search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


East African Journal of Public Health
East African Public Health Association
ISSN: 0856-8960
Vol. 5, Num. 3, 2008, pp. 193-198
Untitled Document

East African Journal of Public Heath, Vol. 5, No. 3, December, 2008, pp. 193-198

A Stepwise Regression Analysis on Under-five Diarrhoael Morbidity Prevalence in Nekemte Town, Western Ethiopia:  Maternal Care Giving and Hygiene Behavioral Determinants

Wondwossen Birke Eshete

Jimma University, Public Health Faculty, School of Environmental Health Sciences
P.O.Box: 947, Telephone: Fixed line, +251-047-1128124; Mobil, +251-0911-548943 , Fax: +251-047- E-mail: wondwossenbirke@yahoo.com, Jimma, Ethiopia

Code Number: lp08036

Abstract

Objective: Various studies have addressed the relationship between maternal care giving behaviours including hygiene behaviours and the occurrence of diarrhoea in children. However, very few studies have done in Ethiopia in general and none exist in Nekemte town, western Ethiopia. Therefore, the present study aimed to estimate the prevalence of under-five diarrhoea morbidity in relation to mothers/care takers behaviours including hygiene behavioural determinants.
Methods: Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Nekemte town, western Ethiopia from October 15– November 26, 2007. 477 mothers/ care takers of index under-five children living in the households selected randomly from sub cities in the town formed the study population. Structured and pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data. The data were entered into a computer, edited and analyzed using SPSS for windows version 12.01. Stepwise logistic regression model was used to calculate the Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval for the different risk factors was considered.
Results: From 477, 461 were participated in the study giving a response rate of 96.6%. The mean ages of the respondents and the index children were about 32.4 (+8.8 SD) years and 25.27(+15.16 SD) months respectively. Diarrhoea morbidity prevalence over a period of two weeks preceding the study was about 28.9%. Although several maternal cares giving and hygiene-related risk factors showed significant association with diarrhoea morbidity on bivariate analysis, the use of cover material during drinking water transportation, faeces seen around the pit-hole and bottle feeding were the only significant variables on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: As diarrhoea morbidity was major problem among under-five children in Nekemte town, appropriate intervention programmes should be formulated focused on identified risk factors.

Key Words: Diarrhoea morbidity, Maternal care giving behaviors, Hygiene behaviors, Prevalence, and Under-five children

Introduction  

Diarrhoea contributes to an annual 3 million deaths in children under the age of five worldwide and diarrhoea-related illness and complications are associated with malnutrition, growth faltering, and compromised immunity (1,2). The burden of diarrhoea morbidity lies largely in the developing world where water and living conditions remain poor. For example in Africa, a child experiences five episodes of diarrhoea per year, and 800,000 children die each year from diarrhoea and dehydration (3). A more recent estimate indicated the two-week period prevalence of diarrhoea in under-five children is about 30.6 and 17.7 percent in Ethiopia and Oromiya region respectively (4).

Different studies done in different parts of Ethiopia have also shown that diarrhoea incidence and prevalence is very high among under-five children. A community based study conducted in Keffa-Sheka Zone, southern Ethiopia, found a two-week childhood diarrhoea prevalence of 15 percent (5). Another study from Jimma town, southwest Ethiopia, showed a prevalence of 36.5 percent (6).

Interventions to improve hygiene behaviors, sanitation, and water quantity and quality can reduce all-cause morbidity by >20% (7) and hygiene interventions specifically were reported to reduce diarrhoea morbidity by nearly 45% (8). The World Bank has declared the promotion of improved hygiene to be the third most productive method for preventing diarrhoea-related morbidities (9). Different reports noted that, hand washing after defecating or handling babies’ faeces and before preparing food, feeding children or eating are also crucial to reduce the transmission of diarrhoea germs. Washing with water alone is not enough. To remove faecal contamination, hands must be washed with an agent such as soap, mud or ashes which requires the hands to be rubbed together.  To be on the safe side the provision of safe water sources and sanitation facilities is important.  But constructing latrines and digging wells will have little effect on health unless people use these facilities, wash their hands and store drinking water hygienically in the home. Water may become unsafe at any point between collection and use. Clean water can easily become contaminated by dirty fingers or when it is poured in to a dirty container (10).

Many writers argued that, among the 2.6 billion people who currently lack adequate sanitation provision, many increase the health risks through their own lack of hygiene. Avoiding contact with fresh faeces and washing hands with soap or ash after defecation are simple hygiene measures that can have a major impact on disease transmission. Household and community cleanliness also reduce exposure to risks. Millions of the world’s poorest people are exposed to infection through the way they earn their living (11).

To this effect, different studies showed that availability of improved water sources or latrine alone will not reduce diarrhoea morbidity, without a change in behaviour that affects hygiene practice (12). Even though the source is protected, water may be contaminated at or following collection, i.e. during transport and/or storage. Water stored in an uncovered container may be contaminated easily by pets, dirt, or other debris (13).

Different studies were conducted in Ethiopia on water- handling practices and sanitation behaviour.  For example a study conducted by Desta (2003), unpublished source, at Agaro town showed that, 83% and 83.77% of the respondents use cover material during transport and store water at home respectively and 75.67% of the households practice dipping method to draw water from the container. Another unpublished study done by Mulugeta (1997) in Jimma town showed that, only 58% of the respondents covers the collection container during transport to their house, 85% rinse/wash the container before collection and 52.2% dipping cup with handle and 42.5% with out handle to draw water from the container.  Dirty utensils used to draw water from a storage container may also contaminate the water obtained from protected sources. A study revealed that the prevalence of diarrhoea was significantly higher in children from households where water is obtained from storage container by dipping than in those where water is obtained by pouring (8).

There are also studies done on the risk factors for diarrhoeal disease and have attempted to describe the relationship between parental behaviour and the occurrence of childhood diarrhoea. They suggested that maternal practices related to hygiene, breastfeeding, food preparation, and health care are important determinants of diarrhoeal disease incidence (12). In their study on breastfeeding and the occurrence of acute childhood diarrhoea, Ketsela et al (1991) found out that the risk of developing diarrhoeal disease in partially breastfed infants was five-times higher than that of infants exclusively on breast milk (14). Further more, it has been reported that there is a high chance of contamination, and greater risk of diarrhoea associated with bottle-feeding (9, 15).

Although, there exists a difference with their study findings the influence of improved water supply and sanitation factors on the prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases has been addressed in a number of studies. Despite of the aforementioned implications and the need for ongoing research, very few studies have focused on the influence of maternal and hygiene behaviours associated with prevalence of diarrhoea among under-five children in Ethiopia in general and none exist in Nekemte town, Western Ethiopia. In this study, therefore an attempt was made to assess the prevalence of diarrhoeal morbidity among under-five children and investigate the influences of the associated maternal care giving and hygiene behavioural risk factors in Nekemte town, Western Ethiopia.

Methods  

A community-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Nekemte town, East Wollega zone from October 15– November 26, 2007. East Wollega zone is one of the 17 zones in Oromiya Regional State located in the western part of the region at 331 km away from Addis Ababa. The study area, Nekemte town, is the capital city of the zone and it is administratively divided into 6 Sub-Cities. According to the 2006 Federal CSA abstracts Nekemte’s total population is approximated to 88,536 and with about 14,541 households (16). The total number of under-five children in the town is estimated to be 16,398 at the end of 2007 based on the assumption that 18 % of the total population is under-five children (17).

The source population were all mothers/ care givers of index under-five children and under-five children living in the town prior to the survey. The study population was mothers/care givers of index under-five children and under-five children living in the selected households from randomly selected Sub-Cities in the town. If there were more than one under-five children in the same family, only one index child was selected by lottery method to collect information on child’s health characteristics. Mothers/care givers of index under-five children who were mentally retarded or abnormal, critically ill and those who did not live at least six-months in the town prior to the survey were excluded.

The two-week period prevalence of diarrhoea among under-five children of the study area was not identified and studied before. Hence, the regional two-week period prevalence of diarrhoea among under-five children i.e., 17.7% was taken from the recent report of the Demographic and Health Survey (18) to calculate the sample size. Moreover, the flowing assumptions were considered: a design effect of 2, desired precision 5% and 95% confidence level and 10% for the anticipated none –response rate. Accordingly, the total sample size was ­­­­­434. The final sample size needed for the study was 477.

Multi stage sampling procedure was employed. In the initial stage, three from six Sub-Cities were randomly selected using lottery method. Accordingly, ‘BekeJama’, ‘BurqaJato’, and ‘Cheleleki’ Sub-Cities were selected. Then, all households in the selected Sub-Cities were registered through a house-to-house survey by fifteen trained 10th grade completed enumerators from October 15 - 31 2007(to draw a sampling frame). Accordingly, a total of 5928 households of which, 1348, 2206, and 2374 households were from BekeJama, BurkaJato, and Cheleleki Sub-Cities, respectively were selected. The probability proportional to size allocation of households to each Sub-City was carried out based on the total number of selected households they have. Systematic random sampling (every 12th households) from the selected households in the Sub-Cities was included for the study.

Data was collected using a structured questionnaire prepared by reviewing previously done similar studies and other materials on the topic. The questionnaire was translated into Afaan Oromo by fluent speaker of both languages to ensure its validity and consistency, and again back to English. Fifteen interviewers who have completed grade 10th and above who are fluent in Afaan Oromo recruited and trained. Three supervisors from Nekemte Health centre were selected and trained. They were fully responsible to lead and handle the whole session of data collection process, and correct any problem along with the principal investigator.

Training was given for both interviewer and supervisors for 3 days before and after pre-test in the form of discussion by using the training guide that was developed by the principal investigator. Hence briefing on the general objectives of the study, discussing the contents of the questionnaires one by one and the type of information needed, any questions arising during data collection time; and discussions on how to maintain confidentiality and privacy were communicated. And 5% of the questionnaires were pre-tested in another sub city with the same level in every aspects of basic infrastructure and socio-demographic characteristics in the study area. The result of the pre-test was used to correct some unclear ideas and statements. Moreover, the completed questionnaires were checked everyday after data collection for completeness, clarity and consistency by the supervisors and the principal investigator.

In the study, the occurrence of any episode of diarrhoea in a child two-week preceding the survey was considered to be the dependent (outcome) variable and maternal care giving behaviours, including water and sanitation related hygiene behaviors (such as hand washing and feeding practices; drinking water transportation, storage, drawing and treatment practices, and latrine and compound cleanliness) as exposure variables.

The collected data were edited, entered into a computer using SPSS version 12.01, and analyzed. Accordingly, the data were categorized and coded. The frequencies, measures of central tendencies and variations were obtained for each variable and displayed mainly on the tables and word expressions.

Bivariate analysis was also used to see the association between the explanatory and outcome variables. Logistic regression model was used to determine Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for the different risk factors of diarrhoea and describe the strength of association between the selected study variables by controlling for the effect of possible confounders and prediction of population parameters. The final (multivariate analysis) model was ran by selecting only those that appeared to be statistically significant (P<0.05) in the bivariate analysis and reported as the result of this study.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Public Health, Jimma University. Then the concerned officials in the zone at each level were communicated through formal letter from the School of Environmental Health Science, Faculty of Public Health of Jimma University. Informed verbal consent was obtained from the mothers of the children. Privacy and confidentiality were maintained during interview. Children who were found to be sick during the visits were advised to visit the nearby health institution.

Results

A total of 477 households with at least one under-five children  were planned to participate in the study, out of which 461 study subjects were enrolled making a response rate of 96.6 %.

One hundred twenty four of the mothers/caretakers (26.9%) were above 35 years of age while the majority, 270 (58.6%) were in the age range of 25‑35 years. The mean age of the respondents was 32.4 years (+8.8 SD). The majority of mothers were married 395 (85.7%), Orthodox 196(42.5%) by religion followed by Protestant 183 (39.7%) and Oromo by ethnic group 347 (75.3%). Regarding occupation, 314 (68.1%) were housewives, 63(13.7%) and 83(18.0%) were government employee and private gainful respectively. 58 (12.6 %) mothers were illiterate. Of the 403 (87.4%) mothers who had formal education, 196 (42.5%) and 207 (44.9%) attended some primary and secondary education, respectively. The mean household size of the study population was 5.5 (±2.0 SD) persons. About 263 (57%) of the households had less than five persons in their families. There was only one under-five child in 383 (83 %) households, and only 77 (16.1%) and 1(0.2%) households had two and three under-five child, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio- economic and demographic characteristics of the respondents, Nekemte town, February 2008 

Variable

Response  category

Frequency(n = 461)

%

Total persons in HH*

< 5

263

57

5 – 8

164

35.6

>8

34

7.4

No of under 5 children in HH

One

383

83.1

Two & above

78

16.9

Age of mother

<18

8

1.7

18 - 24

59

12.8

25 - 35

270

58.6

< 35

124

26.9

Marital status

Single

10

2.2

Married

395

85.7

Divorced

33

7.2

Widow

23

5

Religion

Orthodox

196

42.5

Protestant

183

39.7

Muslim

80

17.4

Others

2

0.4

Ethnicity

Oromo

347

75.3

Amhara

103

22.3

Garage

8

1.7

Other

3

0.7

Maternal Education

Illiterate

58

12.6

Elementary

196

42.5

Secondary & Above

207

44.9

Occupation of mother

Housewife

314

68.1

Government employee

63

13.7

Private gainful work

83

18

Other

1

0.2

Average monthly income of HH

< 500

171

37.1

501 - 1000

186

40.3

>1000

104

22.6

The age ranges of the children included in this study were from 0-6, 7-11, 12-23, 24-35 and 36-59 and in each range there was a total of 43 (9.3%), 37 (8.1%), 132 (28.6%), 121 (26.2%) and 128 (27.8%) children respectively. The mean age of the index children thus found to be about 25.27(+15.16 SD) months. Moreover, 260(56.4%) and 201(43.6%) of the children were male and female by sex respectively. As to the current breast feeding status of the child, the majority 277(60.1 %) of the children were non-breast feed, 138(29.9%) were partially breast feed and only 46(10%) of the index children were exclusively breastfeeding (Table 2).

Out of the total 412 mothers/caretakers who started supplementary feeding for their children 264(64.1%) started before the child reached 6 months, where as some 148(35.9%) started after the age of 6 and above months. As far as the method they used to feed their child is considered, 195(47.3%) mothers used cup and spoon, 221(53.6%) used their hands, and 137(33.3%) bottle to feed their child (Table 2).

It is interesting to note that out of 461 respondents the majority 340 (73.8%) do not treat their drinking water while about 121(26.25%) do treat their drinking water at household level prior to consumption by using either boiling, adding chlorine, or strain through a cloth.

The majority of the respondents, 407(88.3%) used a covered container during transportation of the drinking water from the sources and only a small proportion 54(11.7%) did not cover their drinking water container during transportation to their home. Furthermore, almost all, 434(94.1%) of the respondents reported that they had a separate storage container and cover their storage container in the home 435(94.3%). Also the respondents were asked for their method of water drawn from the storage container, and the majority 371(80.5%) responded that they draw water by pouring and 90(19.5%) draw water from the storage container by dipping (Table 2). 

Table 2. Maternal Care Giving and Hygiene-Related Behaviour Characteristics of the study households, Nekemte town, February, 2008

Variable

Response  category

Frequency

(n = 461)

%

Current breastfeeding status of the  chills

Exclusive breastfeeding

46

10

Partial breastfeeding

138

29.0

Not breastfeeding

277

60.1

Supplementary feeding (months)

<6

264

64.1

>6

148

35.9

Methods used in supplemtary feeding

Hand

221

53.6

Cup & spoon

195

47.3

Bottle

137

33.3

Drinking water transportation

In a cover container

407

88.3

In uncovered container

54

11.7

Home drinking water treatment

Yes

121

26.2

No

340

73.8

Separate storage container for drinking water

Yes

27

5.9

Cover water storage container

No

435

94.3

Method of drawing water

By pouring

371

80.5

By dipping

90

19.5

A separate ca/cup for dipping (N = 90)

Yes

63

70

No

27

30

Doest the can/cup have handle

Yes

54

60

No

36

40

How often do you wash your hands

After defecation

281

61

Before preparing child’s food

104

22.6

After cleansing child’s faeces

106

23

After eating

157

34.1

Cleansing materials used to wash hands

Soap

313

67.9

Ash

2

0.4

Only water

146

31.7

Faeces seen around the pit-hole/slab/floor

Yes

154

36

of latrine (N = 423)

No

269

64

Faeces seen in the compound

Yes

111

24.3

No

350

75.7

As indicated in Table 2, mothers/caretakers were asked about their hand washing practice.  Accordingly, 281(61%), 104(22.6%), 106(23%) and 157(34.1%) of the respondents responded that they often used to wash their hands after defecation, before preparing child’s food, after cleansing child’s faeces and after eating, respectively. About 423 (91.8%) of the study households were responded that they either had privately owned or shared latrine facility and a proportion of 38(8.2%) households do not have the facility. From these 423 households with latrine facility, faeces were seen around the pit-hole/slab/floor of latrine of 154 (36%) households.

Upon further questioning to identify the history of diarrhoea, 329(71.4%), 65(14.1%) and 133(28.9%) study participants had reported that their child had a history of diarrhoea during their life time, survey time and in the past two weeks periods respectively. Out of the two week report of diarrhoeal history, 118(77.6%) mentioned that a child exhibit a watery type of diarrhoea and 34(22.4%) had bloody & mucus diarrhoeal type.

Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the characteristics that differentiated the child who had diarrhoea during the two week period prior to the survey from those who do not had diarrhoea, and the dichotomous variable is defined as 1= child who had diarrhoea: 0= the child who did not have diarrhoea during the two week period. Coefficients were expressed as crude and adjusted OR relative to the referent category.

In the Bivariate analysis, a number of risk factors emerged as significant predictors of under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity. These include presence or absence of the cover of drinking water container during transportation to the house, home drinking water treatment,  the presence of faeces around the pit-hole (P<0.001), cover of the storage container in the house, faeces seen in the compound, hand wash practice after cleansing child’s faeces (P<0.05), breast feeding status of the child (P<0.05) and the use of bottle to feed the child (P<0.001) were found to be significantly associated with under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity (Table 3).

Multivariate logistic regression model was employed to evaluate associations between factors and dichotomous variables designed to measure maternal care giving behaviors, including hygiene behaviors risk factors and under-five childhood morbidity in the last two-weeks prior to survey. In the model, variables which were found to be associated significantly in a bivariate analysis were re-evaluated independently controlling for other potential confounders. Hence, most of the variables disappear and condition of drinking water transportation to the house from the source, the presence of faeces around the pit-hole, and the use of bottle to feed the child were remained to be independent risk factors/predictors of under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity.  Children from households who claimed to transport their drinking water using covered container had about 87% less likely to have diarrhoea than children from households who transports their drinking water using uncovered container, [OR: 0.13, 95%CI (0.02, 0.85)]. Again children from those households in which  faeces were observed around the pit-hole/on the slab had about three times more likely to had diarrhoea compared to those children from houses in which faeces had not observed around the pit-hole[OR : 3.13, 95%CI (1.04,9.45)]. Bottle feeding had also found to be about three times more likelihood of increased risk of getting diarrhoea than those children who did not used bottle feeding method [OR: 3.16, 95%CI (1.04,9.64)].

Table 3 Bivariate Analysis: Variables significantly associated with under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity, Nekemte town, February, 2008.

Variables

Diarrhoea

Yes (%)         No (%)

Crude OR (95% CI)

P-Value

Breast feeding status

 

 

 

 

Exclusively breast feed

6(13)

40(87)

1.00

 

Partially breast feed

45(32.6)

93(67.4)

3.22(1.27,8.16)

0.014

Not breast feed

82(29.6)

195(70.4)

2.80(1.14,6.86)

0.024

Drinking water transportation

 

 

 

 

 In covered container

99(24.3)

308(75.7)

0.19(0.10,0.34)

0.000

 In uncovered container

34(63)

20(37)

1.00

 

Home drinking water treatment (strain through a cloth)

 

 

 

 

Yes

11(45)

9(45)

1.00

 

No

30(30)

70(70)

0.35(0.13,0.093)

0.036

Storage container in home

 

 

 

 

Have cover

118(27.2)

316(72.8)

0.27(0.12,0.61)

0.002

Do not have cover

15(57.7)

11(42.3)

1.00

 

Faeces around pit-hole/slab

 

 

 

 

Yes

70(45)

84(55)

1.00

 

No

52(19)

217(81)

0.29(0.19,0.45)

0.000

Faeces seen in the compound

 

 

 

 

Yes

42(37.8)

69(62.2)

1.00

 

No

91(26)

259(74)

0.58(0.37,0.91)

0.017

Hand wash after cleansing child’s faeces?

 

 

 

 

Yes

20(18.9)

86(81.1)

1.00

 

No

112(31.6)

242(68.4)

1.99(1.17,3.40)

0.012

Bottle feeding

 

 

 

 

Yes

58(42.3)

79(57.7)

1.00

 

 No

69(24.2)

216(75.8)

0.44(0.28,0.67)

0.000

Discussion

A number of studies revealed that poor maternal care giving behaviors, including hygiene behaviors related to water and sanitation contribute to the leading killers of children under-five, including diarrhoea disease (12). Interventions to improve hygiene behaviors were reported to reduce diarrhoea morbidity by nearly 45% (8).

This study used a representative sample of households with at least one under-five child in Nekemte town to determine maternal care giving behaviors, including hygiene behaviors associated with the two-week period prevalence of childhood diarrhoeal morbidity. The study presents findings from community based analytical cross-sectional survey of the study area.

The two-week period prevalence of childhood diarrhoea morbidity in this study was 28.9%. This finding is almost inconsistent with the study done in different parts of the south-western Ethiopia which was about 33.7% and 36.5% in Manna district and Jimma town, respectively (19, 6). But the finding is not in agreement with the one reported from Keffa-Sheka Zone, southern Ethiopia which showed about 15% of two- week period prevalence of diarrhoeal morbidity (5). The difference might be attributable to the difference in the socio demographic characteristics of study households.

As to the water handling practice, the findings of this study showed that about 88.3% of the respondents reported that they cover their material during transport to house, 94% reported that they used a separate storage container and the container have a cover. In line with this, this finding is in comparable with the findings of thesis done by Desta (2003), unpublished, in Agaro which showed 83% and 83.7%, respectively. In the present study, it has been found that about 19.5% of the respondents claimed that they used dipping method to draw water from the storage container which is lower than the findings reported by Desta (2003), which sowed about 52.2% used dipping method. Even though, significance association was not observed in this study between method of drawing water from storage container and diarrhoeal morbidity, another study revealed that the prevalence of diarrhoea was significantly higher in children from households where water is obtained from storage container by dipping than in those where water is obtained by pouring (5).

On the other hand, our study showed a significant association between drinking water transportation to the house and under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity. Children from households who claimed transport their drinking water using uncovered container had about 87% more likely to have diarrhoea than children from households who transports their drinking water using covered container, [OR: 0.13, 95%CI (0.02, 0.85)].This might be attributable to because of the fact that, even though the source is protected, water may be contaminated at or following collection, i.e. during transport and/or storage. Water stored in an uncovered container may be contaminated easily by pets, dirt, or other debris (13).

The presence or absence of faeces around the pit-hole or on the slab was another independent predictor of under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity identified in this study. Children from those households in which  faeces were observed around the pit-hole/on the slab had about three times more likely to had diarrhoea than those children from houses in which faeces had not observed around the pit-hole[OR : 3.13, 95%CI (1.04,9.45)].Consistent with our findings other study also reported that the presence of excreta around pit hole showed strong association with under-five childhood diarrhoeal morbidity (15). This is an important implication that the mere presence of latrine facility does not have a great contribution for prevention of excreta-related disease but it is the proper utilization that had a vital importance.

In this study, significant association was observed between method of bottle feeding and diarrhoeal morbidity. Children who were on bottle feeding had about three times more likely to have diarrhoea than those children who did not used bottle feeding [OR: 3.16, 95%CI (1.04, 9.64)]. This is inconsistent with the study findings reported by Getaneh et al (1997) and Van Derslice et al (1994) which found out that that there is a high chance of contamination and greater risk of diarrhoea associated with bottle-feeding (6, 15).

Even though they disappeared in multivariate analysis, breast feeding status of the child and hand washing after cleansing child’s faeces were significantly associated with diarrhoeal morbidity in bivariate analysis. Different literatures also revealed that maternal practices related to hygiene, breastfeeding, food preparation, and health care are important determinants of diarrhoeal disease incidence (12, 6, and 15).

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Jimma University for its financial and material support to undertake the study. I would also like to express my gratitude to Nekemte City Administration and Municipality, the data collectors and the study participants as a whole. 

References

  1. Lanata CF, Black RE. Diarrhoeal diseases. In: Semba RD, Bloem MW (eds). Nutrition and Health in Developing Countries. Totowa: Humana Press, 2001.
  2. Bern C, Martines J, Zoysa Ide & Glass RI. The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: a ten- year update. Bull. WHO 1992; 70(6): 705-714.
  3. Woldemichael G. Diarrhoeal morbidity among young children in Eritrea: Environmental and socioeconomic determinants. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001 Jun; 19(2): 83-90.
  4. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Central Statistics Authority & ORC Marco. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA, 2005.
  5. Teklemariam S, Getaneh T & Bekele F. Environmental determinants of diarrhoea morbidity in under-five children. Keffa-Sheka Zone. Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. Med. J.   2000; 38(1): 27-34.
  6. Getaneh T. Assefa A, Taddesse Z. Diarrhoea morbidity in urban area of South-west Ethiopia. East Afr. Med. J. 1997; 74(8): 491-494.
  7. Aiello AE, Larson EL. What is the evidence for a causal link between hygiene and infections? Lancet Infect Dis 2002; 2:103–10.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Fewtrell L, Kaufmann RB, Way D et al. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5:42–52.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Martines J, Phillips M, Feacham RGA. Diarrhoeal diseases. In: Jameson DT, Mosley WH, Measham AR, Bobadillo JL (eds). Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  10. Dialogue on Diarrhoea. Hygienic habits in the home: No-54 Sep- Nov. 1993
  11. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, Sanitation for All? June 2007, pp.10, UK
  12. Mock NB, Sellers TA, Abdoh AA & Franklin RR. Socioeconomic, environmental, demographic and behavioral factors associated with the occurrence of diarrhoea in young children. Soc. Sci. Med. 1993; 36(6): 807-816.
  13. Asnake M.  Water handling practices and their association with childhood diarrhoea. MPH Thesis. AAU; 1991.
  14. Ketsela T. Knowledge and practice of mothers/caretakers towards diarrhoea and its treatment in rural communities in Ethiopia. Eth. Med. J.1991; 29(4)
  15. Van Derslice J, Popkin B & Briscoe J. Drinking water quality, sanitation and breastfeeding: their interactive effects on infant health. Bull. of WHO. 1994; 72(4): 589-601.
  16. Central Statistical Authority (CSA) Statistical Abstract of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, January 2006, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.pp.50
  17. Federal Ministry of Health of Ethiopia (FMOH) Health and Health related indicators. 2005 Addis Ababa, pp.22
  18. Ethiopia Demographic and health survey (DHS). Central Statistics Authority & ORC Marco. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA, 2005.
  19. Kaba M & Ayele F. Ethnographic study of diarrhoeal disease among under-five children in Mana District, Jimma Zone, and Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Dev. 2000; 14(1):77-83

Copyright 2008 - East African Journal of Public Heath

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil