search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


African Journal of Biomedical Research
Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group
ISSN: 1119-5096
Vol. 6, Num. 2, 2003, pp. 79-84

African Journal of Biomedical Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, May, 2003, pp. 79-84

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY PROFILE OF MICROORGANISMS ENCOUNTERED IN THE LAGOS LAGOON , NIGERIA

AJAYI A. O 1* AND AKONAI K.A 2

1 Department of Microbiology, Adekunle Ajasin University , P.M.B. 01, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State .
2 Department of Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University , Ile-Ife , Osun State Nigeria
*Corresponding Author.

Received: December 2002
Accepted in final form: March 2003

Code Number: md03015

ABSTRACT  

The Lagos Lagoon is an area of salt and brackish water situated in the western part of Nigeria . The in vitro antibiotic sensitivity profiles of microbial isolates encountered in the 24 designated sampling sites of the Lagos Lagoon were determined. 46 (60%) of these microorganisms tested showed multiple antibiotic resistance. This included the enteric gram negative short rods such as Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp.and Escherichia coli. The prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistant microorganisms in fresh water as well as marine environment may be important, since their presence indicates recent contamination with sewage. This resistant organisms may contaminate fish and other products within the food chain and if such are consumed by humans, it may become part of the individual flora. The Lagos Lagoon is populated with pathogenic bacteria and the pathogenic organisms are more likely to be found in area of low salinity than in areas of high salinity. The enteric organisms found in most areas showed multiple antibiotic resistances, which is significant healthwise.  

Keywords: antibiotic, microorganisms, lagoon, Lagos , Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

The Lagos Lagoon is an area of salt and brackish water separated from the adjacent sea by a low-lying sand or shingle barrier. The high level of urbanization and industrialization of the city of Lagos and its environs with inevitable generation of domestic and industrial wastes have led to biological consequences in the coastal aquatic environment (Ajao 1990). The Lagos Lagoon is situated in the western part of Nigeria . The central body of the Lagoon is located between longitude 3 0 23' and 3 0 40'E and latitude 6 0 22' and 6 0 28'N. it is the largest of the four Lagoon system of the Gulf of Guinea Coast (Webb. 1958).

The importance of the Lagoon and estuaries as sources of fishery products and as desirable recreation areas is now being recognized with increasing awareness. This is coupled with global increase in population and resultant waste generated. In the estuaries a large part of conversion of solar energy into plant life take place and it is where many of the commercially harvested marine animals begin their lives (Halasi-Kun, 1981; Webb, 1958).

The discharge of raw sewage into the Lagoon has important health implication (Akpata and Ekundayo 1978; Halasi-kun, 1981). The occurrence of the enteric organisms and other microorganisms in the Lagos Lagoon may lead to contamination of aquatic life and other food products, thereby causing possible health hazard unto those that consume these products. Thus, in the cause of treatment or control of infectious disease that can originate from this source, the study of the antibiotic sensitivity profile of the organisms encountered becomes of importance. Similarly, with recent scientific and biotechnological discoveries, various strains of microorganisms with unique physiological and biochemical characteristics has emerged from our environments (Prescott et al ,2002), Thus much attention is focused on assessing impacts such organisms have on the ecological environment. Their clinical effects on human health, industrial values and other socio-economic importance are also considered

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection from study site: Specific sites were mapped out on the Lagos Lagoon for the study with the assistance of the Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR). Twenty four sampling point were located, with the aid of a compass, from where surface water and sediment samples were collected. Sterile plastic container was used in collecting the water with the aid of a Ruttner standard water sampler, 8cm diameter and 50cm long, capacity 500ml. A "Metal grab" was employed in collecting the sediment, part of this was packed into sterile plastic nylon seals and kept together with the water samples in the cooler. All stations were sampled in February and June period.

Laboratory procedure: The salinity of the water sample was determined using salinometer. According to Okafor (1986), the major property of marine is its high salinity (or sodium chloride content) which reaches 3.5% in the open ocean and it varies in the Lagoon. Salinity is recorded as gram of solid per kilogram of water (0/00) by marine scientists. The antibiotic sensitivity profile of each isolate was also determined. The water samples were analysed within 36 hours of sample collection.

Discrete microbial colonies were obtained employing a millipore membrane filter technique for the surface water while a pour plate technique was used to get isolated colonies from the sediment sample. The bacterial colonies that grew on the medium plates were incubated at 37° C for 18-24 hours. After incubation a gram stained film of each discrete microbial colony was prepared. Each bacterial isolate was identified based on their morphological characteristics, their colour, and arrangement of vegetative cell and possession of spores (Robert et al 1984; Kotzekidou, 1996). Each isolate was preserved on nutrient agar slopes for further characterization, identification and research purposes.

Antibiotic Sensitivity Test: The in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing of bacteria isolates was performed using the standardized disc agar diffusion method described by Bauer et al . (1996). Paper disc medium (PDM), Antibiotic sensitivity agar (AB BIO DISK, Solna , Sweden ) was the Plating medium used.

Preparation and Inoculation of Test Plate: Inoculums of each sample was prepared from an 18-24hours culture suspended in sterile distilled water and mixed thoroughly to provide homogenous liquid suspension. A sterile cotton tipped application ( Kemi-Intressen , Sweden ) was dipped into the standardized bacteria suspension. The swab was then used to streak the entire dried surface of the PDM Antibiotic sensitivity test agar plate. The inoculated plates were incubated for 20minutes to allow excess moisture to dry.

Placement of disc: Antibiotic disc were placed at equidistance from each other on the plate with the aid of a pair of sterile forceps. Each disc was then pressed firmly onto the agar with the sterile forceps to ensure complete contact with the agar. The plates were inverted and placed in the refrigerator for 30minutes to allow for diffusion of the antibiotics into the agar. They were removed and incubated at 35 0 C for about 18hours. The antibiotic discs (AB BIODISK, Solna , Sweden ) that were used for this test include:

Gentamicin - 30 μ g/disc;

Nalidixic acid - 30 μ g'disc;

Tetracycline - 30 μ g/disc;

Trimethoprim+Sulfamethoxazole1-2+23.8 μ g/disc;

Trimenthoprim - 1.2 μ g:

Spectinomycin - 30 μ g;

Ampicillin - 10 μ g;

Sulfamethoxazole - 23.8 μ g;

Chloramphenicol - 30 μ g;

Streptomycin - 30 μ g.

Reading and Interpretation of Results

The portion between the end point and the areas showing no visible growth was taken as the zone of growth inhibition and was measured by means of a ruler diagonally in millimeters from the underside of the plates. Scanty growths near the edge of the inhibition zones were regarded as resistant strains. AB Biodisk manual for interpretive zone diameter standards were used to interpret the diameter of zone inhibition. Isolates were then scored as either sensitive or resistant.

RESULTS

Samples used for analysis were obtained from 24 sites in the Lagos Lagoon. The salinity of the Lagoon water was determined and expressed in part per thousand (PPT). For the month of February the range was from 4PPT to 14.7PPT. During the month of June the Salinity ranged from zero (0) value of fresh water to a high of 12PPT. The average salinity during the mouth of February was 7.6PPT for the entire period of sampling compared with a significantly lower mean of 2.03PPT recorded during the month of June (Table 1).

The in vitro antibiotic sensitivity test was performed for all the bacterial isolate to (Tables 2&3). Table 4 shows the pattern of antibiotic resistance. A total of 77 strains were tested with 46 (60%) of the strains showing multiple antibiotic resistance. Moreover, it will be observed in the result summarized in table 4 that both the Bacillus and enteric group of organisms which are the predominant microbial strains encountered showed much of the multiple antibiotic resistance in this study. The pathogenic organisms are observed to be found in areas of low salinity than in areas of high salinity (Table 1-3).

DISCUSSION

The in vitro antibiotic sensitivity profile of microbial isolates encountered in the Lagos Lagoon marine environment was determined. Twenty four stations were mapped out in the Lagoon by the Nigeria Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR) Lagos and samples were obtained at these sites.

The salinity profile in this shallow Lagoon probably delinated the limits of distribution of stenohaline and euryhaline species during the two periods when samples were collected. Tidal influence and seasonal rainfall have been reported to cause salinity fluctuation of 20% diurnal and 34% annually (Hill and web, 1958).

Table 1 shows that the Lagoon salinity was low during the month of June compared with relatively high salinity recorded for February in most of the designated stations. These periodic changes in salinity could have influenced seasonal distribution of microorganisms (Olaniyan 1957; Sandison and Hill, 1966; Fagade and Olaniyan, 1974).

Table 1: Salinity profile of Lagos Lagoon surface water

Station

Salinity

PPT (0/00)

February

June

1

9.8

12

2

14.7

7

3

8.2

2

4

9.6

4

5

12.1

Fresh

6

14.4

1

7

13.2

Fresh

8

5.8

1.5

9

9

0.5

10

9.6

Fresh

11

14.9

1.5

12

5.2

1.5

13

4.9

1

14

5.5

1.5

15

4

1

2 special

ND

7

9 MJR

6

Fresh

OGR

7.5

ND

AGR

ND

Fresh

12/10

6

10

12/14

ND

ND

Total

160.4

42.49

Mean of total

7.6

2.03

ND = Not Determined

The in vitro antibiotic sensitivity profile of the isolates were determined; 46 (60%) of these microorganisms tested showed multiple antibiotic resistance. This included the enteric gram negative short rods such as klebsiella sp., Enterobacter sp., and Escherichia coli;.

The prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistant microorganisms in fresh water as well as marine environment may be important, since their presence indicates recent contamination with sewage.

Table 2: Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile for Lagos Lagoon Sediment Samples:

ISOLATES

LAB CODE

GM

NA

TS

TC

TR

AM

SM

SC

SX

CL

Bacillus spp.

1s

23s

10R

23R

11R

0R

0R

20s

0R

11R

10R

Bifidobaterium adolescentis

1m

23s

7R

20R

18R

0R

7R

13R

0R

8R

8R

Streptococci fecium

1b

20s

23R

21R

7R

0R

0R

14R

7R

0R

0R

Bacillus spp.

2s

25s

30s

22s

27R

0R

0R

23s

14R

23s

28s

Enterobacter spp

2b

20s

12R

15R

8R

0R

15R

0R

15R

0R

25s

Bacillus spp

Bacillus spp.

2 special (s)

2 special (b)

20s

21s

24R

21R

25s

21R

7R

28s

15R

0R

8R

10R

10R

20s

10R

12R

12R

20s

20R

28s

Bacillus spp.

Enterobacter spp.

Aeromonas hydrophila subs Anarogenes

3s

3m

3b

20s

25s

26s

25R

26s

30s

0R

18R

37s

18R

27R

40s

0R

0R

26s

8R

8R

34s

0R

22s

22s

10R

10R

15R

0R

20s

30s

10R

30s

40s

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus spp.

4s

4b

25s

20s

27s

25R

25s

20R

28s

22R

0R

0R

10R

10R

21s

15R

12R

10R

25s

0R

28s

27s

Escherichia coti

Escherichia coti

5s

5b

23s

23s

25R

26s

30s

35s

23R

25R

18R

25s

12R

24s

20s

20s

15R

22s

0R

0R

18R

25s

Bacillus spp.

Moraxella bovis

6s

6b

18R

26s

23R

30s

15R

40s

24R

40s

0R

25s

7R

37s

20s

20s

11R

16s

13R

15R

26s

40s

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus spp.

7s

7m

7b1

22s

21s

20s

23R

0R

26s

18R

0R

16R

22R

8R

25R

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

11R

15R

21s

21s

10R

16s

12R

8R

16R

16s

13R

0R

27s

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus spp.

7b2

8s

8b

23s

28s

25s

0R

27s

27s

0R

22s

15R

11R

25R

27R

0R

0R

0R

0R

10R

10R

0R

30s

18R

0R

10R

10R

0R

25s

20s

25s

28s

26s

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus megaterium

Micrococcus varians

Micrococcus spp.

9s

9b

9 MJR (s)

9 MJR (b)

22s

23s

22s

15R

21R

25R

24R

27s

12R

0R

19R

20R

25R

9R

0R

25R

0R

0R

0R

0R

12R

0R

0R

8R

20s

20s

16R

15R

12R

10R

9R

10R

17s

0R

0R

20s

27s

30s

0R

25s

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus spp.

5/7 (s)

5/7 (b)

23s

22s

26s

22R

12R

16R

18R

30s

0R

0R

12R

21R

22s

22s

11R

15R

20s

16s

25s

27s

Proteus vulgaris

Proteus vulgaris

10s

10b

26s

20s

20R

6R

10R

20R

25R

20R

0R

0R

10R

10R

0R

0R

18s

7R

0R

10R

35s

30s

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus megaterium

11s

11b

20s

27s

25R

19R

16R

36s

27R

30s

0R

30s

10R

30s

0R

0R

15R

20s

12R

25s

27s

30s

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus spp.

12s

12b

15R

30s

0R

30s

0R

46s

22R

40s

0R

40s

0R

42s

15R

26s

0R

12R

0R

38s

0R

34s

Bacillus spp.

Micrococcus luteus

Bacillus spp.

10/11s

10/11m

10/11b

20s

13R

30s

24R

10R

20R

20R

7R

32s

25R

23R

16R

0R

0R

22s

0R

0R

33s

20s

0R

0R

10R

0R

18s

10R

0R

15R

0R

0R

30s

Enterobacter spp.

Enterobacter spp.

10/12s

10/12b

0R

18R

8R

0R

32s

12R

27R

17R

8R

0R

8R

0R

0R

0R

0R

10R

28s

0R

24s

0R

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus spp.

12/14s

12/14m

12/14b

21s

20R

21s

8R

22R

21R

13R

16R

0R

21R

27R

24R

0R

0R

0R

0R

10R

12R

0R

21s

20s

10R

12R

10R

16R

17R

0R

22R

24s

25R

Bacillus spp.

Bacillus polymyxa

13s

13b

26s

20s

10R

15R

18R

18R

20R

20R

0R

14R

0R

0R

0R

0R

12R

0R

15R

0R

25s

15R

Bacillus spp

Bacillus spp.

14s

14b

24s

22s

21R

25R

21R

18R

26R

25R

17s

0R

0R

0R

20R

18R

0R

8R

0R

17s

22R

28s

Klesiella spp

Klesiella spp

Agboyi (s)

Agboyi (b)

20s

20s

17R

12R

0R

20R

0R

17R

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

20s

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

Bacillus megaterium

Bacillus spp

15s

15m

24s

24s

0R

10R

17R

18R

27R

28s

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

13R

12R

17R

20s

27s

26s

Bacillus spp

Bacillus spp

15b1

15b2

22s

20s

10R

21R

10R

0R

25R

10R

0R

0R

0R

0R

22s

0R

6R

11R

8R

0R

28s

27s

TABLE 3: Antibiotic Sensitivity Profile for Surface Water Samples

ISOLATES

LAB CODE

GM

NA

TS

TC

TR

AM

SM

SC

SX

CL

Escherichia coli

1

18R

15R

18R

18R

17s

0R

16R

12R

0R

22R

Enterobacter spp.

2

22s

18R

25s

22R

20s

9R

20s

8R

0R

18R

Bacillus spp.

2 Special

25s

30s

25s

15R

0R

7R

23s

16s

40s

32s

Bacillus spp.

5

28s

25R

28s

25R

0R

40s

15R

10R

23S

35s

Bacillus spp.

6

26s

30s

40s

36s

24s

35s

16R

16s

33s

38s

Bacillus spp.

7

0R

0R

20s

0R

0R

0R

0R

0R

12R

0R

Bacillus spp.

5/7

21s

20R

17R

25R

0R

20R

20s

13R

20s

27s

Bacillus megaterium

9

20s

25R

20R

6R

0R

6R

18R

9R

0R

27s

Micrococcus spp.

9MJR(1)

26s

32s

38s

38s

25s

28s

24s

16s

22s

31s

Bacillus spp.

9MJR(2)

27s

29s

34s

30s

22s

28s

25s

13R

30s

33s

Bacillus spp.

12/10

25s

0R

0R

12R

0R

0R

18R

0R

OR

0R

Micrococcus luteus

11

26s

22R

30s

33s

30s

36s

0R

25s

30s

36s

Bacillus megaterium

12

28s

25R

40s

33s

39s

38s

22s

10R

15R

30s

Bacillus megaterium

14

22s

18R

21R

22R

18s

0R

10R

0R

0R

14R

Bacillus spp.

AGR

22s

18R

23s

23R

15R

0R

20s

20s

0R

15R

Bacillus spp.

OGR (1)

20s

26s

46s

36s

38s

35s

25s

10R

40s

30s

Klebsiella spp.

OGR (2)

18R

17R

25s

17R

19s

8R

22s

14R

7R

22R

Pseudomonas aeroginosa

OGR (3)

26s

40s

36s

21R

42s

35s

20s

16s

34s

36s

Klebsiella spp.

7/9(b)

18R

17R

26s

17R

19s

9R

22s

14R

7R

22R

Escherichia coli

10/11(s)

18R

15R

17R

18R

17s

0R

16R

12R

0R

22R

Micrococcus luteus

10/11(m)

20s

15R

9R

28R

0R

7R

0R

0R

0R

7R

Bacillus spp.

10/11(b)

30s

20R

31s

16R

23s

33s

0R

18s

15R

30s

Bacillus megaterium

12/14

21s

10R

15R

21R

7R

0R

10R

0R

16R

22R

Bacillus megaterium

15

28s

10R

18R

28s

0R

0R

0R

13R

21s

26s

LEGEND: S : Sensitive R : Resistant

Antibiotics: G M- Gentamycine; NA- Nalidixic Acid; TS- Trimethoprim + Sulfamethoxazole TR- Trimethoprime; AM- Ampicillin; SM- Streptomycin SC- Spectinomycin; SX- Sulfamethoxazole; CL- Chloramphenicol.

The resistant organisms may also contaminate fish and other products within the food chain and if such are consumed by humans, it may become part of the individual's flora. As a result of selective pressure, such organisms may establish themselves within the individuals and became the predominant microflora. In the event of infection caused by such organisms, treatment will be difficult. Individuals coming in contact with the water and with open sores or sounds may be exposed to contamination with resistant organisms.``

In conclusion, this study shows that Lagos Lagoon is populated with pathogenic bacteria and that the pathogenic organisms are more likely to be found in areas of low salinity than in areas of high salinity. The enteric organisms found in most areas showed multiple antibiotic resistances which is significant health wise. If such organisms are consumed by marine organisms, they could spread within the food chain. The study also indicates the prevalence of multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria isolates in natural water probably as in this study through contamination with human wastes. The results of antibiotic sensitivity profile of microbial strains encountered in Lagos Lagoon that is ecologically marine in nature should be helpful for health-care administrators in proper monitoring of our natural waters and suggest possible solutions to problems that may arise from resistant microbial strains that could invade our communities from these sources

TABLE 4 : Pattern of Antibiotic Resistance

Isolates

No. of strains tested

No. (%) that showed multiple resistance.

Bacillus spp.

35

24 (68.57)

Bacillus megaterium

14

10 (71.43)

Micrococcus spp.

7

2 (28.57)

Klebsiella spp.

4

3 (75)

Enterobacter spp.

5

3 (60)

Escherichia spp.

4

2 (50)

Bacillus polymyxa

1

-

Viellonella spp.

-

-

Streptococcus spp.

1

-

Proteus vulgaris

2

2 (100)

Pseudomonas

1

-

Aeromonas hydrophila Subspecies anaerogenes

1

-

Bafidobacterium adolescentis

1

-

Moraxella bovis

1

-

Total

77

46 (60)

REFERENCES

  • Ajao E.A. and Fagade S.O. (1990). A study of the sediment and communities in Lagos Lagoon , Nigeria , 32pp.
  • Akpata, T.V.I and Ekundayo, J.A. (1978). Faecal pollution of the Lagos Lagoon, Nigeria Journal of science, vol. 12, Nos 1&2. 39-53. Nigeria .
  • Bauer, A.W., Kirby, W.W.M., Sherries, J.C. and Turck M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American Journal on clinical pathology 45: 493-496. U.S.A
  • Fagade S.O. and Olaniyan, C.I.O. (1974). Seasonal distribution of the fish farms of the Lagos Lagoon. Bulletin IFAN. Series A. 36 (1), 224-52. Nigeria .
  • Halasi-kun, G. ). J. (1981). Pollution and water resources, Columbia University seminar series volume XIV part 2. Pollution, coastal biology and water resources selected reports. Pergamon press, New York 10523. U.S.A.
  • Hill, M.B. and Webb, T.E. (1958). The ecology of Lagos Lagoon 11. The topography and physical features of Lagos harbour and Lagos Lagoon. Pml. Trans. Royal Society Bulletin, 241, 319-33. Nigeria .
  • Kotzekidou P. (1996). A microtitre tray procedure for a simplified identification of Bacillus spp. in spoiled canned foods. Food Microbiology, 1996,13,35-40.
  • Olaniyan C.I.O. (1957) The seasonal variation in plankton populations in the Lagos harbour Ph.D. Thesis, University of London . 15&pp. England .
  • Prescott , M.L; Harley P.J and Klein A.D (2002) Microbiology (3 rd Edition). Win.C. Brown Publishers.
  • Robert, A. S., Eller S.H., and Connie, A.N.V. (1984). Introduction to food borne fungi (12 th edition) Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academic of Acts and Science. Netherlands .
  • Sandison E.E. and Hill M.B. (1966). The distribution of Balanus pallidus stintusburi Netherland Darwin,Gryphaea gasar (adenson), Dantzen berg, Mercierellla enigmatica faurel Hydroides uncinate (phillipi) in relation to salinity in Lagos Harbour and adjacent creeks. Journal of Animal Econology 35. 235-50. Nigeria .
  • Webb. J.E. (1958). Ecology of Lagos Lagoon III. The life history of Branchiostoma negeriense webb . Phil. Soc. Bulletin; 241:355-91 Nigeria .

© Ibadan Biomedical Communications Group

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil