search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


East and Central African Journal of Surgery
Association of Surgeons of East Africa and College of Surgeons of East Central and Southern Africa
ISSN: 1024-297X EISSN: 2073-9990
Vol. 14, Num. 1, 2009, pp. 119-121

East and Central African Journal of Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 1, March-April 2009, pp. 119-121

Retrocaval Ureter with Ureterohydronephrosis

A.Tegegne, C. Cobas

Urologic Surgeons
Correspondence to: Dr. A Tegegne, Email: alett2006@yahoo,com

Code Number: js09021

Retrocaval ureter is one of the rarest congenital anomaly. We report a case of retrocaval ureter who presented to us with right lumbar pain, with ureterohydronephrosis. The intravenous urography showed dilated proximal ureteric segment with moderate hydronephrosis. The patient was operated, findings were Retrocaval ureter and a ureteroureterostomy with anteriorisation of ureter was performed.

Introduction

Retrocaval ureter is one of the rarest congenital anomaly. It is a condition in which the ureter deviates medially and passes behind the inferior vena cava, winding about and crossing in front of it from medial to lateral side. It was first reported by Hochstetter in 1893.2 Incidence of retrocaval ureter is one in 1500 cadavers.1,3 Male to female ratio is 3 or 4:1. Most patients present with right lumbar pain. They may have recurrent urinary tract infection or episodes of acute pyelonephritis. Occasionally calculi may form above the obstruction and symptoms may be attributed to these.

Case Report

A 22 years old male presented with right flank pain aggravated by supine position since the past one year. The pain was of sudden onset, intermittent and colicky. He had also occasional left flank pain, frequency and urgency of urine. Had low-grade intermittent fever. Initially he has hematuria. On general examination, no abnormality was detected. On per abdomen examination, the patient had pain in the right lumbar region, right flank and right renal angle. He had no rebound tenderness. The per rectal examination was normal.

A complete laboratory evaluation was done. His haematological profile was within normal limits; the serum electrolytes were normal and so were his blood urea nitrogen and creatinine values. Urinalysis was normal. Ultrasonography of the abdomen revealed right side chronic obstructive uropathy secondary to retrocaval ureter. Intravenous urography showed hydronephrosis with proximal hydroureter on the right side. The left kidney, left ureter and urinary bladder were normal. The right kidney and ureter were approached by right subcostal incision below the twelfth rib. On exploration, right proximal ureter and pelvis were moderately dilated. Dilated proximal ureter curved medially, then posterior to the inferior vena cava, finally curved anteromedial to the inferior vena cava and took a downward course. The distal ureter was normal.

Procedure

Ureter was separated anteriorly from the inferior vena cava. The delated ureter opened by vertical incision and the ureter was anteriorised and a ureteroureterostomy was done using 4-0 Vicryl. Tube drain was placed and wound was closed in layers.

Drain was removed on the fiveth postoperative day. Patient was discharged on eighth postoperative day after suture removal.

Discussion

Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital abnormality. Though the abnormality is congenital, it does not present until the third or fourth decades of life. The inferior vena cava normally develops from the posterior cardinal, subcardinal and supracardinal veins, which undergo sequential development, anastomosis and regression to become the inferior vena cava and azygous venous system. Normally the right subcardinal veins forms the pre renal inferior vena cava, the subcardinal -supracardinal anastomosis forms the renal segment and the right supracardinal vein forms the post renal inferior vena cava. Left supracardinal and lumbar portion of right posterior cardinal vein atrophy. If the subcardinal vein in the lumbar portion fails to atrophy and becomes primary right side vein, the ureter is trapped dorsal to it.1 Variations of this include duplication of vena cava with the ureter lying beside or behind the vascular limbs. There is a report of a case of left Retrocaval Ureter associated to a transpsition(Brooks),(8).

Common presentations are right lumbar pain, dull aching or intermittent (renal colic), recurrent urinary tract infections and microscopic or gross haematuria. There is a high incidence of calculi due to stasis. Diagnosis is confirmed by ultrasonography and intravenous urography. Spiral CT scan and MRI help sometimes to delineate the anatomy clearly and non-invasively. Retrocaval ureter is classified into two types based on its radiographic appearance and the site of narrowing of ureter.4,5

Type I

  • More common
  • Ureter crosses behind the inferior vena cava at the level of the third lumbar vertebra and has a fish hook shaped (S shaped) deformity of the ureter at the point of obstruction.
  • Marked hydronephrosis is seen in 50% of the patients.

Type II

  • Cross over occurs higher at the level of the renal pelvis.
  • Lesser degree of hydronephrosis or none at all.
  • Renal pelvis and upper ureter lie nearly horizontal before encircling the vena cava in a smooth curve (sickle shaped curve).

The various anomalies associated with retrocaval ureter are Horse shoe kidney, Double IVC6 and Left retrocaval ureter with Goldenhar syndrome.7

Harril in 1940 emphasised that the position of the ureter and involved structures makes transection of the pelvis and re-anastomosis the most effective surgical treatment. Treatment entails dissecting the ureter anteriorly from the inferior vena cava, anteriorization and ureteroureterostomy. If there is severe hydronephrosis, Anderson Hynes pyeloplasty with pre caval transposition of the ureter has been advocated. Occasionally nephrectomy may be required in presence of thinned out cortex, poor function or severe infection.

Figure 1

References

  1. Schlussel RN, Relik AB. Anomalies of upper urinary tract: Anomalies of ureteric position. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr (Eds): Campbell’s Urology, 7th Edition, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1998; 1850-57.
  2. Resnick MI, Kurush ED. Extrinsic obstruction of the ureter, in Walsh P, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr. (Eds) : Campbell’s Urology, 6th Edition, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992; I : 533-69.
  3. Helsin JE, Mamonas C. Retrocaval ureter. Report of four cases and review of literature. J Urol 1951; 65 : 212.
  4. Bateson EM, Atkinson D. Circumcaval ureter, A new classification. Clinical radiol 1969; 20 : 173.
  5. Kenawi MM, Williams DI. Circumcaval ureter. A case report of four cases in children with a review of literature and new classification. Br J Urol 1976; 48 : 183.
  6. Kokubo T, Okada Y, Yashiro N, et al. CT diagnosis of retrocaval ureter associated with double inferior vena cava: report of a case. Radiat-Med 1990; 8 (3) : 96-98.
  7. Ishitoya S, Arai Y, Okubo K, et al. Left retrocaval ureter associated with the Goldenhar Syndrome (brachial arch syndrome). J Urol 1997; 158 (2) : 572-3.
  8. Emmett .Urografia Clínica.Ureter poscavo y circumcavo.1983;112-118(2)

© 2009 East and Central African Journal of Surgery


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[js09021f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil