|
East African Journal of Public Health
East African Public Health Association
ISSN: 0856-8960
Vol. 3, Num. 2, 2006, pp. 3-9
|
East African Journal of Public Heath, Vol. 3, No. 2, October 2006, pp. 3-9
PROVISION
OF HEALTH INFORMATION AND ADVICE TO ADOLESCENT PATIENTS BY CLINICIANS IN
ARUSHA, TANZANIA.
Melkiory
C. Masatu1,2, Gunnar Kvåle2, and Knut-Inge Klepp3
Correspondence to: Melkiory C. Masatu, P.O.Box 1162 Arusha, Tanzania and
Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Norway: E-mail:cmasatu@cedha.ac.tz
1Centre for Educational Development in Health Arusha, 2Centre
for International Health, University of Bergen, Armauer Hansen Building N-5021,
Bergen, Norway, 3Department of Nutrition Research, University of
Oslo, P.O.Box 1046 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
Code Number: lp06008
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the
extent to which clinicians provide health information and advice about
prevention of STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use to adolescent patients; and
investigate if clinicians’ demographic and practice-related factors are
associated with provision of such information and advice.
Methods: Administration of questionnaire to 197 practicing clinicians in health
facilities within two districts of Arusha region, Tanzania; investigating provision
of health information and advice on STDs/HIV, pregnancy, and substance abuse to
adolescent patients in the preceding 3 months. Demographic and practice-related
information was collected from respondents. Logistic regression was used to assess if demographic and practice related factors were
associated with providing information and advice.
Results: Sixty-four percent of clinicians regularly provided
information and advice to adolescent patients about STDs/HIV, 49% about
pregnancy and 45% about substance use prevention. Having often attended
adolescents with STDs was positively associated with regular provision of
information and advice about STDs/HIV, as well as regular provision of information
and advice about pregnancy. Being a clinical assistant and having often
attended adolescents with cigarette/alcohol-related problems were positively
associated with regular provision of information and advice about substance
use.
Conclusion: A substantial proportion of clinicians
miss important opportunities to prevent disease and promote health of their
adolescent patients. Future research should explore barriers to provision of
health information and advice to adolescent patients who seek health care services.
Key words:Health information, health promotion, clinicians, adolescents,
Tanzania
Introduction
A significant proportion
of young people in Tanzania become sexually active at tender ages (1-3).
Furthermore, sexuality-related problems such as sexually transmitted diseases
(STDs) including HIV/AIDS (4,5) and unwanted pregnancies with associated
complications (6,7) are prevalent among young people. Use of substances is
another emerging problem in this age group (8,9). Such problems may cause death
or long and recurring illnesses, reducing quality of life and the ability of
young people to participate actively in various roles in the society. On the
other hand, the adoption of healthy behaviours and lifestyles at a young age
could have significant impact on health throughout the life span; and could,
over time, represent a substantial long term saving in direct medical costs,
indirect costs, as well as suffering (10).
Research in the Arusha region, Tanzania, has shown that 85% of
school-going young people report having sought help from modern health care
facilities at least once in two years, most of the visits being due to illness
(11, 12). Visits to health facilities offer opportunities not only for
treatment of presented illness, but also, provision of information and
preventive advice for a variety of health problems affecting young people, such
as those related to unhealthy lifestyles. Use of illness visits as
opportunities for providing information and advice to patients in order for
them to take preventive measures for health problems, besides prevailing
illness, is an important primary prevention strategy.
This strategy is
widely being used in developed countries for adults as well as adolescent
populations (13-17), and has been found to be effective in promoting healthier
behaviours (18,19). Its extent, determinants and potential barriers in
developing countries has not been widely explored.
One study in Tanzania found that young people view clinicians as
trusted sources of sexual and reproductive health information (20). In the
Tanzanian health system clinicians are the foremost
contacts for most patients who seek health care. Clinicians are medical or
dental personnel, who examine, diagnose and prescribe treatment to
patients. They comprise of several professional categories with varying level
of medical or dental training. These include dental assistants, clinical
assistants, clinical officers, assistant medical/dental officers,
medical/dental officers, and medical/dental specialists. Medical/dental
officers and medical/dental specialists are University graduates. Except for
specialists working in government health facilities, the rest of the clinicians
work as general practitioners. Nurses, health officers, pharmacists, X-ray or
laboratory staff are not included in the clinician category. Thus,
clinicians are well placed to promote health and prevent morbidity and
mortality among patients.
Understanding the extent to which clinicians provide
information and advice to their adolescent patients, determinants of such
practices and potential barriers, may shed light on what critical areas needs
to be addressed in the training of health personnel and in the organization of
health services delivery in order to promote adolescent health.
The current study examines the extent to which clinicians provide
information and advice to their adolescent patients about prevention of
STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use (alcohol, cigarettes). In addition,
demographic and practice-related factors associated with the provision of
information and advice are investigated.
Methods
Participants
Study participants were recruited from government and privately
owned health facilities within Arusha (urban) and Arumeru districts (rural),
both located in Arusha region, northern Tanzania. At the time of this
survey, there were 50 and 71 registered and functioning health facilities
within Arusha and Arumeru district, respectively. The aim was to reach all
health facilities and survey all clinicians who had been attending adolescent
patients (age 10-19 years) in the preceding 3 months (inclusion criteria). All
50 health facilities in Arusha and 45 health facilities in Arumeru district
were eventually reached. Twenty-six health facilities in Arumeru district could
not be reached because the roads were impassable by car after being damaged by
heavy rainfall. The total number of clinicians registered in the health
facilities reached, were 131 for Arusha and 79 for Arumeru district. They were
all given the questionnaire. Six clinicians, 2 in Arusha and 4 in Arumeru
district, did not return the forms for unknown reasons. Seven participants (6
from Arusha, 1 from Arumeru district) have been excluded from analysis because
they reported not attending any adolescent patient within the last 3 months.
The analysis is therefore based on 197 participants, 123 from Arusha and 74
from Arumeru district.
Procedure
The Tanzanian Ministry of Health
approved the research protocol. Permission to conduct the study was also
obtained from medical authorities of Arusha and Arumeru districts. In addition,
written consent for participating in the study was obtained from the
respondents.
A self-administered questionnaire with a code unique for each
health facility was handed directly to the participant by the research team
whenever possible. Where it was not possible to hand it to the participant, the
head of the health facility was given the questionnaire so that he/she hand it
to the participant.
Participants
were requested to complete the questionnaire in a one-week period. They were
instructed to put the completed questionnaire in provided envelope and seal the
envelope before handing it to the head of the health facility or returning it
to the first author directly. After one week, the research team visited the
health facilities to collect the forms that had not been returned. The majority
of the respondents completed the questionnaire in the one-week period. For a
few respondents, up to two follow-up visits were made in order to retrieve the
forms. The six clinicians who did not return their forms after two follow-up
visits were regarded as unwilling to participate. The data was collected from
August through October 1998.
Instrument
The questionnaire, originally in English and translated into
Kiswahili (national language in Tanzania), was developed by the research team.
Clinicians were asked whether or not they had been attending adolescent
patients (age 10 - 19 years) in the three months period preceding the survey,
and if so, they were asked to indicate how often they attended such patients
and their characteristics (sex and school status). Further, they were asked to
indicate how often they attended adolescents who were pregnant,
had sexually transmitted diseases or health problems related to the use of
alcohol or cigarettes in the same period of three months. Also, they were asked
how often in the past three months they had discussed with
their adolescent patients (irrespective of presenting illness) about STDs/HIV,
pregnancy, substance use (cigarettes, alcohol) and relevant prevention measures
(responses 1 = Never, 5 = Always). In addition, respondents were asked to
estimate the number of adolescents that they had advised to use condoms in
order to avoid STDs or pregnancy, and also the number of adolescents they had
advised not to take alcohol or smoke cigarettes during the previous month.
Those who had not advised their adolescent patients to use condoms were asked
to indicate one major reason for not doing so, based on a given list of
possible options. The options were: it is against government policy, it is
culturally/morally inappropriate, fear of making adolescents promiscuous, lack
of skills, lack of time, lack of privacy at workplace and not part of
clinicians' responsibility. Also included was the "others (specify)"
option in order to allow participants to give reasons not listed.
Information
regarding clinician's sex, age, marital status and religion was obtained. Also
obtained were practice-related information namely; facility type, facility
location, facility ownership, consultation place, average number of patient
attended per day, average consultation time per patient and exposure to
STDs/HIV or substance use counseling training.
Data analysis
Chi-squared test was used to compare proportions. Factors associated
with clinicians' provision of information and advice on STDs/HIV, pregnancy and
substance use prevention (dependent variables) were assessed using bivariate
and multivariate logistic regression. The dependent variables were defined as 1
= Regular provision of information and advice (original codes
"always" or “often"), 0 = Irregular provision
of information and advice (original codes "seldom",
"rarely", or "never"). This dichotomization aimed at having
adequate number of subjects in each cell to allow analysis and meaningful
interpretation of the findings. Models were fitted for each
dependent variable. Demographic and practice-related characteristics
served as independent variables. In the multivariate analysis,
adjustments were made for variables significantly associated with the dependent
variable in the bivariate model and additional factors which had appreciable
effect on the regression parameters. A p-value < .05 was considered
statistically significant. Data were analysed using SPSS for Windows version
9.0 (21).
Results
Sample
characteristics
The majority of the clinicians were male and over 80% were under 45
years of age (Table 1). Female clinicians were more likely to be younger than
male clinicians (female under 35 years of age 57%, male 28%; χ 2(1) = 13.8; p = 0.001).
Clinical officers and those working in privately owned health facilities were
in the majority. Fifty-one percent of the clinicians had some training on
counselling about STDs/HIV, while only 10% had substance use counselling
training (Table 1). Of the 100 clinicians who had exposure to STDs/HIV
counselling training, only 2 said they had such training at the time they
pursued medical studies. Also, of the 19 clinicians who had exposure to
substance use counselling training, only 1 said the exposure occurred at the
time of medical training.
Most clinicians were working in dispensaries, they attended on
average 20 or more patients per day, and they were seeing patients in private
rooms. Ninety-one percent of the clinicians reported consultation time per
patient of 20 minutes or less (Tables 1). Clinicians working in private health
facilities were more likely than those working in government facilities to have
been exposed to STDs/HIV counselling training for a duration of 2 weeks or more
(42% versus 26%; χ 2(1) = 4.9; p = 0.03). Similarly, clinicians working in
dispensaries were more likely than those working in hospitals or health centres
to have been exposed to STDs/HIV counselling training for a duration of 2 weeks
or more (49% versus 25%; χ 2(1) = 11.7; p = 0.001).
Attendance of
adolescent patients in the past 3 months
In the past 3 months, all 197 clinicians included in the analysis
had attended adolescent patients. Nearly all (98%) reported they attended both
male and female adolescents, and a similar proportion reported that they
attended in-school as well as out-of-school adolescents. Ninety-two percent of
the clinicians reported having attended adolescent patients every workday or
several times a week (Table 2). More than a third (36%) of the clinicians said
they attended adolescents having STDs, while a third (33%) said they attended
pregnant girls at least several times a week in the past 3 months (Table 2).
More than half of the clinicians said they did not attend any adolescent having
cigarette or alcohol-related health problems in the past 3 months (Table 2).
Table 1. Demographic and practice
characteristics of participants (n = 197)
Characteristic |
n* |
% |
Sex |
|
|
Male |
154 |
78 |
Female |
43 |
22 |
Age (years) |
|
|
24-34 |
67 |
34 |
35-44 |
94 |
49 |
45-67 |
33 |
17 |
Marital status |
|
|
Married/cohabiting |
156 |
80 |
Single/separated/widow |
40 |
20 |
Religion |
|
|
Protestant |
121 |
62 |
Catholic |
47 |
24 |
Muslim |
28 |
14 |
Professional category |
|
|
Clinical assistant |
46 |
23 |
Dental assistant |
2 |
1 |
Clinical officer |
112 |
57 |
Assistant medical officer |
12 |
6 |
Medical officer |
15 |
8 |
Specialist |
10 |
5 |
STDs/HIV counseling training |
|
|
2 weeks or more |
72 |
37 |
Less than 2 weeks |
28 |
14 |
None |
97 |
49 |
Substance use counseling training |
|
Some training |
19 |
10 |
None |
178 |
90 |
Facility type |
|
|
Hospital |
72 |
37 |
Health centre |
28 |
14 |
Dispensary |
97 |
49 |
Facility ownership |
|
|
Government |
66 |
33 |
Private |
131 |
67 |
Facility location |
|
|
Urban |
123 |
62 |
Rural |
74 |
38 |
Patient workload per day |
|
|
Less than 20 |
83 |
43 |
20 or more |
111 |
57 |
Consultation room |
|
|
Private |
114 |
58 |
General |
81 |
42 |
Consultation time per patient (minutes) |
|
Less than 10 |
80 |
42 |
10 – 20 |
94 |
49 |
More than 20 |
17 |
9 |
*Total number may not add up to 197 owing to missing data
Percentages are rounded to nearest whole number
STDs = sexually transmitted diseases; HIV = human immune deficiency
virus
Table 2. Attendance of adolescent
patients in the past 3 months (n = 197)
|
% of clinicians
attending adolescents with |
|
Any problem |
|
Cigarette/alcohol |
Frequency |
STDs |
Pregnancy |
related problems |
Every workday |
51 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
Several times a week |
41 |
33 |
30 |
9 |
Once a week |
3 |
14 |
11 |
8 |
Occasionally |
5 |
40 |
47 |
30 |
Never |
0 |
10 |
9 |
52 |
Percentages are rounded to nearest whole number
STDs = sexually transmitted diseases |
Provision of
information and advice
Table 3 shows the percent of clinicians reporting having provided
information and advice to adolescent patients regarding prevention of STDs/HIV,
pregnancy and substance use in the past three months. Provision of information
and advice was common practice in relation to STDs/HIV, with 64% of clinicians
asserting that they regularly ("always" or "often") did so;
compared to 49% and 45% for pregnancy and substance use, respectively.
Information regarding the number of adolescents advised to avoid use
of alcohol/cigarettes and the number of adolescents advised to use condoms in
the previous month was available for 194 clinicians. Of these, 87 (45%) said
they advised between one and five adolescents to avoid alcohol/cigarette use,
25 (13%) advised between 6 and 10, 21 (16%) advised more than 10 and the
remaining 51 (26%) did not advise any. Regarding condoms, 91 (47%) clinicians
said they advised between one and five adolescents to use them in the previous
month, 28 (14%) advised between 6 and 10, 35 (18%) advised more than 10 and the
remaining 40 (21%) did not advise any.
Advising about condom use was significantly associated with
professional category and attendance of adolescents having STDs. After
adjusting for attendance of adolescents having STDs, the category including
assistant medical officers, medical officers and specialists was significantly
less likely to advise about condom use than clinical assistants (OR = 0.1, 95%
CI, 0.04 to 0.5). Clinicians who often (daily/several times a week) attended
adolescents having STDs were significantly more likely to advise about condom
use than those who seldom (once a week/occasionally/never) attended adolescents
having STDs (OR = 3.8, 95% CI, 1.5 to 9.3).
The reasons for not advising condom use to
adolescent patients in the previous month were given by 38 of the 40 respondents
who did not provide such advice. The reasons, with the number of respondents in
parenthesis, were: it is culturally/morally inappropriate (10), fear of making
adolescents promiscuous (7), lack of skills (5), lack of time (3), lack of
privacy at workplace (1), not part of clinicians' responsibility (2) and
patient did not raise the issue (10).
Table 3. Provision of information and
advice to adolescent patients in the past 3 months (n= 197)
|
% of clinicians
providing information and advice |
Information and
advice on: |
Always |
Often |
Seldom |
Rarely |
Never |
|
|
|
|
|
|
STDs/HIV prevention |
24 |
40 |
20 |
11 |
5 |
Pregnancy prevention |
17 |
32 |
25 |
13 |
13 |
Substance use prevention |
18 |
27 |
24 |
12 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentages are rounded to nearest whole number
STDs = sexually transmitted diseases; HIV = human immune deficiency
virus-
Factors
associated with advising regularly on STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use
prevention
Factors associated with advising regularly
on STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use prevention were investigated using all
the variables shown in Table 1 and Table 2. But, only variables with
significant findings in the bivariate analysis are presented in Table 4. In the
bivariate logistic regression analysis, having received STDs/HIV counselling
training for duration of two or more weeks, working in a dispensary, working in
a privately owned health facility, having often (daily/several times a week)
attended adolescents having STDs, and having often attended pregnant
adolescents were positively associated with regularly advising on STDs/HIV
prevention (Table 4). After adjusting for other predictors (exposure to
STDs/HIV counselling training, facility type, facility ownership, attendance of
adolescents having STDs and attendance of pregnant adolescents if appropriate),
only the association between attendance of adolescents having STDs and regular provision
of information and advice about STDs/HIV prevention persisted. Clinicians who
often attended adolescents having STDs were significantly more likely to
regularly advise on STDs/HIV prevention than those who seldom (once a
week/occasionally/never) attended adolescents having STDs (OR = 3.5, 95% CI,
1.6 to 7.9).
In the bivariate logistic regression analysis, clinicians who often
attended adolescents having STDs were significantly more likely to regularly
advise on pregnancy prevention than those who seldom attended adolescents
having STDs (Table 4). The association between attendance of adolescents having
STDs and advising regularly on pregnancy prevention was retained after
adjusting for clinicians' sex, attendance of pregnant adolescents and
attendance of adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related problems (OR = 2.7,
95% CI, 1.3 to 5.4).
In the bivariate logistic regression analysis, advising regularly on
substance use was associated with professional category and attendance of
adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related health problems (Table 4). These
associations were retained after adjusting for age, professional category and
attendance of adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related health problems as
appropriate. The category including assistant medical officers, medical
officers and specialists was significantly less likely to advise regularly
about substance use prevention than clinical assistants (OR = 0.2, 95% CI, 0.07
to 0.6). Furthermore, clinical officers were also significantly less likely to
regularly advise on substance use prevention than clinical assistants (OR =
0.4, 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8). Clinicians who often attended adolescents having
cigarette/alcohol-related health problems were significantly more likely to
regularly advice on substance use prevention than those who seldom attended
adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related problems (OR = 5.9, 95% CI, 1.8 to
19.6)
Factors which were not significantly associated with
advising regularly on STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use prevention were:
age, marital status, religion, exposure to substance use counselling training,
location of health facility, patient workload per day, consultation place and
consultation time per patient.
Table 4.
Factors associated with regular provision of information and advice about
STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use prevention in the past 3 months
|
Regular provision
of information and advice about prevention of: |
|
STDs/HIV |
Pregnancy |
|
Substance use |
|
|
Unadjusted |
|
Unadjusted |
|
Unadjusted |
Variable |
% |
OR (95% CI) |
% |
OR (95% CI) |
% |
OR (95% CI) |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male (n = 154) |
65 |
1 |
45 |
1 |
44 |
1 |
Female (n = 43) |
60 |
.8 (.4 - 1.6) |
62 |
1.9 (1.0 - 3.9) |
49 |
1.2 (.6 - 2.5) |
Professional category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinical assistant (n = 46) |
62 |
1 |
56 |
1 |
58 |
1 |
Clinical officer (n = 112) |
66 |
1.1 (.6 - 2.4) |
49 |
.8 (.4 - 1.5) |
43 |
.6 (.3 - 1.1) |
AMO/MO/SP (n = 37) |
57 |
.8 (.3 - 1.9) |
43 |
.6 (.3 - 1.5) |
30 |
.3 (.1 - .8) |
STDs/HIV counselling training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2 weeks/none (n = 125) |
57 |
1 |
46 |
1 |
48 |
1 |
2 weeks or more (n = 72) |
74 |
2.1 (1.1 - 3.9) |
54 |
1.4 (.8 - 2.5) |
39 |
.7 (.4 - 1.3) |
Facility type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital/health centre (n = 100) |
56 |
1 |
47 |
1 |
40 |
1 |
Dispensary (n = 97) |
71 |
1.9 (1.1 - 3.4) |
51 |
1.2 (.7 - 2.1) |
49 |
1.4 (.8 - 2.5) |
Facility ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government (n = 66) |
52 |
1 |
54 |
1 |
42 |
1 |
Private (n = 131) |
69 |
2.0 (1.1 - 3.7) |
47 |
.7 (.4 - 1.4) |
46 |
1.2 (.6 - 2.1) |
Attendance of adolescents having STDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a week/occasionally/never (n = 124) |
53 |
1 |
40 |
1 |
39 |
1 |
Daily/several times a week (n = 69) |
82 |
4.2 (2.1 - 8.7) |
65 |
2.7 (1.5 - 5.1) |
52 |
1.7 (.9 - 3.1) |
Attendance of pregnant adolescents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a week/occasionally/never (n = 131) |
58 |
1 |
44 |
1 |
44 |
1 |
Daily/several times a week (n = 64) |
75 |
2.2 (1.1 - 4.2) |
59 |
1.6 (1.0 - 3.3) |
44 |
1.0 (.6 - 1.8) |
Attendance of adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related problems |
Once a week/occasionally/never (n = 175) |
63 |
1 |
47 |
1 |
42 |
1 |
Daily/several times a week (n = 18) |
67 |
1.2 (.4 - 3.2) |
72 |
3.0 (1.0 - 8.7) |
79 |
4.9 (1.6 - 15.5) |
Percentages are rounded to nearest whole number
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; STDs = sexually transmitted
diseases; HIV = human immune deficiency virus
AMO = assistant medical officer; MO = medical officer; SP = specialist---
Discussion
Ideally, every contact with clinicians provides an opportunity for
disease prevention and health promotion. The finding in this study that 64%,
49% and 45% of clinicians regularly advised their adolescent patients about
STDs/HIV, pregnancy and substance use prevention, respectively, is a step in
the right direction. But, it is worrying that only 18% of the clinicians had
advised more than 10 adolescent patients regarding condom use in the previous
month, despite that 51% of the clinicians had attended an adolescent patient
every workday (equivalent to at least 20 adolescents being seen a month). This
clearly indicates that most adolescents are not being advised on condom use.
Regular provision of advice was relatively higher for STDs/HIV than
pregnancy or substance use prevention. This difference may be due to the fact
that from July 1995 to January 1997, two-weeks refresher courses about
management of sexually transmitted diseases using a syndrome approach were
conducted in several regions in Tanzania including Arusha. These courses
targeted clinicians working in private health facilities, and one of the course
contents was education and counselling of patients with STDs regarding their
sexual behaviour (22). As found in our study, 37% of the respondents reported
having been exposed to STDs/HIV counselling training for two weeks or more.
Thus, it is plausible that most of these clinicians attended the
above-mentioned course and were practising the skill. Indeed, a study of
clinicians who attended the above-mentioned course (who were practising in
Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions), reported that 95% of the clinicians claimed
they were applying the skill of patient education and counselling most of the
time (22).
Advising regularly on STDs/HIV prevention was associated with
exposure to STDs/HIV counselling training, type of the health facility and
ownership of the facility in the bivariate but not in the multivariate
analyses, after simultaneous adjustment for the effect of these variables. This
can be explained by the fact that majority of the clinicians who had exposure
to STDs/HIV counselling training were working in privately owned dispensaries.
Most of these clinicians might have undergone the course on syndromic
management of STDs mentioned earlier (22). Therefore, the association between
facility type and regularly advising on STDs/HIV prevention, as well as the
association between facility ownership and regularly advising on STDs/HIV
prevention, noted in the bivariate logistic regression analysis, is an effect
of exposure to STDs/HIV training.
Clinicians' professional category was associated with provision of
condom use advice and also with regularly advising on substance use prevention.
Clinical assistants were significantly more likely to provide condom use advice
and regularly advice on substance use prevention than clinical officers or the
category including assistant medical officers, medical officers and
specialists. According to the training programme in Tanzania, clinical
assistants receive less intensive medical training compared to clinical
officers, assistant medical officers, medical officers or specialists. Given
this fact, one would expect clinical officers and the category comprising of
assistant medical officers, medical officers and specialists to engage in
preventive work more than clinical assistants, but this was not the case. The
reasons for this discrepancy are unclear.
In this study, advising on STDs/HIV prevention in the past three
months and on condom use in the previous month were associated with the rate at
which clinicians attended adolescents having STDs. Similarly, advising on
substance use prevention in the past three months was associated with the rate
at which clinicians attended adolescents having cigarette/alcohol-related health
problems. These findings suggest that most clinicians were preferentially
targeting advice to adolescents who had symptoms of a particular problem. This
practice is common among physicians (23-25). However, the practice has been
criticised by other people; arguing that it is often too late for the desired
behaviour change to be effective (25).
Studies have indicated that younger (14) as well as female
physicians (15,17,26,27) may be more involved in preventive practice. Our
findings did not confirm this.
Health workers cite a number of obstacles to providing disease
prevention information and advice to all patients during illness visits,
including providers' lack of knowledge and skills, time constraints owing to
heavy workload, perception that the topics may be irrelevant to patients, and
thinking that such practice is not part of their responsibility (28,29). Other
barriers are provider's lack of confidence in being effective in this approach
and concern that the approach may jeopardize the doctor-patient relationship (25).
In our study lack of skills, lack of time, and thinking that it is not part of clinician’s
responsibility were mentioned by respondents as reasons for not advising all
adolescents on condom use. However, reasons for not advising on STDs/HIV,
pregnancy and substance use prevention were not investigated. Thus, future
studies should ellucidate such factors.
Some limitations are worthy noting when interpreting the findings of
this study. First, clinicians were only asked whether or not they discussed
with their adolescent patients about STDs/HIV, pregnancy, substance use and
relevant prevention measures. The detail of the discussion, such as, who
initiated it, what specific prevention measures were discussed, and quality of
information given is unknown. Secondly, generalizability of the results is
limited since the sample was small and drawn from a localized geographical
area. Also, some eligible clinician did not take part in the study because they
were inaccessible. The small sample size also reduced the power of the study to
detect statistically significant differences among some participants'
subgroups. Thirdly, as with any study utilizing self-reports, clinicians'
responses regarding provision of information and advice may not accurately
reflect their actual practice. Previous research has found that physicians
over-report their practices (14).
Despite these limitations, our study provides important information
with implications for clinicians' training and future research. A substantial
proportion of clinicians has never been trained on counselling about STDs/HIV,
and even fewer clinicians, on substance use. Given the vulnerability of
adolescent population to sexuality and substance use-related problems, it is
important that clinicians' basic and continuing education training programmes
incorporate counselling training on health risk behaviours as an essential part
of the curriculum.
Many demographic and practice-related factors investigated in this
study were not significantly associated with provision of information and
advice to adolescents by clinicians, suggesting that other factors may be
operating. Future work should explore factors such as clinicians' attitudes,
subjective norms, and self-efficacy in provision of information and advice to
adolescent patients. These factors have been found to predict health
practitioners' counselling of young adults (30) and children (31).
In conclusion, a substantial proportion of clinicians miss important
opportunities to promote the health of their adolescent patients. There is need
for clinicians to seize every opportunity of interacting with adolescents in
health care facilities and offer health education and preventive advice to
them. Future research should investigate barriers to provision of information
and preventive advice to adolescent patients about STDs/HIV, pregnancy and
substance use during illness-related visits to health care facilities.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Norwegian Council of Universities' Programme for
Development Research and Education for funding the research. We are grateful to
all respondents and to Mrs. Florence Eseko and the late Miss. Caroline Sangiwa
for invaluable support in data collection.
Conflicts of
interest
The authors do
not have any conflicting interests
References
- Kapiga SH, Hunter DJ &
Nachtigal G. Reproductive knowledge, and contraceptive awareness and practice
among secondary school pupils in Bagamoyo and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Central African Journal of Medicine1992;
38:375-80.
- Lugoe WL, Klepp K-I &
Skutle A. Sexual debut and predictors of condom use among secondary school
students in Arusha, Tanzania. AIDS Care1996; 8: 443-52.
- Klepp K-I, Ndeki SS, Thuen F, Leshabari MT & Seha AM.
Predictors of intention to be sexually active among Tanzanian school children. East African Medical
Journal 1996; 73: 318-24.
- Kessy AT. Prevalence and risk factors for HIV infection and other
sexually Transmitted diseases among youth in Moshi rural district, Kilimanjaro
region. [Dissertation].
University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.1996.
- Mnyika KS, Klepp
K-I, Kvåle G, Nilsen S, Kisssila P & King'ori, NO. Prevalence of HIV-1 infection in urban, semi-urban and
rural areas in Arusha region, Tanzania. AIDS 1994; 8:1477-1481.
- Mgalla Z, Schapink D
& Boerma JT. Protecting
school girls against sexual exploitation: A guardian programme in Mwanza,
Tanzania. Reproductive Health Matters 1998; 6:19-30.
- Rasch V, Muhammad H, Urassa
E & Bergström S.The
problem of illegally induced abortion: results from a hospital-based study conducted
at district level in Dar es Salaam. Tropical Medicine and International
Health 2000; 5:495-502. 8. Lugoe WL, Klepp K-I, Rise J, Skutle A & Biswalo
PM.
- Relationship between sexual
experience and non-sexual behaviours among secondary school students in Arusha,
Tanzania. East
African Medical Journal 1995; 72, 635-640.
- Nyange FK. Drug use and
bullying behaviour among primary school pupils in Dar es Salaam region,
Tanzania. [Dissertation]. University of Bergen, Norway. 1997.
- Igra V &
Millstein SG. Current status and approaches to improving preventive services
for adolescents. The Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 269:1409-1412.
- Masatu MC, Klepp K-I &
Kvåle G. Use of health services and reported satisfaction among primary school adolescents
in Arusha, Tanzania. Journal of Adolescent Health 2001; 28:278-287.
- Masatu MC, Lugoe WL,
Kvåle G & Klepp KI. Health
services utilisation among secondary school students in Arusha region,
Tanzania. East African Medical Journal 2001; 78:300-307.
- Fredman L, Rabin
DL, Bowman M, et al. Primary
care physicians' assessment and prevention of HIV infection. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine1989; 5:188-195.
- Gemson DH,
Colombotos J, Elinson J, Fordyce J, Hynes M, Stoneburner R. Acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome prevention: knowledge, attitudes, and practices of
primary care physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine19; 151:
1102-1108.
- Millstein SG, Igra V &
Gans J. Delivery of
STD/HIV preventive services to adolescents by primary care physicians. Journal
of Adolescent Health 1996; 19:249-257.
- Franzgrote M,
Ellen JM, Millstein SG, Irwin CE. Screening for adolescent smoking among primary care
physicians in California. American Journal of Public Health1997;
87:1341-1345.
- Haley N, Maheux
B, Rivard M, Gervais A. Sexual health risk assessment and counseling in primary
care: how involved are general practitioners and obstetricians-gynaecologists? American
Journal of Public Health1999; 89: 899-902.
- Russel MAH,
Wilson C, Taylor C & Baker CD. Effect of general practitioners' advice
against smoking. British Medical Journal 1979; 2:231-235. .
- Kamb ML,
Fishbein M, et al. Efficacy
of risk-reduction counselling to prevent human Immunodeficiency virus and
sexually transmitted diseases: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of
the American Medical Association1998; 280: 1161-1167.
- Masatu MC, Kvåle
G, Klepp KI. Frequency and
perceived credibility of reported sources of reproductive health information
among primary school adolescents in Arusha, Tanzania. Scandinavian Journal
of Public Health 2003; 31(3):216-223.
- Norušis MJ. SPSS for
Windows, Version 9.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc., Illnois, USA, 1998.
- Martin D, Klouman E, Masatu M, Klepp KI. Clinicians’
perspective of a training programme in syndromic management of sexually
transmitted diseases. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2005;
16:697-701.
- Coleman T
& Wilson A. Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general
practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problems. British Journal
of General Practice 1996; 46: 87-91.
- Flocke SA, Stange KC,
Goodwin MA. Patient and
visit characteristics associated with opportunistic preventive services
delivery. The Journal of Family Practice1998; 47:202-208.
- Lawlor D, Keen S
& Neal RD. Can general practitioners influence the nation's health through
a population approach to provision of lifestyle advice? British Journal of
General Practice 2000; 50: 455-459.
- Woodward CA,
Hutchison BG, Abelson J & Norman G. Do female primary care physicians practise
preventive care differently from their male colleagues? Canadian Family
Physician 1996; 42: 2370-2379.
- Maheux B, Haley
N, Rivard M & Gervais A. Do women Physicians do more STD prevention than
men? Quebec study of recently trained family physicians. Canadian Family
Physician1997; 43:1089-1095. 28.
- Mungherera M, Van der
Straten A, Hall TL, Faigeles B, Fowler G & Mandel, JS. HIV/AIDS-related attitudes and practices of
hospital based health workers in Kampala, Uganda. AIDS 1997; 11:(suppl), S79-S85.
- Kushner RF.
Barriers to providing nutrition counselling by physicians: A survey of primary
care practitioners. Preventive Medicine1995; 24: 546-552.
- Ngomuo ET, Klepp K-I, Rise J
& Mnyika KS. Promoting
safer sexual practices among young adults: a survey of health workers in Moshi
rural district, Tanzania. AIDS Care1995; 7: 501-507.
- Cheng TL, DeWitt TG,
Savageau JA, O'Connor KG. Determinants
of counselling in primary care paediatric practice: Physicians attitudes about
time, money, and health issues. Archives of Paediatrics and Adolescent
Medicine, 1999; 153: 629-635.
© Copyright 2006 - East African Journal of Public Heath
|