search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Association of Medical Microbiology
ISSN: 0255-0857 EISSN: 1998-3646
Vol. 27, Num. 3, 2009, pp. 202-209

Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol. 27, No. 3, July-September, 2009, pp. 202-209

Review Article

Probiotics

Department of Microbiology, GMCH, Chandigarh - 160 032
Correspondence Address:Department of Microbiology, GMCH, Chandigarh - 160 032
varshagupta_99@yahoo.com

Date of Submission: 13-Feb-2008
Date of Acceptance: 31-Jul-2008

Code Number: mb09062

PMID: 19584499
DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.53201

Abstract

The term "probiotic" was first used in 1965, by Lilly and Stillwell, to describe substances secreted by one organism which stimulate the growth of another. The use of antibiotics, immunosuppressive therapy and irradiation, amongst other means of treatment, may cause alterations in the composition and have an effect on the GIT flora. Therefore, the introduction of beneficial bacterial species to GI tract may be a very attractive option to re-establish the microbial equilibrium and prevent disease. Prebiotic is a non-digestible food ingredient that confers benefits on the host by selectively stimulating one bacterium or a group of bacteria in the colon with probiotic properties. Both probiotics and prebiotics are together called as Synbiotics. Various bacterial genera most commonly used in probiotic preparations are Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia, Enterococcus, Bacillus and Streptococcus . Some fungal strains belonging to Saccharomyces have also been used. Probiotics have been shown to be effective in varied clinical conditions- ranging from infantile diarrhoea, necrotizing enterocolitis, antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, relapsing Clostridium difficle colitis, Helicobacter pylori infections, inflammatory bowel disease to cancer, female uro-genital infection and surgical infections. Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG has proven beneficial affects on intestinal immunity. It increases the number of IgA and other immunoglobulins secreting cells in the intestinal mucosa. It also stimulates local release of interferons. It facilitates antigen transport to underlying lymphoid cells, which serves to increase antigen uptake in Peyer's patches. Probiotics are live microorganisms, so it is possible that they may result in infection in the host. The risk and morbidity of sepsis due to probiotic bacteria should be weighed against the potential for sepsis due to more pathological bacteria and the morbidity of diseases for which probiotic bacteria are being used as therapeutic agents. Also, future, well-designed placebo controlled studies with validated results are required for ascertaining the true health benefits of probiotics The important point in this regard is careful selection of the probiotic agent, its dose standardization and a thorough knowledge of its beneficial effects.

Keywords: Probiotics, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Diarrhoea

Introduction

The concept of probiotics probably dates back to 1908, when Noble Prize winner Eli Metchnikoff suggested that the long life of Bulgarian peasants resulted from their consumption of fermented milk products. [1] The term "probiotic" was first used in 1965, by Lilly and Stillwell for describing substances secreted by one organism which stimulate the growth of another. [2] Marteau et al , in 2002 defined them as "microbial preparations or components of microbial cells that have a beneficial effect on health and well being". [3]

Humans live in close association with vast numbers of micro-organisms present on the skin, in the mouth and in the gastro-intestinal tract. The greatest concentration of commensal organisms is found in the GI tract, which has more than 400 m 2 of surface area. This constitutes the second largest surface area of the body after that of the respiratory tract. The GIT harbors a rich flora of more than 500 different bacterial species, some of which have important health functions, which include stimulating the immune system, protecting the host from invading bacteria and viruses and aiding digestion, [4],[5] The gut flora is acquired rapidly after birth, remains relatively stable throughout the life and is essential for human homeostasis. When the intestinal microflora is developing, the interactions between this microflora with the host results in evolution of a unique and distinct intestinal immune system. The challenge facing this host mucosal immune system is to discriminate between pathogens and benign organisms by stimulating protective immunity without excessive inflammatory response that may disrupt the integrity of the GI mucosa, [5]

The use of antibiotics, immunosuppressive therapy and irradiation, amongst other means of treatment, may cause alterations in the composition and have effect on the flora. Therefore, the introduction of beneficial bacterial species into the GI tract may be a very attractive option to re-establish the microbial equilibrium and prevent disease. [6]

Definition

The term ′probiotics′ was derived from the Greek word, meaning "for life". [7] An expert panel commissioned by FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) and WHO defined probiotic as "live micro-organisms," which, when administered in adequate amounts confers a health benefit on the host. [8] Various bacterial genera most commonly used in probiotic preparations are Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Escherichia, Enterococcus, Bacillus and Streptococcus . Some fungal strains belonging to Saccharomyces have also been used [Table - 1]. [9],[10],[11]

Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) was the first probiotic, which received most clinical attention to date. [12] The Lactobacillus strain used traditionally for fermentation by dairy industry was unable to implant the gut, so,, Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG was discovered in 1985, by developing a list of ideal qualities for probiotics. [13] Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG has proven beneficial affects on intestinal immunity. It increases the number of IgA and other immunoglobulins secreting cells in the intestinal mucosa, stimulates local release of interferons and facilitates antigen transport to underlying lymphoid cells, which serves to increase antigen uptake in Peyer′s patches. [7]

Prebiotic is a non-digestible food ingredient that confers benefits on the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one bacterium or a group of bacteria in the colon,and thus improve the host health. [14] Prebiotics are dietary carbohydrates that escape digestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract, alter the bacterial composition of the gut, by changing the type of the substrate provided to the existing microbial population in the gut e.g. fructo oligosaccharides, gluco oligosaccharides and inulin. Both probiotics and prebiotics are together, Synbiotics, improves the survival of the bacteria in the GIT, so that their effect is more.

Properties of a probiotic

An ideal probiotic preparation should have the following properties [Table - 2]. [15] For adequate amount of health benefits, a dose of five billion colony forming units a day (5x10 9 CFU/day has been recommended, for at least five days. [16] The microorganisms used in probiotic preparations should be generally recognized as safe (GRAS), they should be resistant to bile, hydrochloric acid and pancreatic juice, have anti-carcinogenic activity and stimulate immune-system, have reduced intestinal permeability, produce lactic acid, able to survive both acidic conditions of the stomach and alkaline conditions of the duodenum. [17] Foods for human consumption that contain mainly lactic acid bacteria include fermented milks, cheeses, fruit juices, wine, and sausages. Single and mixed cultures of live microorganisms are used in probiotics preparations. [18]

Mechanism of action

Several mechanisms have been postulated regarding action of Probiotics. Partial lactose digestion and stimulation of the intestinal mucosal lactase activity has been postulated as a possible mechanism against some types of diarrhoea. Lactobacilli used in the fermented milk industry have active beta-galactosidase to decrease the lactose concentration in dairy products, which may affect the severity of osmotic diarrhea due to organisms as rotavirus. [19],[20] Lactic acid bacteria produce several metabolites like fatty free acids, hydrogen peroxide, bacteriocins etc. which prevent the growth of food borne pathogens in dairy products [Figure - 1]. [21] Probiotics can also use enzymatic mechanisms to modify toxin receptors and block toxin mediated pathology. [22] Probiotic agents also prevent colonization of pathogens by competitive inhibition. [23]

The other suggested mechanisms for the effect on intestinal microflora are lowering the intestinal pH,release of gut protective metabolites,regulation of intestinal motility and mucus production.

Gastrointestinal mucosa is the primary interface between the external environment and the immune system. Whenever intestinal microflora reduces, antigen transport is increased indicating that the normal gut microflora maintains gut defences. [24] The non-pathogenic probiotic bacteria interact with the gut epithelial cells and the immune cells to start the immune signals. These bacteria must interact with M cells in the Peyers patches, with gut epithelial cells, and with associated immune cells. Probiotic bacteria have been shown to modulate immunoglobulin production. Secretory IgA plays an important role in mucosal immunity, contributing to the barrier against pathogenic bacteria and viruses. The increase in the number of IgA producing cells was the most remarkable property induced by probiotic organisms and also by fermented milk yogurt. [25],[26] T independent IgA induction has also been demonstrated. [27] The increase in profiles of certain cytokines (TNF- α IFN- γ, IL-10) has also been observed due to stimulation with probiotic bacteria.[28] The release of cytokines is induced to up or down regulate the immune responses and maintain intestinal homeostasis. Interactions between probiotic micro-organisms and GALT(Gut associated lymphoid tissue), mechanisms of immunomodulation and anti-inflammatory properties are not yet fully understood.

Uses of Probiotics

Probiotics have been shown to be effective in varied clinical conditions- ranging from infantile diarrhoea, necrotizing enterocolitis, antibiotic associated diarrhoea, relapsing Clostridium difficle colitis, Helicobacter pylori infections, inflammatory bowel disease to cancer, female uro-genital infection and surgical infections. [7]

Evidences of probiotic effectiveness in Necrotising Enterocolitis
(NE) - NE is one devastating intestinal disorder that a preterm infant may face in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). It is characterized by abdominal distension, bilious vomiting, bloody diarrhoea, lethargy, apnoea, and bradycardia. [29] NE is reported in 10 to 25% of preterm infants, admitted to NICU and may affect 1/3 to1/2 of all low birth weight infants. The mortality ranges from 20 to 30% and those who survive have long term sequalae as short gut syndrome, intestinal obstruction and multi-organ failure. [30] Low birth weight pre-term infant delivered by Caesarean section often require intensive care and are breast fed only after several days. The normal process by which organisms such as lactobacillus species are ingested via vaginal birth and propagated by mother′s milk does not take place in these infants. [31] Therefore these infants are exposed to a plethora of pathogenic microbes like - Clostridium, Escherichia, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus , which colonize the intestine and increase the risk of NE..Further, pre-term infants, given formula feeding have less Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in their stool compared to controls. These findings suggest a correlation between NE and Lactobacillus species.

A human trial with 2.5 x 10 8 live Lactobacillus acidophilus and 2.5 x 10 8 live Bifidobacterium infantis given to 1237 newborn in Columbia, resulted in 60% reduction in NE and overall mortality. [32] A correlation between normal gut microflora and protection against various infections has been reported. This supports the concept of early intestinal colonization with organisms such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium infantis and subsequent protection against NE. [33]

Diarrhoea
Probiotics have preventive as well as curative effects on several types of diarrhoea of different etiologies. Prevention and therapy of diarrhoea have been successfully investigated for numerous dietary probiotics micro-organisms (eg. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. reuteri, certain strains of L. casei, L. acidophilus, Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 and certain Bifidobacteria and Enterococci ( Enterococcus faecium SF 68) as well as the probiotic yeast Sacchromyces boulardii have been investigated with regards to their medicinal use, either as single strain or as mixed culture probiotics. [34]

Rota virus diarrhoea - Various randomized, double blinded and placebo controlled studies have shown beneficial effects with Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 for prevention and Lactobacillus reuteri SD 2222 for treatment of acute diarrhea caused by rota virus in children. [26],[35],[36]

Antibiotic associated diarrhoea - Although newer antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity and fewer side effects have been developed, the incidence of antibiotic associated diarrhea (AAD) still ranges from 3.2-29/100 hospitalized patients. [37] The complications of AAD include electrolyte imbalance, dehydration, pseudomembrane colitis and toxic megacolon. Antibiotics with a spectrum of activity that includes anaerobic bacteria (esp. cephalosporins, penicillin or clindamycin) have been associated with higher rates of AAD, although nearly all types of antibiotics have been associated. A meta analysis to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in prevention and treatment of AAD showed an Odds ratio of 0.39 (p less than 0.001) in favor of active treatment over placebo with Saccharomyces boulardii. [18]

Radiation induced diarrhea - A double blind, placebo controlled trial was done to investigate the efficacy of a high potency probiotic preparation on prevention of radiation - induced diarrhoea in cancer patients. About 490 patients, who underwent adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy, were given either high potency probiotic preparation VSL#3 or placebo. Efficacy end points were incidence and severity of radiation-induced diarrhoea and daily number of bowel movements. Results were- more placebo patients had radiation induced diarrhoea than VSL #3 patients and more patients given placebo suffered grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea compared with VSL #3 recipients. So it was concluded that probiotic lactic acid producing bacteria are an easy, safe and feasible approach to protect cancer patients against the risk of radiation. [38]

Traveller′s diarrhea - Traveler′s diarrhoea is a common health complaint among travelers. Rates of traveler′s diarrhoea can range from five to 50% depending upon destination. A meta-analysis was done on published randomized controlled clinical trials of traveler′s diarrhoea cases. It was concluded that probiotics significantly prevent traveler′s diarrhoea. Saccharomyces boulardii and a mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum had significant efficacy [39].

Helicobacter pylori

H. pylori , is a major cause of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer and a risk factor for gastric malignancies. Antibiotics based H. pylori eradication treatment is 90% effective. However, it is expensive and causes side effects and antibiotic resistance. A literature search of MEDLINE database (1966-2006) was performed on studies dealing with H. pylori and probiotics. The studies revealed that Probiotics had an in vitro inhibitory effect, reduced H. pylori associated gastric inflammation in animals, improved H. pylori associated gastritis and also probiotic treatment reduced H. pylori therapy associated side effects. [40]

Inflammatory bowel disease
Inflammatory bowel disease classically includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn′s disease representing different patterns of chronic inflammation of GIT. Recent clinical and experimental observation implicates an imbalance in the intestinal mucosa with relative predominance of aggressive bacteria and relative paucity of protective bacteria [41] and also stimulation of proinflammatory immunological mechanisms. [34] Various preliminaries studies suggest a positive response to probiotics in patients with IBD, causing decreased expression of inflammatory markers ex-vivo , [42] increasing the immune response [43] and improving the gut barrier functions. [44] Thus, probiotics have a potential for inducing or maintaining remissions in IBD. However, further studies are required to have a proven beneficial role in IBD cases. Limited data from small controlled studies would suggest that VSL#3 is a reasonable therapy in the primary and secondary type of pouchitis. [45],[46]

Cancers
In intestinal tumors, prevention or delay of tumor development by lactobacilli is that they bind to mutagenic compounds in the intestine and also suppress the growth of bacteria which convert procarcinogens into carcinogens. [47] The ability of lactobacilli to reduce the risk of cancers has also been suggested based on their ability to modify gut microflora and to decrease β-glucoronidase and other carcinogen levels.[48] Studies indicate that recurrences of urinary bladder cancers appears to decrease by internal instillation of probiotics like L. casei Shirota, but this finding needs confirmation. [49]

Surgical Infections
Before the advent of antiseptics and antibiotics, fermented milk was used for healing wounds and to fight infections. Recent studies show some success in application of probiotics for treating and preventing surgical infections. Studies shows L. fermentum RC-14 was shown to significantly inhibit S. aureus infection and bacterial adherence to surgical implants also. [50] L. plantarum 299 with oat fibres for one week had significantly fewer episodes of infection and pancreatic abscesses. Also, these studies indicate the role of probiotics to decontaminate the intestine prior to gut surgery instead of antibiotics. [51]

Other Benefits

Role in uro-genital infections- An abnormal microbiota of the vagina predisposes a female to symptomatic vaginal or bladder infection. Two strains, Lactobacillus GG (ATCC 53103) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 appear to be effective at colonizing and protecting urogenital tract. [52],[53] The various by-products of lactobacillus metabolism that have an antagonistic effect against urinary and vaginal pathogens are biosurfactants that inhibit adhesion; the acids,bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide inhibit growth;and the coaggregation molecules block the spread of the pathogens. [54] In this direction, the administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L.fermentum RC-14 as a self therapy by mouth to restore and maintain urogenital health is a major step for prevention and treatment of uro-genital infections. [55] By reducing the risk of bacterial vaginosis, probiotics may also help to reduce infant mortality and pre-term labour in pregnant women.

Role in prevention of transmission of AIDS and STDs
- Lactobacilli play a critical role in the regulation of the vaginal microflora. It has been suggested that the production of H 2 O 2 rather than a particular species of Lactobacillus , is essential in the regulation of the vaginal flora. This toxic molecule is the most potent local microbicide present in the human vagina. The findings of experiments have suggested that LB+ given at high concentrations is viricidal for HIV-1. [56],[57] There is also an inverse association between vaginal Lactobacilli and HIV seroconversion. [58] These studies suggest that LB+ may play a role in protecting women against some pathogens in the vagina.

Role in infection control programs and eradication of multi-drug resistant micro-organisms: - The alarming increase of inappropriate antibiotic use and bacterial resistance, along with renewed interest in ecological methods to prevent infections, makes probiotics a very interesting field for research. A case report describes a 68-year-old woman from Japan with a decubitus ulcer colonized by methicillin resistant S taphylococcus aureus who was successfully treated with a Lactobacillus preparation. [59] Studies of this potential use may have profound impact in coming years.

Antibacterial effects
In vitro
studies suggest multiple specific activities of different probiotic agents against several pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes, [60] Salmonella typhimurium, [61] E. coli [62],[23] and H. pylori [63] among others. Therefore, probiotic agents may provide prototypic antimicrobial substances that will be useful for pharmaceutical companies in the development of new antibiotics.

Role In oral candidiasis - None of probiotic bacterial species completely prevent mucosal candidiasis, but B. animalis was found to reduce the incidence and severity of mucosal candidiasis. Probiotic bacteria also modulated antibody and cell mediated immune responses to C. albicans . Thus the study demonstrated that probiotic bacteria have biotherapeutic potential in prophylaxis and therapy of C. albicans infections by a variety of immunologic and non-immunologic mechanisms. [64]

Probiotics in critical illness
Some studies propose that probiotics have an important emerging role in managing critical illnesses originating in gastrointestinal tract like acute pancreatitis. In cirrhotic patients, probiotics have shown a decrease in incidence of encephalopathy. Also reduction of post liver transplant infective complications using probiotics have been seen. [65] It also helps in colonic involvement in Stevens -Johnson syndrome. [66]

Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri reduces gingivitis and decreases gum bleeding. [67]

Probiotics in allergic diseases
Most studies on the use of probiotics have assessed patients with atopic eczema. Also work has been carried out on the role of probiotics in respiratory allergies like asthma. [68] Experimental studies suggest that specific strains of probiotics may act upon the intestinal mucosa with potential modulation of the allergic response. [69]

Probiotics sometimes relieve the symptoms of anxiety. [17]

Lactic acid produced by Lactobacillus can be used as food preservative, flavouring agent and emulsifier. [23]

Safety

Probiotics are live micro-organisms and hence, I it is possible that they may result in infection in the host. Different strains of probiotics have different safety profiles. Although probiotic therapy is generally considered safe, the concept of willingly ingesting live bacteria remains somewhat counter intuitive. Systemic infection has rarely been reported with Bifidobacterium, although many cases of sepsis secondary to Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG or Lactobacillus casei have been reported. [70],[71] The issue of safety becomes more complex when the organism is Enterococcus spp. As probiotic. [72] The risk and morbidity of sepsis due to probiotic bacteria should be weighed against the potential for sepsis due to more pathological bacteria and the morbidity of the diseases for which probiotic bacteria are being used as therapeutic agents. The reports of sepsis are mainly seen in immunocompromised or infants. [70],[71] Another study done on dietetic products for infants suggests that caution should be exerted regarding probiotic therapeutics and use of other organisms than Lactobacillus should be encouraged. [73] But the conclusion based on different reports is that the risk of infection with probiotics Lactobacilli or Bifidobacterium is similar to infection with commensal strains, and that consumption of such products presents a negligible risk to consumers including immunocompromised hosts. [74] However ,in order to establish safety guidelines for probiotic organisms, FAO and WHO recommends that probiotic strains be characterized at a minimum with a series of tests, like antibiotic resistance patterns, metabolic activities, toxin production, hemolytic activities, infectivity in immuno-compromised animal models, side effects in humans, and adverse outcome in consumers. [75] FAO/WHO developed Operating Standards in 2002, which gave guidelines for all companies producing probiotic products.

These guidelines include

  1. Implementation of guidelines for use of probiotics;
  2. Phase I, II and III clinical trials to prove health benefits that are as good as or better than standard prevention or treatments for a particular condition or disease;
  3. Good manufacturing practice and production of high quality products;
  4. studies to identify mechanism of action in-vivo;
  5. Informative/precise labeling;
  6. development of probiotic organism that can carry vaccines to hosts and /or antiviral probiotics;
  7. Expansion of proven strains to benefit the oral cavity, nasopharynx, respiratory tract, stomach, vagina, bladder and skin as well as for cancer, allergies and recovery from surgery/injury. [76]

Conclusion

Probiotic therapy has already made its way in the treatment of number of conditions-Infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic and allergic. There is a long list of potentials of giving probiotics in a number of these conditions. But before bringing probiotics into routine usage, proper evaluation of these products is essential. Several important criteria and standards regarding quality and reliability have to be met. Thus future well designed placebo controlled studies with validated results are required for ascertaining the true health benefits of these products. The important point is careful selection of the probiotic agent, its dose standardization and a thorough knowledge of its beneficial effects over and above the toxic effects, so that this traditional therapy proves to be an effective tool for medical therapy.

References

1.Metchnikoff E. The prolongation of life. Optimistic studies New York: Putman's Sons; 1908. p. 161-83.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Lilly DM, Stillwell RH. Growth promoting factors produced by probiotics. Science 1965;147 : 747-8.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Marteau P, Cuillerier E, Meance S, Gerhardt MF, Myara A, Bouvier M, et al . Bifidobacterium animalis strain DN- 173 010 shortens the colonic transit time in healthy women: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16 : 587-93.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.McGhee JR, Lamm ME, Strober W. Mucosal immune response: An overview. In: Pearay LO, ed. Mucosal immunology. San Diego: Academic press 1999:485-506.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Mcfarlane GT, Macfarlane S. Human colonic microbiota: Ecology, physiology and metabolic potential of intestinal bacteria. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1997;222 : 3-9.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Vanderhoof JA, Young RJ. Use of probiotics in childhood gastrointestinal disorders. J Pediatr Gasroenterol Nutr 1998;27 : 323-32.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT, McCormick JK. Potential use of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003;16:658-72.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organizations.2001. posting date. Regulatory and clinical aspects of dairy probiotics. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Expert Consultation Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. Working group Report (online).  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Jin LZ, Marquardt RR, Zhao X. A strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) inhibits adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to porcine small intestine mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66 : 4200-4.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 1995;125 : 1401-12.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Alvarez-Olmos MI, Oberhelman RA. Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: A modern perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1567-76.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Gorbach SL. Probiotics and Gastrointestinal Health. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:S2-4.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Saxelin M. Lactobacillus GG-a human probiotic strain with thorough clinical documentation. Food Rev Int 1997;13:293-313.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 1995;125:1401-12.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Harmsen HJ, Wildeboer-Veloo AC, Raangs GC, Wagendorp AA, Klijn N, Bindels JG, et al . Analysis of intestinal flora development in breast -fed and formula -fed infants by using molecular identification and detection methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;30:61-7.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, Kero P. Faecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: Permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28 : 19-25.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Vimala Y, Dileep P. Some aspects of probiotics . Ind. J of Microbiol 2006;46 : 1-7.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.D'Souza AL, Rajkumar C, Cooke J, Bulpitt CJ. Probiotics in prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhea: meta analysis. BMJ 2002;324:1361.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Mcfarlane GT, Cummings JH. Probiotics and prebiotics: Can regulating the activities of intestinal bacteria benefit health? BMJ 1999;318 : 999-1003.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Snel J, Schillinger U Huis in't Veld JH. Overview of gut flora and probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 1998 ; 41:85-101.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Vandenbergh PA. Lactic acid bacteria, their metabolic products and interference with microbial growth. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1993;12 : 221-38.   Back to cited text no. 21    
22. Pothoulakis C, Kelly CP, Joshi MA, Gao N, O'Keane CJ, Castagliuolo I, et al Saccharomyces boulardii inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A binding and enterotoxicity in rat ileum. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1108-15.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Mack DR, Michail S, Wei S, McDougall L, Hollingsworth MA. Probiotics inhibit enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by inducing intestinal mucin gene expression. Am J Physiol 1999;276:G941-50.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Madsen K, Cornish A, Soper P, McKaigney C, Jijon H, Yachimec C et al . Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function . Gastroenterology 2001;121 : 580-91.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Isolauri E, Kaila M, Mykkanen H, Ling WH, Salminen S. Oral bacteriotherapy for viral gastroenteritis. Diq Dis Sci 1994;39 : 2595-600.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Szajewska H, Kotowska M, Murkowicz JZ Armanska M, Mikolajczyk W. Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in prevention of nosocomial diarrhea in infants. J Pediatr 2001;138:361-5.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Mao Y, Nobaek S, Kasravi B, Adawi D, Stenram U, Molin G, et al . The effects of Lactobacillus strains and oat fiber on methotrexate-induced enterocolitis in rats. Gastroenterology 1996;111 : 334-44.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Arvola T, Laiho K, Torkkeli S, Mykkδnen H, Salminen S, Maunula L, et al . Prophylactic Lactobacillus GG reduces antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children with respiratory infections: A randomized study . Pediatrics 1999;104 : e64 .  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Caplan MS, Jilling T. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: Possible role of probiotic supplementation . J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;30 : S18-22.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Glass RI, Lew JF, Gangarosa RE, LeBaron CW, Ho MS. Estimates of morbidity and mortality rates for diarrheal diseases in American children. J Pediatr 1991;118:S27-33.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Gewolb IH, Schwalbe RS, Taciak V, Harrison TS, Paulgrahi P. Stool microflora in extremely low birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F167-73.   Back to cited text no. 31    
32.Hoyos AB. Reduced incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis with enteral administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium infantis to neonates in an intensive care unit. Int J Infect Dis 1999;3 : 197-202.  Back to cited text no. 32    
33.Walker WA. Role of nutrients and bacterial colonization in the development of intestinal host defenses. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;30 b : S2-S7.  Back to cited text no. 33    
34.de Vrese M, Marteau PR.. Probiotics and prebiotics: effects on diarrhea. J Nutr 2007:137:803-11S.  Back to cited text no. 34    
35.Shornikova AV, Isolauri E, Burnakova L, Lukovnikova S, Vesikari T. A trial in the Karelian Republic of oral rehydration and Lactobacillus GG for treatment of acute diarrhea. Acta Paediatr 1997;86:460-5.  Back to cited text no. 35    
36.Pant AR, Graham SM, Allen SJ, Harikul S, Sabchareon A, Cuevas L, et al . Lactobacillus GG and acute diarrhea in young children in the tropics. J Trop Pediatr 1996;42:162-5.  Back to cited text no. 36    
37.Bartlett JG. Antibiotics associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:573-81.  Back to cited text no. 37    
38.Delia P, Sansotta G, Donato V, Frosina P, Messina G, De Renzis C, et al . Use of probiotics for prevention of radiation induced diarrhea. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:912-5.  Back to cited text no. 38    
39.McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrhea. Travel Med Infect Dis 2007;5:97-105.  Back to cited text no. 39    
40.Lesbros-Pantoflickova D, Corthesy-Theulaz I, Blum AL. Helicobacter pylori and probiotics. J Nutr 2007;137:812S-8.  Back to cited text no. 40    
41.Mitsuyama K, Toyonaga A, Sata M. Intestinal microflora as a therapeutic target in inflammatory bowl disease . J Gastroenterol 2002;37 : 73-7.  Back to cited text no. 41    
42.Borruel N, Carol M, Casellas F, Antolνn M, de Lara F, Espνn E, et al . Increased mucosal tumour necrosis factor alpha production in Crohn's disease can be downregulated ex-vivo by probiotic bacteria. Gut 2002;51:659-64.  Back to cited text no. 42    
43.Malin M, Suomalainen H, Saxelin M, Isolauri E. Promotion of IgA immune response in patients with Crohn's disease by oral bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus GG. Ann Nutr Metab 1996;40 : 137-45.  Back to cited text no. 43    
44.Gupta P, Andrew H, Kirschner BS, Guandalini S. Is Lactobacillus GG helpful in children with Crohn's disease? Results of a preliminary, open -label study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;31:453-7.  Back to cited text no. 44    
45.Ruseler-van Embden JG, Schouten WR, van Lieshout LM. Pouchitis: Result of microbial imbalance? Gut 1994;35: 658-64.  Back to cited text no. 45    
46.Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Venturi A, Brigidi P, Matteuzzi D, Bazzocchi G et al Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: A double - blind , placebo- controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2000;119:305-9.  Back to cited text no. 46    
47.Orrhage K, Sillerstrom E, Gustafsson JA, Nord CE, Rafter J. Binding of mutagenic heterocyclic amines by intestinal and lactic acid bacteria . Mutat Res 1994;311:239-48.  Back to cited text no. 47    
48.Ling WH, Korpela R, Mykkanen H, Salminen S, Hanninen O. Lactobacillus strain GG supplementation decrease colonic hydrolytic and reductive enzyme activities in healthy female adults. J Nutr 1994;124:18-23.  Back to cited text no. 48    
49.Aso Y, Akaza H, Kotake T, Tsukamoto T, Imai K, Naito S. Preventive effect of a Lactobacillus casei preparation on the recurrence of superficial bladder cancer in a double -blind trial. The BLP Study Group. Eur Urol 1995;27:104-9.  Back to cited text no. 49    
50.Gan BS, Kim J, Reid G, Cadieux P, Howard JC. Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 inhibits Staphylococcus aureus infection of surgical implants in rat. J Infect Dis 2002;185:1369-72.   Back to cited text no. 50    
51.Olah A, Belagyi T, Issekutz A, Gamal ME, Bengmark S. Randomized clinical trial of specific Lactobacillus and fiber supplement to early enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis . Br J Surg 2002;89:1103-7.  Back to cited text no. 51    
52.Gorbach SL, Chang TW, Goldin B. Succesful treatment of relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis with Lactobacillu s GG. Lancet 1987 ; 2:1519.  Back to cited text no. 52    
53.Saxelin M, Pessi T, Salminen S. Fecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatin capsules to healthy volunteers . Int J Food Microbiol 1995;25:199-203.   Back to cited text no. 53    
54.Reid G. Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:437S-43.  Back to cited text no. 54    
55.Reid G, Bruce AW, Fraser N, Heinemann C, Owen J, Henning B. Oral probiotics can resolve urogenital infections . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2001;30:49-52.  Back to cited text no. 55    
56.Hillier S. The vaginal microbial ecosystem and resistance to HIV. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1998;14 : S17-21.  Back to cited text no. 56    
57.Klebanoff SJ, Coombs RW. Viricidal effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on human immunodeficiency virus type 1: possible role in heterosexual transmission. J Exp Med 1991;174:289-92.  Back to cited text no. 57    
58.Martin HL, Richardson BA, Nyange PM, Lavreys L, Hillier SL, Chohan B, et al . Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. J Infect Dis 1999;180:1863-8.   Back to cited text no. 58    
59.Shigeru K, Yumiko T, Hiroko T, Shigehiko M, Haruki K, Motoharu K. Multiple antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria preparation eliminated MRSA from the decubitus of bed-ridden elderly patient. Chin Med J 1997;110:157-9.  Back to cited text no. 59    
60.Nomoto K, Miake S, Hashimoto S, Yokokura T, Mutai M, Yoshikai Y, et al . Augmentation of host resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection by Lactobacillus casei . J Clin Lab Immunol 1985;17:91-7.  Back to cited text no. 60    
61.De Simone C, Tzantzoglou S, Baldinelli L, Di Fabio S, Bianchi-Salvadori B, Jirillo E, et al . Enahancement of host resistance against Salmonella typhimurium infection by a diet supplemented with yogurt. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1988;10:399-415.  Back to cited text no. 61    
62.Mack DR, Michail S, Wei S, McDougall L, Hollingsworth MA. Probiotics inhibits enteropathogens E. coli adherence in vitro by inducing intestinal mucin gene expression. Am J Physiol 1999;276:G941-50.  Back to cited text no. 62    
63.Kabir AM, Aiba Y, Takagi A, Kamiya S, Miwa T, Koga Y. Prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection by lactobacilli in a gnotobiotic murine model . Gut 1997;41:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 63    
64.Wagner RD, Pierson C, Warner T, Dohnalek M, Farmer J, Roberts L et al . Biotherapeutic effects of probiotics bacteria on candidiasis in immunodeficient mice. Infect Immun 1997;65 : 4165-72.  Back to cited text no. 64    
65.Rayes N, Seehofer D, Hansen S, Boucsein K, Müller AR, Serke S et al . Early enteral supply of lactobacillus and fiber versus selective bowel decontamination: A controlled trial in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 2002;74:123-7.  Back to cited text no. 65    
66.Powell N, Munro JM, Rowbotham D. Colonic involvement in Stevens- Johnson syndrome. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:e10.  Back to cited text no. 66    
67.Krasse P, Carlsson B, Dahl C, Paulsson A, Nilsson A, Sinkiewicz G. Decreased gum bleeding and reduced gingivitis by the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri . Swed Dent J 2006 ; 30 : 55-60.  Back to cited text no. 67    
68.Cario E, Brown D, McKee M, Lynch- Devaney K, Gerken G, Podolsky DK. Commensal- associated moleculer patterns induce selective toll like receptor trafficking from apical membrane to cytoplasmic compartments in polarized intestinal epithelium. Am J Pathol 2002;160:165-73.  Back to cited text no. 68    
69.Isolauri E, Sutas Y, Kankaanpaa P, Arvilommi H, Salminen S. Probiotics: Effect on immunity. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:444S-50.  Back to cited text no. 69    
70.Simhon A, Douglas JR, Drasar BS, Soothill JF. Effect of feeding on infants' faecal flora. Arch Dis Child 1982;57:54-8.   Back to cited text no. 70    
71.Adlerberth I, Carlsson B, de Man P, Jalil F, Khan SR, Larsson P et al . Intestinal colonization with Enterobacteriaceae in Pakistani and Swedish hospital-delivered infants. Acta Paediatr Scand 1991;80:602-10.  Back to cited text no. 71    
72.Franz CM, Holzapfel WH, Stiles ME. Enterococci at the crossroads of food safety? Int J Food Microbiol 1999;47:1-24.  Back to cited text no. 72    
73.Bjarnason I, MacPherson A, Hollander D. Intestinal permeability: An overview. Gastroenterology 1995;108 : 1566-81.  Back to cited text no. 73    
74.Ouwehand A, Vesterlund S. Health aspects of probiotics. IDrugs 2003;6 : 573-80.  Back to cited text no. 74    
75.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organizations 2002. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organizations. Working Group Report (online).   Back to cited text no. 75    
76.Reid G. The importance of guidelines in the development and application of probiotics. Curr Pharm Des 2005;11:11-6.  Back to cited text no. 76    

Copyright 2009 - Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology


The following images related to this document are available:

Photo images

[mb09062t2.jpg] [mb09062t1.jpg] [mb09062f1.jpg]
Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil