier (1995) have studied the production of this aquatic macrophyte in relation to different effluent salinity value. They were also tracking plant reactions to high levels of salinity by observing symptoms of a different intensity (De Casabianca and Laugier, 1995). They have concluded that production of water hyacinth was reducing and necroses on leaves and bulbous petioles were occurring earlier with increase of salinity.

Possible Applications of Water Hyacinth: Through water hyacinth’s engulfing presence, large amounts of sunlight are blocked, thorough oxygen exchange is prevented and dissolved oxygen levels drop, the food web is altered, habitat for water fowl and other organisms is either destroyed or changed, and the biological diversity of the invaded area is greatly reduced (Denny et al., 2001, Brendonck, 2003). Water hyacinth can be a problem economically as it negatively affects fisheries, slows or even prevents water traffic, impedes irrigation, reduces the water supply, obstructs water ways, and slows hydropower generation (Denny et al., 2001, Brendonck, 2003). The positive aspects of the weed thus seem to outweigh its negative attributes.

Prior research on water hyacinth’s effects on water quality has focused mainly on the consequences of the dense mats formed by the interlocking of individual plants. The most commonly documented effects are lower phytoplankton productivity and dissolved oxygen concentrations beneath mats (Rommens et al., 2003; Mangas-Ramirez and Elias-Gutierrez, 2004; Perna and Burrows, 2005). Water hyacinth also has been found to stabilize pH levels and temperature in experimental lagoons, thereby preventing stratification and increasing mixing within the water column (Giraldo and Garzon, 2002). Photosynthesis is limited beneath water hyacinth mats, and the plant itself does not release oxygen into the water as do phytoplankton and submerged vegetation (Meerhoff et al., 2003), resulting in decreased dissolved oxygen concentration. The extent of dissolved oxygen reduction is dependent on the capacity of the water hyacinth mat to prevent light infiltration into the water column.

Water hyacinth is just beginning to be used for phytoremediation. This use came about for a few reasons, the first being that water hyacinth is so plentiful. People have been trying to remove the plant from many water ways, spending billions of dollars in doing so. In many cases this removal is nigh unto impossible. It has been discovered that water hyacinth's quest for nutrients can be turned in a more useful direction. Water hyacinth is already being used to clean up waster water in small scale sewage treatment plants. Phytoremediation used for removing heavy metals and other pollutants is a newly developed environmental protection technique. Extensive studies on freshwater resources decontamination revealed that some freshwater plants, among which is the water hyacinth growing prolific in wastewater, can efficiently accumulate heavy metals (Yahya, 1990; Vesk et al., 1999; Ali and Soltan, 1999; Soltan and Rashed, 2003; Tiwari et al., 2007). Water hyacinth also absorbs organic contaminants (Zimmels et al., 2007), and nutrients from the water column (Aoi and Hayashi, 1996). In California, water hyacinth leaf tissue was found to have the same mercury concentration as the sediment beneath, suggesting that plant harvesting could help mediate mercury contamination if disposed of properly (Greenfield et al., 2007). On a similar note, water hyacinth’s capacity to absorb nutrients makes it a potential biological alternative to secondary and tertiary treatment for wastewater (Ho, 1994; Cossu et al., 2001).Water hyacinth has long been used commercially for cleaning wastewater. The luxuriant plant’s tremendous capacity for absorbing nutrients and other pollutants from wastewater has long been overlooked by many wastewater engineers. Water hyacinth is also known for its ability to grow in severe polluted waters (So et al., 2003). Eichhornia crassipes is well studied as an aquatic plant that can improve effluent quality from oxidation ponds and as a main component of one integrated advanced system for treatment of municipal, agricultural and industrial wastewaters (U.S. EPA, 1988; Sim, 2003; Wilson et al., 2005; Mangabeira et al., 2004; De Casabianca and Laugier, 1995; Maine et al., 2001). To regret water hyacinth is often described in literature as serious invasive weed (Wilson et al., 2005; U.S. EPA, 1988; Maine et al., 1999; So et al., 2003; Singhal and Rai, 2003). In last few years a great interest has been shown for research of aquatic macrophytes as good candidates for pollutant removal or even as bioindicators for heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems (Aoi and Hayashi, 1996; Maine et al., 1999). Water hyacinth just one of the great number of aquatic plant species successfully used for wastewater treatment in decades, was of particular importance. It is important to emphasize that Eichhornia crassipes has a huge potential for removal of the vast range of pollutants from wastewater (De Casabianca and Laugier, 1995; Maine et al., 2001; Mangabeira et al., 2004; Sim, 2003) and that a great number of aquatic systems with water hyacinth as basic component were construct (U.S. EPA, 1988; Aoi and Hayashi, 1996).

Water hyacinth harvests have been put into valuable uses in several countries. Methods of converting the plant material into valuable products have emerged. Apart from its ornamental value, the plant has been found useful as a source of animal feed (Gopal, 1987), as a source of fertilizers for use in agriculture (Oyakawa et al., 1970; Majid, 1986), a source of biomass energy, a source of raw materials for building, handcraft making, paper and boards. In addition the plant has been found to be useful as a filter worth of solving man created problems of pollution in water bodies. However all the potential uses of the water hyacinth do not promote utilization of the weed to the level that qualifies it as a viable control option (Ogutu-Ohwayo et al., 1996). Below I will consider a number of possible uses for the plant, some which have been developed and others which are still in their infancy or remain as ideas only.

Paper: Similar small-scale cottage industry papermaking projects have been successful in a number of countries, including the Philippines, Indonesia, and India.

Fibre Board: Another application of water hyacinth is the production of fibreboards for general-purpose use and also a bituminised board for use as a low cost roofing material.

Yarn and Rope: The fiber from the stems of the water hyacinth plant can be used to make rope. The stalk from the plant is shredded lengthways to expose the fibers and then left to dry for several days. The rope making process is similar to that of jute rope. The finished rope is treated with sodium metabisulphite to prevent it from rotting. In Bangladesh, the rope is used by a local furniture manufacturer who winds the rope around a cane frame to produce an elegant finished product.

Basket Work: In the Philippines water hyacinth is dried and used to make baskets and matting for domestic use. The key to a good product is to ensure that the stalks are properly dried before being used. In India, water hyacinth is also used to produce similar goods for the tourist industry. Traditional basket making and weaving skills are used.

Charcoal Briquetting: This is an idea which has been proposed in Kenya to deal with the rapidly expanding carpets of water hyacinth which are evident on many parts of Lake Victoria. The proposal is to develop a suitable technology for the briquetting of charcoal dust from the pyrolysis of water hyacinth.

Biogas Production: The possibility of converting water hyacinth to biogas has been an area of major interest for many years. Conversion of other organic matter, usually animal or human waste, is a well established small and medium scale technology in a number of developing countries, notably in China and India. The process is one of anaerobic digestion which takes place in a reactor or digester and the usable product is methane gas which can be used as a fuel for cooking, lighting or for powering an engine to provide shaft power. Other studies have been carried out, primarily in India with quantities of up to 4000 liters of gas per tonne of semi dried water hyacinth being produced with a methane content of up to 64% (Gopal, 1987). Most of the experiments have used a mixture of animal waste and water hyacinth. There is still no firm consensus on the design of an appropriate water hyacinth biogas digester.

Animal Fodder: Studies have shown that the nutrients in water hyacinth are available to ruminants. In Southeast Asia some non ruminant animals are fed rations containing water hyacinth. In China pig farmers boil chopped water hyacinth with vegetable waste, rice bran, copra cake and salt to make a suitable feed. In Malaysia fresh water hyacinth is cooked with rice bran and fishmeal and mixed with copra meal as feed for pigs, ducks and pond fish. Similar practices are much used in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. The use of water hyacinth for animal feed in developing countries could help solve some of the nutritional problems that exist in these countries.

Fertilizers: Water hyacinth can be used on the land either as a green manure or as compost. As a green manure it can be either ploughed into the ground or used as mulch. The plant is ideal for composting. After removing the plant from the water it can be left to dry for a few days before being mixed with ash, soil and some animal manure. Microbial decomposition breaks down the fats, lipids, proteins, sugars and starches. The mixture can be left in piles to compost, the warmer climate of tropical countries accelerating the process and producing rich pathogen free compost which can be applied directly to the soil. The compost increases soil fertility and crop yield and generally improves the quality of the soil. In developing countries where mineral fertilizer is expensive, it is an elegant solution to the problem of water hyacinth proliferation and also poor soil quality. In Sri Lanka water hyacinth is mixed with organic municipal waste, ash and soil, composted and sold to local farmers and market gardeners.

Fish Feed: The Chinese grass carp is a fast growing fish which eats aquatic plants. Other fish such as the tilapia, silver carp and the silver dollar fish are all aquatic and can be used to control aquatic weeds. The manatee or sea cow has also been suggested as another herbivore which could be used for aquatic weed control. Water hyacinth has also been used indirectly to feed fish. Dehydrated water hyacinth has been added to the diet of channel catfish fingerlings to increase their growth. It has also been noted that decay of water hyacinth after chemical control releases nutrients which promote the growth of phytoplankton with subsequent increases in fish yield (Gopal, 1987). The response of the fish communities to water hyacinth is highly dependent on the preexisting fish community, preferred and available fish habitat, food requirements and availability, physiochemical conditions and, likely although not proven, water hyacinth density. The combination of these factors makes it very difficult to predict specific effects. However, given that dissolved oxygen concentrations decrease with increasing water hyacinth density, and given that macroinvertebrates and zooplankton are found at higher densities and in great diversity along the edges of water hyacinth mats, it is logical to suggest that fish could benefit from highly fragmented mats of water hyacinth. Such mats will have a higher edge-tocore ratio, providing some of the benefits of water hyacinth and minimizing the negative effects of dense nonfragmented mats.

Conclusion: In conclusion, water hyacinth can be brought to make compost, mulching and to clean the sewage. It is a good way to change waste products into useful things. More research is needed in order to define the optimum water hyacinth density in the reservoirs to determine its influence on the water quality of the effluent. Although all efforts must be made to control these plants where they are nuisance from natural ecosystems, research efforts must be stepped up to tap these recourses for human welfare. At a broader scale, we suggest research that focuses on the potential spread of water hyacinth into northern latitudes as a response to global climate change (Hellmann et al., 2008; Rahel and Olden, 2008). Finally, more research is needed on alternatives for the sustainable management of this worldwide invader; this includes economic incentives for private removal, spread prevention, or utilization projects that create goods from water hyacinth. In conclusion, our understanding of water hyacinth is still relatively weak, and hinders our ability to manage systems appropriately where this invader occurs. With the likely spread of aquatic invaders due to climate change, it is imperative that we continue and refine our water hyacinth research efforts to reflect better the needs of managers. The socioeconomic effects of water hyacinth are dependent on the extent of the invasion, the uses of the impacted water body, control methods, and the response to control efforts. Ecosystem-level research programmes that simultaneously monitor the effects of water hyacinth on multiple trophic levels are needed to further our understanding of invasive species.


  1. Ali, MM; Soltan, ME (1999). Heavy metals in aquatic macrophytes, water and hydro soils from  the river Nile. Egypt J Union Arab Biol 9: 99-15.
  2. Allen, LH; Sinclair, TR; Bennett, JM (1997). Evapotranspiration of vegetation of Florida: perpetuated misconceptions versus mechanistic processes. In: Proceedings of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, vol. 56. pp. 1–10.
  3. Aoi, T; Hayashi, T (1996). Nutrient removal by water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). Water Science and Technology 34: 407-412.
  4. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation (2005). Best Management Practices in Support of Fish and Wildlife Habitat. 3272 Sherman Ridge Road Marietta, Georgia 30064.
  5. Bartodziej, W; Weymouth, G (1995). Water bird abundance and activity on water hyacinth and Egeria in the St-Marks river, Florida. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 33: 19-22.
  6. Brendock, Luc (2003). The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrphic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). II. Species diversity. Arch Hydrobiol 158: 389-40.
  7. Brendonck, L; Maes, J; Rommens, W; Dekeza, N; Nhiwatiwa, T; Barson, M; Callebaut, V; Phiri, C; Moreau, K; Gratwicke, B; Stevens, M; Alyn, N; Holsters, E; Ollevier, F; Marshall, B (2003). The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). II. Species diversity. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 158: 389-405.
  8. Center, TD; Hill, MP; Cordo, H; Julien, MH (2002). Water hyacinth. In: Van Driesche, R., et al: Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States. USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 41-64.
  9. Cook, CDK (1990). Origin, autecology, and spread of troublesome aquatic weeds: In Pieterse, A.H., and Murphy, K., eds., Aquatic Weeds: The Ecology and Management of Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation: Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, p. 31-38.
  10. Cossu, R; Haarstad, K; Lavagnolo, MC; Littarru, P (2001). Removal of municipal solid waste COD and NH4-N by phyto-reduction: A laboratoryscale comparison of terrestrial and aquatic species at different organic loads. Ecological Engineering 16: 459-470.
  11. De, Casabianca M; Laugier, T (1995). Eichhornia crassipes production on petroliferous wastewaters: effects of salinity. Bioresource Technology 54: 39-43.
  12. Masifwa, WF; Twongo, T; Denny, P (2001). The impact of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms on the abundance and diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates along the shores of northern Lake Victoria, Uganda. Hydrobiologia 452:79-88.
  13. Giraldo, E; Garzon, A (2002). The potential for water hyacinth to improve the quality of Bogota river water in the Muña reservoir: comparison with the performance of waste stabilization ponds. Water Science and Technology 42: 103-110.
  14. Gopal, B (1987). Aquatic Plant Studies 1. Water Hyacinth. Elsevier Publishing, New York, New York, USA.
  15. Greenfield, BK; Siemering, GS; Andrews, JC; Rajan, M; Andrews, SP; Spencer, DF (2007). Mechanical shredding of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): Effects on water quality in the Sacramento-San Joaquin river Delta, California. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 627-640.
  16. Hellmann, JJ; Byers, JE; Bierwagen, BG; Dukes, JS (2008). Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 534-543.
  17. Ho, YB; Wong, WK (1994). Growth and macronutrient removal of water hyacinth in a small secondary sewage treatment plant. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 11: 161-178.
  18. Jafari, NG; Trivedy, RK (2005). Environmental pollution control by using phytoremediation technology. Pollution Research 24(4): 875-884.
  19. Lu, JB; Wu, JG; Fu, ZH; Zhu, L (2007). Water hyacinth in China: A sustainability science based management framework. Environmental Management 40: 823-830.
  20. Maine, MA; Duarte, MV; Sune, NL (2001). Cadmium uptake by floating macrophytes. Water Research 35(11): 2629-2634.
  21. Maine, MA; Sune, NL; Panigatti, MC; Pizarro, MJ (1999). Relationships between water chemistry and macrophyte chemistry in lotic and lentic environment. Arch. Hydrobiol 145 (2): 129-145.
  22. Majid, FZ (1986). Aquatic Weeds: Utility and Development. 1st Ed India Agro Botanical Publishers.
  23. Mangabeira, PAO; Labejof, L; Lamperti, A; de Almeida, AAF; Oliveira, AH; Escaig, F; Severo, MIG; Silva, D; Saloes, M; Mielke, MS; Lucena, ER; Martinis, MC; Santana, KB; Gavrilov, KL; Galle, P; Levi-Setti, R (2004). Accumulation of chromium in root tissues of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. in Cachoeira river, Brazil. Applied Surface Science 232: 497-501.
  24. Mangas-Ramirez, E; Elias-Gutierrez, M (2004). Effect of mechanical removal of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on the water quality and biological communities in a Mexican reservoir. Journal of Aquatic Health and Management 7: 161-168.
  25. Martinez Jimenez, M; Gomez Balandra, MA (2007). Integrated control of Eichhornia crassipes by using insects and plant pathogens in Mexico. Crop Protection 26: 1234-1238.
  26. Meerhoff, M; Mazzeo, N; Moss, B; Rodriguez-Gallego, L (2003). The structuring role of free floating versus submerged plants in a subtropical shallow lake. Aquatic Ecology 37: 377-391.
  27. Murugesan, AG (2001). Environmental status of the perennial river Thamirabarani with special reference to domestic and industrial pollution. Proc. Workshop on Enhancing Awareness of Ecological Status of River Basins Pp 15-21.
  28. Murugesan, AG (2002). Integrated biological control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes in the fresh habitats of India. In Ecology and Ethology of Aquatic Biota, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 361-372.
  29. Murugesan, AG; Ruby, J; Paulraj, MG; Sukumaran, N (2005). Impact of different densities and temperature regimes on the feeding behaviour of water hyacinth weevils, Necochetina Bruchi and Neochetina Eichhorniae on Eichhornia crassipes. Asian Jr of Microbiol Biotech Env Sc 7(1): 73-76.
  30. Ogutu-Ohwayo, R; Hecky, RE; Cohen, AS; Kaufman, L (1996). Human impacts on the African Great Lakes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 50: 117-131.
  31. Olivares, E; Colonnello, G (2000). Salinity gradient in the Manamo river, a dammed distributary of the Orinoco Delta, and its influence on the presence of Eichhornia crassipes and Paspalum repens. Interciencia 25: 242-248.
  32. Oyakawa, N; Orlandi, W; Valente, EOL (1970). The use of Eichhornia crassipes in the production of yeast, feeds and forage. In FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 187.
  33. Perna, C; Burrows, D (2005). Improved dissolved oxygen status following removal of exotic weed mats in important fish habitat lagoons of the tropical Burdekin river floodplain, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51: 138-148.
  34. Rahel, FJ; Olden, JD (2008). Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Conservation Biology 22: 521-533.
  35. Rao, VS (1988). Principles of weed science. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (India), 544 pp.
  36. Reed, SC; Bastian, RK (1980). Aquaculture systems for wastewater treatment: An Engineering Assessment. U.S. EPA Office of Water Program Operations, EPA 430/9-80-007.
  37. Rommens, W; Maes, J; Dekeza, N; Inghelbrecht, P; Nhiwatiwa, T; Holsters, E; Ollevier, F; Marshall, B; Brendonck, L (2003). The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment (Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe). I. Water quality. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 158: 373-388.
  38. Sim, CH (2003). The use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water International, Malaysia Office, 24.
  39. Singhal, V; Rai, JPN (2003). Biogas production from water hyacinth and channel grass used for phytoremediation of industrial effluents. Bioresource Technology 86: 221-225.
  40. So, LM; Chu, LM; Wong, PK (2003). Microbial enhancement of Cu2+ removal capacity of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.). Chemosphere 52: 1499-1503.
  41. Soltan, ME; Rashed, MN (2003). Laboratory study on the survival of water hyacinth under several conditions of heavy metal concentrations. Adv in Environ Res 7(2): 82-91.
  42. Sooknah, RD; Wilkie, AC (2004). Nutrient removal by floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecological Engineering 22: 27-42.
  43. Stephenson, MG; Turner, G.; Pope, P; Colt, J; Knight, A; Tchobanoglous, G (1980). The use and potential of aquatic species for wastewater treatment. Publication No. 65, California State Water Resources Control Board.
  44. Thomas, KT (1983). Studies on the ecology of aquatic weeds in Karalla, India. Int. Conference on Water Hyacinth. Karala, India.
  45. Tiwari, S; Dixit, S; Verma, N (2007). An effective means of biofiltration of heavy metal contaminated water bodies using aquatic weed Eichhornia crassipes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 129: 253-256.
  46. Trivedy, RK (2001). Use of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment. P.164-183 In: Low Cost Wastewater Treatment Technologies. ABD publishers, Jaipur.
  47. U.S. EPA (1988). Design Manual Constructed Wetlands and Aquatic Systems for Municipal Wastewater Treatment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. EPA/625/188/022. Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, 83.
  48. Vesk, PA; Nockold, CE; Aaway, WG (1999). Metal localization in water hyacinth roots from an urban wetland. Plant Cell Environ 22:149-158.
  49. Wilson, JR; Rees, M; Holst, N; Thomas, MB; Hill, G (2001). Water hyacinth population dynamics. Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. ACIAR Proceedings No. 102.
  50. Wilson, JR; Holst, N; Rees, M (2005). Determinants and patterns of population growth in water hyacinth. Aquatic Botany 81: 51-67.
  51. Yahya, MN (1990). The absorption of metal ions by Eichhornia crassipes. Chem Speciation Bioavailability 2: 82-91.
Copyright 2010- Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2019, Site last up-dated on 15-Ago-2019.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Internet Data Center of Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa, RNP, Brazil