About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News  Donations

Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research
College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin
ISSN: 1596-6941
Vol. 4, Num. 1, 2005, pp. 59-64
Untitled Document

Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, June 2005, pp. 59-64

Prevalence of oral and parafunctional habits in Nigerian patients suffering temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction

BDO Saheeb

Dr B. D. O. Saheeb, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Correspondence: Dr BDO Saheeb, P. O. Box 2799, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria 300-001; E-mail:

Code Number: jm05008


This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of oral and parafunctional habits in Nigerian patients suffering temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. It consisted of patients that were referred for treatment at the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic of the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. A pre-designed data form was used to collect information on age, gender, reasons for attendance, joint pain, side of pain, clicking, oral habits known to patient, parafunctional habits, occlusion and dietary habits. A total of 29 patients comprising 48.3% male and 51.7% female in a male to female ratio of 1:1.1 were studied. Their age ranged from 17 to 70 years. Eighty two per cent of them complained of joint pain on presentation while 17.1% complained of muscle pain. The joint pain was mainly unilateral in 62.1% and bilateral in 20.7%. Twenty six (89.7%) patients indulged in oral and parafunctional habits such as unilateral mastication 65.5%, hand-on-chin posture 58.6%, clenching 17.2%, tooth grinding 13.8%, chewing gum 37.9%, and finger and nail biting 24.1%. In all, 31.0% of males and 34.5% of females had clicking joints. Reciprocal click was detected in 52.6% of the study sample. There was a prevalence of 89.7% of oral and parafunctional habits in Nigerian patients suffering temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction.

KEY WORDS: Mastication, clenching, grinding, chewing, clicking, pain


Pain and dysfunction of the temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) still pose a therapeutic dilemma to the oral and maxillofacial surgeon. Epidemiological data on the disorder in Nigerians appear not to be available, as only few studies are recorded.1 Studies from North America revealed a prevalence rate of 12.1% amongst adults,2 although some authors have claimed that pain, clicking and locking have been experienced by approximately 20% of the general population.3

Pain in the joint and muscles is often distressing to patients. Advances in research in this area have thrown more light on the probable causes of the pain. The concept of inflammatory changes in the joint synovium, capsule or retrodiscal tissues as the principal underlying cause of pain has been documented.4 Large quantities of inflammatory mediators of pain were identified in the synovial fluid of patients with TMJ pain dysfunction.5 Fu et al correlated the concentration of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in synovial fluid with TMJ pain.6 Further studies showed that IL-6 is one of the most important pro-inflammatory cytokines that contribute to the pathogenesis of internal derangement in the TMJ.6-8 Sato et al9 detected the substance in nearly 50% of the synovial tissue specimen taken from TMJs with internal derangement. Other chemical mediators like a new peptide such as substance p and serotonin have also been detected in the TMJs and are thought to contribute to internal derangement.10, 11

While research on what is causing pain in the TMJ is advancing, the association between oral habits such as finger and nail biting, unilateral mastication and parafunctional habits with pain and dysfunctional changes in the TMJ appears not to have been studied in Nigerians. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of these habits in Nigerian patients suffering TMJ pain and dysfunction who were referred to our clinic.


All consecutive patients with TMJ pain and dysfunction who were referred to the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic from 1998 to 2002 were studied. Information on age, gender, reason for attendance, side of pain, clicking and its timing, muscle pain, type of diet, occlusion, oral and parafunctional habits were recorded in a pre-designed data form and analysed.

All the patients were examined for joint tenderness, muscle tenderness, clicking on opening and closing and occlusal relationship. Where necessary, radiographs were taken to eliminate hidden lesions in the head and neck region and haematological investigations were carried out.


A total of 29 patients referred to the clinic were studied. These comprised 14 (48.3%) males and 15 (51.7%) females in a male to female ratio of 1:1.1. Their age ranged from 17 to 70 years with a mean age of 39.6 years. There were 9 (31.0%) patients in the 17-25 years age group, 3 (10.3%) in the 26-34 years age group, 7 (24.1%) in the 35-43 years age group, 3 (10.3%) in the 44-52 years age group and 8 (27.6%) in the over 53 years age group.

Twenty four (82.8%) patients complained of joint pain on presentation. Of these, 18 (62.1%) had the pain located unilaterally, 6 (20.7%) located bilaterally and 5 (17.2%) complained of muscle pain alone. There was clicking in the joints of 19 (65.5%) patients. Of these, there were unilateral clicking in 13 (44.8%) patients and bilateral clicking in 6 (20.7%) patients. Slightly more of the females (n = 10, 34.5%) had clicking joints than males (n = 9, 31.0%). Of the females, with clicking joints, 4 (40%) were in the 21-25 years age brackets, while 4 (44.4%) males were in the 17-29 years age bracket.

Twenty six (89.7%) patients indulged in oral and parafunctional habits. Only 3 (10.3%) patients did not indulge in these habits. Table 1 shows the oral and parafunctional habits detected in the patients. The most common habits were unilateral mastication (65.5%) and hand-on-chin posture (58.6%). Some patients indulged in more than one oral or parafunctional habit. Table 2 shows the association of symptoms with oral and parafunctional habits. Table 3 shows the timing and classification of clicks. The most frequent sides of joint pain were left (n = 9, 31.0%), right (n = 8, 27.5%), both sides (n = 6, 20.7%) and not applicable (N/A) (n = 6, 20.7%). Majority of the patients (n = 23, 79.3%) had angle class I malocclusion, while 1 (3.7%) patient had angle class II division I, 3 (10.3%) patients had angle class III, while 2 (6.9%) patients lost their lower molars. The dietary habits of the patients were mainly mixed (n = 13, 44.8%), soft diet (n = 10, 34.5%), hard food (n = 5, 17.2%) and not available (n = 1, 3.5%).


Previous studies in Nigeria1 on facial arthromyalgia patients had identified unilateral mastication as an unconscious habit in over 50% of a sample of 20 patients. Earlier works by some investigators12 linked this habit to the contralateral pain in the joint. Although an appreciable number of the patients in this study indulged in the habit, the association between it and contralateral pain experienced by the patients was equivocal. There was no notable difference between the preferred side for chewing and contralateral pain in the patients studied.

The patients who indulged in hand-on-chin posture and other parafunctional habits such as daytime clenching and tooth grinding tend to overload the joint.13 It was not surprising that 47.1% of the patients in this study who indulged in the former habit felt pain on both joints. Although we did not determine whether the patient used the right hand or left hand on chin, the results of the study did not reflect the side where the pain was felt most. Bruxists and clenchers are prone to developing hyperactivity in the superior pterygoid muscle, which tend to put the meniscus under strain.14 It is not clear whether these habits contribute to the damage of the meniscus, superior pterygoid muscles and cause dysfunction. However, Berry et al15 postulated a gradual stretching of the upper head of the lateral pterygoid muscle in extreme bruxing as in sleep. If there is an initial change in the meniscus attachments as may occur after trauma,13 such activities as bruxism and clenching will only serve to apply further tension to the already damaged structure,14 thus causing local pain. Electro-myography studies have demonstrated a dramatic change in the contraction pattern of the lateral pterygoid muscle in patients suffering TMJ dysfunction.14

The other oral habits detected in the patients were pen and pencil chewing, finger and nail biting and chewing gum. Their role in causing pain and dysfunction in the joint has not been properly determined, none-the-less the damaging effect these activities may have in the joint may not be different from what occurs in bruxists and clenchers. Myalgia occurred in only 17.2% of the patients in this study. One of the causes of myalgia in the chewing muscles is the stress induced hyperactivity, which is thought to be built up through oral habits and other self-destructive behaviour.16 Furthermore, when subluxation of the meniscus has occurred it is also accompanied by myofascial pain and tenderness of the masticatory muscle.17

Some workers have associated TMJ dysfunction with the relationship of the mandibular incisors in the arch or malo-cclusion.15 However, this view is no longer popular although some adherents to this concept still abound amongst practitioners. The results of this study, where 79.3% of the patients have angle class I malocclusion lend credence to this. In this study, 82.8% of the patients complained of joint pain, which was mostly located unilaterally in 62.1% of the patients. A preliminary report on facial arthromyalgia in Nigerians1 had identified 60% of patients who complained of joint pain. Most patients who experience painful dysfunction will encounter it before the age of 40 years.18 Majority of the patients in this study who experienced dysfunction were in the 17-25 years age group, which is in agreement with the observation of some authors.13

The results of this study show that equal number of young men and women aged 17-29 years experienced clicks and that the habits of unilateral mastication and hand-on-chin posture were most frequently associated with joint pain and clicking while the latter habit was most frequently associated with TMJ pain alone. Clicking occurred in 20-30% of individuals above the 25 years age group and young women had a greater prevalence of clicking than men.19 Painful clicks were detected in only 15.8% of the clicking joints studied, while about eight out of ten clicks were painless. Most patients find clicking of the joint a disturbing phenomenon especially during mastication. Pain in the muscles of mastication could occur at the same time as painful clicks.17 Painless clicks do not seem to worry the patient. Many patients only seek treatment when the clicks are painful. Clicks become painful when the main insertion of the meniscus to the condylar poles begin to fail and the whole meniscus subluxes, while painless clicks are associated with the subluxation of the posterior band as the joint moves.17

About two thirds of the patients in this study experienced clicks on opening while 57.9% experienced it on closing. Clicking on opening and closing has been referred to as "reciprocal clicks" and when it is painful it signifies a total subluxation of the meniscus forward and in a medial position,20 resulting in internal derangement. However, available evidence has shown that internal derange-ment per se cannot be the sole cause of pain in some individuals.4,21 None of the patients in this study described the joint as either locking or grating.

This study has revealed a high prevalence of oral and parafunctional habits in Nigerian patients who had painful and dysfunctional temporomandibular joint. The identified habits in the study sample may be significant in aggravating the signs and symptoms of the disorder by overloading the joint and perpetuating the condition. It is therefore important for the clinician to elicit these habits in all TMJ pain and dysfunction patients and counsel them appropriately as part of the overall management of the patient.


  1. Saheeb BDO. Facial arthromyalgia in Nigerians: a preliminary report. Nig J Clin Prac 2001; 4: 28-32.
  2. Dworkin SF, Truelove EL, Bonica JJ and Sola A. Facial and head pain caused by myofascial and temporomandibular disorders In: Bonica JJ (Ed.). Management of Pain. Second Edition, Vol. 1. Philadelphia: Lea Febiger, 1990; 729-745.
  3. Bradley PF. Conservative treatment for temporomandibular pain dysfunction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 25: 125-137.
  4. Dolwick MF and Dimitroulis G. Is there a role for temporomandibular joint surgery? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 30: 307-313.
  5. William AC and Daniel M. Long-term evaluation of arthrocentesis for the treatment of internal derangement of temporoman-dibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 852-855.
  6. Fu K, Ma X, Zhang Z, Pang X and Chen W. Interleukin-6 in synovial fluid and HLA-DR expression in synovium from patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain 1995; 9: 131-137.
  7. Kubota E, Kubota T, Matsumoto J, Shibata T and Murikami K. Synovial fluid cytokines and proteinase as markers of TMJ diseases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 192-198.
  8. Sandler NA, Buckely M, Cillo JE and Braun TW. Correlation of inflammatory cytokines with arthroscopic findings in patients with temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 534-543.
  9. Sato J, Segani N, Nishimura M, Demura H, Yoshimura Y and Nishikawa K. Expression of interleukin-6 in synovial tissues in patients with internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 41: 95-101.
  10. Kopp S. The influence of neuropeptide, serotonin and interleukin 1b on temporo-man dibular pain and inflammation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 189-191.
  11. Henry CH and Wolford LM. Substance P and mast cells: preliminary histologic analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 384-389.
  12. Frank AST. The dental health of patients presenting with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Br J Oral Surg 1967; 5: 157-61
  13. Juniper RP. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction: facts and fallacies. Dent Update 1986; 13: 479-486.
  14. Juniper RP. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a theory based on electromyo-graphic studies of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 22: 1-8.
  15. Berry DC and Wakinson AC. Mandibular dysfunction and incisor relationship. Br Dent J 1978; 144: 74-77.
  16. Solberg WK, Clark GT and Rugh TD. Nocturnal electromyographic evaluation of bruxism patients undergoing short-term therapy. J Oral Rehab 1975; 2: 215-523.
  17. Juniper RP. The pathogenesis and investigation of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 25: 105-112.
  18. Solberg WK. Temporomandbular disorders: background and the clinical problems. Br Dent J 1986; 160: 157-161.
  19. Solberg WK, Woo MS and Houston JB. Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 98: 25-34.
  20. Juniper RP and Leopard PJ. Surgery for internal derangement In: deNorman JE and Bramley PA (Eds.). A Textbook and Colour Atlas of Temporomandibular Joint. London: Wolf Medical Publication, 1990; 176-186.
  21. Saheeb BDO. Temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction: an update and the controversies. Nig Dental J 1997; 11: 16-21.


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[jm05008t2.jpg] [jm05008t3.jpg] [jm05008t1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2019, Site last up-dated on 16-Oct-2019.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Internet Data Center of Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa, RNP, Brazil